Fashion brands accused of shortcuts on climate pledges overlooking workers
Fashion brands including luxury label Hermes, sportswear giant Nike, and fast fashion chain H&M are in the hot seat amid new allegations of climate greenwashing after making commitments to slash carbon emissions in Asia, which is home to more than 50 percent of global garment production.
A report released this morning by the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre (BHRRC), titled, The Missing Thread, analysed 65 global fashion brands. It found that while 44 of them had made public commitments to reduce carbon emissions, none had adopted what is known as a 'Just Transition' policy, a concept first introduced during COP27 in Egypt in 2022.
A Just Transition ensures that workers are not left behind as industries shift towards a low-carbon economy.
Only 11 companies in the study acknowledged the climate-related impact on workers in their social and human rights policies. Just four provided any guidance on managing heat-related stress.
Only two companies among those deemed the most ambitious by the report mentioned the welfare of workers. These included Inditex, the Spanish retail giant that owns the fast fashion company Zara, and Kering, the parent company of Gucci.
'Decarbonisation done without workers as critical and creative partners is not a just transition, it's a dangerous shortcut,' said Natalie Swan, labour rights programme manager at BHRRC, in a news release.
Currently, the global textile industry relies on 98 million tonnes of non-renewable resources per year, such as oil and fertiliser. At current trends, the fashion industry is on track to be responsible for more than 25 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
'The fashion industry's climate targets mean little if the people who make its products are not taken into consideration,' Swan said. 'It's not enough to go green. It has to be clean and fair.'
'Brands must stop hiding behind greenwashing slogans and start seriously engaging workers and their trade unions, whose rights, livelihoods and safety are under threat from both climate change and the industry's response to it. A just transition is not just a responsibility, it's a critical opportunity to build a fairer, more resilient fashion industry that works for people and the planet.'
Al Jazeera reached out to Nike, Hermes, H&M, Inditex and Kering. None of them responded to a request for comment.
The effects of climate change have already hit much of Southeast Asia hard. Garment workers in countries including Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, and Vietnam have experienced extreme weather events such as surging temperatures and severe flooding.
In Bangladesh, workers reported fainting from heat-related illnesses. According to the report, factories allegedly failed to provide fans or drinking water. Similar challenges were noted in Cambodia, where temperatures regularly exceeded 39 degrees Celsius (102 degrees Fahrenheit) during a 2022 heatwave.
A third of workers said they had already lost work due to automation. In Bangladesh's garment sector, 30 percent reported job losses stemming from technological changes. These shifts have disproportionately affected female workers, who are less likely to receive training on new technologies and are often excluded from on-the-job learning opportunities that could help them adapt to evolving industry demands.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
21 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Why China's rare earth exports are a key issue in trade tensions with US
China's export of rare earth elements is central to the trade deal struck this week with the United States. Beijing has a virtual monopoly on the supply of the critical minerals, which are used to make everything from cars to drones and wind turbines. Earlier this year, Beijing leveraged its dominance of the sector to hit back at US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, placing export controls on seven rare earths and related products. The restrictions created a headache for global manufacturers, particularly automakers, who rely on the materials. After talks in Geneva in May, the US and China announced a 90-day pause on their escalating tit-for-tat tariffs, during which time US levies would be reduced from 145 percent to 30 percent and Chinese duties from 125 percent to 10 percent. The truce had appeared to be in jeopardy in recent weeks after Washington accused Beijing of not moving fast enough to ease its restrictions on rare earths exports. After two days of marathon talks in London, the two sides on Wednesday announced a 'framework' to get trade back on track. Trump said the deal would see rare earth minerals 'supplied, up front,' though many details of the agreement are still unclear. Rare earths are a group of 17 elements that are essential to numerous manufacturing industries. The auto industry has become particularly reliant on rare-earth magnets for steering systems, engines, brakes and many other parts. China has long dominated the mining and processing of rare earth minerals, as well as the production of related components like rare earth magnets. It mines about 70 percent of the world's rare earths and processes approximately 90 percent of the supply. China also maintains near-total control over the supply of heavy rare earths, including dysprosium and terbium. China's hold over the industry had been a concern for the US and other countries for some time, but their alarm grew after Beijing imposed export controls in April. The restrictions affected supplies of samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium, and required companies shipping materials and finished products overseas to obtain export licences. The restrictions followed a similar move by China in February, when it placed export controls on tungsten, bismuth and three other 'niche metals'. While news of a deal on rare earths signals a potential reprieve for manufacturers, the details of its implementation remain largely unclear. Chinese customs data shows the sale of rare earths to the US dropped 37 percent in April, while the sale of rare earth magnets fell 58 percent for the US and 51 percent worldwide, according to Bloomberg. Global rare earth exports recovered 23 percent in May, following talks between US and Chinese officials in Geneva, but they are still down overall from a year earlier. The greatest alarm has been felt by carmakers and auto parts manufacturers in the US and Europe, who reported bottlenecks after working their way through inventories of rare earth magnets. 'The automobile industry is now using words like panic. This isn't something that the auto industry is just talking about and trying to make a big stir. This is serious right now, and they're talking about shutting down production lines,' Mark Smith, a mining and mineral processing expert and the CEO of the US-based NioCorp Developments, told Al Jazeera. Even with news of a breakthrough, Western companies are still worried about their future access to rare earths and magnets and how their dependence on China's supply chain could be leveraged against them. The Financial Times reported on Thursday that China's Ministry of Commerce has been demanding 'sensitive business information to secure rare earths and magnets' from Western companies in China, including production details and customer lists. Trump shared some details of the agreement on his social media platform, Truth Social, where he also addressed concerns about rare earths and rare earth magnets. 'We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%. The relationship is excellent,' Trump said, using a figure for US duties that includes levies introduced during his first term. 'Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me),' Trump said. Ahead of the negotiations in London, China's Ministry of Commerce had said it approved an unspecified number of export licences for rare earths, and it was willing to 'further strengthen communication and dialogue on export controls with relevant countries'. However, an op-ed published by state news outlet Xinhua this week said rare earth export controls were not 'short-term bargaining tools' or 'tactical countermeasures' but a necessary measure because rare earths can be used for both civilian and military purposes. NioCorp Developments' Smith said Beijing is unlikely to quickly give up such powerful leverage over the US entirely. 'There's going to be a whole bunch of words, but I really think China is going to hold the US hostage on this issue, because why not?' he said. 'They've worked really hard to get into the position that they're in. They have 100 percent control over the heavy rare earth production in the world. Why not use that?' Deborah Elms, the head of trade policy at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore, said it was hard to predict how rare earths would be treated in negotiations, which would need to balance other US concerns like China's role in exporting the deadly opioid fentanyl to the US. Beijing, for its part, will want guarantees that it can access advanced critical US technology to make advanced semiconductors, she said.
Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Inditex's early summer sales fall short of expectations, shares dip
Agencies Fast-fashion giant and Zara owner Inditex missed analysts' expectations for first quarter sales and early summer trading on Wednesday, as tariff fallout weighed over its efforts to maintain strong growth. Concerns about resurgent inflation and an economic slowdown triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's erratic tariff rollout have already dampened shopping enthusiasm in the U.S. and other major consumer markets. The weaker-than-expected numbers, which sent Inditex's shares down 4.6% on Wednesday, offer a first glimpse of the impact of global trade tensions on the fast-fashion industry ahead of the second quarter earnings season. The tariff environment is difficult to predict, but Inditex is well-placed to weather it, Gorka Garcia-Tapia, the Spanish company's head of investor relations, said in an investor call. 'We have such a global presence, and therefore we have a lot of experience over the last few decades with regards to managing changes in tariff regimes,' he said, adding that Inditex's diversified sales and sourcing give it flexibility. 'We have that focus on proximity sourcing. I think that all that, regarding the U.S., really helps us out.' Inditex reported a slower start to its summer sales, with currency-adjusted revenue growth of 6% from May 1 to June 9, compared to analysts' expectations of 7.3%, and down from 12% growth in the same period a year ago. Revenues for the first quarter ending April 30 were 8.27 billion euros ($9.44 billion), falling short of the analysts' average estimate of 8.36 billion euros, according to an LSEG poll. Garcia-Tapia said that net income increased 0.8% in the quarter, to 1.3 billion euros. The company expects its growth margin to remain stable, as stated. Inditex did not provide an explanation for the weaker sales growth. In a statement, it called its performance 'solid,' having labelled it 'very robust' at its previous results announcement in March, when annual sales were up 10.5%. 'We need to take a step back and look at mid single-digit growth as actually being quite good in this environment,' said Bernstein analyst William Woods. Inditex's competitors have also experienced a sluggish spring. H&M's sales have struggled, growing by just 1% in March compared to 4% in the same period a year earlier. Its December-February revenue grew by 2%, below analyst forecasts. H&M will report results for the second quarter on June 26. Rainy weather in Inditex's home market, Spain, which accounts for 15% of its global sales, also likely hurt the company's performance, according to Bernstein analysts. Spain has experienced one of its wettest-ever springs, with Madrid recording three times its usual levels of rainfall for the season. With volatility in foreign exchange markets driven by trade risks, Inditex said currency fluctuations will have a bigger impact than expected, predicting a 3% adverse effect on its 2025 sales, compared with the 1% it flagged in March. Inditex is testing its low-priced, Gen Z-focused brand Lefties in markets beyond Spain, Portugal and Mexico, CEO Oscar Garcia Maceiras said. It also plans to open new stores for its Oysho brand in the Netherlands, he said.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Fashion brands accused of shortcuts on climate pledges overlooking workers
Fashion brands including luxury label Hermes, sportswear giant Nike, and fast fashion chain H&M are in the hot seat amid new allegations of climate greenwashing after making commitments to slash carbon emissions in Asia, which is home to more than 50 percent of global garment production. A report released this morning by the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre (BHRRC), titled, The Missing Thread, analysed 65 global fashion brands. It found that while 44 of them had made public commitments to reduce carbon emissions, none had adopted what is known as a 'Just Transition' policy, a concept first introduced during COP27 in Egypt in 2022. A Just Transition ensures that workers are not left behind as industries shift towards a low-carbon economy. Only 11 companies in the study acknowledged the climate-related impact on workers in their social and human rights policies. Just four provided any guidance on managing heat-related stress. Only two companies among those deemed the most ambitious by the report mentioned the welfare of workers. These included Inditex, the Spanish retail giant that owns the fast fashion company Zara, and Kering, the parent company of Gucci. 'Decarbonisation done without workers as critical and creative partners is not a just transition, it's a dangerous shortcut,' said Natalie Swan, labour rights programme manager at BHRRC, in a news release. Currently, the global textile industry relies on 98 million tonnes of non-renewable resources per year, such as oil and fertiliser. At current trends, the fashion industry is on track to be responsible for more than 25 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. 'The fashion industry's climate targets mean little if the people who make its products are not taken into consideration,' Swan said. 'It's not enough to go green. It has to be clean and fair.' 'Brands must stop hiding behind greenwashing slogans and start seriously engaging workers and their trade unions, whose rights, livelihoods and safety are under threat from both climate change and the industry's response to it. A just transition is not just a responsibility, it's a critical opportunity to build a fairer, more resilient fashion industry that works for people and the planet.' Al Jazeera reached out to Nike, Hermes, H&M, Inditex and Kering. None of them responded to a request for comment. The effects of climate change have already hit much of Southeast Asia hard. Garment workers in countries including Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, and Vietnam have experienced extreme weather events such as surging temperatures and severe flooding. In Bangladesh, workers reported fainting from heat-related illnesses. According to the report, factories allegedly failed to provide fans or drinking water. Similar challenges were noted in Cambodia, where temperatures regularly exceeded 39 degrees Celsius (102 degrees Fahrenheit) during a 2022 heatwave. A third of workers said they had already lost work due to automation. In Bangladesh's garment sector, 30 percent reported job losses stemming from technological changes. These shifts have disproportionately affected female workers, who are less likely to receive training on new technologies and are often excluded from on-the-job learning opportunities that could help them adapt to evolving industry demands.
