Cruelty claims at Skye House children's unit 'must lead to change'
A BBC documentary on alleged cruelty in a children's psychiatric unit "must and will lead to improvements", a government minister has pledged. Patients who were teenagers when they were admitted to Skye House, a specialist NHS unit in Glasgow, told BBC Disclosure about a culture of cruelty among nursing staff.Maree Todd, minister for mental wellbeing, told the Scottish Parliament she was treating the issues raised in the documentary "with the utmost seriousness".Government ministers will meet leaders of all health boards with child and adolescent mental health units on Wednesday.
Programme-makers spoke to 28 former patients, some of whom had been detained under the mental health act, while making BBC Disclosure's Kids on The Psychiatric Ward documentary.One said the 24-bed psychiatric hospital, which sits in the grounds of Glasgow's Stobhill hospital, was like "hell".
Conduct 'fell below basic decency'
Skye House, which opened in 2009, accepts children aged 12 to 18 who are usually at crisis point.Most are detained under the Mental Health Act, which means they cannot leave until doctors decide they are fit to be discharged.The BBC began investigating after one young patient reported her treatment at the unit.Many other cases soon came to light.Speaking at Holyrood, Todd said the culture depicted in the documentary was "disturbing" and the conduct of some staff fell far below "basic standards of decency and compassion". "I treat the issues raised in the documentary with the utmost seriousness," she said. "It must, and will, result in improvements."But she said NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde had assured her that issues raised had been dealt with, standards had already improved and internal and external reviews had been commissioned. She added: "I will carefully scrutinise both of these reviews as soon as they come out and expected Greater Glasgow and Clyde to act immediately on any recommendations for improvement."I will also be asking about the governance arrangement in place to make sure that this can never happen again."
Responding to a question from Conservative health spokesman Sandesh Gulhane about who had been held to account for the incidents at Skye House, Todd said improvements had already been made at Skye House."What I heard in the programme has shocked me and has put in place a sequence of events that will give myself and others in this chamber assurance that the situation has changed since the time period of the programme," she added. Tory Meghan Gallacher said individual cases were "critical for shining a light on the lack of action taken by staff, the NHS and the Scottish government. "The Scottish government didn't find about this through the BBC documentary, they had known for years," she said.She added that one of her constituents had been contacting the government about the way her daughter was treated since 2023."I've no idea how the minister can stand here today and pretend to be shocked because she's known about this for years."Todd said ministers received a "huge amount of correspondence daily" and letters about medical cases were normally referred to their health board. NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde previously said a review of medication was carried out in 2023 and this changed the way medication was administered.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Warning over TikTok filming by hospital patients
Patients who film their own medical treatment for TikTok or Instagram could be putting themselves and NHS staff at risk, the Society of Radiographers (SoR) has warned. The trade union's annual conference heard that more patients were videoing their procedures on mobile phones, often without asking permission. This could distract staff or make them feel uncomfortable and anxious, the society material on social media also risks publicising the private medical data of other people who may be in the same room or area of the hospital. "I had one patient whose relative started filming while I was trying to set up," said Ashley d'Aquino, a therapeutic radiographer from London. "It wasn't the right time - I was trying to focus on delivering the treatment."Ms d'Aquino, who is also a local union representative, said she had recently been contacted by other colleagues in a similar situation. "We had a member of staff who agreed to take photos for a patient," she said. "When the patient handed over her phone, the member of staff saw that the patient had also been covertly recording her, to publish on her cancer blog." Most NHS staff wear identity badges and their names and job titles may be visible on videos posted online. The union said another of its members, a department assistant from the south coast of England, was inserting a cannula as part of a cancer procedure, when the patient's 19-year old daughter started filming on her phone. "She thought it would be entertaining on social media but she didn't ask permission," said the member of staff. "I spent the weekend afterwards worrying: did I do my job properly? I know I did, but no-one's perfect all of the time," she added."I don't think I slept for the whole weekend." NHS 'needs policies' Ms d'Aquino said there were valid reasons for patients to record the audio of medical consultations - so they could listen back to the detail, for example. "The difficulty is that our phones have become so much a part of our day-to-day life that recording and sharing has become second nature," she added. Dean Rogers, the director of strategy at the SoR, is calling for NHS trusts to have clear policies in place that stop patients from filming without permission."As healthcare professionals, we need to think: does that recording breach the confidentiality of other patients? Does it breach our ability to deliver care?" he said."There are hospital trusts that have very good policies around patients taking photos and filming procedures but this is something all trusts need to have in place."Prof Meghana Pandit, co-national medical director at NHS England, said it was vital that, if patients want to record any part of NHS care, they discuss it with staff first and it remains for their personal use only."Recording other patients inadvertently and without their permission risks breaching patient confidentiality – the information and treatment provided to other patients on NHS premises should never be recorded, let alone posted to social media," she added.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
More than two thirds of cancer patients waiting over TWO MONTHS to start treatment in parts of England - how does YOUR area fare?
England's 'deadly' cancer treatment postcode lottery was today laid bare in a damning analysis revealing where patients are having to wait months for care. More than two thirds (69 per cent) of patients at Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust in Cambridgeshire had to wait over 62 days to start treatment for their disease after an urgent referral from their GP in April. This was more than double the proportion waiting too long for cancer treatment nationally. By comparison, NHS guidelines state that 85 per cent of patients should start treatments like surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, within two months. Senior cancer doctors said the data highlights the 'frightening truth' that too many patients were experiencing fatal delays. Prompt treatment for cancer is considered critical, with every four weeks a patient is forced to wait, linked to a 10 per cent increase chance of death. Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust ranked second worst in the nation for speedy cancer treatment, with more than half (55 per cent) of patients having to wait at least two months. Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust followed, at 51 per cent of patients and Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust with 48 per cent of patients waiting too long. Joint fifth were Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust in Essex, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. A total of 47 per cent of cancer patients referred by their family doctor for signs of the disease had to wait too long to start treatment at these trusts. Nationally, around one in three cancer patients (30.1 per cent), over 8,000 people, had to wait over two months to start treatment. Reacting to the data top oncologist and co-founder of the Catch Up With Cancer campaign, Professor Pat Price, said: 'This data shows the frightening truth that a third of patients following an urgent GP cancer referral do not get their treatment on time. 'These deadly delays show that the Government needs to urgently invest in cancer treatments.' She added: 'It is still the case that there is a deadly postcode lottery when it comes to cancer treatments. 'For instance, in radiotherapy, despite some investment last year, around half of the cancer treatment machines for radiotherapy are spiralling towards their expiration date.' Despite the NHS target of 85 per cent, this goal hasn't been met since 2015. Rapid access to cancer treatment can boost patient survival as it reduces the chances of a tumour growing larger—which requires more extensive treatment— or the disease spreading to other parts of the body, a far more serious stage. At the opposite end of the scale, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust recorded the highest adherence to the target with 96 per cent of cancer patients starting treatment within two months. This was followed by Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust which saw 92 per cent of cancer patients within the 62-day target. Both trusts are specialty hospitals meaning they will generally see fewer cancer patients than a normal NHS trust. The analysis was carried out by medical negligence law firm Patient Claim Line. The firm's senior litigation executive Michael Blakemore-Carson suggested delays could be devastating to patients and potentially costly to the NHS. 'If you have experienced delayed treatment, you could be entitled to make a claim for compensation,' he said. A Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust spokesperson said: We are sorry that too many cancer patients are waiting longer than they should. 'We are working collaboratively internally and with our partner hospitals to make sure referrals reach us earlier, so we can provide the very best, timely care.' A spokesperson for NHS Humber Health Partnerships, which represents Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust and Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, blamed the figures on rising cancer cases in the area. 'We are working hard to minimise delays to our patients who are waiting to start their cancer treatment, and I am sorry some people are waiting longer than we would like,' they said. 'However, we are seeing a striking growth in the number of referrals coming into our hospitals. To try to deal with this we are providing additional "one stop" sessions at weekends, thanks to the help of our medical, nursing and imaging staff.' Stephanie Lawton, chief operating officer at The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust also said the trust was working to reduce waiting times for cancer patients. 'We are focusing on initiatives including additional clinical triage of all patient referrals, further diagnostic and outpatient capacity, and a review of our external pathways to support patients requiring onward referral to specialist centres,' she said. 'In some services, we are working on "one-stop" diagnostic capacity, so patients have all their investigations in one visit.' Christine Blanshard, chief medical Officer for Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, also said they were working to make improvements. 'Our priority is to provide the highest possible quality of patient care, and we appreciate how difficult it is for anyone waiting for cancer treatment,' she said. 'We are implementing an improvement plan focused on rapidly reducing cancer diagnosis and treatments times.' Kirsten Major, Chief Executive, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust said: Reducing the time patients wait for cancer treatment is a top priority and whilst we have more work to do, we have already reduced the wait time by five days following focused work to increase both staffing and capacity over the past year.' Other NHS data shows other cancer targets are struggling to meet ministers' ambitions. The Government has target that by March 2026, 80 per cent of all urgent cancer referrals should be either diagnosed or ruled out within 28 days. But the latest figures show this was only true for 76.7 per cent of patients in April, down from 78.9 per cent in March. Both figures are above the current target of 75 per cent of patients being told they have disease or have it ruled out within this time frame. Another target, that cancer patients should only wait a month from a decision to treat their cancer to starting that treatment was also missed. The NHS only managed to treat 91.3 per cent of cancer patients within 31 days. The target is 96 per cent. Oncologists—doctors who specialise in cancer care—have previously described the continuing failure for the NHS to meet its cancer treatment targets as a 'heartbreaking disaster'. Almost 400,000 cancer cases are diagnosed across the UK each year, with almost 170,000 deaths from the disease recorded per annum. Nearly half of all Britons—45 per cent of men and 43 per cent of women—are expected to be diagnosed with some form of cancer during their lifetime.
South Wales Argus
4 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Poll suggests support for better end-of-life care over assisted dying Bill
The polling, commissioned by a group opposed to assisted dying being legalised, 'blows apart the arguments that the public are desperate' for a change in the law, a campaigner claimed. Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater said last week that MPs should not have to choose between supporting assisted dying or palliative care as it is not an 'either/or' conversation for dying people. She said palliative care and assisted dying 'can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days', and urged MPs to support 'all options available to terminally ill people'. An amendment to the Bill, requiring the Health Secretary to publish an assessment of the availability, quality and distribution of palliative and end-of-life care one year after the Bill passing into law, could be voted on on Friday. Friday is also set to be the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill's third reading stage, which is likely to see the overall Bill voted on for the first time since November's historic yes vote, when a majority of 55 supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales. The latest polling, commissioned by Care Not Killing and carried out by British Polling Council member Whitestone, saw 2,089 UK adults surveyed online between May 30 and June 1. Respondents, who are said to have been weighted to be a representative sample, were told of concerns raised by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists and the Association for Palliative Medicine about the Bill in its current form as well as opposition from disability campaigners. Campaigners gathered in Parliament Square earlier this month (James Manning/PA) In this context, they were asked about replacing the Bill with a plan to improve and invest in palliative care – to which 69% agreed, and about a Royal Commission being set up to consider and make recommendations for a holistic end-of-life and palliative care service – with which 61% agreed. Almost two thirds (65%) said the Government's priority should be sorting out palliative and social care before changing the law – down very slightly from 66% last year. Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing, said: 'This major new poll blows apart the arguments that the public are desperate for a so-called assisted dying law. 'The public want the Government and MPs to focus on fixing the NHS and palliative care which they know are broken. After all one in four Brits who would benefit from palliative care aren't currently receiving it, while in many places services are piecemeal, part-time or facing cuts.' Former prime minister Gordon Brown (Lucy North/PA) It comes as former prime minister Gordon Brown repeated his opposition to assisted dying. Writing in the Guardian, he said: 'It has become clear that whatever views people hold on the principle, passing the terminally ill adults (end of life) bill into law would privilege the legal right to assisted dying without guaranteeing anything approaching an equivalent right to high-quality palliative care for those close to death.' He said MP's personal preferences 'cannot be separated off from the duties they have as members of a community to ensure that the way we treat the dying reflects the values of a decent, compassionate country'. He added: 'That should mean upholding the role of the medical professions as care-givers, and exclusively care-givers; avoiding the possibility of private profiteering by legal-medical consortiums which might well commercialise assisted dying as a lucrative business; safeguarding vulnerable people about whose fate the royal medical colleges have all expressed concern; preventing unacceptable coercive pressures that can be brought to bear on disabled people, and those who are incapacitated or mentally stressed; and thus showing that as a society we value life above death.' Dozens of Labour MPs called for Friday's overall vote to be delayed, asking for more time to scrutinise a Bill they brand as 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. Writing to Commons leader Lucy Powell, they said: 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.' A Government spokesperson said: 'This Bill has been brought as a Private Members' Bill. The amount of time for debate is therefore a matter for the House.' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater is the sponsor of the Bill (Jordan Pettitt/PA) The Bill's sponsor, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, has repeatedly stated that her proposed legislation has been strengthened since it was first introduced last year, insisting it is subject to robust safeguards. Medical staff are among some of the MPs who back the Bill. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer voted in favour of the Bill last year, but said the Government remains neutral on the issue. Both Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood voted against.
