Peddling fear: China's top security agency mocks CIA spy recruitment drive as ‘farcical'
China's top intelligence agency says a recent
CIA campaign aimed at recruiting informants from China is a sign the US spy agency is desperately looking for ways to survive as Washington slashes budgets.
'Yet, as resources shrink, the CIA has doubled down on hyping the 'China threat' as its lifeline, peddling fear to Congress and taxpayers to carve out a larger slice of the budget pie,' the
Ministry of State Security (MSS) said in an article published on Wednesday on its official WeChat account.
The post, published in both Chinese and English, referred to a CIA effort to recruit Chinese spies as 'yet another farcical performance'.
03:25
New CIA videos seek to lure Chinese officials to leak secrets to US
New CIA videos seek to lure Chinese officials to leak secrets to US
It was the first time that the MSS, which has become increasingly active on social media, has responded to the advertisements – two Chinese-language videos posted by the CIA on social media last month.
The videos were intended to exploit possible dissatisfaction among Chinese officials with the ruling Communist Party leadership and encourage them to leak secrets to the United States.
A public recruitment drive, launched by the CIA last October, posted instructions online on how to safely contact the US spy agency in the hope of attracting informants from China, Iran and North Korea.
Last month, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian condemned the recruitment drive, calling it 'a serious violation of China's national interests and a blatant political provocation'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
33 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump's Iran strikes: will short-term gains bring more long-term pain?
President Donald Trump claimed victory after US forces attacked three key nuclear sites in Iran last weekend, but the operation might not translate into diplomatic gains – at least for now, observers said. They noted that whether the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran would hold remained uncertain, while Trump's unpredictable rhetoric and actions were making it increasingly difficult for foreign governments, including China, to trust the United States. 'In the short-run it appeared to be a gain for Trump, as the attacks dealt a significant blow to Iran's nuclear programme, but in the long term this could also make Iran determined that the only path is to pursue nuclear weapons; otherwise it would continue to be oppressed by the US and Israel,' said Wu Xinbo, director of the Centre for American Studies at Fudan University in Shanghai. Iran's hostility with the US and Israel was unlikely to end, he added. 'Whether it is the conflict with Israel or the tensions with the US, none of these issues have been resolved … so in the short term, it may be a gain, but in the long run, it could turn into pain for the US.' CNN, citing a preliminary classified US intelligence assessment, reported on Wednesday that the US military strikes did not destroy the core components of Iran's nuclear programme but 'likely only set it back by months'.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Congratulations to Iran and the occasional flash of Trump genius
I love Mexican food, especially Tacos. So it pains me and spoils my appetite whenever media pundits mention the acronym for 'Trump always chickens out'. It must be admitted that most of the time, the president's erratic pronouncements and obsessive-compulsive tweets, from universal tariffs and China sanctions to military support, or the lack thereof, for Ukraine betray a complete absence of clear thinking and actual policy. But with his highly controversial strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, you have to wonder whether he had not been thinking or at least hoping a few steps ahead of most others, for once. Maybe Taco this time isn't so bad. Let me, for argument's sake, just put it on the table. Trump, against most of his advisers – both the supposedly wise as well as foolish ones, whether Maga or neocons – has escalated to de-escalate. And Tehran gets the message and is playing ball, hence its latest missile volley, in a symbolic retaliatory gesture, on an American military base in Qatar in which everyone came out relatively unscathed. Consider the previous sequence of events. First, Trump forced the Iranians to negotiate. Then, when the Israelis attacked, he tried to use that as leverage and continued negotiations. Then he joined the Israelis with the heavy US strike on nuclear-related targets and threatened to broaden the war to impose regime change in Tehran. The Iranians talked tough but responded with remarkable restraint, having warned friendly Qatar and therefore the Americans, about its forthcoming attack. Trump immediately reciprocated afterwards, and tweeted for world peace. He thanked Iran 'for giving us early notice, which made it possible for no lives to be lost, and nobody to be injured'. 'CONGRATULATIONS WORLD,' he wrote in all caps. 'IT'S TIME FOR PEACE!'
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump's Iran strikes: will short-term gains end in more long-term pain?
US President Donald Trump claimed victory after US forces attacked three key nuclear sites in Iran last weekend, but the operation might not translate into diplomatic gains – at least for now, observers said. Whether the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran would hold remained uncertain, they added, while Trump's unpredictable rhetoric and actions made it increasingly difficult for foreign governments, including Beijing, to trust Washington. 'In the short-run it appeared to be a gain for Trump, as the attacks dealt a significant blow to Iran's nuclear programme, but in the long term this could also make Iran determined that the only path is to pursue nuclear weapons; otherwise it would continue to be oppressed by the US and Israel,' said Wu Xinbo, director of the Centre for American Studies at Fudan University in Shanghai. Tehran's hostility with the US and Israel was unlikely to end, he added. 'Whether it is the conflict with Israel or the tensions with the US, none of these issues have been resolved … so in the short term, it may be a gain, but in the long run, it could turn into pain for the US.' Citing a preliminary classified US intelligence assessment, CNN reported on Wednesday that the US military strikes on three of Iran's key nuclear facilities did not destroy the core components of the country's nuclear programme but instead likely set it back by only a few months.
