logo
In a historic win for U.S. labor, all major Las Vegas Strip casinos are now unionized

In a historic win for U.S. labor, all major Las Vegas Strip casinos are now unionized

Fast Company04-08-2025
When Susana Pacheco accepted a housekeeping job at a casino on the Las Vegas Strip 16 years ago, she believed it was a step toward stability for her and her 2-year-old daughter.
But the single mom found herself exhausted, falling behind on bills and without access to stable health insurance, caught in a cycle of low pay and little support. For years, she said, there was no safety net in sight — until now.
For 25 years, her employer, the Venetian, had resisted organizing efforts as one of the last holdouts on the Strip, locked in a prolonged standoff with the Culinary Workers Union. But a recent change in ownership opened the Venetian's doors to union representation just as the Strip's newest casino, the Fontainebleau, was also inking its first labor contract.
The historic deals finalized late last year mark a major turning point: For the first time in the Culinary Union's 90-year history, all major casinos on the Strip are unionized. Backed by 60,000 members, most of them in Las Vegas, it is the largest labor union in Nevada. Experts say the Culinary Union's success is a notable exception in a national landscape where union membership overall is declining.
'Together, we've shown that change can be a positive force, and I'm confident that this partnership will continue to benefit us all in the years to come,' Patrick Nichols, president and CEO of the Venetian, said shortly after workers approved the deal.
Pacheco says their new contract has already reshaped her day-to-day life. The housekeeper no longer races against the clock to clean an unmanageable number of hotel suites, and she's spending more quality time with her children because of the better pay and guaranteed days off.
'Now with the union, we have a voice,' Pacheco said.
Union strength is fading nationally
These gains come at a time when union membership nationally is at an all-time low, and despite Republican-led efforts over the years to curb union power. About 10% of U.S. workers belonged to a union in 2024, down from 20% in 1983, the first year for which data is available, according to U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics.
President Donald Trump in March signed an executive order seeking to end collective bargaining for certain federal employees that led to union leaders suing the administration. Nevada and more than two dozen other states now have so-called 'right to work' laws that let workers opt out of union membership and dues. GOP lawmakers have also supported changes to the National Labor Relations Board and other regulatory bodies, seeking to reduce what they view as overly burdensome rules on businesses.
Ruben Garcia, professor and director of the workplace program at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas law school, said the Culinary Union's resilience stems from its deep roots in Las Vegas, its ability to adapt to the growth and corporatization of the casino industry, and its long history of navigating complex power dynamics with casino owners and operators.
He said the consolidation of casinos on the Las Vegas Strip mirrors the dominance of the Big Three automakers in Detroit. A few powerful companies — MGM Resorts International, Caesars Entertainment and Wynn Resorts — now control most of the dozens of casinos along Las Vegas Boulevard.
'That consolidation can make things harder for workers in some ways, but it also gives unions one large target,' Garcia said.
That dynamic worked in the union's favor in 2023, when the threat of a major strike by 35,000 hospitality workers with expired contracts loomed over the Strip. But a last-minute deal with Caesars narrowly averted the walkout, and it triggered a domino effect across the Strip, with the union quickly finalizing similar deals for workers at MGM Resorts and Wynn properties.
The latest contracts secured a historic 32% bump in pay over the life of the five-year contract. Union casino workers will earn an average $35 hourly, including benefits, by the end of it.
The union's influence also extends far beyond the casino floor. With its ability to mobilize thousands of its members for canvassing and voter outreach, the union's endorsements are highly coveted, particularly among Democrats, and can signal who has the best shot at winning working-class votes.
The union has — and still — faces resistance
The union's path hasn't always been smooth though. Michael Green, a history professor at UNLV, noted the Culinary Union has long faced resistance.
'Historically, there have always been people who are anti-union,' Green said.
Earlier this year, two food service workers in Las Vegas filed federal complaints with the National Labor Relations Board, accusing the union of deducting dues despite their objections to union membership. It varies at each casino, but between 95 to 98% of workers opt in to union membership, according to the union.
'I don't think Culinary Union bosses deserve my support,' said one of the workers, Renee Guerrero, who works at T-Mobile Arena on the Strip. 'Their actions since I attempted to exercise my right to stop dues payments only confirms my decision.'
But longtime union members like Paul Anthony see things differently. Anthony, a food server at the Bellagio and a Culinary member for nearly 40 years, said his union benefits — free family health insurance, reliable pay raises, job security and a pension — helped him to build a lasting career in the hospitality industry.
'A lot of times it is an industry that doesn't have longevity,' he said. But on the Strip, it's a job that people can do for '20 years, 30 years, 40 years.'
Ted Pappageorge, the union's secretary-treasurer and lead negotiator, said the union calls this the 'Las Vegas dream.'
'It's always been our goal to make sure that this town is a union town,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If You'd Invested $1,000 in VIG 5 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today
If You'd Invested $1,000 in VIG 5 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

If You'd Invested $1,000 in VIG 5 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today

Key Points The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF has produced impressive net growth since the middle of 2020, at least closely trailing growth tech stocks. While it's paid good dividends during this period, most of these gains have come from capital appreciation. Although properly categorized as a dividend fund, VIG may be better used for a different purpose, with another ETF meeting your immediate investment income needs. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF › Growth stocks such as Nvidia and Broadcom may have dominated headlines in recent years due to their huge artificial intelligence (AI)-driven gains. It's not like dividend stocks completely faltered during that stretch, though. Many performed pretty well during that period, too, as evidenced by the performance of the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSEMKT: VIG) over the course of the past five years. Then and now The graphic below tells the tale. Had you invested $1,000 in the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation fund in August of 2020, today you'd have $1,640 plus all the dividends it paid in the meantime. And if you'd reinvested those dividend payments in more shares of VIG, your $1,000 investment would be worth $1,800 now. The dividend payments for this exchange-traded fund (ETF) have also grown during this time. July's quarterly payment of $0.87 per share is well above the same quarter's payment of only $0.60 in 2020, in line with this fund's actual dividend growth during this five-year period. Not the best ETF for dividend income In this vein, you should know that while this Vanguard fund prioritizes reliable dividend growth over high yields or capital appreciation, Vanguard Dividend Appreciation also offers the latter at least as well as most other dividend-oriented ETFs. Only the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEMKT: VYM) has fared better for the past five years, and only by a slight margin. Credit a quirk of the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF's underlying S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, mostly. It excludes the highest-yielding one-fourth of tickers that would otherwise be eligible for inclusion in the index. Standard & Poor's fears these high yields suggest their particular companies may be facing growth headwinds. Removing these highest-yielding names from the mix, of course, also dials back this ETF's average dividend yield. VIG's trailing yield right now is a little less than 1.7%, which isn't much for anyone looking for above-average investment income. Point being, this fund is best used as a defensive, quality-capital-growth holding. Should you invest $1,000 in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF right now? Before you buy stock in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 11, 2025 James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia, Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, and Vanguard Whitehall Funds-Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. If You'd Invested $1,000 in VIG 5 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

World Liberty Financial token valued at $0.20 in Trump crypto project's ALT5 treasury deal
World Liberty Financial token valued at $0.20 in Trump crypto project's ALT5 treasury deal

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

World Liberty Financial token valued at $0.20 in Trump crypto project's ALT5 treasury deal

World Liberty Financial's deal with ALT5 Sigma Corporation has put a value on WLFI, the Trump-backed DeFi project's token, for the first time since its sale last year. On Monday, ALT5 announced plans to pivot to become a so-called crypto treasury company, selling 200,000 new shares and using the proceeds to buy up the $1.5 billion worth of WLFI. The firm will swap half of the newly-issued shares directly for WLFI held by World Liberty Financial in a deal that values the token at $0.20, Matt Morgan, ALT5's chief investment officer, told DL News. It's not clear if World Liberty Financial is the only participant swapping WLFI tokens for shares. The firm said that several other unnamed institutional investors and venture capital firms participated in the share sale. It's the first time that WLFI has received a valuation since World Liberty Financial sold $550 million worth tokens to investors between October and March. At the time, investors paid varying prices for WLFI depending on how early in the sale they bought it. Large WLFI holders include Tron founder Justin Sun, who bought $75 million worth during the token sale. On its launch, WLFI was programmed so that buyers couldn't trade it, meaning that there was no way for the market to value the token. Conflict of interest The deal also highlights the growing crypto treasury company trend. Michael Saylor's Strategy was a trailblazer in this regard. The firm has issued debt or shares to buy Bitcoin since 2020, a ploy which has seen its shares skyrocket by over 3,500% since. Over the past year, a new wave of crypto treasury companies have copied Saylor's playbook on the back of a favourable crypto regulatory environment under the Trump administration. Many of these companies issue debt or shares to buy up their cryptocurrency of choice, and often emerge through reverse mergers with struggling publicly traded companies. Sometimes there's a conflict of interest between the treasury companies and the issuers of the crypto asset they buy. Tron Inc, a crypto treasury company that says it will buy up TRX, the native token of the Tron blockchain, has Weike Sun on its board, the father of Justin Sun. The firm listed the father-son relationship among its potential conflicts of interest in its S-3 filing last month. As a part of ALT5's crypto treasury swerve, the firm added several World Liberty Financial executives and backers to its board of directors. They include World Liberty Financial CEO Zach Witkoff, the project's COO Zak Folkman, and Eric Trump, President Donald Trump's son. All three new appointees hold WLFI and therefore have a financial interest in the token's value. Morgan said he's not at liberty to comment on matters that may involve commercially sensitive information relating to his role or ALT5 when asked about the potential conflict of interest of the board appointments. Trading the token The WLFI token is designed to govern World Liberty Financial. Those who hold the token can vote on changes to the protocol, its creators said. The project makes clear that it isn't a decentralised autonomous organisation, a type of crypto collective popular among DeFi projects. In July, WLFI holders voted to make the token tradable after the question was put to them by the project's creators. World Liberty Financial said in an X post that the token could begin trading as soon as the end of August. Tim Craig is DL News' Edinburgh-based DeFi Correspondent. Reach out with tips at tim@

Billionaire Tyler Perry just revealed why he cut off his family financially — refused to be ‘welfare.' Do you agree?
Billionaire Tyler Perry just revealed why he cut off his family financially — refused to be ‘welfare.' Do you agree?

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Billionaire Tyler Perry just revealed why he cut off his family financially — refused to be ‘welfare.' Do you agree?

Tyler Perry is no stranger to making tough decisions. The actor, director and producer, best known for his "Madea" franchise, has strategically created a media empire that turned him into a billionaire, according to Forbes. But in a recent interview that's making waves online, the 55-year-old entrepreneur revealed that he had to make tough decisions on the personal front too, including financially cutting off some members of his family. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now '[My aunt] said she wanted a job. She would always call asking for money. I said, 'Okay,' I would send her the money,' Perry explained on an episode of Den of Kings on YouTube. 'But then I was like, 'Listen, I want to help you. I want to help you build this thing, not be welfare to you. So, let me give you a job.'' When his aunt failed to show up for work, he said he had no choice but to fire her and cut her off financially. 'You want me to hand you the money, but you don't want to work for it,' he said. 'See, that doesn't work for me.' Perry's decision may seem extreme, but it's one many Americans can relate to — especially those navigating the complexities of financial boundaries with family. Family welfare You don't have to be a billionaire for your family to expect some financial assistance from you. In fact, lending or giving money to people in your social network is surprisingly common. According to community finance platform SoLo's 2025 Cash Poor Report, 43% of people have borrowed money from friends or family members over the past year. Perhaps the most common form of family financial support is from parents to adult children. It turns out that 46% of Gen Z Americans (ages 18 to 27) rely on financial assistance from parents and family, according to new research from Bank of America's Better Money Habits team. Many of these financial arrangements end badly. A survey by found that 42% of people who loaned money to their friends and family didn't get paid back and roughly a quarter of these lenders say the loan damaged their relationship with the borrower. With this in mind, avoiding such loans could be the key to a healthy and durable relationship with everyone in your circle. However, if you feel compelled to offer some financial assistance to a loved one in desperate need, make sure you set clear expectations to preserve the relationship and your own financial security. Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. Setting clear boundaries Whether you're borrowing or lending money to a loved one, setting expectations upfront can help you both avoid damage to the relationship. The first step, perhaps, is to never offer more than you can afford. "Ask yourself: Am I really in a position to be gifting money right now?," Wendy De La Rosa, an assistant professor at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, told NPR. If you believe your friend or family member is asking for too much, politely turn them down and honestly explain the impact this loan or gift could have on your own financial stability. If you can afford it, it may be better to offer the money as a gift rather than a loan. This minimizes the pressure on the borrower and could help you sustain the relationship. However, regardless of whether your assistance is in the form of a loan or a gift, formalize the arrangement in a written document. This is because loans and gifts between friends and family can have tax implications. Gifting more than $19,000 per person per year could make you, not the receiver, subject to the federal gift tax. There are higher limits for married couples and lifetime limits for all individuals that you need to be aware of. A written document with all the details should help you and the receiver plan for these tax implications and stay on the same page about the arrangement to avoid disagreements in the future. What to read next Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store