Wealth edition 26-May-2025 to june-1-2025
Live Events
Know your fund
Asset allocation funds came into the limelight when the equity market turned sour towards the end of last year. Amid a prolonged market slump lasting over six months, the primary task for these funds was to cushion the downside. Now, as the market rebounds, these funds have had a chance to prove their mettle. So did your multi-asset fund or dynamic asset allocation fund do its job?The sharp correction in the broader market since October last year tested many investors ' nerves. The BSE 500 index fell nearly 21% by 7 April 2025 from its 27 September 2024 peak. It has since recovered, and now hovers 8% off its previous high. Asset allocation funds as a basket have fared better, but most were not completely immune to value erosion. During this period, multiasset allocation funds saw an average NAV decline of 6.7%, while dynamic asset allocation funds recorded a drop of 8.5%.There were some outliers in this space. Among the multi -asset funds that averted a drawdown were Edelweiss Multi Asset Allocation, WhiteOak Capital Multi Asset Allocation and Franklin India Multi Asset Solution Fund of Funds. A few others like Quantum Multi Asset Fund of Funds , HDFC Multi-Asset Active FoF, ICICI Prudential Asset Allocator Fund, among others, managed to limit the downside. Parag Parikh Dynamic Asset Allocation was the only scheme from the dynamic asset allocation basket to deliver a positive return in this period. However, many like DSP Dynamic Asset Allocation, Franklin India Balanced Advantage and SBI Balanced Advantage cushioned the downside well.A closer look at the asset allocation patterns of these funds reveals why they could hold their ground so well. Not surprisingly, the funds that averted a drawdown had among the lowest exposure to equities. In a category populated by funds taking a distinct equity slant, it was the funds that practiced a prudent asset allocation approach that kept investors in the game.Sizeable gold allocation in a few funds also helped prop up returns further. Rajani Tandale, Senior Vice President, Mutual Fund at 1 Finance, asserts, 'During downturns, these funds typically benefit from bond and gold exposure, which help offset equity losses.'On the flip side, several funds saw sharp drawdowns during this period, including Motilal Oswal Balanced Advantage, Motilal Oswal Multi Asset, HSBC Multi Asset Allocation and Quant Dynamic Asset Allocation. Some of these are aggressive by nature. These do not necessarily cater to the risk profile of investors that asset allocation funds typically attract. The equity tilt in some funds allows them to retain favourable tax treatment, but risk rises. Tandale says, 'Since October 2024, funds with higher allocations to bonds or gold likely cushioned losses more effectively. In contrast, equity heavy portfolios experienced sharper declines but also stronger rebounds.'Bhavana Acharya, Co-founder, Primeinvestor.in, observes that the risk in some funds emanates from higher exposure to the broader market. 'Individual stocks fell much more than the index during the correction. Funds holding these names got hit far more despite having sizeable allocation to fixed income,' Acharya says. For instance, Motilal Oswal Balanced Advantage and Motilal Oswal Multi Asset had 60% and 50% allocation, respectively, to mid- and small caps at the end of September 2024.This increased further to 73% and 59% by December end. Samco Dynamic Asset Allocation, HSBC Multi Asset Allocation and Shriram Multi Asset Allocation also ran high allocation to mid- and small-caps, hurting returns amid the market crash. Many of these affected funds did not hedge their equity allocation or did so modestly.Samco Dynamic Asset Allocation, Motilal Oswal Multi Asset, Quant Dynamic Asset Allocation and Shriram Multi Asset Allocation, among others, had marginal or no hedging of existing equity positions at September-end. Samco MF's offering raised its hedged positions only later. At the other end, Edelweiss Multi Asset Allocation's fully hedged exposure to equities helped it stave off a drawdown.The choice of funds in this space is critical to your investing experience. In turbulent phases, an asset allocation fund truly serves its purpose if it allows you to keep your cool and not throw in the towel. It gives you the comfort of staying invested even during the tough times. By retaining your invested money, it provides you the platform to continue wealth creation irrespective of the market's vagaries.It is a good idea to look under the hood, insist experts. Acharya remarks, 'The asset allocation construct sounds appealing but what funds do within the portfolio is important. Not all asset allocation funds have the ability to contain downside. Some are more aggressive than others. Investors must know how the fund approaches asset allocation to know if it aligns with their expectations.'Given the role these funds play in the portfolio, experts reckon it is better to opt for funds adopting a moderate-toconservative stance. Avoid chasing returns in this category. Funds that emphasise on risk construct, rather than offering an edge in returns, should be your pick.Kaustubh Belapurkar, Director, Fund Research, Morningstar India, asserts, 'We prefer strategies that take graded exposure to underlying asset classes, that moves within a narrow band. Funds moving from 20% to 80% in equities are essentially trying to time the market, which can deliver lumpier returns.' He emphasises that oscillating equity exposure may not always work in the funds' favour. 'If the fund model doesn't pull equity allocation back when market recovers, it can hurt the fund performance, erasing gains on the downside,' Belapurkar adds.Tandale reckons asset allocation is highly personal and cannot be generalised. Instead of relying entirely on a single fund, investors may be better served by creating their own allocation using low-cost index equity funds, debt funds, and gold ETFs. 'This approach offers greater transparency, better control, and often lower expense ratios than packaged multiasset or balanced advantage funds, which may not suit every investor's profile or goals,' she argues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Only 1 in 3 new-age IPOs beat market: Study
Representational Image BENGALURU: A five-year analysis of 25 venture capital and private equity-backed new-age companies that listed in India between May 2020 and June 2025 showed that sustained market outperformance has been rare. A whitepaper by wealth management firm Client Associates found that only 36% of IPO investors, roughly one in three, generated positive alpha over the BSE 500. The success rate was 32% for post-IPO investors, while 43% of pre-IPO investors outperformed the benchmark. While these companies often saw heavy oversubscription, with average subscription of 48.5 times, and 68% delivering first-day listing gains that averaged 24.1%, many failed to maintain those gains over time. Companies such as Zomato, Nazara Technologies and Ixigo consistently outperformed, while others saw sharp declines in value post-listing. IPO frenzy Pre-IPO investors achieved the best risk-adjusted returns when exiting at the six-month lock-in expiry, with 52% of companies delivering positive alpha at that stage, compared to 38% for those who stayed invested longer. A group of 10 IPOs that had high retail demand in the unlisted market performed worse than the rest. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Online Skin Care Consultation - Learn More AskLayers Learn More Undo For pre-IPO investors, average returns at the six-month lock-in expiry were -5%, compared with +45% for other listings. IPO investors in this subset saw -6% alpha, while post-IPO investors faced -25% alpha. The study found no consistent pattern between IPO performance and the proportion of shares sold via offer for sale (OFS) versus primary issuance. High-OFS listings such as Ixigo performed strongly, while some primary-heavy IPOs, including Ola Electric and Mobikwik, were among the weakest. According to Client Associates, the exuberance of the 2020-2021 phase, marked by abundant liquidity and growth-focused narratives, has given way to a more disciplined market in 2024-2025, where profitability, cash flow generation and capital efficiency are key investor benchmarks. The report advised selective exposure to high-quality listed new-age companies, tactical IPO participation for listing gains, avoiding retail-driven unlisted market hype and using professional fund managers for private market allocations. "India's startup IPO boom was driven more by narrative than numbers. Our analysis shows that while listing gains rewarded early risk-takers, sustained outperformance was reserved for companies built on solid fundamentals, not hype. Capital efficient growth, profitability, and business discipline are what drive long-term value," Nitin Aggarwal, director, Investment Research and Advisory, Client Associates, said. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
Mint
3 days ago
- Mint
Cash Burnt! Two-third of new-age IPOs failed to beat market benchmarks, shows study
An analysis of 25 venture capital and private equity-backed 'new-age' Indian companies that went public between May 2020 and June 2025 paints a less-than-rosy picture: only about one-third have consistently outperformed the market. As per a white paper by Client Associates, only 36 per cent of IPO investors and 32 per cent of post-listing investors managed to generate positive alpha over the BSE 500 index. Pre-IPO investors saw comparatively better results, with 43 per cent achieving gains — but mainly when they exited at the right time. Those who sold soon after the mandatory six-month lock-in period typically enjoyed the highest returns, while long-term holders often faced lower or even negative returns. 'The study concludes that while new-age IPOs created substantial excitement and short-term gains, the risk-adjusted returns for retail investors, particularly in the unlisted market, remain questionable when compared to diversified fund-based approaches or established listed alternatives,' the report said. Although strong subscription demand was a frequent trend, the report notes that most listing gains failed to hold over time. Leading performers like Ixigo (Le Travenues Technology), Zomato (now Eternal), Nazara Technologies, and PolicyBazaar showcased clear paths to profitability alongside steady revenue growth and improving margins. In contrast, laggards such as Ola Electric, Paytm, Mobikwik, and FirstCry struggled due to capital-intensive business models, inflated valuations, or challenges in maintaining market share. 'High-profile IPOs such as Paytm and Ola Electric have failed to live up to the hype and have not delivered returns to their investors, due to factors ranging from overvalued IPOs to loss of market share to listed peers post-listing,' the report added. Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 days ago
- Business Standard
Less than one-third of new-age Indian IPOs beat market benchmarks: Report
India's 25 venture capital and private equity backed 'new-age' companies, that listed between May 2020 and June 2025, reveals a sobering reality behind the hype: barely a third have delivered sustained outperformance against the market. According to the white paper by Client Associates, only 36 per cent of IPO investors and 32 per cent of post-listing investors generated positive alpha over the BSE 500 index. Pre-IPO investors fared slightly better at 43 per cent, but only if they timed exits well. Those who sold at the mandatory six-month lock-in expiry window often reaped the highest returns versus much lower or even negative returns for long-term holders. While strong subscription demand was common, the report finds that most listing gains proved unsustainable. 'The study concludes that while new-age IPOs created substantial excitement and short-term gains, the risk-adjusted returns for retail investors, particularly in the unlisted market, remain questionable when compared to diversified fund-based approaches or established listed alternatives,' the white paper by Client Associates noted. Top performers such as Ixigo (Le Travenues Technology), Zomato (now Eternal), Nazara Technologies and PolicyBazaar combined clear profitability paths with revenue scaling and margin expansion Underperformers including Ola Electric, Paytm, Mobikwik and FirstCry were often dragged down by capital-heavy models, overvaluation, or inability to defend market share. Sector Trends Technology-enabled platforms with network effects or asset-light models typically delivered better post-listing returns. By contrast, capital-intensive businesses without sustainable unit economics destroyed substantial shareholder value after debut. Retail Frenzy Underperforms A subset of 10 'retail frenzy' stocks, actively traded in pre-IPO secondary markets, badly lagged the benchmark. In this group, IPO investors earned just 2 per cent, and post-IPO investors lost 16 per cent on average, with deep negative alpha.
