logo
Riverbed washes away in NC to reveal 1862 shipwreck is wrapped around older ship

Riverbed washes away in NC to reveal 1862 shipwreck is wrapped around older ship

Miami Herald09-07-2025
A confounding act of nature has uncovered one of the nation's most unusual wartime shipwrecks in eastern North Carolina.
The Union gunboat USS Picket spent much of the past 163 years buried in mud in the Tar River, about a 110-mile drive southeast from Raleigh.
But for reasons unknown, up to 7 feet of riverbed has been scoured away, excavating parts of the 130-foot-long ship not seen since it sank in 1862, according to Nathan Richards, director of the Maritime Studies program at East Carolina University's Department of History.
The discovery was made as Richards led an ECU field school at the wreck site, and divers started seeing details that are uncommon among Civil War military shipwrecks.
The USS Picket is essentially two shipwrecks, or as Richards explains: 'An iron-hulled watercraft 'wrapped' in a larger wooden hull, integrating the earlier structure into the U.S. Army gunboat.'
'We are able to access previously unseen parts of the ship that have long been buried. Added to this, the site is well known for having very bad visibility for divers (mere inches), but we have been very lucky to have had several feet of visibility,' Richards told McClatchy News in a phone interview.
'The wreck is largely intact below deck level. ... It appears to not only be intact bow(s) to stern(s) but there is 7 (feet) of exposed structure in many places.'
The Picket remains completely submerged, but two-thirds of the hull are now free of mud, providing the team with 'tantalizing clues' of how two distinctly different types of American ship building were merged in desperate times.
Ship within a ship
The USS Picket exploded in mid battle in 1862, killing 19 crewmen and the captain, historians say.
Before that, it led the kind of history that makes for a great war story. It had been a flagship for Maj. Gen. Ambrose E. Burnside, who led a notorious 'motley fleet' crewed by sailors who 'conformed to neither army nor navy standards,' NCpedia.org reports.
Its mission was to shut down North Carolina's ports and starve the Confederacy of supplies, and the fleet did its job well.
The Picket was among the smallest of the fleet, and its unusual construction resulted from an urgency to expand the Union's naval capabilities.
'At least three other Civil War ships were created in a similar way, but none survived to be studied by historians,' Maritime Studies graduate student Rebecca Kelley, who is writing a thesis on the wreck's construction, told McClatchy News in an email.
The Winslow, built in 1845, represents one of the earliest examples of iron ship construction, and its hull is still intact, Kelley says.
And because the wreck was encased in protective mud, much of the timber that made up the Picket's hull is also still there, she says.
That makes the Picket a rare opportunity for researchers.
The Picket's last day
Little is known about the history of the Winslow, which was a barge built for New York's canal system, historians say.
'They are the least romantic type of ship. They often don't have stories associated with them or a spectacular romantic narrative that allow us to track them through history. Nothing really incredible happens to them,' Richards says.
'But it was transformed in multiple ways when it became the Picket. It was a witness to multiple battles as part of the Picket and was a flagship. It really went from a nondescript thing to something of prominence.'
The Picket was used to transport Union troops and was a participant in a number of assaults on Confederate forces in North Carolina, Richards says.
Its final battle was Sept. 6, 1862, when Confederates pulled off a surprise attack on federal troops near Washington, North Carolina, according to the N.C. Maritime Museum in Beaufort.
'The gun boats, Picket and USS Louisiana began to shell advancing opponents. The Picket was only able to fire one gun before something went wrong onboard,' the museum reports.
The cause of that explosion remains unclear. It could have been the ship's magazine exploding or its boiler, Richards says.
Why the shipwreck is important
The wreck of the Picket may deteriorate more rapidly now that it's no longer protected by mud, and that means the field school's use of emerging technology comes at a critical time.
When completed, an updated 3D interpretation will tell the story of something bigger than a Civil War gunboat.
The Picket represents emerging technology, industry and science from a time when the United States was evolving into a super power, Richards says.
'Faced with the 'rude test of war' both the Union and Confederate forces leverage technical know-how in many interesting ways,' Richards says.
'The adaptation of civilian craft into vessels of war is one major theme — and we aren't aware of too many cases where an iron vessel used in the New York canal trade was adapted so extensively and 'strangely.'
'Information from the wreck site provides a window into this period of experimentation and innovation under rare circumstances. Little of this seems to have been preserved in written records.'
Kelley's thesis could be the most in-depth analysis made public on the ship's mysterious construction, Richards said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These dog breeds rank as the trendiest in the US. See which ones made the list
These dog breeds rank as the trendiest in the US. See which ones made the list

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

These dog breeds rank as the trendiest in the US. See which ones made the list

A dog breed ranks as the nation's trendiest for the second year straight. The miniature poodle ranks No. 1 on a list of breeds that are gaining year-over-year interest, according to results published Wednesday, Aug. 20. 'Up 4% this year, the miniature poodles bring all the brains and charm of a standard poodle in a smaller, whiskered package,' the online pet resource wrote in its report. 'These lovable Velcro dogs stick close to their humans, which could (be) why they are sticking in the number one trending spot again this year.' So, which other types of pups were trending? Here are the breeds that round out the top five: American Staffordshire terrier at No. 2Cavalier King Charles spaniel at No. 3Toy poodle at No. 4Pug at No. 5 To create the list, studied data from millions of pet owners who use its online resources. It studied figures from 2024 to 2025 to determine which breeds saw a 'sudden increase' in growth 'from one year to another,' the website wrote in a news release and in an email to McClatchy News. For the second year in a row, the miniature poodle reigns as the trendiest U.S. dog breed. It topped the list in 2024 after previously holding the No. 2 spot in 2023, results show. 'Continued popularity could be due to their compact size as well as breed traits that make miniature poodles more likely to want companionship with their people,' a spokesperson wrote. 'According to Rover's survey, pet parents say size is a top factor when choosing a dog (58%) and loyalty is the most desirable personality trait (67%).' In addition to surveying more than 1,000 pet owners across the country, considered which of the nation's dog breeds are most popular overall. To create that list, it studied the total volume of each type of dog that joined its website in 2025. Here are the favorites: Mixed breed at No. 1Labrador retriever at No. 2Golden retriever at No. 3Goldendoodle at No. 4German shepherd at No. 5 Earlier this year, the American Kennel Club found that French bulldogs were the nation's most common breed, McClatchy News reported.

National Park Peak Set to Be Renamed
National Park Peak Set to Be Renamed

Newsweek

time4 hours ago

  • Newsweek

National Park Peak Set to Be Renamed

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Teton County Board of County Commissioners is proposing to change the name of Mount Woodring in Wyoming's Grand Teton National Park to Raven Peak, due to concerns about the mountain's namesake being charged with sexual assault in the 1930s. Newsweek reached out to the press office of the National Park Service and the U.S. Geological Survey via email for comment. Why It Matters Mount Woodring was named after the park's first superintendent, Samuel T. Woodring. Woodring was charged with assaulting and attempting to commit rape against an 11-year-old girl in 1934, according to court documents. The charges were dismissed a year later because the parents of the girl did not want to put their daughter through the trauma of testifying, the name change proposal form states. The name change was proposed by the Teton County Board of County Commissioners, which said that "the name Mount Woodring is offensive." The board said that there was a "need to adopt a new name at the earliest possible opportunity." Mount Woodring was included in the U.S. Geological Survey's list of "upcoming proposals of interest" last year. Mount Woodring of the Grand Tetons Peaks in Grand Tetons National Park. Mount Woodring of the Grand Tetons Peaks in Grand Tetons National Park. htrnr/Getty Images What To Know The Teton County Board of County Commissioners has suggested the name Raven Peak, as "ravens are commonly found in the Tetons, they are considered intelligent birds, and the raven is considered significant in most Native American cultures." The board said it felt that it was important to name the peak after an animal and not a person, because "the reputation of a person can change with the passage of time, whereas the status of a raven is not likely to change as years pass." "The hope is that Raven Peak will have staying power that helps to make it a fitting name," the proposal said. In its original letter to the U.S. Board on Geographic Names, there was also another possible name mentioned: Equality Peak. However, after listening to public feedback, the board found that there was "overwhelming support for the name Raven Peak," while the name Equality Peak was deemed "controversial" and met with "considerable opposition" by some members of the public. President Donald Trump has been an active proponent of historical monuments and military bases keeping their original names, signing an executive order in March titled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History." The administration wrote in the order: "Over the past decade, Americans have witnessed a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation's history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth." It added: "This revisionist movement seeks to undermine the remarkable achievements of the United States by casting its founding principles and historical milestones in a negative light." Earlier this year, he signed an executive order changing the name of Alaska's highest peak, Denali, back to its original name, Mount McKinley and renamed the Gulf of Mexico the "Gulf of America." What People Are Saying The Teton County Board of County Commissioners, in its letter: "Ravens live in our community and in Grand Teton National Park year-round and exhibit incredible intelligence, play an important role in our ecosystem, are adaptable – thriving at high and low elevations, often performing impressive acrobatic maneuvers – and are known to be highly social and playful. It is our community's sentiment that Raven Peak is an appropriate name for the mountain where these remarkable birds live and play." What Happens Next The final decision for the name change lies with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names, although Trump is able to override the board's authority should he decide to.

My Partner and I Aren't Excited to Move In Together. Is That Bad?
My Partner and I Aren't Excited to Move In Together. Is That Bad?

New York Times

time8 hours ago

  • New York Times

My Partner and I Aren't Excited to Move In Together. Is That Bad?

My partner and I have been seeing each other for two and a half years. We're planning to move in together next year, and if all goes well, to get married the year after that. The problem: Neither of us is super excited about moving in together. I like living alone, and I'm concerned about losing my independence. My girlfriend is concerned about having to deal with my small quirks. We've even discussed looking for a two-bedroom apartment, so we can have defined spaces to be alone. Make no mistake, we love each other deeply. And we recognize that there are many benefits to moving in together, such as advancing our relationship. Do we have a problem? BOYFRIEND I think you have the opposite of a problem: Through good communication, you and your girlfriend have identified an issue that was probably awkward to raise and to discuss. But you did it. Well done! To me, this bodes well for your relationship. And since there is no single answer here, let's consider a few options. Regardless of which apartment you plan to live in — hers, yours or one you haven't found yet — you can experiment now, in your current spaces, by designating zones and blocks of time in which you can be alone. Healthy couples are rarely together 24/7, and scheduling time and space for independence can be an important part of caring for yourself and your relationship. Now, this may be easier to pull off in a larger apartment, as you suggest, but you can still try it now. Let me add that there is no one way to advance your relationship, as you put it — and it certainly doesn't require shared real estate. I know a happily married couple who have lived in separate apartments in the same building for 30 years! This may not be your aim, but keep talking about what's working and what isn't. That's the important thing. It seems to me that you and your girlfriend are off to a healthy start. A Guest With Pre-Wedding Jitters Our adult son's girlfriend is transgender. This is not an issue for us. But we are all invited to our nephew's wedding, and his branch of the family is socially conservative. I have heard passing remarks from them over the years that indicate potential transphobia. The bridegroom's family has never met our son's girlfriend, nor do they know she is trans, but everyone has deep affection for our son. Do we owe the bridegroom or his parents any warning? Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store