Campaigners and industry respond to ‘once-in-a-generation' water reform report
The much-anticipated final report from the Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, outlined 88 recommendations to the UK and Welsh governments to turn around the ailing industry.
Mr Keil said: 'The commission has set out significant changes to the regulatory system.
'But water companies have always had the freedom to do what's right by their customers – and many have made bad choices.'
Mr Keil said affordability must be a key focus of reform, with households already struggling following this year's sharp rise in water bills.
'More people are turning to CCW to complain about not being able to afford their bill,' he said.
'Over two in five households have told us they've cut spending on essentials like food to make ends meet.
'The case for a single social tariff for water has never been more urgent.'
He welcomed recommendations to make the existing voluntary ombudsman scheme mandatory, saying: 'We're delighted the commission has recommended building on our work at a time when we're seeing more people turn to us for help.'
But River Action chief executive James Wallace accused the commission of falling short, saying it had 'blinked' when faced with a chance to break with the past.
'This was a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reset a broken and corrupted system,' he said.
'Instead, we've been handed vague policy nudges that leave the current failed privatised water company model intact.'
Mr Wallace said nothing less than 'a credible plan to rescue Britain's rivers, lakes and seas' was needed, including a clear path to bring 'failing companies like Thames Water into public control'.
He called on the Government to put Thames Water into special administration as a 'powerful statement of intent', warning: 'Our water is our life-blood and not for sale.'
Water UK, the trade body for the water companies, welcomed the commission's findings, calling reform 'long overdue'.
A spokesperson said: 'Everyone agrees the system has not been working.
'These recommendations should establish the foundations to secure our water supplies, support economic growth and end sewage entering our rivers and seas.'
Richard Benwell, a member of the Independent Water Commission's expert advisory group and chief executive of Wildlife and Countryside Link, said a 'culture of rule-breaking and non-compliance' was harming rivers and wetlands, and called for a more powerful and independent environmental regulator.
He welcomed the proposal for new regional water authorities but warned reforms would fall short without proper funding and a clear steer from Government.
'Reforming regulators without fixing resourcing and remit would be painting over cracks,' he said.
Ali Morse, water policy manager at The Wildlife Trusts, said the report offered 'strong recommendations' for more integrated, regionally driven planning, but warned time was running out to act.
'The commission has set the framework – now the Government must act with purpose,' she said.
Gary Carter, national officer at the GMB union, said the report confirmed what the union had argued for years – that water privatisation had been a 'disastrous failure'.
He accused company bosses of profiting while the water infrastructure 'crumbles through lack of investment' and sewage pollutes rivers.
'It's a disgrace – and one Ofwat has overseen,' he said.
'Now is the time to fundamentally reform the water sector and renationalise this vital resource.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Residents 'rightly frustrated' over Thames Water hosepipe ban
The leader of a council affected by a hosepipe ban has said "people are tired of the same old excuses" from the water company. Thames Water introduced the hosepipe ban for customers in north Wiltshire, east Gloucestershire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire on Tuesday. Jim Robbins, who leads Swindon Borough Council, said he was "really disappointed" by the ban, adding that the company had prioritised pay-outs to shareholders over "making sure the water supply for customers is there where it needs to be".Thames Water said the restriction was due to a lack of rain and increasing demand and added leakage in the network was at its "lowest ever level". While the company did not respond directly to Mr Robbins' comments, it added that it was using "innovative technology" to fix leaks faster, with 650 leaks fixed each however now face a fine of up to £1,000 if they are found to use of a hosepipe for activities such as watering the garden, washing the car or filling a paddling pool. Thames Water has been fined millions of pounds and heavily criticised for a series of leaks and Robbins, who has been highly critical of the company in the past, said: "I think residents are rightly frustrated that this is an organisation that hasn't made the investment that it needs to over the past 20 years or so since it's been privatised. "People are tired of the same old excuses... after years of failure and them not doing the hard work to make sure they maintain people's supply and keep our rivers clean."It's consistently prioritised taking money out of the business... but there is no evidence they have done the work of making sure that the water supply for customers is there where it needs to be." 'Doing everything we can' The hosepipe ban was announced last week and came into force at midnight on Tuesday - covering some 1.1 million people. The temporary restrictions cover areas with postcodes beginning with OX, GL, SN, RG4, RG8 and RG9.A number of other water companies around the country have announced similar hosepipe bans, though none of those are in the West or South West. Announcing the restrictions, Nevil Muncaster, Thames Water's strategic water resources director said: "I'd like to reassure all our customers that we are doing everything we can to look after our water resources and to protect the environment through this continued warm, dry weather."Our engineers are working 24/7 to maintain supply to all our customers and we have more teams out in the field fixing leaks, which often increase during long dry spells because of shifts in the ground that move our pipes. "We all have a role to play in reducing our water use and customers can help us by saving water around the home and in the garden."
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Thousands of visitors flock to this year's Royal Welsh Show
This year's Royal Welsh Show welcomed thousands of visitors as the most popular agricultural show in the UK kicked off. The show was officially opened with a ceremony that celebrated the richness of Welsh culture, the strength of rural communities, and the enduring importance of the agricultural industry in Wales. Chair of Council, Mrs Nicola Davies FRAgS, welcomed members and dignitaries to the event, reflecting on the pivotal role of the Society in championing Welsh agriculture and rural life. 'The Show is a very important platform to promote the very best of the agricultural industry that we all hold so very dear,' she said. 'It underlines its importance, not only economically, but socially and culturally too.' Mrs Davies paid warm tribute to the 2025 Feature County, Caernarfonshire, and thanked its fundraising committees for their outstanding work in raising awareness and vital funds to support capital developments at the showground. Mr John R Owen, the Society's President for 2025, then addressed the audience, expressing his pride and honour in representing Caernarfonshire as Feature County. 'I have no doubt that the founders of the Society are looking down in much admiration of today's standards and achievements,' he said. A special highlight of the day was the visit of HRH The Princess Royal, who was attending in her capacity as President of the Royal Agricultural Society of the Commonwealth (RACS). Her Royal Highness attended the AGM of the RASC and then toured the showground, engaging with exhibitors and visitors, and seeing the many new additions to the show since her last visit in 2022. During the afternoon's Awards Ceremony, Dylan Jones, Castellior, Menai Bridge, Anglesey was announced as the winner of the prestigious Sir Bryner Jones Memorial Award, which featured the beef industry for the first time in 30 years. The were changes to this year's show with the introduction of a new Heavy Horse Village — a dedicated area celebrating the legacy and ongoing role of working horses in Welsh agriculture. The village featured interactive exhibits, live demonstrations, and opportunities for visitors to meet these gentle giants and their handlers, along with new turn-out competition classes. The opening day's main ring programme was headlined by the Ukrainian Cossacks, whose dazzling displays of traditional horsemanship and acrobatics captivated showgoers. Other main ring attractions included the Bolddog FMX display team, the Tristar Carriage and the RAF Falcons Parachute display team.
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Keir Starmer is no politician – but this could be his strength
If you cut him, would he bleed? Nobody knows. Keir Starmer is one of the strangest of all the odd characters we have had in No 10: perhaps we are only just beginning to realise just how different he is. He does almost none of the obvious things a prime minister 'must' do. With few exceptions, he doesn't speak to the cabinet. By speak, I mean properly, confidentially, deeply – not just exchanging phrases in a meeting. He doesn't speak to his other ministers either. He doesn't read newspapers, magazines or blogs. He's not in the Commons. He doesn't make uplifting speeches. At the recent cabinet away day at Chequers he delighted ministers present by explaining why he was in politics. But it was their surprise, even relief, that was eloquent. What he said was the down-to-earth, autobiographical account an averagely egotistical prime minister would repeat while asleep. This curiously closed man seems surrounded by other politicians and advisers who can explain him better than he can. The downsides of his behaviour are by now well understood. The New Statesman has been charting the problem of dropping policies well before you have won the argument about them; of having no personal relationship with MPs on whom your legislation depends; of failing to develop an emotional connection with voters when your enemies can. Another downside, largely unreported, is an atmosphere of distancing and thinking beyond Starmer inside the cabinet. This is not, I must emphasise, a 'leadership plot'. We must move beyond the clichés. One senior minister says: 'There is no active conversation going on, but a lot of us are looking at the restlessness of the party and we think it's serious.' There are two obvious crisis points ahead after the summer break. One comes next May with the Scottish, Welsh and English local elections. If Labour is absolutely hammered up and down the country, Starmer's leadership will come into question. Scotland is probably going to go better than the commentators expect – the best result in 20 years, predicts one insider. The more serious challenge doesn't yet have a date attached: that is the possibility of a Truss-style market meltdown sufficient to destroy Rachel Reeves' chancellorship. Her frustration with Labour critics who don't understand how close to the edge the British economy stands, is completely understandable. Long-dated UK gilt yields (5.5 per cent last week) are already at levels not seen since 1998. For a lot of public debt, repayments recur frequently. Government sources worry about the 'extraordinary' lack of a senior economic policy adviser in No 10, which leaves the Treasury to itself while Downing Street is 'constantly racking up the bills'. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe The bond markets are watching all the stuttering, over-indebted 'advanced' (aka sclerotic) economies like vultures. In the eurozone, France is in obvious trouble. But there is a particular focus on Britain, and not just because of Liz Truss and not just for technical reasons. After the U-turn on welfare cuts, the markets are asking whether this Labour government is really in control. Will it be forced to come back for substantial new borrowing? These are the big questions ahead of the Autumn Budget. They go a long way towards explaining the removal of the whip from rebels. If Starmer and Reeves are really committed, as the Prime Minister says, to lifting the two-child cap, there would have to be major spending cuts elsewhere, or tax rises, to compensate. In all this, Wes Streeting's fight with the resident doctors has become the political front line. It's lucky that he is the best political explainer, by far, the government has. Reeves has possible tweaks to make which could bring her up to £15bn extra and is doubtless looking at other moves: a banking levy and a gambling tax. But without tight spending control, that is all loose change – and she would have to turn to the big tax promises made at the election. Bringing investment income into line with income tax, as Angela Rayner has suggested, would be a possible answer, though that too has consequences for growth. Tony Blair, whose influence over the government grows by the day, has been bringing in groups of Labour MPs to warn them that if Reeves raises the big taxes in November 'it's over'. As one senior adviser says: 'The more you borrow, the less control you have over your destiny.' How close are we, then, to 1976, when the UK was unable to service its debts and needed an IMF bailout? I think of Jim Callaghan speaking to the Labour conference that year: 'We used to think you could spend your way out of a recession… by cutting taxes and boosting government spending. I tell you, in all candour, that that option no longer exists.' That isn't, yet, the speech that Starmer is planning. He intends to build on the spending review to chart a more optimistic year ahead, with waiting lists down, houses going up, and trade deals bringing better jobs, with a distinct community-first tone. The danger is that it sounds insufficiently confrontational, just when the markets are watching most closely. Downing Street is not complacent: one source talks of the difficulty of governing with an enfeebled state, one that is 'fat, not fit', a machine that seems 'too weak to lift a bin in Birmingham; to pick up the phone in a GP's office; to stop sewage flowing into rivers'. This inheritance will take time to turn around. In the short term, there needs to be an urgent challenge to the party about its priorities, as well as self-congratulation about the things that have gone well. The Labour Growth Group's call for a 'National Renewal Compact', recently published online by the New Statesman, is a sign of the serious thinking about Britain's challenges being done on the back benches. Mark McVitie, Lola McEvoy and Chris Curtis argue that Britain is facing a 'revolutionary moment'. The language is stark. Inside government, there is no longer an assumption that both Starmer and Reeves will survive. Angela Rayner, while the most obvious successor, is said not to want the top job for personal reasons. She is regarded as loyal to Starmer. Others doubt this. 'She always gives the impression of someone who does want the top job; she is very important, very political,' says another minister. If, to use Boris Johnson's phrase, the ball came loose from the scrum, we would probably see some kind of alliance between Wes Streeting, Bridget Phillipson and perhaps Shabana Mahmood – Mahmood representing the most right-of-centre, state-sceptical part of the party. The only other name being mentioned is John Healey, the Defence Secretary, seen as the safest hands in the administration, and a man who could Callaghan-style calm markets and backbenches alike. So, finally, we return to this oddest of prime ministers. His disdain for ordinary politics, his lack of real conversation with colleagues, and his arm's-length relationship with a commentariat are also a kind of strength which we have not perhaps taken seriously enough. He has the hide of a rhinoceros. Starmer doesn't, to switch jungle metaphors, give a monkey's about most of the criticism. He can listen – and he is refreshing Downing Street, importing badly needed experience of governing. Pat McFadden is likely to be given, I'm told, an enhanced political role at the centre. The former Blair-era spinner Tim Allan has been approached as communications supremo. The fundamental question, however, is about the real state of the country. Plenty of ministers believe we are on the edge of something pretty grim. As the summer stretches on, there is a general sense that the state is losing control of the streets – and Nigel Farage is watching, with one nicotine-tinted finger on the national pulse. The Prime Minister does not think the country is broken, and from the City to the universities, from science to new technology, there is plenty to celebrate. Calm and resilience are great political strengths. But we are living through a social and economic Dunkirk. Business as usual won't cut it. [See also: Kemi Badenoch isn't working] Related
