Alabama Sen. Greg Albritton announces run for re-election
Who will be Alabama's next governor? The latest look at who's in and out of the race
According to a news release, Albritton was elected to the state senate in 2014 after serving in the state House of Representatives from 2002 to 2006.
District 22 covers Escambia County, Washington County, and portions of Baldwin County.
Albritton is the chairman of the Finance and Taxation — General Fund Committee, where he oversees the allocation of the General Fund Appropriation.
He has helped with broadband expansion, water and sewer improvements, and enhancing residents' quality of life, according to the release.
'I am honored to have had the opportunity to serve the people of District 22,' said Senator Albritton. 'Together, we have made significant strides in improving our communities and managing our state's resources wisely. I look forward to continuing this work and building a brighter future for Alabama.'
Alabama health officials urge public to protect themselves during mosquito season
The release said Albritton is a retired Navy officer and an attorney.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he'll seek ‘long-term' control of DC police and signals he'll target other cities next
Donald Trump said on Wednesday he would ask Congress for 'long-term' control of Washington DC's police department and signaled he expected other Democratic-led cities to change their laws in response to his deployment of national guard troops and federal agents into the capital. The president's comments came as the White House took credit for dozens of arrests overnight in Washington as part of Trump's campaign to fight a 'crime crisis', which the city's leaders say does not exist. Trump earlier this week invoked a never-before-used clause of the law that sets out the federal district's governance structure to take temporary control of the police department, but will need Congress's permission to extend it beyond the 30 days allowed under the statute. 'We're going to need a crime bill that we're going to be putting in, and it's going to pertain initially to DC,' Trump said during a visit to the Kennedy Center performing arts venue in Washington. 'We're going to use it as a very positive example, and we're going to be asking for extensions on that, long-term extensions, because you can't have 30 days.' He said he expected to propose the legislation 'very quickly', though the Senate and House of Representatives are out of session and not scheduled to return until 2 September. Trump alluded to other options for extending control of the police department, saying 'if it's a national emergency, we can do it without Congress'. The president spoke after national guard troops appeared on the National Mall on Tuesday evening as officers from the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration and Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies appeared in neighborhoods across the city. Video circulating on local media showed police and federal agents arresting at least one person that evening in Columbia Heights, home to the city's largest Hispanic population. Other videos showed traffic stops near Kennedy Street in north-west Washington, which in years past has been the site of gang activity. The administration argues the steps are necessary to fight what Trump has called an 'out of control' crime problem in the nation's capital, but local officials have disputed that characterization. Data shows that crime rates plunged last year to the lowest levels in three decades, though the capital does have higher rates of some violent crimes compared with cities with similar populations. Trump ordered federal assets into the capital after a staffer with the so-called 'department of government efficiency' was attacked early in the morning in an upscale entertainment district. A White House official credited Tuesday night's deployment with a total of 43 arrests, twice the total of the previous evening. It was unclear how much more that was than a typical night. A spokesperson for the Metropolitan police department said a total of 76 arrests were made throughout the day citywide on Tuesday; the agency's data showed they made an average of 56 arrests per day in 2024. More than 1,450 officers participated in the deployment, about half of whom were from the city's police department, while only 30 national guard troops were deployed of the roughly 800 whom defense officials have said are expected to arrive for the mission. A White House official said to expect a 'significantly higher' presence of national guard troops over the days to come, as well as round-the-clock patrols by federal agents, which have thus far only been present in the evenings. Democratic lawmakers have condemned Trump's incursion as an authoritarian move intended to distract his supporters from outrage over his refusal to make public files related to the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, a one-time friend who has become a fixation of conspiracy theorists. Trump on Wednesday accused the Democrats of being 'afraid to do anything because they don't want to be criticized. But fighting crime is a good thing.' He warned that he would seek changes to Washington DC's crime laws that he expected other cities to adopt, pointing to a cash-bail reform lawmakers in DC approved in 1992. 'We're going to go for statutes in DC and then ultimately for the rest of the country, where that's not going to be allowed,' Trump said, singling out New York, Chicago and Los Angeles, all cities governed by Democrats. He also criticized the city government's long-term push to be made a state, saying it was an attempt by Democrats to get two more senators. 'Statehood is ridiculous. We want to straighten the place out,' Trump said. Washington DC is the second US city to which Trump has deployed troops since taking office in January. In June, he ordered US marines and federalized national guard troops into Los Angeles to quell protests over his immigration crackdown. Officials in the overwhelmingly Democratic city have chafed at Trump's deployment, with the attorney general, Brian Schwalb, saying earlier this week that the government was 'considering all of our options and will do what is necessary to protect the rights and safety of District residents'. The Democratic mayor, Muriel Bowser, has sought a cordial relationship with Trump since his return to the White House, but changed her tone on Tuesday, urging residents and voters during a social media event 'to protect our city, to protect our autonomy, to protect our home rule and get to the other side of this guy and make sure we elect a Democratic House so that we have a backstop to this authoritarian push'. The White House said a total of 19 teams of officers from various federal agencies are in the city 'to promote public safety and arrest violent offenders', while the national guard will 'protect federal assets, provide a safe environment for law enforcement officers to make arrests, and deter violent crime with a visible law enforcement presence'. On Tuesday night, arrests were made of people suspected of driving under the influence, unlawful entry and resisting arrest, and of an individual with an outstanding warrant for assault with a deadly weapon, the White House official said. Seven illegal firearms were also recovered. In an opinion piece published in the Washington Post, Jeanine Pirro, the Fox News personality recently confirmed as Washington DC's US attorney, said she would push the city council to change laws around criminal sentencing, particularly for the juveniles she blamed for violence. 'Young criminals have been emboldened to think they can get away with committing crime in this city, and, very often, they do. But together with our local and federal partners, our message to them today is: we will identify you, prosecute you and convict you,' Pirro said. The 700,000 residents of the federal district have no voting representation in Congress and the president and federal lawmakers have the power to meddle in laws passed by the city council. Solve the daily Crossword
Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Newsom fights fire with fire against Republicans and Trump
As Texas Republicans seek to redraw their congressional maps in favor of Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives, Gov. Gavin Newsom has a power play of his own: redraw California's congressional districts to favor Democrats. With a new special election campaign, Newsom is proposing to temporarily scrap California's independently-drawn congressional lines in favor of districts that support Democrats. Could this political gerrymandering be the thing that saves democracy from Trump's increasingly authoritarian impulses? It's a boundary-pushing gamble that will undoubtedly supercharge Newsom's political star in the short-term, my colleague Julia Wick writes. But a ballot-box flop would be brutal for both the California governor and the Democrats. The 'Election Rigging Response Act,' as Newsom has named his ballot measure, would temporarily scrap the congressional districts enacted by the state's voter-approved independent redistricting commission. Under the proposal, Democrats could pick up five seats currently held by Republicans while bolstering vulnerable Democratic incumbent Reps. Adam Gray, Josh Harder, George Whitesides, Derek Tran and Dave Min, which would save the party millions of dollars in costly reelection fights. But first the Democratic-led state Legislature must vote to place the measure on the Nov. 4 ballot and then it must be approved by voters. If passed, the initiative would have a 'trigger,' meaning the redrawn map would not take effect unless Texas or another GOP-led state moved forward with its own gerrymandering effort. For Democrats like Rep. Laura Friedman (D-Glendale), who appeared alongside Newsom to kick off the special election campaign, there is 'some heartbreak' to temporarily shelving their commitment to independent redistricting. California voters have twice rallied for independent redistricting at the ballot box in the last two decades and many may struggle to abandon those beliefs. A POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll found that voters prefer keeping an independent panel in place to draw district lines by a nearly two-to-one margin, and that independent redistricting is broadly popular in the state. Still, Friedman told the Times she was hearing overwhelmingly positive reactions to the proposal from all kinds of Democratic groups on the ground. 'The response that I get is, 'Finally, we're fighting. We have a way to fight back that's tangible.'' Newsom isn't using political gerrymandering as his only method of combating Trump and the Republicans. His digital team has resorted to trolling Trump on X, mimicking the president's own social media vernacular. Think petty insults and hyperbole with a heavy reliance on the 'caps lock' key. 'DONALD IS FINISHED — HE IS NO LONGER 'HOT.' FIRST THE HANDS (SO TINY) AND NOW ME — GAVIN C. NEWSOM — HAVE TAKEN AWAY HIS 'STEP,' ' one of the posts read last week. Newsom's actions are notably different from how he spent the first months of the new administration. In an attempt to reshape the California-vs.-Trump narrative, the governor hosted MAGA leaders on his podcast and contradicted the Democratic orthodoxy on the participation of transgender athletes in women's sports. But after the president sent California National Guard troops into Los Angeles amid immigration sweeps and ensuing protests in June, Newsom's MAGA conciliation ended. Now he's making a big gamble with his new special election campaign, the kind of big play that could redefine how voters across the country see him. Read the full story here. Today's great photo is from Times intern Annie Goodykoontz at a vigil honoring a man who died while fleeing an immigration raid at a SoCal Home Depot. Kevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newslettersJim Rainey, staff writerDiamy Wang, homepage internIzzy Nunes, audience intern How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on
Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Newsom's redistricting plan is a power grab. But the GOP objections are rubbish
SACRAMENTO — One accusation hurled at Gov. Gavin Newsom for his retaliatory redistricting move against President Trump and Texas Republicans is that he's overriding the will of California voters. Rubbish. The flawed argument goes like this: Californians — once upon a time — voted overwhelmingly to ban partisan gerrymandering and strip the task of drawing congressional seats from self-interested legislators. In a historic political reform, redistricting was turned over to an independent citizens' commission. Now, Newsom is trying to subvert the voters' edict. 'It is really a calculated power grab that dismantles the very safeguards voters put in place,' California Republican Party Chairwoman Corrin Rankin said in a statement last week, echoing other party members. 'This is Gavin the Gaslighter overturning the will of the voters and telling you it's for your own good.' Again, baloney. Power grab? Sure. Overturning the voters' will? Hardly. Newsom is asking voters to express a new will–seeking permission to fight back against Trump's underhanded attempt to redraw congressional districts in Texas and other red states so Republicans can retain control of the U.S. House of Representatives after next year's midterm elections. First of all, that anti-gerrymandering vote creating the citizens' commission was 15 years ago. It was a wise decision and badly needed, and still a wonderful concept in the abstract. But that was then, this is now. Just because a ballot measure was passed one or two decades ago doesn't mean it has been cast in stone. Would Californians still vote to ban same-sex marriage or deny public schooling to undocumented children? Doubtful. Circumstances and views change. Second, that 2010 electorate no longer exists. Today's electorate is substantially different. And it shouldn't necessarily be tied to the past. Consider: PPIC researchers recently reported that 'partisanship now shapes the state's migration — with those moving out of the state more likely to be Republican and those moving in more likely to be Democrat. … This process makes California more Democratic than it would otherwise be.' So, Newsom and Democratic legislators are not thumbing their noses at the voters' will. They're asking today's voters to suspend the ban on gerrymandering and adopt a partisan redistricting plan at a Nov. 4 special election. The good government process of map drawing by the citizen's commission would return after the 2030 decennial census. The heavily Democratic Legislature will pass a state constitutional amendment containing Newsom's plan and put it on the ballot, probably this week. It would take effect only if Texas or other red states bow to Trump's demand to gerrymander their congressional districts to rig them for Republicans. Trump is seeking five more GOP seats from Texas and Gov. Greg Abbott is trying to oblige. Republicans already hold 25 of the 38 seats. Newsom's plan, released Friday, counters Texas' scheme with a blatant gerrymander of his own. It would gain five Democratic seats. Democrats already outnumber Republicans on the California House delegation 43 to 9. Neither the governor nor any Democrats are defending gerrymandering. They agree it's evil politics. They support redistricting by the citizens' commission and believe this high-road process should be required in every state. But that's not about to happen. And to stand by meekly without matching the red states' election rigging would amount to unilateral disarmament, they contend correctly. 'It's not good enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be,' Newsom declared at a campaign kickoff last week. 'We have got to recognize the cards that have been dealt. And we have got to meet fire with fire.' But polling indicates it could be a tough sell to voters. A large majority believe the bipartisan citizens commission should draw congressional districts, not the politicians who they don't particularly trust. 'It'll be complicated to explain to voters why two wrongs make a right,' says Republican strategist Rob Stutzman, a GOP never-Trumper. Former GOP redistricting consultant Tony Quinn says: 'There is no way to 'educate' voters on district line drawing. And Californians vote 'no' on ballot measures they do not understand. … It's sort of like trying to explain the basketball playoffs to me.' But veteran Democratic strategist Garry South doesn't see a problem. 'The messaging here is clear: 'Screw Trump',' South says. 'If the object is to stick it to Trump, [voter] turnout won't be a problem.' Gerrymandering may not be the voters' will in California. But they may well jump at the chance to thwart Trump. The must-read: Newsom's decision to fight fire with fire could have profound political consequences The TK: Trial in National Guard lawsuit tests whether Trump will let courts limit authority The L.A. Times Special: Hundreds of Californians have been paid $10,000 to relocate to Oklahoma. Did they find paradise? Until next week,George Skelton —Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.
