John Whelan: Trade war leaves Ireland's booming aviation sector vulnerable
However, having been caught off guard by a letter threatening the 30% duty on EU goods the weekend before last, the European Commission last week quickly tabled a plan to put counter tariffs worth €72bn on imports of US goods.
Inevitably, this will hit the European Union's own economy, with Ireland potentially being one of the most impacted.
The proposed EU retaliatory tariffs target imports of industrial goods from the US, including aircraft and aircraft parts, machinery, automotives, chemicals and plastics, and medical devices and equipment. Potential EU countermeasures on aircraft imports, coupled with retaliation from the US administration, could risk Ireland's position as a world-leading hub in aviation.
Aviation is a highly important part of the Irish trading base, covering aircraf and parts and set to be heavily impacted by EU countermeasures. Potential EU import restrictions on these goods, worth nearly €14bn, according to a document from the Central Statistics Office, would be very damaging to many companies in the sector, including the lucrative aircraft leasing sector. A recent report by aviation investment group Irelandia said the industry in Ireland accounts for 37% of the global commercial fleet, making Ireland a central player in the world's air transport infrastructure.
Within the EU member states, the country with the biggest US aircraft imports in 2024 was Ireland, followed by France, the Netherlands, and Germany.
Ryanair, Europe's largest airline, imports new aircraft on a regular basis. A 30% import duty would significantly increase the cost of acquiring these new planes.
Increased import costs would also likely lead to higher operating expenses for Ryanair. This could affect their ability to maintain their low-cost model and potentially lead to fare increases or reduced profitability.
If the cost of new aircraft becomes prohibitive, it could also delay Ryanair's expansion plans, potentially affecting the addition of new routes and increased flights on existing routes. Furthermore, increased costs might lead to a reduction in the number of aircraft available for service, potentially impacting their operational efficiency.
Ryanair has already threatened to cancel orders for hundreds of Boeing aircraft if a US tariff war leads to materially higher prices, and said it could look at alternative suppliers, including Chinese plane maker COMAC.
However, this will still leave Ryanair exposed to higher costs on Boeing-related maintenance, repair, and overhaul, all increasingly critical with the growth of their fleet. A new import tariff would add to these challenges, potentially exacerbating existing operational difficulties.
Aviation between the US and EU is a highly interconnected sector. French multinational aerospace and defence company Thales with a manufacturing base in Northern Ireland, and supplies US-based Boeing and European competitor Airbus with flight management systems and cockpit displays. In exchange, US aerospace giant Honeywell provides flight management systems for Airbus.
Hence, the EU's potential retaliatory tariffs on US-made aircraft could escalate the trade war to impact a wider range of aviation products exported to the US. Eurostat figures show Boeing earned €7.5bn of its revenues from Europe in 2024. Airbus had sales of €16bn to the US last year. Future sales would likely be caught in the crossfire.
Ireland is already facing a serious hit to its economy due to potentially high tariffs on exports to the US after the August 1 deadline. After Germany, Ireland could be the most affected economies in the EU. Retaliatory actions by the EU could then be more damaging than increased US tariffs on exports.
Brussels says it is still seeking a deal to avoid a tit-for-tat escalation in the trade war but is poised to retaliate if needed. Preparations for retaliation are underway.
Some commentators believe it is time for the EU to put its guns on the table in the tariff spat and show strength and determination. But there may be extensive consequences. Brussels-based think tank Bruegel has estimated that Ireland's cumulative real GDP loss, due to the total impact of US tariffs, could be 3% by 2028.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
17 minutes ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Trump's deal with Europe sucks for Ireland and what the EU is importing
Europe is poised to embrace a surge of American vehicles and energy following Brussels securing an eleventh-hour trade agreement with Donald Trump, barely averting a transatlantic trade war. The pact, revealed on Sunday, means the European Union will now encounter a uniform 15 per cent levy on exports to the United States—cutting in half the 30 per cent rate previously threatened by the former president. In return, Mr Trump stated the EU had consented to eliminate tariffs completely on US goods entering the bloc. Nevertheless, in stark contrast to the EU's negotiations with the UK over Brexit, where complex matters such as implementing trade obstacles across the Irish Sea arose, this time Ireland's interests appear to have been relegated to the lower end of the bloc's priorities. How significant is Trump's agreement with Europe? Under the arrangement, the EU will purchase $750bn (£558bn) of energy from the United States and pledge an additional $600bn in investments into the world's largest economy. "We are agreeing that the tariff straight across for automobiles and everything else will be a tariff of 15pc," said Mr Trump, who has consistently advocated for Europe to purchase more American oil and gas. "We have the opening up of all the European countries, which were essentially closed. You were not exactly taking our autos, you weren't exactly taking our agriculture. Now it is open. "It is open for our companies to go in and do a good job." Europe is set to welcome a wave of American cars and energy after Brussels clinched a deal (Image: Getty) Mr Trump stated the agreement would provide Europeans with enhanced access to US pickup trucks and SUVs, with commerce between the two economies now poised to grow. "They [Europe] are going to make a lot of money with this," he said. "I think everybody is. And it is going to bring a lot of unity and friendship." Financial markets have been rattled in recent months by Mr Trump's fluctuating trade policies, with the tariff standoff generating uncertainty for global investors and governments. What does Trump hope to achieve with his Europe trade deal? Ms von der Leyen said the objective of the agreement was to "rebalance" trade flows between the two sides. "The starting point was an imbalance, a surplus on our side and a deficit on the US side, and we wanted to rebalance that," she said. "We wanted to do it in a way that trade goes on between the two of us, across the Atlantic. "The two biggest economies should have good trade flowing: rebalance, but enable trade on both sides, which means good jobs on both sides of the Atlantic, which means prosperity on both sides of the Atlantic. That was important to us." The agreement excludes steel and aluminium, which will still face higher tariffs of 50 per cent when exported to the US. British exports of the same materials face a reduced tariff of 25 per cent. Bad for Ireland: drugs firms left out of deal This exclusion could prove a major blow to Ireland, which depends heavily on its pharmaceutical exports. "We have to have them made in the US," Mr Trump declared. "We want them made in the US. Pharmaceuticals are very special. "We can't be in a position where we are relying on other countries. Europe is going to make pharmaceuticals, drugs and everything else for us too, a lot, but we are going to make our own." The Irish government has voiced concerns that looming US tariffs could deal a major blow to the country's pharmaceutical sector, which employs around 45,000 people. Ministers are particularly worried about the impact on multinational drug companies based in Ireland, following signals from Washington that the pharmaceutical industry may be the next target in a broader trade clampdown. While the EU's new trade agreement with Donald Trump excluded pharmaceuticals from immediate tariff hikes, the US has made clear that it still plans to address the sector in separate talks. Claus Vistesen, from Pantheon Macroeconomics, stated that the agreed 15 per cent tariff was less severe than many feared, and unlikely to alarm financial markets-but he warned it would still dent both the EU and US economies. "Trump is finding a middle ground," Mr Vistesen commented. "He is still shooting himself in the foot. US consumers will pay higher prices, and growth in trading partners will be lower than it would have otherwise been."
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: This may be the dawn of the clean energy era
Even five years ago, we might have looked at the head of the UN saying 'the sun is rising on a clean energy age' with the shining hope it deserved. It wasn't blind hyperbole last week. Some 90% of renewable energy projects are now cheaper than their fossil-fuel equivalents. A surge in solar adoption has been important, and the huge focus on low-carbon manufacturing from China has played a significant role. This should probably be seen as dovetailing with the country's policies around control of the materials vital for green energy. And yet, in the face of the continuing rise in global temperatures, the struggle to encourage accelerated adoption of EVs (bearing in mind the vast number of petrol and diesel vehicles still on the roads), and a US administration that is turning the clock back on renewable energy, one might almost see António Guterres's statement as a pyrrhic victory. Still, we could look at this in five years and comment on a remarkable turnaround. Guterres is right to point out that a great deal of energy insecurity revolves around fossil fuels, and so they are susceptible to the price shocks that accompany wars, invasions, and other geopolitical events. He said: 'There are no price spikes for sunlight,' he said. 'No embargoes for wind.' Let us look on his speech last week with the positivity it deserves. When it comes to hope, like the Irish phrase says: 'Níl sé marbh fós.' It isn't dead yet, even if it is a faded shade of what it once was. Real battles are for resources History might, to adapt Jacob Field, seem like one bloody thing after another, but it seems to have been an endless resource grab. For example, the ceaseless scramble for raw materials led to the carving up of Africa by European imperial powers in the 19th century and the same of the Americas from the 15th century on. Water is likely to be a future issue, but right now the flashpoints centre around things like rare earths (vital for semiconductors) and minerals that are essential for modern technology and green energy. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), subjected to what we would now class as crimes against humanity by Belgian interests in the 19th century, is as important to minerals as Saudia Arabia has been to oil. The EU has been working to secure contracts there. America, however, has been improving its position, attempting to capitalise on ongoing violence sponsored by DRC's neighbouring countries such as Rwanda. This as Donald Trump still harbours ambitions of annexing the mineral-rich Canada and Greenland, as well as securing a treaty with Ukraine that allows for US exploitation of its mineral wealth. All that, though, still leaves every country trailing well behind China. China, having spent the last few years greatly expanding its influence through its belt and road initiative, has extensive footholds in Africa now, between mining contracts and loans to fund infrastructure. It has mining operations around the world, and some 60%-80% of minerals — including cobalt (batteries) and uranium — are within its orbit. This has been seen as a security threat by some Western powers, and the thought is not without merit (even if some Western countries would do the same if they could). What if China simply cut off Western access to the minerals under its control? Or hiked all the prices? How long would existing supplies for advanced and everyday technology last? China has typically taken the long — some would say very long — view when it comes to economics. It may well be the manufacturing hub of the world, but that doesn't mean it couldn't simply outwait the countries that have outsourced their manufacturing industries to its cities. We live in a globalised world, despite the best efforts of some, and the phone in your hand or pocket with the cobalt in its battery serves as a reminder of just how delicate it is and how interconnected we all are. What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Making dreams come true When it comes to connections, despite our own travails at home, it is good that we, as a country, still remember that there are those with greater needs than our own. As reported by Imasha Costa in today's edition, there are now six children's homes in Sri Lanka that have been funded by Irish people. All are named after the towns that support them. Initially founded by Wicklow-Wexford TD Brian Brennan, these began in the aftermath of the 2004 tsunami that devastated swathes of Asia. They have since grown in number. While Sri Lanka itself has its dangers — Costa notes in a first-person piece that emigration is common, extreme poverty is endemic, and she herself was injured in an attempted robbery there in 2023 — it is something of a balm to know that there are oases of calm for children. The country faces significant economic and political challenges, yet some of the boys and girls who have spent time at the homes have gone on to bigger and better things. They are described as 'exceptionally talented … they have incredibly massive dreams'. Mol an óige agus tiocfaidh sí. Read More Letters to the Editor: Blurred line between right and wrong
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
From boycotts to barcodes: How supermarket choices still shape the world
Collective action in the supermarket can influence world events. Dunnes Stores workers boycotted South African oranges in the 1970s. The strike made international headlines and led the Irish government to ban fruit and vegetables from South Africa. Prior to the strike the workers had known little about South Africa, but were persuaded by Nimrod Sejake, a trade unionist from South Africa exiled in Ireland, that South Africa was like a pint of Guinness: A small number of whites at the top and all the black people underneath. People can now take collective action by using apps. Scan a barcode and the app may tell you whether the product you want to buy has been ethically produced. I was recently made aware of a missed scan or misinformation on one of these boycott apps. That gave rise to a question about the country of origin of a citrus fruit and the information contained on the label. It's remarkable how much information can be derived from a small tag or label attached to a net of oranges, and I'm going to use oranges as an example. The shopper had scanned the label on a net of oranges in to an app, which read the label and reported that it was an unrelated product, a bar of chocolate. Because the bar code didn't match the product that had been scanned, the shopper felt there was something nefarious about the oranges, which were labelled as Egyptian. There are two questions: Do the boycott apps work, and can we rely upon the labels in the supermarket? Boycott apps scan a product's bar code and identify the brand, manufacturer, or parent company. Based on this, they tell you whether the product aligns with or violates ethical, political, or environmental criteria. Most of these apps do not have access to a full bar code registry, so they rely on crowdsourcing databases, open-product databases, and public company information. Larger organisations and companies are easier to track than others, particularly when the bar codes are common internationally. For example, a can of popular cola has the same bar code no matter the country. Products that are produced and manufactured specifically for a supermarket are more difficult to track. Some retailers use brand-specific bar codes that only work in their own shop environments and do not transfer elsewhere. I visited five supermarkets belonging to the pillar retail brands in Ireland and examined each individual bar code on citrus fruit. That shopper was right: One specific net of oranges scans as a bar of chocolate from a competitor. However, of all the citrus fruit labels that I examined more than 50% are not contained within the boycott app that the consumer used. Remember, the apps rely on shoppers to upload this data to inform others. What about those labels that say that the product has come from Egypt? I visited many Irish supermarkets and examined more labels on oranges, lemons, and limes than I care to count, and one thing became apparent: All citruses sold in Ireland are clearly labelled with the country of origin. It's actually unsurprising that some of the oranges on our shelves come from Egypt, the fifth-largest producer of citrus fruit in the world and the largest in proximity to Europe — it produces more than Spain. Under EU regulations (No 1169/2011) the country of origin must be placed clearly on the product label. All the labels I examined stated where these citrus fruits had originated, whether it was Egypt or Spain, or beyond Europe and her neighbours, or as far afield as Argentina and Costa Rica. Also, did you know that any treatments applied to your fruit before it makes it to the supermarket shelves are now clearly disclosed on the labels? If you have looked closely at the labels on fruit lately you may have noticed some terms that may not be familiar to you. Thiabendazole, Pyrimethanil, and Imazalil are all fungicides and applied as a dip or a spray after harvest to reduce the growth of mould. You'd be familiar with this mould if you picked up an orange that may have sat in the fruit basket for too long and saw it had developed a green or blue mould and was exceedingly squishy. These fungicides are designed to keep your fruit fresher for longer and are highly regulated by the EU. The final treatment that you may see listed on the label is E904 — commonly known as shellac. Shellac is often used to glaze apples and citrus fruits to give them a shiny appearance and can extend shelf life. Any fruits that have been treated with this glaze are unsuitable for vegans, as shellac is a natural resin secreted by the lac insect. Vegan or not, we should all be washing our fruits before eating or even juicing them. BOYCOTT APPS Boycat and 'No Thanks' [ are the names of two ethical trading apps which many Irish consumers are using to check food producers to see if they are on a boycott list. An organisation may be placed onto a boycott list for being based in a particular country, but also having dubious equality or sustainability credentials. These apps enable consumers to make an informed choice when doing the shopping. Always read the label — and approach the retailer if you have any queries on provenance. If you believe that a retailer or trader has breached consumer law, you can always report your concerns to the CCPC by phoning their National Consumer Helpline on 01 402 5555 or emailing ask@ Read More Remember when a minister held Guinness 'hostage'? And other Irish food stories
