Can I get an extension if I can't file taxes by April 15?
(NEXSTAR) – There are only a few days left to gather your documents, calm your nerves and hope for a good tax refund – but if you already know you're unlikely to make the deadline, here's how you can get an extension.
The last day to file in 2025 for most people is Tuesday, April 15, but the Internal Revenue Service has a tax deadline extension for those who need a few extra months.
If you're planning on pushing back your filing date, you can get an automatic six-month extension using the IRS' Form 4868, just make sure to do it before the April tax deadline to avoid late-filling penalties.
Your new deadline will be Oct. 15 2025, but the IRS could make an exception and push it back even further for taxpayers living out of the country.
What to know about filing for an extension
Filing for an extension can now easily be done online – you can use IRS Direct Pay; the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System; or pay with a credit, debit card or digital wallet – but there are some things to keep in mind before hitting snooze on your 2024 tax return.
One key consideration is that the extension is for the paperwork, not the payment. You'll still need to estimate your tax liability and pay by April 18, using the same form. The IRS reminds taxpayers looking for an extension that they should pay on time, even if they can't give the full amount, to reduce possible penalties.
Where does your neighborhood rank among the 2025 'Best Places to Live'?
The penalty for filing after the due date (including any extensions) is generally 5% per month, or part of a month, that the return is late. The maximum penalty is 25%, and taxpayers who are more than 60 days tardy will face a minimum penalty of $510 or the tax balance due, whichever is smaller.
'You might not owe the penalty if you have a reasonable explanation for filing late,' the IRS advises. 'Attach a statement to your return fully explaining your reason for filing late.'
There is also a penalty for late payments, which is usually .5% per late month, with a maximum of 25%. Interest on the late payments, currently 7% for the first half of 2025, is compounded on a daily basis.
While interest must be paid on outstanding taxes, you may be able to avoid the late payment penalty if you can show reasonable cause by meeting both of these requirements:
At least 90% of the total tax on your 2024 return is paid on or
before the regular due date of your return through withholding,
estimated tax payments, or payments made with Form 4868.
The remaining balance is paid with your return
The IRS says it will work with those people unable to make full payments, and most people can set up a payment plan.
Finally, you can request that the IRS delay the collection process if your financial hardship is so great that you can't make payments. The IRS warns that penalties and interest will still be charged during the collection delay, so one's debt will still grow until it is fully paid. The agency also reserves the right to review one's ability to pay and even to file a tax lien.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Sharing an inherited house with your siblings? It can get complicated
Dear Liz: My husband's parents, who are 88 and 93, respectively, have decided to leave their house, worth $800,000, equally, to their three children, who are all in their sixties. The children get along well and all decisions will be made as a group. None of the adult children can afford to buy out the other two, and the three adults and their families cannot all live in the house at once. Everyone would like to keep the home, which is paid for, in the family. What solutions exist for this situation? Where do we begin, and what questions do we need to ask, thinking into the next generation? Answer: Owning real estate with other people can be difficult, even when the individuals get along. Perhaps your generation can pull it off, but there's no guarantee the next one will. Let's say the time has come to replace the roof. How will the group decide how much to spend, and will everyone be equally willing to split that considerable cost? How might the dynamics change if one family is living in the home, but the others are expected to pay for repairs and maintenance? What happens if one inheritor later wants to sell, and the others still can't buy out that share? Keeping the family home can feel like an important legacy to offer to your children, but not if ownership creates strife that imperils family relationships. An experienced estate planning attorney can meet with you as a group and discuss the scenarios and legal documents you may need going forward. Dear Liz: When you're writing about required minimum distributions from retirement accounts, please make sure people know about qualified charitable distributions. Those of us lucky enough not to need the money can donate it directly from an IRA to the nonprofits of our choice. That way, we don't even have it in our income column, and there are no taxes. I am looking forward to making many qualified charitable distributions to my favorite nonprofits when I turn 73. Answer: You don't have to wait. Qualified charitable distributions from IRAs can start as early as age 70½. The distribution limit for 2025 is $108,000 per individual. If you're considering this option, please familiarize with the IRS rules for such distributions and consider consulting a tax pro. Dear Liz: I know you work to maximize people's money. I had a thought about the quality of life with Social Security. I took it at 65, which was then full retirement age. I was fully employed and did not need it to live. However, the extra money allowed us the opportunity to travel to all seven continents, help our kids with debts and down payments, and generally enjoy things with the extra cash. Now the full retirement age is 67, so there are fewer years between full retirement age and when benefits max out at 70. But the difference could still be enough for that motor home or world cruise. Answer: All financial planning requires a balance between current and future spending. If you spend too much in the early years, you may not have enough to make it through the later ones. Retirement planning is further complicated by the fact that we don't know how long we'll live or how our health will hold up. We can delay spending so long that we're no longer able to do the things we want to do, such as travel. Still, the fact remains that when one spouse dies, one Social Security check goes away. That can lead to a devastating drop in income for the survivor. Because the survivor receives the larger of the two benefits, and may have to live on that amount for years, it almost always makes sense for the higher earner to delay filing as long as possible. Liz Weston, Certified Financial Planner, is a personal finance columnist. Questions may be sent to her at 3940 Laurel Canyon, No. 238, Studio City, CA 91604, or by using the 'Contact' form at
New York Post
10 hours ago
- New York Post
Elon Musk body-checked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent ‘like a rugby player' during fiery clash at White House: report
Elon Musk aggressively body-checked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in the White House after being called a fraud – igniting a fiery clash that sparked the billionaire's messy falling-out with President Trump, a new report claims. The heated scuffle broke out in mid-April after both men pitched rival plans for the Internal Revenue Service to Trump in the Oval Office, with the president ultimately backing Bessent's choice, the Washington Post quoted former White House official Steven Bannon as saying. The pair left the meeting hurling insults at each other within earshot of the president's office, Bannon told the outlet. Advertisement 3 Elon Musk reportedly hurled his body into Scott Bessent's rib cage during a heated scuffle in the White House. Getty Images 'Scott said, 'You're a fraud. You're a total fraud,'' Bannon said, referencing the-then Department of Government Efficiency honcho's attempt to slash $1 trillion in federal spending. The verbal spat turned allegedly physical when the world's richest man rammed his shoulder into Bessent's rib cage 'like a rugby player,' prompting the treasury chief to fight back, the paper said Bannon claimed. Advertisement Bannon told the outlet it took multiple people to break up the playground tussle, before the SpaceX and Tesla founder was quickly removed from the West Wing. 'President Trump heard about it and said, 'This is too much,'' said Bannon, who has long been critical of Musk and his involvement in Trump's campaign and presidency. 3 The fiery clash started when Bessent called Musk a 'fraud.' Francis Chung/UPI/Shutterstock The latest details on Musk's dramatic White House exit emerged just days after the X owner went on a multi-day social media rampage against the commander in chief over his support of the 'big, beautiful' bill making its way through Congress. Advertisement Their breakup has unfolded in real time on social media and escalated after Trump told reporters in the Oval Office Thursday that he was 'disappointed' in the ex-DOGE chief, noting, 'I've helped Elon a lot.' 3 The latest details on Musk's dramatic White House exit emerged just days after the X owner went on a multi-day social media spiral against Trump. FRANCIS CHUNG/POOL/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Musk proceeded to lash out against the president, accusing the Trump administration of withholding documents related to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein because the president would be mentioned in them. Trump charged that Musk has gone 'crazy' and threatened to cancel the 'Billions and Billions' of dollars in contracts and subsidies the entrepreneur receives from the federal government. Advertisement Bannon also demanded a federal investigation into Musk's immigration status, pressing that he should be deported 'immediately.' Musk, who hails from South Africa, is an American citizen, according to reports. The White House and Treasury Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Reps for Musk couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
Miami Herald
20 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Social Security garnishments spark alarm
Hundreds of thousands of Social Security recipients were jolted recently by notices warning that their benefits would be reduced starting in June. The reason? Delinquent federal student loans. However, in a last-minute reversal, the Trump administration announced a pause on the garnishment of Social Security checks for borrowers in default. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The initial warnings, issued by the Departments of Education and Treasury, triggered widespread concern among older Americans, especially those already living on fixed incomes. While the temporary suspension may offer short-term relief, it does little to clarify the long-term picture or ease the financial vulnerability of retirees with government debt. Tania Melnyczuk on Unsplash According to Elaine Floyd, director of retirement and life planning at Horsesmouth, garnishment of Social Security and other federal retirement benefits is authorized under the Treasury Offset Program for several types of unpaid federal debts: Unpaid federal student loans: "If you've defaulted on your federal student loans, the government can garnish up to 15% of your monthly Social Security payment without giving you a court hearing or additional warnings," said Floyd. "They must leave you with at least $750 per month. For example, if your benefit is $3,000 per month, they can take $450 (15%). If your benefit is $800 per month, they can take no more than $50, ensuring that you can keep at least $750."Unpaid federal taxes: Garnishments for back taxes are handled under the Federal Payment Levy Program (FPLP) and continue until the debt is paid in full. "The $750 protection applied to other loans does not apply to federal income tax debts," Floyd said. "A court order is not required." While the IRS typically sends multiple warning letters, retirement, disability, and survivor benefits remain subject to garnishment-though Supplemental Security Income (SSI), lump-sum death payments, and children's benefits are obligations: "For child support or alimony, the Consumer Credit Protection Act (CCPA) limits garnishment of Social Security benefits to a maximum of 50% if you're supporting a spouse or child other than the one covered by the court order," said Floyd. "If you are not supporting another spouse or child, the limit is 60%. Additionally, if the support is 12 or more weeks in arrears, an additional 5% can be garnished." Floyd emphasized that the Social Security Administration (SSA) cannot reverse garnishment once it begins. "It is therefore preferable to work out debt repayment arrangements directly with the creditor in question before garnishment of Social Security starts." Options may include installment agreements or offers in compromise with the IRS. "Even though taxes would still be owed, taking such measures would forestall garnishment by the IRS." She said settlement, rehabilitation, or consolidation could be considered for student loans in default. "Obviously, debt management and repayment options are varied and complex." She warned that bankruptcy typically is not a solution. "Taxes, federal student loans, and child support - the very loans Social Security can be garnished for - may not be discharged in bankruptcy." Related: How the IRS taxes Social Security income in retirement In January, the average monthly Social Security retirement benefit was estimated to be $1,976, and 68 million Americans received Social Security benefits, and 7.5 million received Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. Heather Schreiber, founder of HLS Retirement Consulting, said most people are unaware of the history and scope of the Treasury Offset Program. "Most consumers are unaware of the history of the Treasury Offset Program," she said. "It was created back in 1996 under then-President Clinton and had wide bipartisan support." She explained that the program was designed to collect delinquent debts such as federal student loans, unpaid federal and state taxes, child support, and SSA overpayments by intercepting federal payments like tax refunds, Social Security and Railroad Retirement benefits (capped at 15%), and federal unemployment compensation. Schreiber noted that when the program was suspended in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some may have assumed it was permanently repealed. "I'm sure many believed (if they were aware that the TOP program existed) that the program was permanently repealed." Its reinstatement, she said, is happening amid a wave of financial challenges for retirees. "Combine its reinstatement with all the other news - of inflation, retirees' concerns about being able to survive in retirement, reinstatement of a quick 100% now down to 50% overpayment recovery rate, the solvency issue that could result in benefit cuts across the board, and now a potential cut to benefits for those who have defaulted on student loans," said Schreiber. "It's a Molotov cocktail that only heightens concerns on an already fearful retired population who is struggling." Related: Social Security income tax deduction clears critical hurdle She welcomed the pause. "So, I am certainly glad that the Department of Education put this on hold before it came out of the gate," Schreiber said. "All the more reason that consumers planning for retirement should find a knowledgeable adviser to help them better plan for and navigate the road to and through retirement." Jim Blankenship, a certified financial planner with Blankenship Financial Planning, said options for those already facing garnishment are limited. "Unfortunately, this situation doesn't come with many escape options," he said. Blankenship said the usual advice - reduce expenses, increase income, or sell possessions - often falls flat for those living on Social Security alone. "The age-old advice of 'reduce expenses,' 'find additional sources of income,' or 'sell some possessions' becomes hollow when the expenses are mostly fixed, taking on employment at a late age is not desired, and there are no possessions to sell," he said. Blankenship stressed that the debt must be dealt with directly. "The loan and the payment aren't going to go away - so reducing that outflow is not an answer," he said. "Realize that you're in a position where you must make hard choices about prioritizing things - housing, food, and medical expenses should come first, and literally everything else is up for debate." Related: Medicare recipients face a growing problem Solutions might include downsizing, renting out part of one's home, or seeking part-time work. "Some level of employment doesn't have to be out of the question, and many businesses are clamoring for employees these days." He encouraged a detailed review of all expenses. "If there are any extras in your month-to-month outflow of expenses that can be reduced, now is the time to do it," said Blankenship. That includes discretionary spending like dining out, entertainment, and subscriptions. "You may have to cut down on your regular coffee klatch, or dining out. Review your cell phone plan, review monthly subscriptions (including streaming services and the like) to see if there are reductions that can be made. Review insurance coverage - maybe increase your deductibles, if that would have an appreciable reduction in your premiums." Got questions about retirement, email The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
