
Illegal betting apps thrive underground despite ban
Experts and law enforcement agencies warn that beyond the lure of easy money, these apps pose serious cyber threats, endangering users' financial data, device security, and even national digital infrastructure.
The state govt categorically banned online gambling and betting under state-specific laws. In 2020, the Andhra Pradesh Gaming (Amendment) Act criminalised online betting. These laws empower police to arrest individuals for promoting or participating in online betting.
However, enforcement is outpaced by technology. With these apps not available on the Google Play Store due to policy violations, developers resort to distributing APK files via Telegram, WhatsApp, YouTube video descriptions, pop-up websites, and even pirated movie streaming platforms.
"Users install these APKs by bypassing Android security warnings. They grant full permissions, often unknowingly giving access to their SMS inbox, contacts, photos, and even UPI apps," says a cybercrime officer from the state cyber crime division.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Đây có thể là thời điểm tốt nhất để giao dịch vàng trong 5 năm qua
IC Markets
Tìm hiểu thêm
Undo
"These apps are often cloned versions of popular betting platforms. Their interfaces look legitimate, but in the background, the data theft begins as soon as you click 'Allow Permissions'," the officer added.
On the ground, the reality is grim. Despite the ban, youth across Vijayawada, Guntur, and other places across the state are drawn into betting via apps linked to cricket matches, virtual casinos, teen patti, or fantasy sports.
During IPL or World Cup seasons, cybercrime complaints spike.
A 22-year-old engineering student from Guntur, requesting anonymity, said he lost over 3.5 lakh to an online poker app downloaded through a Telegram group. "It started with small wins. Then I was told to deposit more to unlock VIP access. One day, the app stopped working, and I couldn't withdraw a single rupee. Later, my Paytm account showed suspicious transactions."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Neglect of senior citizens will not be tolerated, says Joint Collector
Neglect of senior citizens will not be tolerated and the violators would be liable for criminal action as per the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007, said Joint Collector Abhishek Kumar. Addressing a district-level orientation session and Senior Citizens Welfare Committee meeting here on Thursday (July 31, 2025), the Joint Collector said that the Department for the Welfare of Differently Abled and Senior Citizens should sensitise field officials and stakeholders about the Act and its associated 2011 rules. Expressing concern over the increasing neglect faced by elderly parents within families, the Joint Collector highlighted the need for strict implementation of the law. He instructed the field officials to hold awareness campaigns to sensitise the public on the rights of elderly people. Representatives of the Anantapur District Legal Services Authority highlighted the key provisions of the Act and said that under Section 23 of the Act, parents could reclaim property transferred to sons and daughters in case of neglect. The Section 24 mandates imprisonment of up to three months with a fine of ₹5,000. Members of the Senior Citizens' Association made few suggestions in improving welfare services and submitted a memorandum to the Joint Collector regarding their concerns. Senior officials from the revenue and police departments from Puttaparthi, Dharmavaram, and Penukonda divisions took part in the meeting.


The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Four arrested in SIM box racket with links to Cambodia
Four individuals of a gang operating an illegal SIM box setup from a rented house in Jannaram mandal in Mancherial were arrested by the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau (TGCSB), in collaboration with the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and the Ramagundam police. The operation led to the seizure of equipment used to facilitate cross-border scams routed through domestic mobile networks. The investigation was triggered after the DoT, through its Chakshu portal, flagged suspicious activity linked to impersonation and fraudulent calls originating from the region. Technical inputs provided by the department identified a SIM box device connected to multiple International Mobile Equipment Identitys (IMEI), which allowed internet-based international calls to be disguised as local calls. With just one or two individuals operating them, fraudsters can manage and make a high volume of calls simultaneously, often used in scams involving impersonation, threats, or financial fraud, while evading detection. The arrested individuals were identified as Yandrapu Kamesh, a 24-year-old unemployed polytechnic diploma holder from Parvathipuram, Andhra Pradesh; Bavu Bapaiah, a 43-year-old labourer from Laxmipur in Jagtial district; Bavu Madhukar, Bapaiah's 32-year-old younger brother; and Gotla Rajeshwer, a 40-year-old farmer from Kishtapur village. The group had been working under the remote direction of Polavalsula Sai Krishna, also known as Jack or Raju, who is currently absconding and was allegedly operating from Cambodia. Investigations revealed that Bapaiah had travelled to Cambodia in mid-2024 and reconnected with Sai Krishna, whom he had initially met in Chandigarh while attempting to secure a visa. After returning to India in April 2025, Bapaiah was contacted by Krishna via WhatsApp and asked to arrange a rented house in Jannaram for setting up the SIM box operation. With assistance from his brother-in-law Rajeshwer, the location was secured, and soon after, telecom devices were shipped to Jagitial. Since Bapaiah was not at home, his brother Madhukar received the parcel and placed the equipment in the rented premises. Subsequently, Krishna instructed the brothers to secure a high-speed Airtel broadband connection, which was arranged with the help of a local dealer. Kamesh, who had been approached via Telegram by Krishna and offered a monthly salary of ₹70,000, was brought to Jannaram to oversee the operation. He was responsible for installing the hardware, configuring the SIM panels, and inserting SIMs in batches to evade detection. Krishna also provided Kamesh with ₹3 lakh to purchase over 200 proofless SIM cards from a man named Simhadri in Parvathipuram, with financial transactions facilitated through another associate, Bonu Jayavardhan. The unverified SIMs were delivered in multiple consignments and used in the SIM box to route fraudulent calls. The group managed to establish a decentralised yet technically coordinated setup capable of handling high call volumes. During the raid, officials seized five SIM box devices, over 230 SIM cards, a laptop, four mobile phones, a D-Link router, a modem, and an inverter, all configured for seamless telecom routing. Efforts are now underway to trace Sai Krishna, Bonu Jayavardhan, who helped procure SIM cards; and Simhadri, who supplied the proofless SIMs. Investigators are also probing the role of telecom service providers and internet companies that may have issued SIM cards without proper verification. Financial transactions linked to the operation are being scrutinised to trace the flow of money and identify any connections to larger call centre-based fraud networks.


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
34 adult websites under UK regulator's scanner, here's what they need to do under the country's new Safety Act
The UK's media regulator Ofcom launched formal investigations into four companies operating 34 pornography websites for allegedly failing to implement mandatory age verification systems designed to protect children from accessing adult content online. The companies under investigation – 8579 LLC, AVS Group Ltd, Kick Online Entertainment S.A., and Trendio Ltd – collectively attract over 9 million monthly UK visitors across their platforms. Ofcom prioritized these firms based on their user numbers and potential risk of harm to minors. The investigations mark the first major enforcement action since age verification requirements took effect July 25 under the UK's Online Safety Act. The legislation requires pornography sites to use "highly effective" age assurance methods to prevent children from stumbling across adult material. Pornography sites could face revenue-based fines if failed to implement age verification by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like When Knee Pain Hits, Start Eating These Foods, and Feel Your Pain Go Away (It's Genius) Read More Undo Ofcom possesses significant enforcement powers, including fines up to £18 million or 10% of a company's worldwide revenue, whichever is greater. In extreme cases, the regulator can seek court orders to block non-compliant sites or require payment providers and advertisers to withdraw services. The investigations add to Ofcom's existing 11 probes into platforms including 4chan, suicide forums, and file-sharing services. Meanwhile, sites like Pornhub have pledged compliance with the stricter requirements. The regulator expects to announce additional enforcement actions in coming weeks as it continues monitoring compliance across thousands of affected websites. VPN usage surges as sites face scrutiny from government Since the new rules launched, the UK has experienced a dramatic spike in virtual private network usage, with four of the top five free apps on Apple's App Store being VPN services. Proton, the most popular VPN app, reported an 1,800% increase in downloads as users seek to bypass geographical restrictions. The Age Verification Providers Association reported an additional 5 million daily age checks across UK platforms since Friday, representing a massive increase from previous tick-box verification methods. Major sites like Pornhub have pledged compliance with the stricter requirements. More than 400,000 people have signed a petition calling for the Online Safety Act's repeal, citing privacy concerns and potential overreach, though the government maintains no plans to withdraw the legislation.