Ackman: Adams can beat Mamdani; Cuomo should leave race
Cuomo will appear on the November ballot representing the 'Fight & Deliver' party — which he formed in May — after losing the Democratic primary last month to 33-year-old state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani. The election, which relies on ranked choice voting, was officially called for Mamdani on Tuesday.
Ackman wrote over two lengthy posts on social platform X late Wednesday evening that he doesn't want Mamdani, a democratic socialist, to become the city's next mayor and thinks removing Cuomo as an option on the ballot will benefit incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat who is seeking reelection as an independent.
The billionaire said he met with both Adams and Cuomo earlier this week to assess their rival candidacies.
'In short, my takeaway is that Adams can win the upcoming election and that the Governor should step aside to maximize Adams' probability of success,' he wrote. 'I say this while having a high regard for Andrew Cuomo and his contributions to New York State.'
Ackman added, 'But it was abundantly clear in his body language, his subdued energy and his proposals to beat Mamdani, that he is not up for the fight.'
The deadline for candidates to remove their names from the November ballot lapsed last Friday. Cuomo has given no indication that he plans to pull away, as polls have shown him ahead of Adams and close to Mamdani if he remains in the race.
'Everyone is entitled to their own political opinion — we understand President Trump supports Eric Adams, and do not believe socialism is the answer,' Cuomo campaign spokesman Rich Azzopardi said in a statement to The Hill this week. 'Most New Yorkers are not Trumpers, and most New Yorkers are not socialists — the majority lies in the middle.'
'We will continue to assess the current situation in the best interest of the people of the City of New York,' he added.
A poll released this week showed that among all candidates slated to be on the ballot, Cuomo came in second to Mamdani with 29 percent to the Democratic candidate's 35.2 percent. Adams polled fourth behind Republican candidate Curtis Silwa with 13.8 percent and 16.1 percent, respectively.
Rev. Al Sharpton, a New York native and Democratic political activist who is backing Mamdani, also urged Cuomo to step aside.
'I think, in the best interest of the legacy of Andrew Cuomo, that he ought to let them have the one-on-one race,' Sharpton said Wednesday on MSNBC's 'Morning Joe.'
Sharpton added, 'He can endorse one or the other, and let them have a battle over what is best for New York.'
The pressure comes after the former governor said last month that he was 'assessing that landscape,' when asked about a potential independent bid.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Beshear on potential White House bid: ‘I'll think about it after next year'
Gov. Andy Beshear (D-Ky.) said he'll consider a 2028 White House bid in an article published Friday while seething over the 'big, beautiful bill' backed by Republicans in Congress. 'Two years ago, I wouldn't have considered [running for president]. But if I'm somebody who could maybe heal and bring the country back together, I'll think about it after next year,' Beshear told Vanity Fair. The Kentucky governor's term ends in 2027 and he's pledged to complete his tenure in office before launching another political bid for a higher office. Fellow party members Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.), Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Gov. Josh Shapiro (D-Pa.) have also been listed as potential contenders for the presidency as Democrats look to claw back the executive branch after their November loss. Political pundits have suggested the GOP-authored spending package will have a significant impact on midterm elections and cycles that follow as Americans grapple with the possibility of losing their healthcare coverage, a top issue for Beshear. 'What the Republican majority is getting wrong is that the American people don't view health care in a partisan way. They want to be able to see their doctor when they need to, and they want their neighbor to be able to see their doctor,' Beshear, Kentucky's former attorney general, said in the interview. 'No state will be able to compensate for the level of devastation that this bill would cause. What they're doing is immoral, and it's certainly not Christian,' he added. The legislation is set to remove millions from Medicaid and introduce stricter work requirements for food stamp benefits and other social services. However, Beshear said in order to break through on the cuts, Democrats will need to help voters conceptualize the ongoing impact of the bill. 'If Democrats say this bill is going to increase food insecurity, their point's not going to get through. If they say people are going to go hungry, it will,' he said. 'And we have to explain not just what we disagree with in this bill, but why. And my why is my faith. The parable of the fishes and the loaves is in every book of the gospel. My faith teaches me that in a country that grows enough food for everyone that no one should starve.'
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats and Republicans were out on the Virginia campaign trail. Here's what they had to say.
With four months until Election Day in Virginia, the campaigns for statewide office are heating up. Both parties are projecting a message of unity, but the ways they've sought to demonstrate unity amongst themselves has varied. Immediately after June's primaries, Democratic gubernatorial nominee Abigail Spanberger embarked on an eight-day bus tour across the state, where she was joined at stops by Ghazala Hashmi and Jay Jones, the nominees for lieutenant governor and attorney general. Meanwhile, Republican candidates Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, Attorney General Jason Miyares and conservative radio host John Reid — who have been the presumptive nominees for months — appeared together for the first time Tuesday night. 'To describe the Republican rally as a unity rally requires a very flexible definition of unity,' said Stephen Farnsworth, a political science professor at the University of Mary Washington. 'The party candidates barely appeared on stage together, did not have a lot to say about each other, and generally have a kind of problematic history for imagining that they're going to be able to work together this fall.' Statewide candidates are elected separately, meaning it's possible to have a governor and lieutenant governor from different parties. In 2005, Virginians elected Democrat Tim Kaine as governor and Republicans Bill Bolling and Bob McDonnell as lieutenant governor and attorney general. Here's how Hampton Roads lawmakers voted on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Spanberger, other Democrats vying for office draw hundreds at Williamsburg campaign stop Virginia's Republican statewide ticket rallies together for the first time But whether Republicans Earle-Sears, Reid, and Miyares — candidates for governor, lieutenant governor and attorney general — have convinced voters they're past their infighting, Farnsworth said a split ticket is unlikely. 'I do think that in this political environment, there aren't going to be very many swing voters,' he said. 'The reality of 2025 is that of a very, very partisan time, and so most voters are likely to vote a unified ticket, because the parties have become increasingly distant from each other nationally and in Virginia.' That means voting for candidates and policies for or against President Donald Trump. 'I think most people, particularly given the very combative approach to governing from President Trump, have decided they're either all in with the president or all not in with the president,' Farnsworth said. 'The old saying that all politics is local I don't think really applies these days when you're looking at what's motivating people.' Meanwhile, the Democratic statewide ticket campaigned together in Hampton Roads last weekend as part of Spanberger's bus tour. The tour concluded Saturday with stops in Williamsburg, Newport News, Norfolk and Virginia Beach. Jones seemingly took aim at the Republicans, who had then not appeared in public together. 'We got a ticket with Ghazala Hashmi and Abigail Spanberger,' he said at a speech at Lafayette High School in Williamsburg. 'And I'll let you in on a little secret this morning: We actually like each other.' Jones made the same comment in Norfolk later that day. Democrats are running on a staunchly anti-Trump platform. Along the trail, Jones pledged to enter Virginia into lawsuits against the Trump administration brought by Democratic attorneys general. Hashmi criticized Gov. Glenn Youngkin for telling laid off federal workers to polish their resumes. And Spanberger said she would defend veterans' access to health care. 'At the theoretical level, people are more likely to describe themselves as conservative,' Farnsworth said. 'But when people start seeing programs cut, they're a lot less conservative than they thought there were … the challenge for Republicans in this environment is not unlike what Democrats faced during the Biden years. 'You have to live with the consequences of the policy choices in Washington, even if you had nothing to do with them.' Statewide Republicans on the campaign trail are engaging less with federal policy, and instead spoke on issues such as transgender children, school choice and Virginia's status as a right-to-work state. At a rally before a packed house Tuesday in Vienna, Earle-Sears spoke at length about her father fleeing socialism in Jamaica and the nomination of Zohran Mamdani as Democratic mayoral candidate in New York. 'You've seen where my old hometown New York has nominated a socialist,' she said. The crowd booed. 'And make no mistake about it, the ideas that my opponent has are socialist in nature, because it's all about what government is going to do and to take your money to do it.' In Williamsburg, Spanberger dismissed the connection to Mamdani. 'I'm kind of a little bit laughing because it's New York City — we're Virginia,' she told reporters. 'I don't know anything about New York politics.' Farnsworth was not convinced that was an effective political strategy. 'It strikes me as a desperate move to imagine that the voice of Democratic primary voters in New York City has any bearing on the Virginia gubernatorial election,' he said. 'People always wish they were running against the politician that they mention, but they're actually running against the politician whose name is on the ballot, or the national figure, the president.' Farnsworth predicted that Republicans will face some significant headwinds this election. Historically, the party out of power in the White House does well in statewide elections in Virginia the following year. For example, in 2021, a year after Joe Biden was elected as president, Republicans regained control of the House of Delegates and won all three statewide positions. Kate Seltzer, 757-713-7881,
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson makes herself heard, prompting a rebuke
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Her opinions, sometimes joined by no other justice, have been the subject of scornful criticism from the right and have raised questions about her relationships with her fellow justices, including the other two members of its liberal wing. Advertisement 'She's breaking the fourth wall, speaking beyond the court,' said Melissa Murray, a law professor at New York University. 'She is alarmed at what the court is doing and is sounding that in a different register, one that is less concerned with the appearance of collegiality and more concerned with how the court appears to the public.' Her slashing critiques sometimes seemed to test her colleagues' patience, culminating in an uncharacteristic rebuke from Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the case arising from Trump's effort to ban birthright citizenship. In that case, the majority sharply limited the power of district court judges to block presidential orders, even if they are patently unconstitutional. Advertisement Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the principal dissent for the court's three-member liberal wing, including Jackson and Justice Elena Kagan. Jackson added her own dissent, speaking only for herself. She said the majority imperiled the rule of law, creating 'a zone of lawlessness within which the executive has the prerogative to take or leave the law as it wishes.' That prompted an extended response from Barrett, the next most junior justice and the author of the majority opinion. It did not stint on condescension. 'We will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries' worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself,' Barrett wrote, in an opinion signed by all five of the other Republican appointees. 'The principal dissent focuses on conventional legal terrain,' Barrett went on, referring to Sotomayor's opinion. 'Justice Jackson, however, chooses a startling line of attack that is tethered neither to these sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever.' Just months ago, Barrett was the target of ugly criticism from the right for minor deviations from Trump's legal agenda, with some of his allies calling her 'a DEI hire,' suggesting she had been chosen only for her gender. But the president's supporters were delighted by her criticism of Jackson, with some crowing that their earlier attacks on Barrett had succeeded. 'Sometimes feeling the heat helps people see the light,' Mike Davis, a right-wing legal activist with close ties to the Trump administration, told NBC News. Advertisement Murray said she suspected that Barrett's remarks were part of a larger agenda intended to silence a critic. 'It was incredibly dismissive,' she said. 'And I just wonder if it wasn't just about this case, but rather about these asides that Justice Jackson has been leavening into her dissents.' Jackson was appointed by President Biden, fulfilling a campaign promise to name the first Black woman to the court. A graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School, she served as a law clerk to Justice Stephen Breyer and succeeded him. Biden had also appointed her to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, where she served for a year. The bulk of Jackson's judicial experience came in her eight years as a federal trial judge in Washington. Among her notable decisions there were ones blocking the first Trump administration's attempts to fast-track deportations, to cut short grants for teen pregnancy prevention, and to shield a former White House counsel from testifying before Congress. Jackson adjusted quickly to the Supreme Court. Other justices have said it took them years to get the hang of things. 'I was frightened to death for the first three years,' Breyer said in a 2006 interview. Even Justice Louis D. Brandeis, a giant of the law who sat on the court from 1916 to 1939, needed time to find his footing. 'So extraordinary an intellect as Brandeis said it took him four or five years to feel that he understood the jurisprudential problems of the court,' Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote of his friend and mentor. Jackson has appeared comfortable expressing herself from the start. Advertisement She has been particularly active in filing concurring opinions — ones that agree with the majority's bottom line but offer additional comments or different reasoning. Indeed, she has issued such opinions at the highest rate of any member of the court since at least 1937, according to data compiled and analyzed by Lee Epstein and Andrew D. Martin, both of Washington University in St. Louis, and Michael J. Nelson of Penn State. She has also been active in dissent. Chief Justice John Roberts did not write his first solo dissent in an argued case until 16 years into his tenure. Jackson issued three such dissents in her first term. Marin Levy, a law professor at Duke, said Jackson had been doing two things in her dissents. 'The first category concerns standard disagreements on the merits,' Levy said. 'The second category feels quite different — I think here we see dissents in which Justice Jackson is trying to raise the alarm. Whether she is writing for the public or a future court, she is making a larger point about what she sees as not just the errors of the majority's position but the dangers of it as well.' Jackson, who did not respond to a request for comment, has also been a harsh critic of the court's use of truncated procedures in ruling on emergency applications. 'This fly-by-night approach to the work of the Supreme Court is not only misguided,' she wrote in April, when the court said that Venezuelan men the administration was seeking to deport to El Salvador had sued in the wrong court. 'It is also dangerous.' In a dissent from an emergency ruling in June granting Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency access to sensitive Social Security data, Jackson accused the majority of giving Trump favored treatment. 'What would be an extraordinary request for everyone else,' she wrote, 'is nothing more than an ordinary day on the docket for this administration.' Advertisement When the court let Trump lift humanitarian parole protections for more than 500,000 migrants in May, Jackson wrote that the majority had 'plainly botched' the analysis, 'rendering constraints of law irrelevant and unleashing devastation.' Jackson and Sotomayor are the only members of the court who have served as trial judges. In the last term, Jackson repeatedly criticized the majority for undermining the authority of their colleagues on the front lines. In the dissent that prompted Barrett's rebuke, she decried the majority's 'dismissive treatment of the solemn duties and responsibilities of the lower courts.' Last year, in a dissent in a public corruption case, Jackson seemed to allude to revelations by ProPublica and others that Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito had failed to disclose luxury travel provided to them by billionaire benefactors, a strikingly critical swipe on a sensitive topic. 'Officials who use their public positions for private gain threaten the integrity of our most important institutions,' she wrote. 'Greed makes governments — at every level — less responsive, less efficient and less trustworthy from the perspective of the communities they serve.' This article originally appeared in
