logo
Trump, ‘60 Minutes' and corruption allegations put Paramount on edge with sale less certain

Trump, ‘60 Minutes' and corruption allegations put Paramount on edge with sale less certain

One fateful October decision to trim two convoluted sentences from a '60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris has snowballed into a full-blown corporate crisis for CBS' parent company, Paramount Global, and its controlling shareholder, Shari Redstone.
President Trump's $20-billion lawsuit — claiming '60 Minutes' producers deceptively manipulated the Harris interview to make her look smarter — has festered, clouding the future of Paramount and the company's hoped-for $8-billion sale to David Ellison's Skydance Media.
The dispute over the edits has sparked massive unrest within the company, prompted high-level departures and triggered a Federal Communications Commission examination of alleged news bias. The FCC's review of the Skydance deal has become bogged down, according to people familiar with the matter who weren't authorized to comment.
The agency, chaired by a Trump appointee, must approve the transfer of CBS television station licenses to the Ellison family for the deal to advance.
A lawsuit resolution, through court-ordered mediation, remains out of reach. And last week, three Democratic U.S. senators raised the stakes by suggesting, in a letter to Redstone, that a Trump settlement could be considered an illegal payoff.
Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) warned in their letter that any payment to Trump to gain favorable treatment by the FCC could violate federal anti-bribery laws. Paramount's dealings with Trump 'raises serious concerns of corruption and improper conduct,' the senators wrote.
'Under the federal bribery statute, it is illegal to corruptly give anything of value to public officials to influence an official act,' the senators said.
Redstone is desperate for the Paramount-Skydance deal to go through.
Her family's holding company is cratering under a mountain of debt. Paramount's sale to the Ellison family would provide the clan $2.4 billion for their preferred shares — proceeds that would allow the Redstones to pay their nearly $600 million in debt — and remain billionaires.
Paramount, Skydance and a spokesperson for Redstone declined to comment.
While recusing herself from granular and final decision-making, Redstone has made it clear that she wants Paramount to settle with Trump, rather than wage an ongoing beef with the sitting president, according to people familiar with the matter but not authorized to discuss internal deliberations.
Figuring a way out of the dispute has divided the company, according to insiders.
For CBS News professionals, apologizing to Trump over routine edits of a lengthy interview is a red line. Tensions have spilled into public view.
Redstone has been cast as the villain. The Drudge Report, created by journalist Matt Drudge, who got his start at CBS in Los Angeles, last month published a photo of 71-year-old heiress, identifying her in all caps as 'The woman who destroyed CBS News.'
Two top CBS News executives have resigned. Both refused to apologize to Trump as part of any settlement, the knowledgeable sources said.
Most CBS journalists and 1st Amendment experts see Trump's lawsuit a shakedown, one seemingly designed to exploit Paramount's vulnerability because it needs the government's approval for the Skydance deal.
'Settling such a case for anything of substance would thus compromise 1st Amendment principles today and the broad notion of freedom of the press in the future,' prominent press freedom lawyer Floyd Abrams said.
Paramount has stressed that it sees the Trump lawsuit and the FCC review of the Skydance deal as separate. 'We will abide by the legal process to defend our case,' a Paramount spokesperson said.
But '60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley connected the two for viewers during an extraordinary April broadcast, in which he rebuked Paramount management on air at the end of the program. That, according to sources, angered some of Paramount's leaders.
While '60 Minutes' has received additional corporate oversight, some insiders pointed to Pelley's acknowledgment that 'none of our stories have been blocked.'
All the high-level scrutiny has put Paramount and Redstone in a box, and the Skydance deal looks less certain than it did months ago.
'Who's going to sign that settlement, knowing that you could be accused of paying a bribe?' asked one person close to Paramount.
Paramount Global's path to peril began long before the infamous '60 Minutes' edits. The company was diminished by management turmoil and years of cost-cutting, which would eventually force Redstone to find a buyer for one of Hollywood's most storied studios.
Should New York-based Paramount, which also owns Comedy Central, MTV, Nickelodeon and the famed Melrose Avenue movie studio, fail to complete its sale to Skydance by its October deadline, the deal could collapse.
Paramount then would owe $400 million to Skydance as a breakup fee, putting the company in further dire financial straits. Skydance and its investor RedBird Capital Partners have agreed, once they take over, to inject $1.5 billion into Paramount, helping it pay down some debt.
Redstone would also be on the hook to repay her financiers. Two years ago, a Chicago banker rescued the Redstone family investment firm, National Amusements Inc., with a $125-million equity investment.
The family's finances were strained after Paramount cut its dividend to shareholders that spring during the Hollywood writers' strike. The family's dire financial situation was a leading impetus for Paramount's sale.
If the deal fell through, Redstone would also have to repay a $186-million loan from tech mogul Larry Ellison. The billionaire Oracle co-founder and father of David Ellison extended the loan so National Amusements could make a looming debt payment.
National Amusements holds 77% of Paramount's controlling shares, giving the Redstone family enormous sway over Paramount management.
Critics privately note Redstone's role in setting up the company for the current drama. It took nearly a year for Redstone and Paramount's special board committee to negotiate a deal with Skydance. The independent directors spent months searching for an alternate buyer, adding to the delays that now haunt both sides.
Had the parties reached agreement sooner, the companies could have asked the FCC for approval earlier last year during the less hostile Biden administration.
Instead, weeks were spent haggling over various demands, including having Skydance indemnify Redstone and her family against shareholder lawsuits. In the end, the Ellisons also agreed to help Redstone pay for her New York apartment and private jet after the deal closes, according to the knowledgeable people.
Paramount petitioned the FCC for review in September.
By that time, political environment was caustic for mainstream media companies. Conservatives were upset over ABC News' handling of the Sept. 10 debate between Trump and Harris after ABC anchors fact-checked Trump in real time, including pushing back on his false claim that Haitian immigrants in Ohio were eating pets.
Trump reportedly backed out of a '60 Minutes' appearance — long a traditional stop for presidential candidates — because CBS intended to fact-check his remarks. Conservatives viewed such formats as a double standard and as an example of how news bias has seeped into major networks' coverage of Republicans.
'This was an issue we were already sensitive to and focused on,' said Daniel Suhr, president of the conservative Center for American Rights legal group, which filed an FCC complaint against Walt Disney Co.'s ABC after the debate.
At CBS, another firestorm had engulfed the newsroom.
Redstone, who had previously urged news executives to bring more balance to CBS' coverage, was livid after managers scolded 'CBS Mornings' co-host Tony Dokoupil for his sharp questioning of author Ta-Nehisi Coates about Israel during an interview segment. Coates' book, 'The Message,' compared Israel's treatment of Palestinians to the Jim Crow South in the U.S.
Redstone, who is Jewish and has focused her philanthropy on battling antisemitism in the wake of Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel, publicly rebuked CBS News managers for their treatment of Dokoupil.
The controversial exchange in the Harris '60 Minutes' interview also happened to concern Israel.
'60 Minutes' correspondent Bill Whitaker suggested to Harris that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was not listening to the Biden administration.
Harris gave a long-winded three-sentence response.
CBS broadcast the convoluted first sentence on its Sunday public affairs show, 'Face the Nation,' on Oct. 6. The following night — the anniversary of the Hamas attacks — '60 Minutes' aired only her most forceful and succinct third sentence: 'We are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end.'
Conservatives zeroed in.
'CBS created this mess for itself. ... The conservative ecosystem was outraged when they saw the two different clips because it vindicated everything,' Suhr said. 'Folks had always believed the media was selectively manipulating interviews like that.'
Journalists routinely cut extraneous words to provide clear and compact soundbites for audiences. CBS released a statement saying that it had not doctored the interview. Rather, news producers said they trimmed Harris' response to cover more ground during the broadcast.
Internally, CBS debated whether to release the full transcript to quell the furor — but it stopped short at first. Some people close to the company have been particularly critical of CBS for not immediately releasing the unedited video.
Trump sued in late October for $10 billion. After he returned to the White House, he doubled his demand to $20 billion.
One of Trump-appointed FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's first moves was to revive a separate news distortion complaint against '60 Minutes,' which Suhr had filed shortly after the broadcast. The matter had been dismissed by the previous Biden-appointed chair.
CBS and the FCC released the Harris footage in February.
By that time, the controversy had consumed the company.
Last month, Bill Owens, the executive producer of '60 Minutes' stepped down, citing a loss of editorial independence.
'60 Minutes' continued with Trump-critical stories — to the chagrin of people who want the Skydance deal to close.
Less than two weeks after CBS Chief Executive George Cheeks pledged support for his team, Wendy McMahon, the head of CBS News, was forced to go.
'It's become clear that the company and I do not agree on the path forward,' McMahon told her staff in a note last week.
Insiders note other McMahon decisions, including the introduction of a new 'CBS Evening News' format, which has led to plummeting ratings, as factors in her fall. McMahon could not be reached for comment.
Redstone and others hope the mediation with Trump's attorneys will produce a truce.
But several questions remain: What will it take for Paramount to appease the president? And could the company's leaders be prosecuted if they pay the president a multimillion-dollar settlement?
In 'normal times,' officials might be alarmed by a president's demand for a big check, said Michael C. Dorf, a Cornell Law School professor.
'These are not normal times, however, so the president will likely be able to get away with soliciting a bribe from Paramount, just as he is getting away with extortion of law firms and universities,' Dorf said.
Staff writer Stephen Battaglio contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China says U.S. moves on computer chips and student visas ‘seriously violate' tariffs truce
China says U.S. moves on computer chips and student visas ‘seriously violate' tariffs truce

Los Angeles Times

time18 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

China says U.S. moves on computer chips and student visas ‘seriously violate' tariffs truce

TAIPEI, Taiwan — China criticized the U.S. on Monday over moves it alleged harmed Chinese interests, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus,' the Commerce Ministry said in a statement, referring to a China-U.S. joint statement in which the United States and China agreed to slash their massive recent tariffs, restarting stalled trade between the world's two biggest economies. But last month's de-escalation in President Trump's trade wars did nothing to resolve underlying differences between Beijing and Washington and Monday's statement showed how easily such agreements can lead to further turbulence. The deal lasts 90 days, creating time for U.S. and Chinese negotiators to reach a more substantive agreement. But the pause also leaves tariffs higher than before Trump started ramping them up last month. And businesses and investors must contend with uncertainty about whether the truce will last. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the U.S. agreed to drop the 145% tax Trump imposed last month to 30%. China agreed to lower its tariff rate on U.S. goods to 10% from 125%. The Commerce Ministry said China held up its end of the deal, canceling or suspending tariffs and non-tariff measures taken against the U.S. 'reciprocal tariffs' following the agreement. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' while China has stood by its commitments, the statement said. It also threatened unspecified retaliation, saying China will 'continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' Trump stirred further controversy Friday, saying he will no longer be nice with China on trade, declaring in a social media post that the country had broken an agreement with the United States. Hours later, Trump said in the Oval Office that he will speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping and 'hopefully we'll work that out,' while still insisting China had violated the agreement. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted. 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' In response to recent comments by Trump, the Commerce Ministry said of the U.S.: 'Instead of reflecting on itself, it has turned the tables and unreasonably accused China of violating the consensus, which is seriously contrary to the facts.' U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the Chinese were 'just slow rolling the deal' from Geneva. Appearing on Fox News on Sunday, Lutnick said the U.S. was 'taking certain actions to show them what it feels like on the other side of that equation,' adding that Trump would 'work it out' with Xi. The Trump administration also stepped up the clash with China in other ways last week, announcing that it would start revoking visas for Chinese students studying in the U.S. U.S. campuses host more than 275,000 students from China. Both countries are in a race to develop advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, with Washington seeking to curb China's access to the most advanced computer chips. China is also seeking to displace the U.S. as the leading power in the Asia-Pacific, including through gaining control over close U.S. partner and leading tech giant Taiwan. Bodeen writes for the Associated Press.

China says US moves on computer chips and student visas ‘seriously violate' tariffs truce
China says US moves on computer chips and student visas ‘seriously violate' tariffs truce

Chicago Tribune

time21 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

China says US moves on computer chips and student visas ‘seriously violate' tariffs truce

TAIPEI, Taiwan — China criticized the U.S. on Monday over moves it alleged harmed Chinese interests, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus,' the Commerce Ministry said in a statement, referring to a China-U.S. joint statement in which the United States and China agreed to slash their massive recent tariffs, restarting stalled trade between the world's two biggest economies. But last month's de-escalation in President Donald Trump's trade wars did nothing to resolve underlying differences between Beijing and Washington and Monday's statement showed how easily such agreements can lead to further turbulence. The deal lasts 90 days, creating time for U.S. and Chinese negotiators to reach a more substantive agreement. But the pause also leaves tariffs higher than before Trump started ramping them up last month. And businesses and investors must contend with uncertainty about whether the truce will last. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the U.S. agreed to drop the 145% tax Trump imposed last month to 30%. China agreed to lower its tariff rate on U.S. goods to 10% from 125%. The Commerce Ministry said China held up its end of the deal, canceling or suspending tariffs and non-tariff measures taken against the U.S. 'reciprocal tariffs' following the agreement. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' while China has stood by its commitments, the statement said. It also threatened unspecified retaliation, saying China will 'continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' Trump stirred further controversy Friday, saying he will no longer be nice with China on trade, declaring in a social media post that the country had broken an agreement with the United States. Hours later, Trump said in the Oval Office that he will speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping and 'hopefully we'll work that out,' while still insisting China had violated the agreement. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted. 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' In response to recent comments by Trump, the Commerce Ministry said of the U.S.: 'Instead of reflecting on itself, it has turned the tables and unreasonably accused China of violating the consensus, which is seriously contrary to the facts.' U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the Chinese were 'just slow rolling the deal' from Geneva. Appearing on Fox News on Sunday, Lutnick said the U.S. was 'taking certain actions to show them what it feels like on the other side of that equation,' adding that Trump would 'work it out' with Xi. The Trump administration also stepped up the clash with China in other ways last week, announcing that it would start revoking visas for Chinese students studying in the U.S. U.S. campuses host more than 275,000 students from China. Both countries are in a race to develop advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, with Washington seeking to curb China's access to the most advanced computer chips. China is also seeking to displace the U.S. as the leading power in the Asia-Pacific, including through gaining control over close U.S. partner and leading tech giant Taiwan.

President Trump's trade agenda is on hold as he waits on a call with Xi Jinping
President Trump's trade agenda is on hold as he waits on a call with Xi Jinping

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

President Trump's trade agenda is on hold as he waits on a call with Xi Jinping

An array of charges and countercharges over the weekend between the US and China raised the stakes of a long-awaited call between leaders of the two countries as relations hit new turbulence over tariffs and other issues. US President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping have significant issues to iron out, from critical minerals to semiconductors. They have led to increasingly hostile commentary from both sides, putting last month's agreement to lower tariffs for 90 days in a tenuous position. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett even suggested Sunday on ABC that trade negotiations with other nations are being held up by the wait for this call between Trump and Xi. He explained why his previous predictions of deals have failed to materialize, saying it's because "the trade team has been focused 100% like a laser beam on the China matter." Once a call resolves the China issues, he added, "then we're going to take [other] deals into the Oval." But it's far from unclear whether a call between the two leaders, who apparently have not spoken since before Trump's inauguration, can resolve the growing issues. The uncertainty is more pronounced by weeks of promises that a call is in the offing, with still no clarity on when it will even take place. A range of Trump officials were pressed over the weekend and offered new uncertainty. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent expressed hope on CBS for "something very soon," while Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick promised on Fox that Trump is "going to go work it out" without offering a timeline. Hassett added he was hoping for a call this week, but said, "you never know in international relations." Whenever the call takes place, the countries will have a series of thorny issues to discuss with a dispute over critical minerals perhaps the most front and center. Trump and his team are charging that China has already violated the 90-day trade truce by not loosening trade restrictions for these building blocks in everything from computers to electric vehicle batteries to jet engines to medical devices. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet China holds a dominant position in the world's reserves of many of these key minerals, as well as in the capacity to refine them. Bessent added on CBS that China is "holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe, and that is not what a reliable partner does." The Chinese Ministry of Commerce reacted Monday morning to the weekend's charges by denying the Trump administration's claims and accusing the US of its own actions to undermine the deal. Issues that the Chinese government cited, according to a translation by Chinese state media, were new export controls on semiconductors, the halting of chip design software, as well as the revocation of Chinese student visas. "If the U.S. insists on its own way and continues to damage China's interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests," a ministry spokesperson said, according to the translation. The Chinese added that the US actions have "severely violated the consensus" reached in Geneva during last month's talks as well as during a Jan. 17 call between Trump and Xi, the last time they say the two men spoke. The growing war of words also comes as both sides appear willing to escalate, with Trump offering a critique of China Friday by saying they "violated a big part of the agreement we made." "I'm sure that I'll speak to President Xi and hopefully we'll work that out," he added during that Oval Office appearance. Lutnick added Sunday that China was slow-rolling a deal and, in response, "we are taking certain actions to show them what it feels like on the other side of that equation." The back-and-forth also comes as Trump's tariff power remains in question after a US trade court blocked some of Trump's most prominent tariffs before a federal court paused enforcement pending appeal. Trump and his team have expressed confidence for days that their appeal — which is expected to eventually reach the Supreme Court — will be successful, but they maintain they have plenty of other tariff authorities that can be used instead. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store