Octopus Energy sparks £10bn demerger of tech arm Kraken
Sky News can exclusively reveal that Octopus Energy is close to hiring investment bankers to help formally separate Kraken Technologies from the rest of the group.
The demerger, which would be expected to take place in the next 12 months, would see Octopus Energy's existing investors given shares in the newly independent Kraken business.
A minority stake in Kraken of up to 20pc is expected to be sold to external shareholders in order to help validate the technology platform's valuation, according to insiders.
One banking source said that Kraken could be valued at as much as $14bn (£10.25bn) in a forthcoming demerger.
Citi, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley are among the investment banks invited to pitch for the demerger mandate in recent weeks.
A deal will augment Octopus Energy chief executive Greg Jackson's paper fortune, and underline his success at building a globally significant British-based company over the last decade.
Octopus Energy now has 7.5m retail customers in Britain, following its 2022 rescue of the collapsed energy supplier Bulb, and the subsequent acquisition of Shell's home energy business.
In January, it announced that it had become the country's biggest supplier - surpassing Centrica-owned British Gas - with a 24% market share.
It also has a further 2.5m customers outside the UK.
Sources said a £10bn valuation of Kraken would now imply that the whole group, including the retail supply business, was worth in the region of £15bn or more.
That would be double its valuation of just over a year ago, when the company announced that it had secured new backing from funds Galvanize Climate Solutions and Lightrock.
Shortly before that, the former US vice president Al Gore's firm, Generation Investment Management, and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board increased their stakes in Octopus Energy in a transaction valuing the company at $9bn (£7.2bn).
Kraken is an operating system which is licensed to other energy providers, water companies and telecoms suppliers.
It connects all parts of the energy system, including customer billing and the flexible management of renewable generation and energy devices such as heat pumps and electric vehicle batteries.
The business also unlocks smart grids which enable people to use more renewable energy when there is an abundant supply of it.
In the UK, its platform is licensed to Octopus Energy's rivals EON and EDF Energy, as well as the water company Severn Trent and broadband provider Cuckoo.
Overseas, Kraken serves Origin Energy in Australia, Japan's Tokyo Gas and Plentitude in countries including France and Greece.
Its biggest coup came recently, when it struck a deal with National Grid in the US to serve 6.5m customers in New York and Massachusetts.
Sources said other major licensing agreements in the US were expected to be struck in the coming months.
Kraken, which is chaired by Gavin Patterson, the former BT Group chief executive, is now contracted to more than 70m customer accounts globally - putting it easily on track to hit a target of 100m by 2027.
Earlier this year, Mr Jackson said that target now risked being seen as "embarrassingly unambitious".
Last July, Kraken recruited Amir Orad, a former boss of NICE Actimize, a US-listed provider of enterprise software to global banks and Fortune 500 companies, as its first chief executive.
A demerger of Kraken will trigger speculation about an eventual public market listing of the business.
Its growth in the US, and the relative public market valuations of technology companies in New York and London, may put the UK at a disadvantage when Kraken eventually considers where to list.
One key advantage of demerging Kraken from the rest of Octopus Energy Group would be to remove the perception of a conflict of interest among potential customers of the technology platform.
A source said the unified corporate ownership of both businesses had acted as a deterrent to some energy suppliers.
Kraken has also diversified beyond the energy sector, and earlier this year joined a consortium which was exploring a takeover bid for stricken Thames Water.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Show them you care with the modern, personalized greeting card delivered straight to their doorstep - no stamps or post office visits needed!
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more Sending a greeting card is so last century. And firing off an e-card is nice, but not nearly as personal as the real thing. Moonpig has developed a solution that modernizes the entire process while putting a much more fun spin on it. The company has thousands of unique, fun, heartfelt, and meaningful cards to celebrate virtually any occasion, big or small. What sets the company apart is their customization feature. You can send a card as it is, but you can also personalize it with a photo, AI stickers, and your own text. Why not add a picture of a special moment or throw in an inside joke? The company makes it so simple to take card-giving to the next level. Once you've chosen and personalized a card, you can simply leave the rest to Moonpig. That's the beauty of going this route — you don't need to go digging around for stamps or try to find time to hit the post office. It's incredibly easy, and you can be sure your recipient will receive their card quickly and right to their doorstep! As for when to send cards, there really is no limit. Any excuse is a good excuse, whether it's your bestie's birthday, you want to lift someone's spirits, or you just want to let them know how much you appreciate them. Using Moonpig is a breeze thanks to the intuitive website. Select the appropriate filters to find the cards that are best suited to the occasion, whether by age, milestone, style, topic, or occasion. There really is nothing off limits here. Celebrate your teen passing their driving test. Congratulate them on a job well done. Wish them well on the first day at school. It's no wonder so many people are thrilled with the service! 'My friend was really delighted we had sent such personal card,' said one reviewer. 'It came the day after order and was made of good strong glossy card.' 'As always with Moonpig I found exactly the card that I wanted to personalise. Such a great variety to choose from for every occasion. Personalizing is simple. The cards are good value for money and delivery is so quick!' exclaimed another. A third commented, 'Amazing finishing result. The recipient was very pleased. Perfect gift, would deffo order again!' Whether you're going for sentimental or hilarious, you can bet you'll find the perfect card at Moonpig (and no worries if you're a little late to send — there's an option to send an e-card instead of a physical card, too!).
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
EU leaders split over tactics as deadline looms for Trump trade talks
The EU is entering a crunch week with only two days of talks left to secure a trade deal with Washinton to avert Donald Trump's threatened 50% tariff on its imports into the US. According to the US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, on Friday, the negotiations – which continued over the weekend – are focussed on 15 to 18 agreements with important partners, while Trump warned of import tax rates of up to 70% on others. The uncertainty created by Washington has sent shock waves through the global economy. Businesses have paused investment and the dollar posted its worst performance in 50 years in the first half of the year. With the clock ticking down to Trump's 9 July deadline, the European Commission remains uncertain how he will treat the bloc, threatening €1.6tn of transatlantic trade. 'Among member states, the big question will be whether we should reach a deal at all costs to avoid a trade war, or show muscle if the deal is not good enough,' one EU diplomat said. The German chancellor, Friederich Merz, has said he wants a quick UK-style deal to avert a full-scale trade war, while the French president, Emmanuel Macron, favours holding out for a better deal if a rushed deal is 'imbalanced'. Giving a flavour of the aggression shown towards the EU, which Trump once called 'nastier than China', Brussels' trade commissioner, Maroš Šefčovič, was threatened last week with 17% tariffs on food imports during talks with senior members of the Trump administration including Bessent. After announcing punitive 'liberation day' tariffs on nearly all countries on 2 April, Trump paused them for 90 days a week later. The US is now on the brink of launching a trade assault on dozens of countries as the 90-day period expires on Wednesday with only two deals in the bag – the UK and Vietnam. This has raised questions about the EU's ability to strike anything other than a political framework agreement to extend talks while a baseline 10% tariff and other levies on cars, steel and aluminium remain in place. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion As talks move into the final and most sensitive stage, industries across Europe are bracing themselves for fresh challenges, deal or no deal. They expect the cost of Trump's presidency is the minimum 10% on exports to the US, five times higher than the 2% average before he was elected last year. That is because after months of threats of retaliatory tariffs on everything from Bourbon to Boeing aircraft, the EU conceded last week that a comprehensive trade deal was unattainable. Instead they are aiming for an agreement in principle, or 'framework deal' which will look more like the UK deal struck in May, which came into force at the end of last month. Many EU diplomats initially dismissed the UK deal as thin and legally dubious under World Trade Organization rules, and held out hope that the bloc's greater economic clout with €1.6tn of transatlantic trade compared with the UK's £314bn (€363bn) would help it secure a better deal. But now they realise a bare-bones deal may be the best they can get.
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Liz Truss is long gone – but her fiscal meltdown still dictates every step Labour makes
On 6 September 2022, Liz Truss entered No 10 with a clear vision for the country; the country asked her to leave less than 50 days later. But nearly three years on, even though all that remains of her premiership at Downing Street is a portrait she didn't stick around long enough to see hung, it is she who really runs Britain. Not through her influence – which has since been reduced to poorly attended speeches at far-right conferences in the US – but through the fear she left behind. Truss may be gone, but what remains is the shadow her failure cast, and the rigid fiscal caution that grew out of it. Last week's benefits bill fiasco is a case in point. While all the talk from this government was about getting disabled people into work, they presented no real evidence that siphoning money away from this group will achieve this. The benefit cuts were driven by a rush to find government savings after GDP growth forecasts were lower than expected, threatening the chancellor's ability to meet her own fiscal rules. If this strikes you as an odd way to make major policy decisions, then you're not alone. We've ended up in a world where a one percentage point difference in a GDP forecast cascades down into a series of reforms that would have pushed hundreds of thousands into poverty. Why? Because the possibility of not meeting the fiscal rules was apparently spooking the markets. The chancellor has been consistent with these fiscal rules. She told the Global Borrowers and Bond Investment Forum (ie bond investors, the same people who turned on Liz Truss) that they were essential for underpinning financial stability. But fiscal rules have become a religion. In this self-imposed straitjacket, governments believe they can only spend if the economy is growing and borrow if the bond markets nod approvingly. These rules weren't created by Truss, but their new totemic status in British politics was forged in the fire she left behind. The result? We've boxed ourselves into a corner. Our public sector needs money. Growth is flat and threatened by global instability. Interest rates are high. But under these arbitrary rules, we're left with just two levers: raise taxes or cut spending. MPs and the public have shown that they are unwilling to tolerate further cuts, seemingly more alive than the government to the fact that they will create further costs in the long run. Who can blame them? The public isn't irrational. They have seen the state decay after 14 years of cuts; they don't believe it will be able to stand another round. They have also lived through years of stagnant wages and will be wary of tax rises on the back of already squeezed household budgets. Plans to means-test the winter fuel payment led to this government being accused of attacking elderly people. Last week, £5bn of rushed and flawed benefit cuts were rightly destroyed through a rebellion from the government's own MPs. And while there is a growing consensus about the need to tax wealth fairly, this government so far appears unwilling to make these trade-offs. The closest we have come to anything resembling a bold wealth tax is a fairly meagre change to capital gains tax rates. And so here we are, being informed that there is a 'black hole' in the public finances that must be filled at all costs, yet with no politically acceptable route to make this happen. But there is a third lever that they should consider: rethink the fiscal rules themselves, and with them, our assumptions about debt and growth. Instead, Westminster treats these constraints as sacred. That's the legacy of Truss. Her mini-budget may have collapsed in days, but the fear it left behind governs us still. The bond market is now our unofficial second chamber. Every policy is measured against its hypothetical response. It doesn't matter that the markets themselves aren't demanding cuts, only that politicians think they might. We are approaching a fundamental choice: do we continue trying to appease the markets by clinging to a set of self-imposed constraints that block the kind of spending needed to improve living standards and revive growth? Or do we remove those constraints and make the decisions necessary to fix our economy? I know which I'd prefer, not least because public investment can boost growth, raise tax revenues and ease pressure on the national debt over time. The alternative of more austerity risks doing the opposite: choking off growth, weakening the economy and actually making our debt burden harder to manage as a result. The fear is that markets will punish us for daring to spend. But that fear has become self-defeating. In reality, the financial returns from well-targeted public spending – on infrastructure, childcare, health, skills – are often far higher than our anaemic assumptions allow. The economic returns are bigger, the benefits broader and the risks lower than we have conditioned ourselves to believe. A politics that always talks down the impact of spending ends up justifying stagnation. That fear is how you end up with a government paralysed by its own Truss trauma, an exhausted politics where every problem is diagnosed but none are treated, because every solution breaks a taboo. And the longer we stay in this holding pattern, the more brittle the state becomes – and the more we're left asking why nothing ever seems to change. Until someone finds the courage to govern without flinching, we will remain stuck in this loop, where fear dictates policy, and decline is dressed up as stability. Until then, this is Liz Truss's UK – we're all just living in it. Max Mosley is a senior economist at the New Economics Foundation
