Court issues arrest warrant vs. Darryl Yap over Pepsi Paloma film
On March 19, the Muntinlupa Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 203 recalled the arrest warrant after Yap posted a P10,000 cash bond for each of the two libel charges, totaling P20,000.
Yap's lawyer, Atty. Raymund Fortun, confirmed the bail. The court scheduled Yap's arraignment for March 26, 2025.
The charges stem from Yap's teaser for his upcoming film, 'The Rapists of Pepsi Paloma', which included a controversial scene involving actor-host Vic Sotto.
Yap's camp and Sotto declined to comment on the matter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
3 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Abu Dhabi court rejects man's lawsuit seeking Dhs15,000 repayment in a cheating case
Abu Dhabi Family, Civil, and Administrative Cases Court dismissed a lawsuit filed by a man against another demanding the repayment of D15,000, along with additional fines. The plaintiff claimed that he had agreed with the defendant, who allegedly worked at a bank, to facilitate the approval of an Dhs800,000 loan with a monthly installment of Dhs6,040 over 25 years, in return for a commission of Dhs25,000. The plaintiff claimed that he transferred Dhs15,000 to the defendant in three installments, but the latter failed to complete the necessary procedures, did not secure the loan approval, and stopped responding to his communications. Upon investigating, the plaintiff discovered that the defendant was not employed by the bank, so he filed a criminal complaint against him. The court stated that the plaintiff's claims were unsupported by evidence and the case file lacked proof that the defendant had misappropriated the funds. Therefore, the court dismissed the lawsuit.
Filipino Times
14 hours ago
- Filipino Times
‘Bawal ang usisero' Dubai Police Warn Against ‘Rubbernecking' at Accident Sites: Dh1,000 Fine and Black Points
Dubai Police have cautioned motorists against the dangerous practice of slowing down or stopping to watch accidents on the road, stressing that such behavior not only disrupts traffic but also endangers lives by delaying emergency response. In a Gulf News report, Brigadier Juma Salem Bin Suwaidan, Acting Director of the General Department of Traffic, said violators face a Dh1,000 fine and black points on their driving record under federal traffic laws. 'This habit poses a serious threat to road safety and human lives while hindering the timely arrival of rescue teams,' he said. Authorities noted that drivers who crowd accident scenes often worsen injuries and cause secondary crashes by abruptly slowing down or stopping. Police urged motorists to keep a safe distance, follow speed limits, and signal before changing lanes. Officials also highlighted ongoing awareness campaigns to remind drivers that 'curiosity at accident sites is not just a bad habit, it is a traffic violation that can end in tragedy.' Brigadier Bin Suwaidan added: 'Every second counts in emergencies. The delays caused by unnecessary congestion may cost a life.' He advised drivers never to stop in the middle of the road, and in cases of breakdowns, to immediately contact Dubai Police for assistance.
Filipino Times
14 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Dubai Court Fines Motorist, Orders Dh50,000 Blood Money in Fatal Scooter Accident
A Dubai court has fined a Gulf national Dh10,000 and ordered him to pay Dh50,000 in blood money to the family of an Asian man who died in a traffic accident earlier this year. The fatal incident took place in March on Al Wasl Road, where the victim, riding an electric scooter, was struck near a pedestrian crossing. Responding officers found him critically injured, and he was declared dead at the scene. The driver told investigators the man suddenly crossed outside the pedestrian lane, leaving no chance to avoid the collision. However, police determined both parties shared responsibility. Traffic reports revealed the driver had run a red light, failed to slow down at a crossing, and neglected proper caution, which directly caused the fatal crash. Investigators also noted that the victim contributed to the accident by riding — instead of walking — his scooter across the pedestrian line and failing to check for oncoming vehicles. In its ruling, the court stressed that negligence, whether through action or omission, constitutes criminal liability, underscoring the shared responsibility of both the motorist and the victim.
