logo
Asus Zenbook A14 review: This Windows laptop is gunning for the MacBook Air 13

Asus Zenbook A14 review: This Windows laptop is gunning for the MacBook Air 13

Telegraph14-04-2025

This article contains affiliate links. The products or services listed have been selected independently by journalists after hands-on testing or sourcing expert opinions. We may earn a commission when you click a link, buy a product or subscribe to a service.
Our Rating: 9/10
We like:
Light and compact
Colourful OLED display
All-day battery life
We don't like:
Unimpressive speakers
60Hz display
Webcam could be better
£1,099.99
Buy now
Price at
Asus
What is the Asus Zenbook A14?
In my view, the Asus Zenbook S16 is one of the most attractive and capable laptops currently on sale in the UK. It's also great value but of course, that's not the same as saying that it's affordable. In the Zenbook A14, Asus has attempted to distil the essence of the S16 into a laptop with a price that's closer to £1,000.
Asus clearly had the latest M4 13.6-inch MacBook Air in its sights when it designed and priced the A14. In size, they are almost identical and the MacBook only has the edge in terms of pricing if you are prepared to put up with a small 256GB hard drive. Specify a basic M4 MacBook Air with the Zenbook A14's 1TB SSD and the price jumps from £999 up to £1,399.
JUMP TO:
How we test laptops
I have been a technology journalist for over 15 years, testing everything from laptops and electric cars to tablets and audio systems. Over the years, I've used and tested devices running all of the major operating systems, settling these days with Windows, Linux and Android.
When I test laptops here at the Telegraph, I focus on five testing metrics: design and usability, keyboard and touchpad, display and audio, performance and configurations and battery life. However, I don't just look at scores on a spreadsheet.
I use the laptops I'm testing as my primary device, which in my case means a lot of typing, using them on the go, general web browsing, emails and other basic productivity, as well as gaming – the latter especially if the laptop has a graphics card. This gives me a good idea of what the laptop is capable of, how long the battery lasts and how it can handle intense tasks.
Why you can trust Telegraph Recommended
Our tech experts continuously conduct in-depth, independent, real-world tests, scoring devices against pre-set testing metrics and industry benchmarks, so we can deliver definitive and comprehensive buying advice.
Telegraph Recommended reviews are never shared with product manufacturers before publication, we don't accept payment in exchange for positive reviews, nor do we allow brands to pay for placement in our articles. Visit our Who We Are page to learn more.
Design and usability
Score: 8/10
The Zenbook A14 is impressively light and compact, even for a 14-inch laptop. At 860g, it makes the 1.24Kg MacBook Air feel almost leaden. It measures 311 x 214 x 13mm, which makes it a similar size to the Apple machine.
Yet despite the low weight, the A14 doesn't feel flimsy or bendy. The body is made from Asus' bespoke 'Ceraluminium' material like the Zenbook S16, though it lacks the slightly matte-effect finish and chrome pinstriping that makes the more expensive machine such a design classic. There are two colours available: Zabriskie Beige and Iceland Gray.
I wouldn't dare say that the A14 is an ugly machine but it's obviously been designed to be just a little less pretty than than the S16. The good news is that the A14's shell is equally good at keeping fingerprints at bay and it still meets the US MIL-STD 810H military-grade standard for resistance to particle ingress, shock and extreme temperatures.
For a skinny compact laptop, the A14 has a decent range of ports with two USB-C 4.0 data/video sockets on the left, along with an HDMI 2.1 video output and a 3.5mm audio jack. On the right, you'll find a solitary 10Gbps USB-A port. Unlike the MacBook Air, which has two Type-C ports and a MagSafe charge port, you'll need to use one of the A14's Type-C ports to connect the 65W power supply.
Wireless communications are handled by a Qualcomm 6900 card that supports 6GHz Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3.
Removing the base panel from the A14 is a straightforward job but there's little point because once inside, all you can do is swap out the battery and the 2280 M.2 SSD.
Speaking of the SSD, the 1TB Crucial card in the A14 proved to be nippy, recording impressive sequential read and write speeds of 4,700MB/s and 2,250MB/s respectively.
Keyboard and touchpad
Score: 9/10
I can't imagine anyone finding fault with the A14's keyboard. The slightly rubberised keys are pleasant to the touch and their action is nigh on perfect, the 1.3mm of travel ending in a precise but well-cushioned end-stop. The white-on-grey keycap graphics are easy to read with or without the three-position white backlight turned on.
The keyboard deck is unusually solid for a slim and compact laptop, with even hard presses on the central keys only causing a small amount of movement in the keyboard base.
At 130 x 80mm, the touchpad is on the larger side for a 14-inch laptop and it feels smooth. The mechanical click-action that works across the lower 80 per cent of the pad is perfectly calibrated and also quiet. You can use it in a library with no fear of getting disapproving looks from other patrons.
Early samples of the A14 were criticised for having a webcam that misbehaved when a strong light source was in shot, but Asus seems to have fixed the problem because it wasn't something I could replicate.
Generally speaking, the A14's 1080p camera does a decent job. Video looks sharp and colourful even in less-than-ideal lighting conditions and there is support for Windows Hello facial security along with the usual raft of Windows Studio Effects image enhancements.
That said, the 1440p webcams that Acer currently fits to some of its compact laptops and the 12MP Center Stage camera Apple uses on the MacBook Air are better.
Display and audio
Score: 8/10
The Zenbook A14's 14-inch display is a detuned version of what you'll find on the S14, so you have to make do with a resolution of 1,920 x 1,200 rather than 2.8K, a 60Hz refresh rate rather than 120Hz and no touch interface. Otherwise, it's every bit as good as the S14.
The difference in resolution is hard to detect in everyday use unless you have your nose pressed right up against the screen or have the eyesight of an eagle. The drop in pixel density from the Zenbook S4's 237dpi and MacBook Air's 224dpi to the A14's 161dpi sounds more precipitous than it looks.
Peak brightness is a good 395 nits and that jumps to 610 nits when displaying HDR (High Dynamic Range) content. Asus makes some of the most colour-accurate displays on the market and the A14 is no exception, with Delta E variances of 0.63 versus the DCI-P3 profile and 0.89 against sRGB. Here, a number less than 1 indicates excellent levels of colour performance.
The screen has a high-gloss finish that gives on-screen proceedings a sumptuous and limpid quality, though slightly at the expense of increased reflections, so I wouldn't describe it as ideal for use outdoors in direct sunlight.
The speaker system is a basic stereo affair without the Harmon/Kardon branding of more expensive Zenbooks. There's plenty of volume on tap, but at higher volumes, the sound is overly brittle and forward.
Performance and configurations
Score: 7/10
The Zenbook A14 comes with two processor options; the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 and the 12-core X Elite X1E-78-100. With all else being equal, I'd suggest the everyday performance difference isn't worth the extra £200 the Elite machine will set you back.
In the CineBench R24 rendering test, the A14 scored 704 points in multi-core and 95 in single-core. The M4 MacBook Air has the A14 handily beat in the single-core test, but when it comes to multi-core, there's not much in it: the Apple machine only enjoys a seven per cent advantage.
Apple's M4 is the better choice when it comes to graphics work because the GPU in the X1-26-100 is simply less powerful. The A14 scored 9,610 in the Geekbench 6 OpenCL test, which is less than a third of what you can expect from an M4-powered MacBook Air.
The dry numbers aside, the Zenbook A14 never feels anything less than quick and in 95 per cent of usage scenarios, you simply won't notice the performance giveaway to nominally more powerful machines like the M4 MacBook Air or Intel Core Ultra S2-powered Zenbook S14.
Where you will notice the difference between the A14 and the MacBook Air is noise, since the latter is fanless and the former is not. Even when under severe stress, the A14's fans are not loud or intrusive, but it's not as deathly quiet as the MacBook Air.
Battery life
Score: 9/10
Qualcomm's Windows-on-ARM chipsets continue to impress with their balance between efficiency and performance. A full charge of the A14's 3-cell 70Wh battery kept the lights on for 19 hours and 10 minutes in our battery test.
That's around four hours more than you'll get from a MacBook Air. This time last year, the MacBook Air was the acknowledged master of laptop battery life but how times have changed.
Technical specifications
The Zenbook A14's primary competition with regards to both internal specifications and price comes from Apple's corner. The new MacBook Air 13 (M4) is £100 less but this is only for the entry-level model with 256GB of storage. If you want to match the Zenbook's 512GB SSD, you'll have to pay an additional £200 £1,199).
Should you buy the Asus Zenbook A14?
The Asus Zenbook A14 is the closest thing to a Windows MacBook Air killer that I've seen.
Compared to the MacBook, the A14 is better value once you've factored in a matching SSD, has a more colourful and larger albeit lower-resolution display, a better keyboard and more ports. It's also lighter and has better battery life.
The MacBook counters this with more power, especially when it comes to graphics and a better camera and speakers. Picking between the two is difficult because it's not so much a damned close-run thing as a dead-heat. It simply comes down to whether you prefer using a Windows or Mac machine.
Yes, if
You want an ultralight laptop
You want a highly accurate OLED display
You want all-day battery life
No, if
You want a touchscreen
You want a screen refresh rate higher than 60Hz
You want a great rather than good webcam
FAQs
What is the price of the Asus Zenbook A14?
The entry-level model with the 8-core Snapdragon X processor and 16GB of RAM is £1,099, while the version with the 12-core Snapdragon X-Elite processor and 32GB of RAM is £200 more at £1,299. The cheaper version is the one to go for because, chipset and memory aside, they are identical and the performance differences are minor.
Is the Zenbook A14 better value than the MacBook Air?
In its cheapest form, the MacBook Air is £100 less but that comes with a 256GB SSD. Doubling the storage capacity costs £200 and quadrupling it costs £400. An M4 MacBook Air with a 1TB SSD and 32GB of RAM will cost £1,799 compared to £1,299 for the equivalent Zenbook A14.
What is the software compatibility for Windows-on-ARM?
The vast majority of users needn't worry about the A14 being an ARM machine. The majority of popular software will run natively on ARM chipsets, or under Microsoft's Prism emulation tool. The Google Drive desktop sync tool was a notable holdout but even that is now available in ARM form. If you need to run a piece of unusually old or esoteric software, you may encounter issues, but most don't need to worry.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour plots to force households to have two smart meters
Labour plots to force households to have two smart meters

Telegraph

time2 days ago

  • Telegraph

Labour plots to force households to have two smart meters

Britain's smart meter rollout promised to help households save money – and energy. In reality, the high-tech gadgets have been a disaster, leaving thousands of households with inaccurate energy bills at a huge cost to the taxpayer. And yet, Labour could soon force homeowners to have two smart meters – one for energy and one for water. The move forms part of the Government's proposed 'family bath time tax' which would force owners of larger properties and gardens to pay more for their water bills. However, experts have warned that forcing homes to have a smart meter would overcomplicate bills, undermine customers' privacy and allow cyber attacks to cut off the nation's water supply. Nick Hunn, founder of the wireless technology consulting firm, WiFore, told The Telegraph: 'We were told that the big benefit for smart meters would be lower bills. We can see by number of complaints that this didn't happen. 'We would see the same thing with smart water meters – moving from a system that's quite simple to one that is needlessly complicated and more likely to go wrong.' At the weekend, The Telegraph revealed that ministers will support utilities companies trialling new tariffs that charge the heaviest users of water a higher rate. Introducing 'progressive' water bills would mean rolling out smart water meters nationwide so that customers' consumption can be tracked in real time or at short intervals. Around 60pc of homes in England have a water meter, but the vast majority of those have a conventional meter from which periodic readings are taken. The plan has raised alarm bells among experts, especially as British households continue to pay the price for the botched smart meter rollout for energy bills. The initial target was to have a smart meter installed in every home by 2020. This has now been reduced to 74.5pc by the end of 2025, with the devices currently installed in just 68pc of homes. It is forecast to cost over £13.5bn, but a significant minority of homes are unsuitable for smart meters, which rely on having adequate reception. An estimated 4.3 million smart meters are faulty and unable to send readings back to suppliers remotely, leading to customers being sent sky-high bills that do not reflect their usage. The National Audit Office said in 2023 that 37pc of smart meter customers surveyed by Smart Energy GB, the company tasked with rolling out the devices nationally, reported having issues with their smart meter, including no automatic readings, inaccurate bills and the connected handheld device not showing any information. Smart meters have also found themselves at the centre of a row over privacy. In January, the Government launched a consultation on plans to allow household energy usage to be shared with third parties who could steer them to cheaper deals, as well as lower carbon tariffs from rival suppliers. A spokesman for Open Rights Group, a digital rights campaign group, said a mass smart water meter rollout posed similar risks for consumers, adding: 'Smart water meters could be used to track how many people are in a property, analyse daily routines, and reveal when you cook, shower or water your garden. 'This is a clear example of how everyday infrastructure can quietly become a surveillance tool – without public awareness or consent.' Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, said Labour had been 'caught red-handed' planning a new tax on water usage with the help of 'Big Brother technology'. Concerns have also been raised over consumer protection. Electricity companies are able to switch off your electricity remotely if you have a smart meter, but only under a very narrow set of circumstances and after taking all reasonable steps to manage debt repayment. Any customers deemed vulnerable cannot be disconnected. However, The Telegraph previously revealed how some energy suppliers are forcibly installing prepayment meters remotely by switching customers' smart meters from credit to prepayment mode. Campaigners have said that doing this amounts to disconnecting customers from the grid 'by the back door', as anyone unable to pay on a prepayment meter will lose power. Even if similarly strict regulations are put in place to stop water companies turning off the taps, digitally connecting the water system raises the threat of a widespread cyber attack, Mr Hunn said. He added: 'Electricity companies can disconnect you through a smart meter. If that logic goes into water then you have a situation where the company would be able to turn off your water. 'If someone hacks into that system, they can turn off large chunks of the country's water supply.'

Orwell bridge work to cost £6m, says National Highways boss
Orwell bridge work to cost £6m, says National Highways boss

BBC News

time3 days ago

  • BBC News

Orwell bridge work to cost £6m, says National Highways boss

Work to replace two joints on a major bridge is set to cost £6m, a National Highways boss said. Two expansion joints on the westbound carriageway of Orwell Bridge, on the A14 near Ipswich, will be replaced from 16 June until Amor, head of scheme delivery for National Highways in the East, said despite the cost of the work, the new joints would last for 50 added that staff would be working "around the clock" to ensure minimal disruption for drivers. "This work is costing around £6m so it's a big undertaking," Mr Amor said."The positive thing is these joints will last for 50 years so once the work is done we won't have to come back for many, many years."It is very complicated work so we have to extract the expansion joints from the bridge structure itself without damaging the bridge."So it is technical and delicate, it's a bit like major surgery on a bridge." The bridge has four of these joints in total - two on each side, with the eastbound carriageway's likely to be replaced within the next five years, according to Mr Amor. He added that carrying out the work in the summer was best for the workers with good weather and more daylight Amor said he was confident the work would be finished by the end of than 60,000 vehicles cross the 1km (0.6 mile) bridge - a key link to the Port of Felixstowe - every single will be various lane and road closures during the work, which have been detailed on National Highways' website. Public information events have also been planned where people were able to meet the project team and ask questions. Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

MPs using AI to polish speeches and prepare for PMQs
MPs using AI to polish speeches and prepare for PMQs

Telegraph

time5 days ago

  • Telegraph

MPs using AI to polish speeches and prepare for PMQs

Politicians of all stripes have often been accused of sounding robotic as they seek to toe the party line. Now that claim might be taken literally, as MPs team up with machines to upgrade their parliamentary potential. The Telegraph has found that MPs across the political spectrum are expensing artificial intelligence (AI) tools to help with tasks like polishing speeches and grilling the Prime Minister. At least three are claiming for ChatGPT subscriptions, while others use AI-powered writing aids and video editing software. It is a sign that the centuries-old job is undergoing another revolution. Politicians are increasingly turning to the cutting-edge technology to boost their abilities as ministers scramble to balance innovation with regulation. An analysis of parliamentary expenses by The Telegraph has found at least 19 MPs have charged the taxpayer for AI tools, or programmes that have AI features. Sir Keir Starmer has actively encouraged the use of AI in Whitehall, saying he is determined to seize the 'golden opportunity' it offers. The Government has said it is throwing its full weight behind the industry to make Britain a world leader. However, there are concerns over the rapidly developing technology's transparency and reliability, as well as the potential for systems to 'go rogue'. Earlier in May, Labour was forced to row back on plans to force companies to opt out if they don't want their content used to train AI systems. The proposals had sparked anger from artists, musicians and filmmakers, who said it amounted to having their work stolen to feed AI models that could eventually replace them. Sir David Davis, the former Cabinet minister, is one of three MPs putting ChatGPT on expenses. The popular AI chatbot answers questions and solves problems by drawing upon a vast wealth of knowledge. The Tory MP, who describes himself as 'Mr Privacy', insisted he never uses the technology to engage with constituents or handle their data. But he said it is a huge asset for his policy work, getting taxpayers 'the value of maybe 10 members of staff from three'. On one occasion, he used the tool to prepare to quiz Sir Keir at Prime Minister's Questions, conducting masses of research far more quickly than any human could. By answering streams of queries in mere minutes that would normally take staff days to complete, he said the chatbot helped him to reduce the burden on his team and craft the most pertinent question possible. 'Half an hour's work on the AI' He said he 'wouldn't even have asked that question' if he had needed to get his staffers to do all the work, as it couldn't feasibly have been completed in time. However, he stressed the information still needed to be manually filtered and fact-checked. 'So it's about half an hour's work on the AI and probably about another half an hour's work checking it,' he said. He also insisted that ChatGPT could not replace his team as it lacked the 'human insight and wisdom' required to ask the right question. 'I'm pretty lucky. I've had a very, very good staff down the years,' he said. 'But they're human. They can't just sit down and read seven and a half million words in half an hour… So it's basically a force multiplier on them.' Sir David has used AI tools to help conduct research on the Lucy Letby case, which he has been campaigning on, and take notes from in-house meetings. He even attempted to get some AI writing aids to replicate his speaking mannerisms but found they couldn't quite match his style. Another MP to expense ChatGPT is Steff Aquarone, the new Lib Dem MP for North Norfolk. He also claims for an unspecified product from OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, and Otter, an AI transcription software. Writing tool can proofread His office said the AI tools were predominantly used for accessibility purposes by one of his staff members, who has a condition affecting his speech and coordination. Brendan O'Hara, the SNP MP for Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber, also expenses ChatGPT on a monthly basis. However, he said he hadn't found it as useful as hoped. He told The Telegraph: 'We signed up to ChatGPT a couple of years ago when it first emerged, hoping that it could assist the office staff in their day-to-day operations. 'We have since discovered that it didn't do what we thought it might, and we really haven't used it very much since. We will probably look at it again before reviewing our £20-a-month subscription.' Amanda Hack, a Labour MP, and Paul Kohler, a Lib Dem MP, have both expensed Grammarly, an AI writing aid which can proofread and rewrite passages of text, as well as help the user 'strike the right tone'. Neither responded to questions about what they use it for. At least 11 MPs, including Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, have claimed for Veed, an AI video editor which promises to make content more engaging. Two MPs who use programmes with AI capabilities told The Telegraph that they do not make use of those features specifically. The revelations show how AI use is becoming increasingly normalised in Westminster. It emerged earlier tin 2025 that Peter Kyle, Science Secretary, has used ChatGPT to come up with policy advice. He had previously said he used the chatbot to learn on the job, telling Politics Home it can be a 'very good tutor' when 'there are things that you really struggle to understand in depth'. The Telegraph went on to reveal that five government departments had used AI to answer questions in Parliament, with Labour ministers accused of providing 'stock answers generated by a computer'. Civil servants have also been told to abide by the mantra that 'no person's substantive time should be spent on a task where digital or AI can do it better, quicker and to the same high quality and standard'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store