‘Dramatic Shift' That Could Leave KiwiSaver Members Better Off
A 'dramatic' shift of KiwiSaver investments into riskier funds should make New Zealanders better off in the long run, if past trends hold true.
The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) released research this week noting the significant shift in risk of KiwiSaver investments.
The proportion of KiwiSaver in funds that are risk category five, with high volatility, has quadrupled from 10 percent in 2021 to more than 40 percent in 2024.
Riskier funds can be expected to be more volatile but over the long term should produce better results. They are generally recommended for investors who still have a significant period of time until they need to access their investments.
Morningstar data shows that aggressive funds have returned 10.89 percent a year over five years, and 9.34 percent over 10 years.
That is compared to 3.07 percent a year over 10 years for conservative funds, 4.47 percent for moderate funds, 6.18 percent for balanced and 7.68 percent for growth.
Data director Greg Bunkall said cash investments' returns had lagged the rate of inflation over that time.
The FMA said the proportion of KiwiSaver investments in lower risk funds dropped from 30 percent to 10 percent over the same 2021-to-2025 period.
Part of this was due to the change to default funds, which now require them to be balanced. But it said there were other factors at play, too.
'In the period prior to the Covid-19 global pandemic, interest rates were historically low, and inflation was low and stable. As a result, many fixed-income assets provided low returns. On the other hand, stock markets have performed very well in most years since 2017, and the few periods of weakness quickly reversed.
'The strong performance and relative stability of stock markets may have therefore made higher-risk investments more attractive to investors. The persistence of this situation over several years may have contributed to the observed shift in preference for higher-risk investments, illustrating adaptive expectations among investors.'
It said market performance could also have affected the risk rating of funds. Spikes of volatility in 2020 and earlier this year affect funds' performance history.
A number of providers have recently launched 'high growth' funds that invest almost solely in equities.
FMA director of markets, investors and reporting John Horner said the FMA was not necessarily implying that people were in the wrong fund or that providers were advising members towards higher-risk funds.
'The observed increase in the risk categorisation of KiwiSaver funds appears to reflect a combination of factors including policy settings, investor behaviour, and market volatility.
'KiwiSaver is a long-term savings regime for retirement, and for most long term investments a higher risk strategy will be appropriate.
'We note that as KiwiSaver has been in existence for a while and become more mature there are more options available, including higher risk options, and there is also more material available to allow investors to educate or inform themselves about risk vs reward.'
Fisher Funds general manager of KiwiSaver David Boyle said the increase in investments in riskier funds was a good thing for investors wanting to grow retirement savings over the long term.
He said consumers knew more about the role of growth assets in a long-term savings scheme like KiwiSaver. Fund mangers were responding to consumer interest and providing education on the risks and benefits of different fund types.
Investors had experienced the Covid downturn and seen the recovery.
'The advent of platforms that allow investors to build their own portfolios allows providers to launch single sector specialist offerings that are often at the riskier end of the spectrum.'
He said members still had choice and there were many lower-risk and savings options available.
Booster chief executive Di Papadopoulos agreed New Zealanders were becoming more sophisticated in assessing their time horizons and figuring out if they could handle more risk to target higher returns.
'It appears people are moving to higher risk funds that align with them not needing their KiwiSaver money for retirement anytime soon,' she said.
'At Booster, we have seen the benefit of these decisions. Moving from a balanced fund to a growth fund increases projected balances at retirement significantly.
'A key factor is how soon or long in the future your might need to access your KiwiSaver, such as if you want to use it to buy your first home, or for your retirement.
'If you're unsure about whether you are in the right fund it's a good idea to check in with a financial adviser.'
How much difference might your outlook be?
Based on Sorted's retirement calculator…
A 20-year-old joining KiwiSaver now with no investment, earning $60,000 and contributing 4 percent of their salary plus an employer's contribution of 4 percent could expect to have at 65:
$381,354 in a balanced fund
$477,814 in a growth fund
$606,456 in an aggressive fund
This accounts for inflation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
5 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Du Val founders will continue to have assets frozen and passports held by court
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Du Val founders will continue to have assets frozen and passports held by court Kenyon Clarke, one of the founders of Du Val. Photo / Supplied By Rowan Quinn of RNZ The founders of the collapsed Du Val companies will continue to have their assets frozen and their passports held by the court, the High Court has ruled. Du Val is in statutory management, owing more than $300 million, and its main owners, Charlotte and Kenyon Clarke, are in receivership, with a preservation order on their assets. The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) obtained the interim order last August and the couple fought back against that at a hearing last month but the court has agreed with the FMA. In laying out the background to her decision, Justice Anderson said the High Court had the ability under the Financial Markets Conduct Act to make a range of protective orders for the benefit of 'aggrieved persons'.
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
'Butter Is Expensive Right Now. There's No Getting Away From That' - Finance Minister Nicola Willis
The Finance Minister does not believe New Zealanders are getting a "raw deal" on butter, but has accepted there is no getting away from how expensive it is right now. Nicola Willis met with Fonterra's chief executive Miles Hurrell at Parliament on Tuesday evening. While the two meet regularly, there was increased interest in the meeting due to the current price of butter. Willis had earlier said it was something she would discuss with Hurrell. Characterising the meeting as "constructive and engaging," Willis said Hurrell was candid about the way butter was priced in New Zealand. Her summarisation of her meeting with Fonterra largely zeroed in on her drive to increase supermarket competition. The large proportion of what people pay for butter is dictated by global demand, which is something the government could not control. "Were that price to come down, you would expect that to be reflected in the prices that New Zealand shoppers pay," Willis said. Hurrell had told her that butter had once been the hardest product for Fonterra to sell globally, but the increasing demand was due to reporting on its health benefits. "It was once viewed as a bogeyman," she said. The meeting had reinforced Willis' interest in increasing supermarket competition to put downward pressure on the price of butter. "All roads lead back to supermarket competition. I continue to believe that is the most powerful lever that the government has on this issue. We will never be able to control global dairy prices. What we can influence is the amount of competition in New Zealand's grocery sector and we have a lot of work underway to address that." Fonterra had also observed the supermarket competition. "Miles specifically conveyed that Fonterra operates in a number of markets around the world, most of which have a more competitive supermarket sector, and that it does feel different in New Zealand." She would leave it to supermarkets and Fonterra to argue who was charging what margin. "The sense that I got from my engagement with Miles is that it's a constant battle between them. Each party are probably going to point fingers at the other." Hurrell would not answer questions when RNZ approached him outside Parliament on Tuesday night, but a Fonterra spokesperson said the meeting was "constructive". Willis said she had encouraged Hurrell to front, in particular to explain what proportion of the margins go to Fonterra and what goes to supermarkets. Acknowledging that Fonterra's job was to get the best possible price for its shareholders, Willis also accepted New Zealanders saw the downsides of that when they were shopping. "I've been satisfied that I don't think consumers are getting a raw deal. I think that there is good work going on to ensure that there is pressure and competition from Fonterra to try and keep its prices low. But I get it. Butter is expensive right now. There's no getting away from that."
Techday NZ
5 hours ago
- Techday NZ
New Zealand's place in global cyber defence - From medieval knights to cybercriminals
During World War I, the British Expeditionary Force was the first military unit to cross the English Channel. This highly trained army featuring cavalry armed with lances, sabres, and rifles was the last reminder of medieval warfare. They were quickly brought low by machine guns, barbed wire and trenches. By the time the war ended, a mere 13 years after the invention of flight, the skies were filled with fighter planes. Conflict quickly reveals what works and what doesn't. In 2025, global instability has reshaped the battlefield once again. This time, it's digital. The rise of digital guerilla warfare We are witnessing a new kind of conflict: digital guerrilla war. This is where decentralised cybercriminal groups are being funded by shadowy nation states to carry out cyber-attacks. These hidden attackers "live off the land" by using legitimate tools to infiltrate systems and strike when least expected. Government entities are frequent targets, but private and listed companies are just as vulnerable. A major attack on them wouldn't just impact businesses, it could affect national stability and disrupt the economy. New Zealand, like the rest of the world, is locked in a cyber battle where threats can come from anywhere, at any time. Today, the front line is everywhere. This might sound excessive and overdramatic, but that's the reality all business leaders need to understand. A key concept in cyber security is that the investment to prevent harm should be in proportion to the needs of the business. But for many businesses, simple technology choices supported by people and processes are enough to mitigate most threats. But some organisations play integral roles in society and we can't afford for them not have the best security procedures in place. The Government must lead on critical infrastructure Critical infrastructure faces a much bigger threat. Last year, the United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), found proof that a state backed cyber security group, Volt Typhoon, had secretly infiltrated critical infrastructure providers across the Western world. Their goal? To cause disruption at a key moment. Another group, backed by the same nation-state, Salt Typhoon, has infiltrated nine major U.S. telecoms, accessing call data, text messages, and even recordings of prominent national leaders. New Zealanders have a right to know that our infrastructure is being protected, and that the government is investing in national cyber defence before disaster strikes. Cyber threats are no longer just a business problem; they're a national security issue. Is New Zealand doing enough to protect its critical infrastructure? Right now, the answer is no. We're at risk of falling behind. In late 2024, Australia passed sweeping cybersecurity legislation to harden national defences. The new laws require industries to uphold high security standards and give the government powers to intervene in the event of a serious breach. These reforms came in the wake of a string of devastating cyber incidents, including major data breaches at Medibank, Optus, and Latitude Finance in 2022 and 2023. The Latitude breach alone became the second largest in Australian history and the most damaging for citizens. It was also New Zealand's largest-ever data breach, exposing the personal information of 20% of our population. Australia has been put serious effort into building its cyber posture at a national level, with a vision of being a global leader in cybersecurity by 2030. In a world reliant on digital infrastructure, this will be a key competitive advantage. New Zealand has the chance to tell the same story, but only if we act soon. That's why we need the government to enact legislation that will protect our country and people. I appreciate developing legislation is not trivial, but the template has been created in Australia and it's in everyone's interest to reflect that over here. This will require some businesses to invest more to become compliant, but that's the point, that we all incur comparable costs to achieve a common standard. Cyber security is complex to understand. Humans evolved to recognise that a warrior charging at you is a threat, not a remote network of industrialised guerilla fighters with keyboards, backed by nations hiding their true intent. New Zealand must not wait until we're reacting to disaster. We need a nationally unified, proactive cyber defence to protect our people, businesses, and critical systems before it's too late.
