Is Delta using AI to personalize ticket prices? Here's how the airline responded to those worrying rumors
Delta recently faced a wave of criticism from lawmakers who feared the airline might start using AI to tailor prices to individuals based on personal data. Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal warned of a future where passengers are charged based on their "pain point"—a.k.a. the maximum they're willing to pay—echoing the surge pricing model of Uber and Lyft.
Delta responded swiftly. In a letter to the senators, the airline stated plainly: It has never used personal data to set individualized prices, nor does it plan to. "Our ticket pricing never takes into account personal data," the company wrote. Instead, Delta says its AI rollout is about speed—helping adjust to shifting market conditions faster and smarter, not pricing passengers based on who they are.
The technology comes from Fetcherr, an Israeli startup specializing in AI-based pricing management. Delta aims to have it running across 20-percent of its domestic network by the end of 2025. Fetcherr promises airlines can "personalize offers" and "maximize profitability," language that raised more than a few red flags in Washington.
Lawmakers aren't fully convinced. "Delta is telling their investors one thing, and then turning around and telling the public another," said Senator Gallego in a public statement. He and others want clarity on what kind of data Delta is actually using.
Delta insists that the AI helps manage traditional variables like demand, competition and route popularity—nothing new in the airline world. "AI promises to streamline the process," not manipulate it, the company assured.
Meanwhile, rivals are also weighing in. Per FOX Business, American Airlines CEO Robert Isom warned that using AI to push personal pricing "could hurt consumer trust."
The debate is only heating up. A new bill introduced by Democratic lawmakers Greg Casar and Rashida Tlaib seeks to ban AI-driven pricing based on personal data altogether, citing FTC concerns about increasingly tailored—and potentially exploitative—pricing models.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
US Justice Department backs plan to revoke Delta-Aeromexico antitrust immunity
Aug 11 (Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Justice on Monday backed a Department of Transportation proposal to revoke antitrust immunity for the joint venture between Delta Air Lines (DAL.N), opens new tab and Grupo Aeroméxico, which allows the two carriers to coordinate on scheduling, pricing, and capacity decisions for U.S.–Mexico flights. In a filing, the Justice Department supported the DoT's position, arguing that the alliance may be stifling competition. 'Competition is particularly valuable in the airline industry. It drives lower prices, better quality, and more of the services consumers want.' The alliance was granted antitrust immunity in 2016, allowing it to go beyond standard codesharing—selling seats on each other's flights. However, in January, the DoT said it did not plan to renew the antitrust immunity after the Mexican government implemented changes regarding airport slots and operations at Mexico City's main airport. Delta and Aeroméxico did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
Norway's sovereign wealth fund sells its shares in 11 Israeli companies
Norway's sovereign wealth fund has sold its shares in 11 Israeli companies, its managers said Monday, a move they said reduces its holdings in the country against the backdrop of the 'serious humanitarian crisis' in Gaza. The management of the fund, which invests Norway's profits from oil and gas, said in a statement that it had investments in 61 Israeli companies at the end of this year's first half. It said it decided last week to sell all its investments in 11 firms that are not in the Norwegian Finance Ministry's equity benchmark index, and has spent recent days completing those sales. It did not identify the companies concerned. The fund also said it will move all investments in Israeli companies that have been run by external managers in-house and is terminating contracts with external managers in Israel. 'These measures were taken in response to extraordinary circumstances. The situation in Gaza is a serious humanitarian crisis," said Nicolai Tangen, the CEO of Norges Bank Investment Management, which manages what is widely known as the Oil Fund. 'We are invested in companies that operate in a country at war, and conditions in the West Bank and Gaza have recently worsened. In response, we will further strengthen our due diligence.' Tangen added in a statement that the latest move 'will simplify the management of our investments in this market' and reduce the number of companies that the fund's council on ethics monitors. The fund's management noted that it intensified its monitoring of investments in Israeli companies last fall and sold its holdings in 'several' firms as a result. Officially known as the Government Pension Fund Global, the Oil Fund owns nearly 1.5% of all shares in the world's listed companies, with holdings in about 9,000 firms, according to its management's website.
Reuters
18 hours ago
- Reuters
Japan's deepening political woes cloud budget, rate hike timing
TOKYO, Aug 11 (Reuters) - Japan's deepening political uncertainty risks prolonging policy paralysis that could affect the drafting of next year's budget and the timing of the central bank's next interest rate hike, analysts say, clouding the outlook for the fragile economy. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is facing increased calls from within his ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) to step down and take responsibility for the party's huge defeat in an upper house election in July and a lower house poll last year. While Ishiba has denied he has any plans to resign, his fading support has triggered inevitable questions about his political future and analysts say a leadership change would likely have implications for the outlook for fiscal and monetary policy. In a meeting on Friday, lawmakers decided to consider holding a rare leadership race even with the party head Ishiba still presiding. Under LDP rules, such a race would take place if the majority of the party's lawmakers and regional heads agreed to hold one. But it is uncertain how long it would take for the party to decide, according to lawmakers and government officials familiar with the procedure told Reuters. That contest could happen in September at the earliest, they say, which would allow the new administration to compile a spending package to cushion the economic blow from U.S. tariffs. But if the race does not take place in September, it may have to wait until early next year to avoid disrupting the government's drafting of next fiscal year's budget, they say. "We would not be surprised if the LDP calls for a leadership election in September," UBS analysts said in a research note. "It seems that uncertainties regarding politics are unlikely to resolve soon." In Japan, the Ministry of Finance collects spending requests from ministries in August and finalises the government's draft budget in late December. The budget must pass parliament in time to take effect from the April start of a new fiscal year. Failure to pass the budget through parliament would force the government to compile a stop-gap budget, which could hurt the economy by causing delays in expenditure. Some ruling party lawmakers say there is no choice but for Ishiba to step down to resolve the deadlock. Having lost control in both houses of parliament, the LDP-led ruling coalition needs opposition party support to pass legislation and budget through parliament. Opposition parties have ruled out forming a coalition unless Ishiba steps down. "Japan needs a stable coalition government. Otherwise, it's impossible to pursue consistent policies," LDP heavyweight Ken Saito told Reuters last week. "It's best for the LDP to seek a coalition partner under a new leader." Ishiba's weak political standing and prolonged political uncertainty also complicate the Bank of Japan's decision on how soon to resume interest rate hikes. While few analysts expect the BOJ to hike rates at its next policy meeting in September, some see a good chance of action in October, December or January next year when more data becomes available on the impact of U.S. tariffs on the economy. Known as a fiscal hawk, Ishiba has endorsed the central bank's efforts to gradually wean the economy off a decade-long, massive stimulus as inflation remains above its 2% target for well over three years. But his bitter election defeat has made his administration vulnerable to calls for big spending and loose monetary policy. Many opposition parties have urged the BOJ to hold off, or go slow, in raising rates and focus on supporting the economy. If the LDP were to hold a leadership race, the event could put the spotlight on the views of candidates like Sanae Takaichi, a reflationist-minded lawmaker who in the past blasted the idea of interest rate hikes as "stupid." All this could discourage the BOJ from raising rates in coming months to avoid drawing unwanted political attention. "All we can say is that we would continue to take appropriate policies to sustainably and stably achieve our 2% inflation target," Governor Kazuo Ueda told a news briefing earlier this month, when asked how the BOJ would respond if political changes lead to fresh demands on monetary policy. "It's impossible to predict how politics will unfold, which means for the BOJ it's best to take a wait-and-see stance," said a source familiar with the bank's thinking.
