Gran jailed for stealing £1.5m 'used cash to gamble and pay off blackmailer'
Coleen Muirhead made the claim as prosecutors seek to get back a large chunk of her ill-gotten gains.
The 57-year-old was jailed for three years and three months in 2023 after she admitted embezzling the money from Panda Rosa Metals in Aberdeen, where she was a £33,000-a-year admin worker.
She had created false accounts to help pocket the cash between June 2015 and October 2021.
The Crown is now seeking to recover almost £700,000 of the stolen sum.
Muirhead, who is challenging the action, gave evidence at the proceeds of crime hearing at the High Court in Glasgow.
She was freed from her prison sentence earlier this year.
Muirhead told her lawyer, Simon Collins, that she is in debt, living on benefits, and staying with her estranged husband purely because it is more cost-effective.
The discovery of unsafe RAAC concrete at the former council house in Aberdeen also cut the value of the property to below £30,000.
Mr Collins went on to take Muirhead through the various people she is said to have given some of the cash to.
One was a then colleague she called 'Scott', who was given £6,760 between 2019 and 2020.
Explaining this for the first time in court, Muirhead told the hearing: 'This was a lad that I worked with. He knew what I had done and was asking for money to keep quiet.'
The mum's four adult sons were also given sizeable amounts of money.
Muirhead stated at one stage: 'I was giving it away as quickly as it came in. If anyone asked for help, I was giving it to them.'
She said she had been struggling to deal with personal matters at the time, leading to issues with drink and gambling.
One son got just over £164,000, another around £140,000, a third £75,000, and the final boy £33,000.
A daughter-in-law, who helped Muirhead clean two static caravans she owned in Lossiemouth got £64,500.
Another, whom Muirhead stated 'used to take me shopping', received around £21,000.
The then partner of one of her other sons was handed more than £60,000 over the years.
But, Muirhead admitted: 'I think she played me a bit.'
Muirhead told the court she has since spoken to most of the people cash was given to, but that none of them are able to pay it back.
In cross-examination, prosecutor Bryan Heaney said the money noted as being handed to others totalled around £600,000, leaving £900,000 of the stolen amount.
Questioning her about that, Mr Heaney asked Muirhead about her gambling problem.
She told him: 'I went into the bingo hall where the (gaming) machines were and sat on them all day.'
She claimed to have never won and does not know how much exactly she lost gambling.
Muirhead admitted to splashing out for the 'whole family' to go on holidays abroad.
She said this included trips to Turkey, Cyprus, and Tenerife.
Asked how much these cost over the years, Muirhead stated: 'Probably a couple of hundred thousand.'
Mr Heaney quizzed Muirhead whether people wondered how she could afford this.
She told him: 'No one was interested. Not one person asked.'
The advocate depute further put to her: 'You are telling the court you do not think you can get any of the money back?'
Muirhead: 'No one has got anything. They do not have the finances.'
In his closing submission to judge Lord Matthews, Mr Heaney said Muirhead seemed to be suggesting £900,000 of the £1.5m went on sunshine breaks, drink, and gambling machines.
But, he said, there was 'not so much as a holiday snap on the beach' as evidence of trips away.
Mr Collins went on to argue that a confiscation order against Muirhead would be 'disproportionate'.
He said she did not have the means to pay money back and that she had asked the others without success.
Lord Matthews will make his decision at a later date.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
3 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Welshpool child rapist Benjamin Sidwell's appeal rejected
A child rapist jailed for 14 years has had an appeal against his conviction and sentence refused by a judge. Benjamin Sidwell, 37, was found guilty by a jury of seven counts of sexual offences against a young girl following a trial in April last year. The most serious was rape and sexual assault by penetration in Welshpool. At Sidwell's sentencing hearing, Judge Niclas Parry said the Shropshire man groomed the girl for his "own sexual gratification in a persistent and devious way", and had shown "absolutely no remorse, and you continue to blame your young victim". READ MORE | Man jailed for 14 years for grooming and raping young girl in Welshpool An appeal against his conviction and sentence was heard by Mrs Justice Mary Stacey sitting with Lady Justice Nicola Davies and Mrs Justice Jennifer Eady in July. Sidwell claimed that his semen, which was found on shorts which the girl had been wearing, could have been "indirectly transferred… rather than from direct transmission from sexual conduct" with the victim. He said the credibility of the girl's account was "undermined" because his hand had been bandaged at the time of his arrest and also argued that there was an "insufficient" investigation and forensic analysis on the bandage, shortly after the last offences took place of sexual touching over clothes. He alleged that the girl's evidence was "inconsistent" and that no corroborating text messages had been found. The lack of text messages, Mrs Justice Stacey, said on behalf of the Crown, was because the victim's evidence was that Sidwell sent messages by Snapchat which has a disappearing message function which he had activated and that after the girl deleted him from her contacts, the messages were automatically lost from her phone too. She also said there was "sufficient" evidence heard before the jury, based on which they were entitled to convict Sidwell. It was the Crown's opinion that "it is not reasonably arguable that the conviction was unsafe' and refused the appeal. Mrs Justice Stacey said: "His behaviour escalated over time from sending sexual messages, to asking her to remove her clothes, to touching her first over and then under clothing, leading to oral and digital penetration, causing her to masturbate him, and eventually rape." Mrs Justice Stacey added: "The Judge had regard to the totality principle by treating the rape offence as the lead offence and imposing no separate penalty for any of the other offences. OTHER NEWS 'It is not reasonably arguable that the final sentence of a determinate sentence of 13 years for all of the offending is manifestly excessive. It fell squarely within the guidelines in recognition of the seriousness of the offences, the applicant's culpability and the harm caused by the offending." The Crown also refused to grant Sidwell's request for an extra 54 days to lodge his oral renewal application against sentence; an order for prosecution disclosure; and leave to admit fresh evidence. "Since there is no merit in the proposed appeal against sentence it is not in the interests of justice."
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Housing migrants in protest-hit Epping hotel was a 'financial lifeline' for its owners and ending its use for asylum seekers would cause 'financial harm', High Court hears
The housing of asylum seekers at a controversial hotel in Epping was a 'financial lifeline' for its owners, a court has heard. The Bell Hotel has been targeted by spate of anti-immigration protests after one of its residents was charged with the sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl last month. Epping Forest District Council is now seeking an injunction from the High Court against its owners, Somani Hotels Ltd, to stop migrants being housed there. Barristers representing the company claimed at the High Court on Friday that the ending of the building's use an asylum hotel would cause 'financial harm'. Piers Riley-Smith told the court that migrants were a monetary 'lifeline' for the hotel, which was only one per cent full in August 2022, when it was open to paying customers. He added that an injunction would 'cause harm to the Home Office 's statutory duty to asylum seekers' and cause them 'hardship'. It comes after lawyers representing the council said housing asylum seekers at the hotel is becoming a 'very serious problem' which 'could not be much worse'. They claimed that Somani Hotels had breached planning rules as the site is no longer being used for its intended purpose as a hotel. The injunction sought by the authority, if granted, would require the company to stop housing asylum seekers at the hotel within 14 days. Opening the hearing in London, Philip Coppel KC, for the council, said: 'Epping Forest District Council comes to this court seeking an injunction because it has a very serious problem. 'It is a problem that is getting out of hand; it is a problem that is causing a great anxiety to those living in the district. 'The problem has arisen because of a breach of planning control by the defendant.' Mr Coppel also referenced the alleged sexual assault of a teenage girl by an asylum seeker who was placed in the hotel and said several schools were in the nearby area. He said: 'Having this sort of thing go on in such a concentration of schools with no measures in place to stop a repetition is not acceptable.' He continued: 'It really could not be much worse than this.' In written submissions for the hearing, Mr Coppel said there was a 'preponderance of factors overwhelmingly in favour of granting an injunction'. He said these included removing 'the catalyst for violent protests in public places'. The barrister added: 'Allowing the status quo to continue is wholly unacceptable, providing a feeding ground for unrest.' He also told the court that the case has been brought against the hotel owner because it is the landowner, and had previously applied for planning permission. Concluding his submissions, Mr Coppel told Mr Justice Eyre that if an injunction was not granted, 'Your Lordship will be telling the residents in Epping: 'You have just got to lump it''.' He added that the council is 'acting in a proportionate way, in the interests of its residents', and that 'enough is enough'. Piers Riley-Smith, representing Somani Hotels, told the court in written submissions that the injunction bid should be delayed to a later date. He added that the Home Office's contracted service provider, Corporate Travel Management (North) Limited (CTM), should be involved in the case. He continued that the alleged planning breach was 'not flagrant', and that it was 'entirely wrong' for the council to 'suggest the use has been hidden from them'. The barrister told the court that the hotel previously housed asylum seekers from May 2020 to March 2021, and from October 2022 to April 2024. He said that the council 'never instigated any formal enforcement proceedings against this use'. He also said that while the company did apply for planning permission for a 'temporary change of use' in February 2023, this was a 'pragmatic attempt to address the claimant's concerns, rather than an acceptance that such a use required planning permission'. This application was later withdrawn as it had not been determined by April 2024, the barrister said. Asylum seekers then began being placed in the Bell Hotel again in April 2025, with Mr Riley-Smith stating that a planning application was not made 'having taken advice from the Home Office'. Mr Riley-Smith also said that the company accepted that since the Southport riots in summer 2024, 'where the perpetrator was mistaken to be an asylum seeker', and the alleged sexual assault in Epping, 'there has been public concern about the use as evidenced by highly publicised violent and disorderly protests'. He continued: 'However, the court should bear in mind - as recognised by the claimant - that these have spread far beyond locals who might have a genuine concern about their area to a wider group with more strategic national and ideological aims, but that does not necessarily mean the concerns are well-founded. 'Fears as to an increase of crime associated with asylum seekers or a danger to schools are common, but that does not make them well-founded.' He added: 'It also sets a dangerous precedent that protests justify planning injunctions.' Police issued a dispersal order in Epping before the march on July 24, which included the town centre and transport hubs such as the Underground station The hearing before Mr Justice Eyre is due to conclude on Friday, with the judge saying it was 'unlikely' that a ruling would come this week. He said: 'I am not going to close my notebook and give a decision now. 'I am going to reflect on this, but we need a decision sooner rather than later.' The judge later said that he would give a ruling at 2pm on Tuesday. He also ordered that Somani Hotels Limited could not 'accept any new applications' from asylum seekers to stay at the site until he had ruled on whether to grant the temporary injunction.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Six men jailed for combined 101 years over gangland attacks
The mob's crime included ambushing a man whose hand was left hanging off as well as the torching of prison officers' cars. They were sentenced at the High Court in Glasgow on Friday, having been found guilty after a lengthy trial last month. The crimes occurred in and around Edinburgh in 2022 and 2023. READ MORE: Nigel Farage's Reform peers demand reignites calls for House of Lords to be scrapped Michael Heeps was jailed for 23 years – he had been convicted of eight charges, including three attempted murders and being involved in the blazes at HMP Addiewell. The 34-year-old is a trusted lieutenant of Edinburgh crime boss Mark Richardson. John Murray, 25, was jailed for 17 years for five charges involving two murder bids. Lee Ridgway, 33, was involved in three of the attempted murders and the incidents at Addiewell. He was sentenced to 22 years. Dale Bauld, 33, will serve 17 years for his part in two of the violent attacks. Damien Mullen, 26, was imprisoned for 14 years for attempted murder and the torching of the cars. Ryan McGovern – who had fled the UK – was involved in the Addiewell blazes. The 33-year-old was jailed for eight years. Lord Mulholland said on Friday: 'The courts and the public will not put up with this type of out-of-control gangsterism. 'The sentences that I impose are intended to punish and deter you and anyone else who is considering engaging in this behaviour. 'The message to the public for those that may be contemplating or emulating you is 'don't, as there will be a very high price to pay'.' READ MORE: Charity rowers mistaken for 'illegal migrants' by Rupert Lowe arrive in Scotland Ryan Brown was one of the gang's victims, having been attacked near his home in the capital's Pilton on January 5, 2023. The 30-year-old was walking to a friend's house when a car raced up and a machete wielding assailant 'casually' got out to strike him. Brown recalled trying to fend off the blows as the weapon was wildly swung at him. He shouted at the balaclava-clad attacker: 'What are you doing, mate?' – but the thug remained silent. Brown slumped to the ground in agony. He told prosecutor John Keenan KC: "I remember screaming and everyone running over. My hand was literally hanging off. "I thought I was dying on the doorstep." He was rushed to hospital, where he was in the operating theatre for 12 hours. This included surgery to repair his hand. Mr Brown told the trial he remains affected by what happened and is expecting further operations. He said speaking about it again was "bringing back bad memories". Peajmaan Khosrowpour was earlier targeted in a 'high speed chase' between Edinburgh and Dalkeith. He was forced off the road and his car smashed into a wall. The man was left with a 'large gaping wound' to his arm after he was struck with machetes. He also needed a number of operations, has been left scarred for life and remains physically affected by the incident. A physio has told him his condition is "as good as its going to get". Robert McLintock was ambushed by masked attackers in late January 2023 in the capital's Ferniehill area. He ended up intensive care and a coma following the assault. Kieran Jenkins had also been targeted in December 2022 in Bilston, near Edinburgh. They were said to be 'lying in wait' before confronting him as he was in his car. They smashed the vehicle up with bladed weapons. He fortunately escaped unharmed. In a 999 call, Jenkins, however, said the attackers had tried to 'chop him up'. READ MORE: Major emergency rescue operation launched as man missing in river Keenan told jurors: "It is plain they planned to attack Kieran Jenkins and cause him harm. "He was left in no doubt that was their intention. There was no injury, but you can still regard this as a murderous attack." The fire attacks at HMP Addiewell occurred on January 7, 2023. A total of six vehicles were set alight late at night designed to intimidate prison staff. The court heard how CCTV footage and forensic evidence helped catch the mob, who had also tried to intimidate a witness by leaving a note calling her 'a grass'. McGovern had fled the UK initially via Campbeltown in Argyll and Bute and onto Dublin. He went on travel to the Netherlands before going to Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand and the United Arab Emirates. He was eventually traced and extradited back to Scotland.
