logo
What Age Is Right for Dating? Therapists and Parents Weigh In

What Age Is Right for Dating? Therapists and Parents Weigh In

Yahoo5 days ago

I can still remember the day my 5-year-old son started telling me all about his four (!) kindergarten girlfriends. I thought it was pretty darn cute and, to be honest, I was just relieved that my shy and sometimes truculent little kid was making friends with such ease. Now that my daughter (who is my oldest child) is 10 years old and definitely on the cusp of puberty, conversations about crushes feel a little more like the real thing—namely because it's clearly the earliest form of hormone-driven feelings for a peer. And to be honest, this development does contribute to a growing sense of dread about the teen years that lie ahead.
Anyways, you can probably see where I'm going with this, so I'll get straight to the point: How soon is too soon for kids to start doing the boyfriend/girlfriend thing? And when can they graduate to actual dating? I went to two Clinical Psychologists (PhD) and a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (LMFT) for some expert advice, plus pooled parents across the country, and the answer is… it depends. Experts and caregivers pretty much agree that there is no single age where dating becomes acceptable, and that it's more about your child's maturity level and understanding. Read on for more nuance on the subject.
Dr. Bethany Cook, PsyD, MT-BC, is a licensed clinical psychologist and author of For What It's Worth: A Perspective on How to Thrive and Survive Parenting. She's a sought after therapist and quoted media expert who brings accessible, real-world guidance to families of all socioeconomic and mental health backgrounds, based on over 20 years of clinical experience in the field.
Jephtha Tausig, PhD, Clinical Psychologist and Supervisor at Columbia University, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Adelphi University, and the Fairwinds Clinic. Dr. Jeph received her doctorate in clinical psychology with distinction from Columbia University and has over 20 years experience working with children, adolescents and adults.
Jonathan W. Smith, LMFT is the Founder and Director at The Center for Family Wellness. His areas of expertise include individual therapy for mood and behavior issues, child behavior as well as couples and family therapy.
JT: It's important to remember that our definitions of the terms 'girlfriend' or 'boyfriend' may mean something different to us as adults from what they mean to your child. Similarly, the way that young children, or older children, teens, and young adults define terms like 'dating' changes over time as they evolve developmentally. So, this is where open communication with your child becomes very important.
JS: First, I want to point out that this topic is very expressly separate from sexual behaviors, which should be discouraged until the child is developmentally able to comprehend the consequences and implications of that type of relationship and how to stay safe and maintain self-respect. That said, the answer as to when a kid should be allowed to date is that it depends. Children are not one size fits all and will all demonstrate varying levels of maturity and readiness for dating at differing ages.
BC: Biology alone can't decide this because puberty might ignite interest by ages 10 to 12 but the brain's circuitry for self-regulation lags behind by about a decade. That's why when biology hits the gas early in puberty, it's the job of society (specifically the parents) to supply a learner's permit. Parents need to look for behavioral readiness rather than a birthday. That said, typical guardrails are casual group dates around ages 12-13 (i.e., middle school) and solo dating around age 16.
JT: It's really about what your 7-year-old feels 'a boyfriend' means. See if you can find out more from her about this in a genuinely curious, interested manner. What does she think having a boyfriend means and how does that work? (Very often at this stage, having a 'boyfriend' or 'girlfriend' could be something that lasts for a few hours or days at most). As for kissing on the lips, you should certainly ask about that. (Why did they do that? Whose idea was it? Are they following behaviors that they have seen adults do? Is this something they were dared to do by peers?) It's good to find out information first before providing a boundary for your child. (This could be something along the lines of 'you will have plenty of time to kiss someone on the lips later, right now you don't need to do that.')
JS: A 7-year-old who is "dating" a classmate might believe it is dating just to declare that they are dating. [At this age], a child who kisses another child on the lips is likely copying behavior modeled by television, parents, older siblings or other adults rather than acting on an internal drive for intimacy. This child can be told about social rules and "time and place" rules society has about dating and affection. Children can be allowed to pretend to "date" without developmental harm, and any correction for kids who either intentionally or unintentionally go "too far" should be without shame and humiliation, and couched in terms of readiness, not appropriateness.
BC: At 7 years old a child is in the 'playground romance' stage: concrete, imaginative, and heavily influenced by peer story-lines (think recess versions of Disney plots). There's no mature concept of intimacy yet—just experimenting with labels and mimicry. If you hear from your child that they kissed at this age, I recommend that you keep your tone light and curious. Ask open questions and mirror the facts back without judgment. If you respond initially with visible shock or concern, your child will feel that they did something wrong and will avoid sharing this type of information with you in the future for fear of getting in trouble. I also strongly encourage parents to take this as an opportunity to introduce or revisit the importance of consent by having a conversation about it using age-appropriate language.
JT: It's good to understand what is meant by 'dating.' Is this a large-group or small-group or one-on-one activity? Who else will be present? What are the expectations you have, as well as those held by your child, their peer and their peer's parents? It's always helpful for everyone to be on the same page and comfortable with whatever the boundaries/limits are.
JS: What dating means to the child is very important contextual information for determining the correct age for dating. Cultural considerations are also relevant for parents and teens. In some families, a child may only be allowed to date based on strict codes regarding the purpose of dating and this, too, is not detrimental in and of itself.
BC: Context is everything—and this includes family values and culture, peer environment and the individual temperament of the child. A practical rule of thumb is this: If a young person can calmly discuss boundaries, respect curfew/tech rules without constant reminders, and cope with rejection without emotional free-fall, they're probably ready for the kind of dating they're requesting.
The experts covered this general question already, but Dr. Cook has a helpful list of specific signs to look for when assessing your child's readiness for dating. Here's a breakdown of what it should look like when your kid is ready to date for real:
Self-Driven SafetyThey pack contraception info, have safe-ride apps (or other parent numbers) because they thought of it—not because you packed their metaphorical backpack.
Boundary BossThey can say 'No, thanks' (and accept 'no' from others) without meltdowns or persuasion tactics.
Emotional Seatbelts FastenedBig feelings—crushes, rejections, jealousy—show up, and your kid can label them ('I'm hurt, not ruined') and use coping tools instead of doom-scrolling or door-slamming.
Respectful Tech HabitsPhones, texts, and DMs are handled with the same care you expect for a pet goldfish: fed responsibly, no late-night chaos, no disappearing 'secrets.'
Curfew CredThey come home (or log off of tech) on time without 37 reminder texts. Reliable time-keeping = reliable rule-keeping.
Friend-Group FirstRomance interests don't eclipse healthy friendships, sports or homework. A balanced social diet beats the all-crush crash diet. Additionally, dating fits alongside their current goals (grades, team try-outs, summer job), not against them. They treat relationships as add-ons, not identity makeovers.
Problem-Solving MusclesWhen rides fall through, plans change, or someone flakes, they troubleshoot calmly instead of calling you to 'fix it now!'
Consent Scripts on Speed DialThey know how to ask ('Is it OK if I…?'), check in ('Still comfortable?'), and adjust when the other person hesitates.
Low Drama, High RepairDisagreements end with apologies and behavior changes—not revenge posts or silent treatment.
Logical Leap CapacityThey can link actions to consequences ('If I ghost someone today, I'll see them in class tomorrow—awkward!') and plan accordingly.
According to Dr. Cook, the best thing you can do is to start early. 'Start before they're even interested, because kids who have conversations about bodies, boundaries and crushes before their hormones hit are more likely to keep you in the loop later.' In other words, don't wait for 'the talk.' Talking to kids about dating shouldn't be one dreaded and awkwardly formal conversation. Or, in the words of Dr. Cook, 'think drip-irrigation, not fire-hose: dozens of short chats, started early, that grow with your child's brain and body.'
Still feeling a little unsure with regards to boundary setting and dating between kids? We don't blame you. When in doubt, phone a friend. Actually, we did that for you by taking the question to a handful of parents across the country. Here's where they stand on the subject:
'I'd say 16. Kids don't have the maturity before that age to make solid judgments about mates and dating and sex…and they usually suffer from under-developed self-esteem.' — Debbie, California mom-of-two.
'I mean, my kids are both under the age of 5 right now so it's hard to say…but I guess I didn't have a boyfriend until age 12, so somewhere around there seems about right. Then again, it does feel like kids are growing up much faster now, so who knows.' — Nicole, New Jersey mom-of-two.
'Hmm…I think no earlier than 16 years old, but ideally 18, just due to emotional maturity and priorities to school, activities, friends, etc. Dating can get intense and also be a distraction if not ready!' — SZ, New York mom-of-one.
'I think it's totally fine for kids as young as 8 to say they have a girlfriend or boyfriend, because I'd assume the title is more just a statement of friendship without any understanding or intention of romance. As for real, romantic dating…maybe 14 or 15 sounds fine, provided they take it really slow, and I know what's up. But boy, I don't know. My kids are still young (5 and 7) so I'm not there yet!' — Vivian, Rhode Island mom-of-two.
'I don't believe there's an age at which it starts being appropriate. What we do in my house is ask our kids what dating means to them, and then we decide if they are ready for that thing. So for example, last year my 12-year-old asked if she could date a boy. I asked her what that meant and she said, 'going out to lunch,' so we allowed her to do that. Additionally, there's so much nuance these days with gender fluidity that I don't think it makes sense to have hard and fast rules there. My daughter asked to have a sleepover with a boy who is her friend, and we simply evaluated based on these two kids and decided she could.' — Denise, Maryland mom-of-two
When it comes to kids and dating, the therapists advise parents to ask neutral questions, consider the context (i.e., the maturity and intentions of your own kid) and then start a relevant and age-appropriate conversation about boundaries. In other words, understanding and communication is key.
Allowances for Kids: How Much, Why Do It and When to Start

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr to encourage Americans to use 'wearable' tech to track their health
RFK Jr to encourage Americans to use 'wearable' tech to track their health

Fox News

time13 minutes ago

  • Fox News

RFK Jr to encourage Americans to use 'wearable' tech to track their health

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said on Tuesday that it is his vision "that every American is wearing a wearable within four years." He made the comments regarding devices like smartwatches, smart rings and fitness trackers to members of Congress, adding that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is "about to launch one of the biggest advertising campaigns in HHS history to encourage Americans to use wearables." Kennedy said during a hearing before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce's Subcommittee on Health that wearables are a way "people can take control of their own health." "They can see, as you know, what food is doing to their glucose levels, their heart rates, and a number of other metrics as they eat it," he told members of Congress. "And they can begin to make good judgments about their diet, about their physical activity, about the way that they live their lives." The health secretary said he has had friends who have "utterly changed their lives just from wearing a glucose meter," who have lost weight while monitoring their diabetes. Shares of continuous glucose-monitoring device makers Abbott and Dexcom were up 3.6% and 10%, respectively, in afternoon trading, Reuters reported. While he has been critical of the diabetes drug Ozempic, which is often used for weight-loss, he has expressed support for the prescription of such weight-loss drugs for adults with morbid obesity and diabetes, provided they are accompanied by exercise. "You know the Ozempic is costing $1300 a month, if you can achieve the same thing with an $80 wearable, it's a lot better for the American people," Kennedy said, adding, "We're exploring ways of making sure that those costs can be paid for." J.P. Morgan analyst Robbie Marcus commented, "We think it's premature to interpret this as a direct comment on whether Medicare and other commercial payors will move towards covering non-intensive Type II diabetes patients or other areas of proactive monitoring." Kennedy has long promoted healthy eating over medicine as a way to combat obesity, and has been a prominent skeptic of vaccine safety. He added, both in person and on X, that the forthcoming wearables campaign is "a key part of our mission to Make America Healthy Again."

Stewardship Cuts IV Treatment for Paediatric Bone Infections
Stewardship Cuts IV Treatment for Paediatric Bone Infections

Medscape

time32 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Stewardship Cuts IV Treatment for Paediatric Bone Infections

TOPLINE: A hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) using post-prescription review and feedback (PPRF) significantly decreased intravenous (IV) antibiotic duration, length of hospital stay, and reliance on third-generation cephalosporin in paediatric bone and joint infections over 5 years. METHODOLOGY: This single-centre, quasi-experimental study evaluated the effect of a PPRF-based multifaceted ASP on antibiotic use, treatment duration, and length of hospital stay in paediatric acute haematogenous bone and joint infections (AH-BJIs). This study included 285 children: 60 in the pre-ASP (2015-2016; mean age, 1.9 years; 50% boys) and 225 in the post-ASP (2017-2023; mean age, 2.9 years; 67.5% boys). Data on demographics, clinical features, microbiology, and treatment were collected from electronic medical records. Primary outcomes were parenteral/oral antibiotic duration, length of hospital stay, and clinical outcomes (sequelae, readmission, and mortality). TAKEAWAY: The median IV antibiotic duration and length of hospital stay in children with AH-BJIs were both significantly reduced after ASP implementation, dropping from 8.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 7.0-12.0) to 7 (IQR, 4.5-8.0) days and from 8.5 (IQR, 7.0-11.0) to 7 (IQR, 5.0-9.0) days, respectively (P < .001 for both). Post-2020, broad-spectrum antibiotic use significantly declined, with third-generation cephalosporin use fell from 81% to 10% in children aged 5 years or younger and cloxacillin use declined by 60.0% in children older than 5 years in favour of narrower spectrum cefazolin (P < .001 for both). Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (22.8%), followed by Kingella kingae (10.9%), which was found in only children younger than 4 years. Blood cultures were positive in 29.3% of cases. Among 52 children with soft-tissue/subperiosteal abscesses (46 occurring post-ASP), the median oral antibiotic duration was 41 days, with total treatment lasting 47 days; the ASP maintained safety, with no increase seen in sequelae (6.3% overall), readmissions (3.3% in the pre-ASP vs 3.6% in the post-ASP), and mortality (0%). IN PRACTICE: "After ASP implementation, the length of parenteral antibiotic treatment, length of hospital stay, and 3rd generation cephalosporin use in children with AH-BJI were reduced safely," the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Aina Font, Pharmacy Department, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Spain. It was published online on June 18, 2025, in the European Journal of Pediatrics. LIMITATIONS: This single-centre study had several limitations, such as the unbalanced sample size and inclusion of neonates, which may have affected generalisability; the findings based on local epidemiology may not apply to other settings. This study did not evaluate treatment days per 1000 admissions, cost-effectiveness, COVID-19 impact, diagnostic advances, and staff turnover effects, nor it systematically monitor prescriber adherence or satisfaction with the stewardship program. DISCLOSURES: No funding was secured for this study. The authors declared having no competing interests. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

The 11 Best Healthy Beverages to Keep You Hydrated This Summer
The 11 Best Healthy Beverages to Keep You Hydrated This Summer

CNET

time32 minutes ago

  • CNET

The 11 Best Healthy Beverages to Keep You Hydrated This Summer

When it comes to picking the right healthy beverage for your taste and preferences, there are multiple factors to consider. Below, we outline them so you can find the right drink for you. Dietary notes If you follow a specific diet or are looking for specific ingredients, this can help you narrow down the best drink for you. Examples include gluten-free, vegan, nut-free, low-sugar or zero-sugar, and no artificial flavors or sweeteners. You'll also want to think about what is added to the drink, such as magnesium, different botanicals, adaptogens and electrolytes and which would best suit your lifestyle or health concerns. Amelia Ti, a registered dietitian and diabetes educator in New York, who is also part of CNET's Medical Review Board, adds, 'Some adaptogens, for instance, may not be suitable for pregnant people or those on certain medications.' Price range Some healthy beverages cost more than others, especially if you want to buy a pack. Consider your budget, how many people you're buying for and how often you plan to purchase these drinks. It's also helpful to think about how often you buy a coffee, tea, juice or smoothie from a local establishment. Perhaps buying these beverages in their place will help you save. Sizes Do you plan to buy just one can of your favorite healthy beverage when grocery shopping? Or, do you want to buy a 6- or 12-pack for your entire family? Think about how many people you're shopping for and how often you want to sip the beverage. Also, if you plan to keep them cold, think about how much space you have available in your refrigerator. Flavors The best part of trying new beverages is finding your favorite flavor. If you're trying to reduce your soda intake, perhaps you want a drink that replicates your favorite soda flavor. Or, if you prefer bold, fruity flavors, consider drinks that offer those. The best part is that there is truly a flavor for everyone. Carbonation Do you like sparkling beverages or prefer your drinks still? This will also help you narrow down your selection. If you like healthier carbonated beverages because you want to cut back on soda, consider something sparkling. However, if you don't like the feel of carbonation, a still coconut water might be more your speed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store