India's foreign policy transformed in last 10 Years: Harsh Vardhan Shringla
He reflected on his transition from diplomacy to politics, expressing gratitude to Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the nomination. Shringla shared his views on India's evolving global stature under the Modi government.
IANS: You've been nominated to the Rajya Sabha. What would you like to say about Prime Minister Modi?
Harsh Vardhan Shringla: I express my heartfelt gratitude to him for entrusting me with such a huge responsibility. I have had a 40-year-long career in diplomacy, and now I look forward to serving the people of this country through Parliament. I am deeply thankful to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi for this honour.
IANS: How did you come to know about your nomination?
Harsh Vardhan Shringla: The official gazette notification had come out. But before that, Prime Minister Modi personally called me. He didn't mention what exactly it would be—just that something significant was going to happen and that I would get an opportunity to serve the nation. I never imagined that he would call me himself. During my time as Foreign Secretary and Ambassador to the US, I had the opportunity to work closely under his leadership. But it felt special and humbling that he took the time to make that personal call.
IANS: What's your view on India's foreign policy under Prime Minister Modi?
Harsh Vardhan Shringla: If you look at how the world perceives India today compared to 10 years ago, the difference is massive. Today, India is seen with great respect. People around the globe recognise India's leadership in technology, innovation, and digital public infrastructure. Our contributions at the global level are now widely acknowledged. During the COVID-19 crisis, Prime Minister Modi initiated Vaccine Maitri, through which India supplied vaccines to many developing nations. There were countries that had their own vaccines but didn't share them due to domestic needs or financial concerns. India, on the other hand, rose above that and helped when the world needed it the most. Everywhere PM Modi goes, he is conferred with international honours. That in itself reflects India's growing stature. I recently visited countries like Kuwait, Algeria, and Bahrain as part of an all-party delegation after Operation Sindoor, and leaders in all these countries praised Prime Minister Modi and appreciated how strong our relationships with Gulf nations have become under his leadership.
IANS: Rahul Gandhi is the Leader of Opposition, but he frequently travels abroad. He is abroad even now. Your comments?
Harsh Vardhan Shringla: Going abroad is one thing, but going abroad and making negative remarks about your own country is quite another. The people of India do not appreciate such behaviour. Criticising the country on foreign soil is deeply unfortunate. During our recent delegations, even opposition leaders accompanied us and stood united for the country. But to raise doubts and speak against the nation—especially at such sensitive times—is not acceptable. After Operation Sindoor, multiple delegations went abroad and sent out a strong message: India stands united.
IANS: Rahul Gandhi has been demanding a debate on Operation Sindoor in Parliament and is calling it 'Narendra Surrender.' Your reaction?
Harsh Vardhan Shringla: Such statements are completely baseless. The world has seen how India asserted its strength. Within four days, our military conducted a successful operation with pinpoint accuracy—our BrahMos missiles struck nine terror bases with precision. Pakistan suffered heavy losses. In fact, it was Pakistan that reached out for a ceasefire. NSA Ajit Doval recently made a public statement confirming that there was no damage to Indian assets. Not even a single military installation was harmed. Satellite images clearly show how much damage was inflicted on Pakistani military sites. It was a decisive operation and an unquestionable victory for India.
IANS: The Opposition is targeting India's foreign policy while glorifying the Gandhi family's past diplomacy. What do you have to say?
Harsh Vardhan Shringla: When you have no substance, you resort to slogans and distractions. Speaking against your own country on international platforms is not only immature but also harmful. The public is watching. They can clearly see the kind of spectacle being created by the Congress. Under this government, the kind of national security challenges we used to face earlier no longer exist. There's a sense of confidence and respect that India commands globally now, and that's the result of strong and visionary leadership.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
27 minutes ago
- The Print
Legs hacked by Left supporters, how RS entrant Sadanandan's case played out in the courts
Sadanandan, a former SFI member, was attacked by several men in January 1994, years after he left the communist party for the RSS. Sadanandan lost both his legs in the attack near Kannur district's Thalassery. The police arrested 12 people, all of them with links to the Communist party. Eight were convicted, while four were acquitted due to the lack of evidence. Nearly a decade later, Sadanandan's nomination to Rajya Sabha is a reminder of Kerala's long history of political violence and revenge murders, most of which involve the CPIM and the BJP. Thiruvananthapuram: At a rally in the run-up to the 2016 Assembly polls, Prime Minister Modi held up the hand of the BJP candidate from Kannur's Koothuparambu constituency, C. Sadanandan Master, highlighting the 'brutality committed by the communists' in the State. According to court documents, the attackers also set off a bomb to create an atmosphere of terror in the area. Analysts say that almost three decades later, the BJP is trying to use Sadanandan's Rajya Sabha entry to highlight Kerala's history of political killings, especially in Kannur district. On Sunday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi described his life as an epitome of courage and refusal to bow to injustice. 'Violence and intimidation couldn't deter his spirit towards national development. His efforts as a teacher and social worker are also commendable,' the Prime Minister wrote on X. However, Joseph C. Mathew, a state-based political analyst, said: 'I don't think it's going to help the BJP in any way. They may try to create a parallel history and ideological base. They might have been victims of violence, but it was a local tussle and not for a larger cause,' Mathew said. Appeal for enhanced punishment turned down In 2014, Sadanandan approached the Kerala HC asking that the punishment for his attackers be increased, but the court turned it down in January this year, saying such an appeal could only be made by the state government. 'In light of the gravity of the offence committed, the sentence of seven years appears to be very light. However, the State, for reasons best known to them, has not filed an appeal,' the Kerala High Court observed while dismissing his appeal. However, the court enhanced the compensation payable by the eight convicted men from Rs 25,000 to Rs 50,000 each. Pronouncing the verdict, the Kerala High Court said the accused as well as the Marxist party workers were maintaining a hostile attitude towards Sadanandan since he left the party. Quoting the trial court's judgment, the High Court noted that Sadanandan, 'a charismatic and efficient leader, was making his mark in the locality, and his efforts helped in spreading and strengthening the roots of his party in the area,' which the rival party could not accept. Of the accused, some had previously worked closely with Sadanandan in the party. The Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Thalassery, sentenced the convicted to seven years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs 25,000. Though the convicted men approached the court challenging the verdict, their appeal was dismissed in 2013. The accused were found guilty under the charges of IPC section 143 (unlawful assembly), 147 (rioting), 342 (wrongful confinement), 326 (grievous hurt with dangerous weapons), and 307 (attempt to murder). 'The attack seems to have been premeditated and well planned. As noticed earlier and at the risk of repetition, it needs to be noted that not only had A1 to A8 hacked PW1 (Sadanandan) repeatedly leading to both his legs being severed, they also made sure that nobody approached PW1 to rescue/save him. This makes the offences all the more grave/severe,' the court observed. Attack and counter-attack Incidentally, Sadanandan's attack was followed by the murder of an SFI worker named K.V. Sudheesh in Kannur the same year. 'If I hadn't lost my legs, Sudheesh would not have died, that's the analysis. If you ask me if it's right, it's not when we think about humanity. But it was a normal reaction from the workers when they saw their district leader had been amputated. That might be the emotion behind Sudheesh's death,' Sadanandan later said in an interview given to local Malayalam TV channel Asianet News. As per court documents, one Janardhanan, a CPI(M) worker, was also attacked at Mattannur shortly after the attack, in which Sadanandan himself was an accused. As per the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data, Kerala reported 42 political murders between 2016 and 2022. Of the total, 15 happened in 2016. Nationwide, this was the third highest after Jharkhand (92) and Bihar (85). (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: 26/11 prosecutor, ex-foreign secretary & Kerala poll violence victim: Stories of 4 Rajya Sabha nominees
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
US manufacturing falters despite policy boost: Donald Trump's tariffs and Biden's subsidies fail to lift sector; jobs, output remain stuck in post-pandemic rut
US manufacturing is showing persistent signs of stagnation despite a policy push from both political sides — with President Donald Trump deploying steep tariffs and former President Joe Biden previously handing out subsidies — to shore up domestic industry. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Job losses and tepid production data point to a sector still waiting for momentum to return. Factories in the US cut 7,000 jobs in June, according to the Labor Department, marking the second straight month of declines. Manufacturing employment is now set to fall for a third consecutive year. Activity also continued to contract in June, with the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reporting that the sector has shrunk in 30 of the past 32 months since October 2022. The analysis highlights the limited impact of both the Biden-era factory investment boom and the Trump administration's aggressive tariff regime, reported by AP. 'The past three years have been a real slog for manufacturing,' said Eric Hagopian, CEO of Pilot Precision Products, a Massachusetts-based industrial tools maker. 'We didn't get destroyed like in 2008, but we've been in this stagnant, sort of stationary environment. ' The slowdown has been driven by several factors, including inflationary pressures that spiked following the post-COVID recovery and the Federal Reserve's sharp interest rate hikes in 2022 and 2023. Though Biden's clean energy and chip subsidies sparked a surge in factory construction between 2021 and 2024, investments have since slowed after Trump returned to power and Congress reversed many green energy incentives. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, warned that 'manufacturing production will continue to flatline,' adding that employment in the sector is likely to shrink further in the coming year. Trump, meanwhile, is pursuing protectionist policies to encourage domestic manufacturing. The administration has imposed tariffs of 50% on steel and aluminum, 25% on autos and parts, and 10% on a range of other imports. While the levies offer some companies a pricing edge, they also raise costs on imported materials essential to US producers. 'For some bids, the tariff helps us stay competitive,' said Chris Zuzick, VP at Waukesha Metal Products in Wisconsin, AP quoted. But steel prices, buoyed by the protectionist policy, have soared — reaching $960 per metric ton in the US, more than double the $440 world average as of June 23, according to SteelBenchmarker. Despite the high duties, firms like Pilot Precision still source steel from France and Austria — even after paying tariffs — because of price and quality dynamics. Further complicating matters is the lack of clarity around policy. Trump has repeatedly delayed and revised tariff schedules, leaving manufacturers in limbo. 'Customers do not want to make commitments in the wake of massive tariff uncertainty,' an ISM survey respondent from the fabricated metal products industry noted. A computer hardware firm added, 'The situation remains too volatile to firmly put such plans into place. ' The recent slowdown may also reflect a reversion to pre-pandemic norms. After losing nearly 1.4 million jobs in early 2020, factories surged during the COVID-driven goods boom, adding 379,000 jobs in 2021 and 357,000 in 2022. But hiring then plateaued in 2023 and has since reversed. As of June, factory payrolls stood at 12.75 million — almost unchanged from the 12.74 million recorded in February 2020. 'It's a long, strange trip to get back to where we started,' said Jared Bernstein, chair of Biden's Council of Economic Advisers. While manufacturers wait for clearer signals from the Trump administration's upcoming 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' many remain cautious. Hagopian is hopeful that targeted tax breaks might help, and Zuzick echoed that it's too soon to judge the tariff impact: 'Manufacturing doesn't turn on a dime.' With policy flip-flops, cost pressure and weak demand all in play, most factories are keeping hiring and investment plans on hold. 'Everyone,' Zuzick said, 'is kind of just waiting for the new normal.'
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
42 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump reiterates claim that he stopped conflict between India & Pakistan
US President Donald Trump Monday reiterated his claim that he stopped the conflict between India and Pakistan, which could have turned into a "nuclear war", through trade. "We've been very successful in settling wars. You have India, (and) Pakistan. You have Rwanda and the Congo that was going on for 30 years," Trump said during his meeting with Nato Secretary General Rutte in the Oval Office. "India, by the way, Pakistan would have been a nuclear war within another week the way that was going. That was going very badly, and we did that through trade. I said, we're not going to talk to you about trade unless you get this thing settled', and they did, and they were both great, great leaders, and they were great, he added. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire after a long night of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim more than a dozen times on several occasions that he helped settle the tensions between India and Pakistan. However, India has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. In a nearly 35-minute phone call with Trump last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi firmly stated that India does not and will "never accept" mediation and that the discussions between Indian and Pakistani militaries on cessation of military actions were initiated at Islamabad's request. India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in retaliation for the Pahalgam attack that killed 26 civilians. India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
