logo
Living next to the PM, putting up with party boats and hosting the Queen: Sam Mostyn on being G-G

Living next to the PM, putting up with party boats and hosting the Queen: Sam Mostyn on being G-G

I am about halfway through my lunch with Governor-General Sam Mostyn when I grow concerned about her nutritional intake. There is a structural inequality to Lunches With – the subject must do all the talking, leaving little time to eat.
And such is the pace of conversation, and the breadth of topics to cover, that the head of state can barely manage a mouthful. 'Oh no, no, don't worry!' she tells me. 'I can eat any time.'
We are sitting at a round antique table in the Governor-General's private study in Admiralty House, Sydney, having been served a light and delicious lunch of curried chickpea soup with a croque madame, prepared by the in-house chef, Graeme Stewart.
We drink water and there is no bill – lunch is on the gracious taxpayer.
The Governor-General and I had originally planned to meet at Deus Ex Machina, a cafe in Sydney's inner west which Mostyn frequented in her former life as a regular civilian.
But heads of state come with large security details, and it was deemed easier to eat together at the Governor-General's official Sydney residence, originally home to the Admiral of the Royal Navy's Australian Squadron.
The Herald / Age photographer and I arrive at a bucolic scene – a posse of young sniffer-dogs-in-training is frolicking on the rolling harbourside lawn.
Mostyn is weaving among them, chatting to their Australian Federal Police handlers, buffeted by the winds coming off the magnificent harbour. The view, a splendid eyeful, must surely be one of the best in the world.
The elegant sandstone residence, with its magnificent colonnaded verandah, is directly opposite the Opera House, under the gaze of the Harbour Bridge, and in full view of the sundry seacraft of the busy harbour.
Mostyn says that sometimes the passing party boat revellers yell out ripe comments intended for the Prime Minister, whose official Sydney residence, Kirribilli House, is next door.
There is no fence between the two houses (Kirribilli House once served as a staff residence for Admiralty House) but the Governor-General says the two neighbours do not socialise. 'He wouldn't come over and hang out,' she tells me. 'That would be a breach of convention.'
But the PM does use the Admiralty House pool, and on the morning after the federal election he contacted Mostyn to say he would be walking his dog Toto across her lawn. Mostyn, who has opted out of voting for the duration of her role, stepped out to meet the re-elected PM, and then invited him inside to discuss the timing of the swearing-in of his new cabinet.
This vignette strikes me as an exquisite glimpse behind the curtain of our constitutional democracy.
It's the kind of anecdote Ms Mostyn shares candidly, along with stories about the last Pope's funeral (where she lent a fan to the president of Iceland Halla Tomasdottir, who was schvitzing in the Italian heat), reminiscences from the King and Queen's visit last year (they bunked upstairs, while Mostyn and her husband, barrister Simeon Beckett, went briefly home to their inner west house, and Queen Camilla was thwarted from swimming in the pool by a paparazzi drone) and her trip to meet President Erdogan of Turkey.
The governor-general's candour is the natural corollary of her interpretation of the role. She wants the institution she represents to be visible, transparent and accessible. This is particularly necessary because many Australians do not know who the Governor-General is, or what she does.
'Wherever I go now, I'd say the majority of people start by saying, 'It's nice that you visited … but sorry, what do you do? What is the Governor-General?'' Mostyn tells me. 'They link it to some kind of royal role. Many still give me a semi-curtsy or a bow, which is absolutely not required.'
'It's clear to me we have done a very poor job talking about civics and our institutions, and the very basis under which our constitutional arrangements work.'
Recent exam results released by the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) show she is correct – Australian students' knowledge of civics and citizenship have fallen to their lowest level in two decades.
Queen Elizabeth II (an informal photo-realist portrait of whom the GG keeps 'at my shoulder', on the wall next to her desk) used to say of royalty that 'we have to be seen to be believed'.
Ms Mostyn has adopted the same credo for the vice-regal role. To that end, she has built a strong presence on Instagram (66,000 followers), where she serves up content such as videos of electoral commissioner Geoff Pope returning the writs for the federal election.
Working with the National Gallery of Australia, Mostyn has brought more modern and contemporary artworks into the official residences. This grand sandstone pile, with its heavily patterned Victorian wallpaper, used to be hung exclusively with dark oils of important men – former Governors-General, and 'a lot of Cook paraphernalia', she says.
Now it is adorned with an eclectic mixture of Arthur Streeton, a 1929 Grace Cossington-Smith painting of the Harbour Bridge being built, a bark painting by Nyapanyapa Yunupingu and a Sidney Nolan or two.
The Captain Cook painting that used to adorn the entry hall has been moved to a position underneath the grand staircase. In its place is a bright canvas by Indigenous artist Paddy Nyunkuny Bedford. 'In modernising the office, it was important to consider how the art and artefacts in official residences could reflect the full story of Australia in all of its diversity,' she says.
When the Prime Minister approached Mostyn about the job in January 2024, she was greatly surprised. Mostyn was not a male in the military, which made her unusual enough for the head-of-state gig.
She had spent most of her career in corporations, not institutions. A law graduate who worked as an associate to Justice Michael Kirby (when he was at the NSW Court of Appeal), she went on to become a policy advisor to two successive Labor ministers for communications, and then as a senior communications policy advisor to prime minister Paul Keating.
She left that job to take up a senior executive position at Optus Vision, and from there, she went on to an executive role at Optus and Cable and Wireless in London, where her daughter, Lotte (now 25) was born. Her business career flourished, and her CV is too dense to summarise neatly, but it includes senior executive roles at companies including Insurance Australia Group, and multiple board and chair roles at Virgin Australia, Transurban, Mirvac, Citigroup and Aware Super, as well as charitable organisations like Beyond Blue, Foundation for Young Australians, the Climate Change Authority and Reconciliation Australia.
In 2005, she was the first woman AFL Commissioner (she was accused of being a 'quota pick') and in 2023 the Prime Minister appointed her to the Women's Economic Taskforce.
As the daughter of an army colonel, who served in Vietnam during her childhood, Mostyn understands service and she respects institutions. 'I'd been to Government House many times ... I'd studied constitutional law in Canberra and I had been to the High Court many times,' she says. 'As a country, we had debated many years ago the issue of whether we would be a republic, and we'd just been through the referendum on constitutional change for a Voice for First Nations people.
'So I think the job of Governor-General was one I understood.' Next week, she will have been in the job a year.
Her law background prepared her well for the constitutional part of her role, which involves giving the royal assent to laws, but also providing extra probity for government appointments in presiding over the federal executive council, which gives legal effect to decisions made by ministers.
More generally, she is a guardian of the constitution and must help ensure the stability of the government.
To this end, she sought extensive legal advice from the Solicitor-General on what to do if the result of the last election had not been clear-cut.
Loading
'After the Dismissal in 1975, people were acutely aware the Governor-General could do one thing, and that was dismiss the Prime Minister,' she says. 'I talk to people about the reserve powers and why I don't believe that will ever happen again … as the Governor-General, you should always be conscious of maintaining the kind of relationship with the Prime Minister and the government where, if you see trouble ahead, you work with them to avoid the trouble.'
Because Ms Mostyn had been a strong advocate for progressive causes including The Voice, and gender inequality, she sustained harsh criticism when her role was announced. She was derided as an 'activist'.
News Corp columnist Andrew Bolt wrote that her appointment was 'the triumph of affirmative action over talent or accomplishment'. His stablemate Janet Albrechtson opined that Mostyn was 'no business heavyweight' and that she 'reflects the worst of modern woke Australia'.
Further, Albrechtson wrote, 'if her chromosomes were XY she wouldn't have been considered for the role'.
Is this the right time to note that the croque madame is delightfully buttery and exactly the right amount of crunchy? I have devoured mine. Beyond a few discreet mouthfuls, the GG has barely touched hers. I don't want to damage Australia's constitutional democracy, but my journalistic duty is to the reader, not to the Governor-General's blood sugar levels. I press on.
How did those personal attacks feel for her? 'How did I feel? I felt really disappointed that so many people were angry at the notion that a woman who had not served in the defence force could possibly be a governor-general,' she says, somewhat carefully.
Was disappointment all she felt? 'I had a lot of emotions running at the time, but I came into this with very clear eyes that this would happen,' she says. 'I can get angry about that, but I find anger is a pretty wasted emotion … so I think, 'What do they need to see?' What they need to see is a person showing up in the job and doing it.'
In preparation for the role, Mostyn spoke to former governors-general, and consulted former prime ministers about how they managed the relationship with the head of state. Sir William Deane, who is now 94, told Mostyn to always show compassion and to stay at each event for at least an hour.
He also advised her to find a seat. 'People don't share how they're feeling standing up, he said. But you sit down, and people tell you their stories.'
The Governor-General coughs. She is now getting a dry throat. I ask if she needs to pause and eat and drink something. 'No, no, I'm all right!' she says. 'I'll just drink this.'
She sips her water. I ask her what she does to unwind. 'I'm a knitter, I'm a weaver. I always have something in my bag that I'm doing,' she says.
An attendant clears our plates away – mine is clean, Mostyn's still quite full.
She asks for a tea with some lemon and honey in it. I take a regular tea.
I ask Mostyn if she is a royalist. 'What do you mean by royalist?' she asks.
'Someone who reveres the royal family,' I reply.
'I don't think I've heard any former Governor-General use that language,' she says. 'I'm deeply respectful of the role that the monarchy plays. I'm deeply respectful of our constitutional monarchy and our strong set of institutions. I think King Charles shows us what a modern king looks like.'
Loading
'But the King doesn't direct me and I don't seek his advice. It's the Prime Minister and the ministry I take my counsel from, and that I work with.'
Her larynx fortified by herbal tea, the Governor-General is happy to continue our chat. 'I talk all the time about a mighty Australian democracy,' she says.
But it is me who has to end our nearly three-hour-long conversation, to attend to the un-vice-regal responsibility of the school pickup. 'That is a real deadline,' Mostyn says, and she sees me out, while issuing an invitation to bring my daughter another day for afternoon tea.
I walk out through the entrance hall, now devoid of Captain Cook pics. Behind me, the door stays open.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia calls for aid to enter Gaza amid 'unimaginable' suffering
Australia calls for aid to enter Gaza amid 'unimaginable' suffering

9 News

time2 hours ago

  • 9 News

Australia calls for aid to enter Gaza amid 'unimaginable' suffering

Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Australia and a long list of allies have decried the "unimaginable" suffering in Gaza , calling on Israel to let in aid and allow foreign aid groups to operate. Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong and her counterparts in 23 other countries and the European Union declared late last night that "famine is unfolding before our eyes". The latest mass statement on the conflict seemed aimed in large part at convincing Israel to reverse onerous new registration requirements for foreign aid groups. Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong and her counterparts in 23 other countries and the European Union declared late last night that "famine is unfolding before our eyes". (Alex Ellinghausen) The ministers warned essential international non-government organisations (NGOs) might be forced to leave the Occupied Palestinian Territories "imminently", making the humanitarian situation worse. "The humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached unimaginable levels. Famine is unfolding before our eyes," Wong and the other foreign ministers said. "Urgent action is needed now to halt and reverse starvation. Humanitarian space must be protected, and aid should never be politicised." Australia, France, Canada, the UK and other countries called on Israel to "provide authorisation for all international NGO aid shipments and to unblock essential humanitarian actors from operating." "Immediate, permanent and concrete steps must be taken to facilitate safe, large-scale access for the UN, international NGOs and humanitarian partners," the foreign ministers said. "All crossings and routes must be used to allow a flood of aid into Gaza, including food, nutrition supplies, shelter, fuel, clean water, medicine and medical equipment. Palestinians struggle to get donated food at a community kitchen in Gaza City, northern Gaza Strip, Monday, August 4, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi) "Lethal force must not be used at distribution sites, and civilians, humanitarians and medical workers must be protected." The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs last week called on Israel to drop new restrictions introduced in March forcing international NGOs to share sensitive personal information about their Palestinian employees or stop operating. The office and NGOs warned "most" foreign groups could be de-registered by September 9 or sooner, forcing them to withdraw all international staff. "Already, NGOs that are not registered under the new system are prohibited from sending any supplies to Gaza," it said. Leader of the Government in the Senate and Minister for Foreign Affairs Penny Wong and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese during a press conference at Parliament House in Canberra on Monday 11 August 2025. fedpol Photo: Alex Ellinghausen (Alex Ellinghausen) "In July this year, Israeli authorities rejected repeated requests by 29 NGOs to ship humanitarian aid to Gaza citing the organisations as ' authorised'. "This policy has already prevented the delivery of life-saving aid including medicine, food, and hygiene items. "This most profoundly affects women, children, older people, and persons with disabilities, further aggravating the risk of being subjected to abuse and exploitation." Wong and some of the other foreign ministers last week said the aid groups' "exclusion would be an egregious signal". A group of Palestinians sit in the shade of their tent amid destroyed buildings on a hot summer day in Gaza City, Tuesday, August 12, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi) The war was triggered by Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, in which militants abducted 251 people and killed about 1200 people, mostly civilians. Israel's air and ground offensive has displaced most of the people in Gaza, destroyed vast areas, pushed the territory toward famine and, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, killed more than 61,400 Palestinians. The foreign ministers last night thanked the US, Qatar and Egypt for their help in negotiations and called for "a ceasefire that can end the war, for hostages to be released and aid to enter Gaza by land unhindered". CONTACT US Property News: Rubbish-strewn house overtaken by mould asks $1.2 million.

Aaron Patrick: Penny Wong can't answer the pivotal question about Gaza
Aaron Patrick: Penny Wong can't answer the pivotal question about Gaza

West Australian

time5 hours ago

  • West Australian

Aaron Patrick: Penny Wong can't answer the pivotal question about Gaza

When Foreign Minister Penny Wong was asked the pivotal question about her Government's recognition of a Palestinian state - why would Hamas give up power? - the woman who spent more than a year working on a historic shift in Australian policy had no answer. 'I speak for Australia,' she told Sarah Ferguson on the 7.30 program Monday evening. 'We are working to deliver a change in the cycle of violence that we have seen, and to work with others to try and provide some hope in what has been a very dark time.' Senator Wong, though, was clearer about another crucial point: Australia's recognition is not conditional on any actions by the Palestinians. The decision has been made, come what may. There was a different emphasis earlier Monday, when Anthony Albanese referred to the 'conditions' he had placed upon the Palestinian Authority's leader, Mahmoud Abbas. The Prime Minister said Mr Abbas had promised to reform the corrupt but largely compliant institution, which Australia will, in a month's time, consider represents a new country, the State of Palestine. 'And the conditions are ones that are consistent with the declaration in June, that recognition of the State of Israel, which of course the Palestinian Authority would argue had occurred with the Oslo Accords,' Mr Albanese said. He was referring to a letter sent in June by Mr Abbas to French President Emmanuel Macron that said: 'Hamas will no longer rule Gaza and must hand over its weapons and military capabilities to the Palestinian Security Forces.' Mr Abbas said he was 'ready to invite Arab and international forces to be deployed as part of a stabilisation/protection mission with a (UN) Security Council mandate'. In other words, the nominal Palestinian leader was asking for the international community to give him the Gaza Strip, from which the Palestinian Authority was violently ejected in 2007. Rather than the agreement towards peace Mr Albanese portrayed the conversation as, Mr Abbas seems to have repeated the offer he made to Mr Macron. On Monday, two months after the French president posted Mr Abbas' Hamas denunciation on X, Mr Albanese claimed credit: 'This is one of the commitments Australia has sought – and received – from President Abbas and the Palestinian Authority.' Mr Albanese's grasp of the intricacies of Middle East politics, and geography, has been questioned by people who have discussed the region with him in private. On Tuesday, appearing on the Sunrise program, he did not appear to know or remember that Israel abuts the Mediterranean Sea. 'Hamas don't support two states,' he said. 'They support one state. In their own words, 'from the river to the sea', from the Jordan river to the ocean.' In the US, a Democratic diplomatic veteran of the conflict did not agree with the switch. Former US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said recognising a Palestinian state before Hamas was removed 'would fortify proponents of terror on the Palestinian side and rejectionists of Palestinian statehood on the Israeli side.' Mr Albanese and Ms Wong say their decision was influenced by a call from 22 Arab countries on July 31 for Hamas to stop fighting and release its hostages. As anti-Israel fervour swept through the streets of the Western world, the Arab position was seen as tacit recognition of Hamas's responsibility for the war. The Arab's position showed that Hamas is being isolated, and a combination of Western pressure on Israel's right-wing government and international support for the Palestinian Authority could help remove it from power, end the violence in Gaza and bring peace closer, Mr Albanese and Ms Wong argued. 'We need to make sure that Hamas is isolated,' the Prime Minister said on Monday. 'The comments by Arab League nations have made it clear that that is their position as well.' There's an important problem with the position. Hamas is not an Arab-sponsored organisation. It is funded by Iran, the Persian power seen as a destabilising force across the Middle East by most Arab leaders. Iran's Islamist leaders are extreme anti-Semites impervious to Arab pressure. Why they would stop funding their Hamas proxies in a war against what they call the Zionist Entity is unclear. Without Iranian pressure, why Hamas's remaining leaders would retire from war and politics is a question not even Australia's formidable Foreign Minister could answer. Amid arguments about the pros and cons of international recognition, less symbolic steps towards peace seem to be happening. A regional media outlet, Sky News Arabia, reported Egypt, Qatar and Turkey are drawing up a cease-fire and hostage-release for consideration by Hamas. The deal would require the release of all hostages, and the bodies of some who have died, in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. The Israeli army would move to less aggressive posture and Hamas fighters would pause attacks while negotiations were held for a permanent cease-fire. The impetus for the renewed peace effort appears to be a desire to avoid another mass Israeli incursion into Gaza, which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu foreshadowed on Sunday. Which suggests that, sadly, violence rather than talk can bring an opponent to the negotiating table.

Anthony Albanese walks a tricky geopolitical tightrope
Anthony Albanese walks a tricky geopolitical tightrope

The Age

time8 hours ago

  • The Age

Anthony Albanese walks a tricky geopolitical tightrope

To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. MIDDLE EAST There is no doubt that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is walking a geopolitical tightrope as he tries to negotiate the competing narratives of this awful conflict between Israel and the Palestinian people (' Former Israeli prime minister rejects Palestinian recognition ', 12/8). On one side is the almost continuous insistence by the Israelis that they have a right to defend themselves (as they do) against the terrorist organisation Hamas. The Israelis also have a right to request, or try to retrieve, the hostages taken in the attack on October 7. On the other side are the rights of the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip, the collateral in this conflict. Had the Israelis stuck to a more surgical operation to dislodge Hamas from Gaza and retrieve the hostages without the need to reduce the Strip to rubble or starve the population, then collective countries might have stuck with them in this aim. However, the ongoing devastation has caused various countries, including Australia, to start the path to recognise a Palestinian State under the prospective leadership of the Palestinian Authority – it is important to note that numerous world leaders have said a precondition is that Hamas is excluded from staying in power. In staring down the criticism from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Trump administration, Albanese has joined a group of countries that have taken a more moral and practical path. Words, however, are not actions. And Australia must now apply more pressure on the Israeli government to come to the table and work towards achieving lasting peace. Jeremy de Korte, Newington Hitched to the wrong leader It's interesting that Sussan Ley believes that Australia is out of step with the US, our major ally, when it comes to recommending the recognition of Palestine statehood. The Dutton Coalition lost the last election in part because it hitched its wagon to Trump. Yet Ley continues to fail to read the room by offering a policy out of step with the rest of the world. Kurt Elder, Port Melbourne Fluid borders Michaelia Cash states that because Palestine does not have defined borders it cannot be recognised. You could argue that Israel's borders are ill-defined because they keep taking more and more land from Palestine. The same could be said of other countries such as Russia or Ukraine. Trump wants his borders to grow as well – Greenland anyone? Are we meant to block them all? Alan Inchley, Frankston A way to peace Palestine Action Group organiser Amal Naser is critical of the Australian government for offering us 'recognition ... as though that is what we have been demanding' (' Recognising Palestine is a distraction ... ' 12/8). Instead of a Palestinian state, she advocates punishing Israel. This points to the problem underlying the conflict. Since 1948, the Palestinian leadership has repeatedly put the destruction of Israel ahead of the wellbeing of its people. Since 1948, they have launched multiple attacks on Israel and rejected a number of proposals for a Palestinian state, most notably in 2000 when Israel PM Ehud Barak offered Yasser Arafat more than ever, including control of East Jerusalem and a corridor connecting the West Bank and Gaza. The suffering in Gaza would have ended years ago, if numerous Israeli peace and statehood offerings had been accepted. Former Israeli PM Golda Meir was right in the 1970s when she said 'peace will come when the Arabs love their children more than they hate us'. Henry Kalus, Southbank Path to peace Congratulations to the Labor government on its decision to recognise the state of Palestine; however, it should have been recognised at the same time as Israel. Now, Israel must withdraw from Palestinian and Syrian territory and then the Arab nations need to acknowledge the state of Israel. Only then will peace occur in the Middle East. Geoff McDonald, Newtown Further recognition Recognition of statehood for Palestine in the absence of a viable and representative government? Well, the Gazan people certainly have been suffering recently, but what about the Kurds, the Tibetans and the West Papuans? Is their suffering and denial of nationhood/sovereignty still to remain 'unrecognisable'? Is the key lesson that you really need to make the neighbours suffer a lot before your own national suffering can be recognised with statehood? Compared to Gaza, Taiwan seems to be pretty much a nationality and a country, decently organised and run by a representative government, so if the powers of the world can tolerate a two-state solution in the Middle East, then why can't we have another one in North Asia, with two Chinas or one China and one Taiwan? Garry Dalrymple, Earlwood, NSW

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store