
9 Years Since the Pulse Nightclub Shooting What Comes Next?
When I called her back, she picked up and sighed deeply. 'Oh, thank god. I know you just like to pick up and leave without giving anyone notice. I thought you could have been there. In Orlando. At Pulse.'
My mother seemed to think she was breaking the news to me, but I already knew. I had still been up in the wee hours the night before, when social media accounts began to report the massacre, when concerned texts from friends started coming in. At around 2 a.m., just after last call, twenty-nine-year-old Omar Mateen had entered Pulse Nightclub on 'Latin Night' with a semiautomatic rifle. He killed 49 people and wounded 53.
He shot people who had traveled to Orlando from Haiti, Puerto Rico, Cuba, Mexico, the Dominican Republic, and more. He shot a mother who would perish protecting her queer child with her body. He shot singers, hairdressers, nurses and photographers and literature students. He fired bullets into the flesh of people who wanted, for an evening, a few hours, a moment, to be free—to move their bodies joyously to the rhythms of Latin Night.
As the news of the massacre was breaking, I didn't know the details of their lives. I just knew, at the deepest of levels, that many were just like me: Queer, Latinx, and fighting to survive. These were queer people composed of diasporic rhythms, queers moving across the globe, queers who have had to reckon with worlds hostile and cruel to their being. I found myself already haunted by their deaths, awestruck at how soon I felt that loss. Haunted by the body counts, the names, the stories and histories attached to those names—just like I am haunted by the many thousands of queer people, both named and unnamed, whom we have lost to AIDS.
What does it mean to be "after' loss? What does it mean to continue after the Pulse Massacre or after the AIDS Crisis? How can we heal when we are always in a cruel and devastating after? I am not alone in asking these questions.
'Yesterday we saw ourselves die again // Fifty times we died in Orlando,' mourns the narrator of Christopher Soto's poem, ' All the Dead Boys Look Like Us.' The 'we' Soto describes in its plural subaltern voice is of young, queer people of color hailing from colonized countries. Many of the Pulse shooting victims were in their twenties, some in their late teens, just babies.
Richard Blanco, in his own tribute to the Pulse victims, ' One Pulse—One Poem,' writes: 'picture the choir of their invisible spirits / rising with the smoke toward disco lights, imagine / ourselves dancing with them until the very end.' Forty-nine people were killed at Pulse. They were friends, lovers, mothers, siblings, partners and so much more.
' Restored Mural for Orlando ' by Roy G. Guzmán focuses on the importance of a city like Orlando for queer community. Yet, he writes,'I am afraid of attending places / that celebrate our bodies because that's also where our bodies // have been cancelled / when you're brown and gay you're always dying / twice.'
The 49 people who were killed at Pulse each had a name: Darryl Roman Burt II, Deonka Deidra Drayton, Antonio Davon Brown, Mercedez Marisol Flores...
Their names of the 49 lives lost go on, as do the details of their lives. Jerry Wright worked at Disney World, one of Orlando's biggest employers. Juan Ramon Guerrero and Christopher 'Drew' Leinonen were boyfriends, and took their final breaths together. Jonathan Camuy worked as a producer at the popular Spanish broadcasting company Telemundo.
Names do not necessarily tell the story of a life, and neither does a number. Yet, when brought together, compiled, and compacted, they speak to vast contexts and histories. Forty-nine people were killed at Pulse. Seven hundred thousand dead—disproportionately poor, unhoused, and people of color—from HIV/AIDS. Sadly, there remain many other queer names we may never know because history did not record them. Yet, despite their incompleteness, we need these names and numbers in order to have a sense of who we have lost, to feel the weight of the tally—not as a burden but as part of our fight for a different past, present, and future.
My mother called me after the Pulse Nightclub shooting because she knew something of tragedy, mourning, and fear. But in truth, she was scared for me long before that terrible morning, ever since I elected to move to New York City when I was eighteen. For years, she experienced the cocktail of emotions that comes with loving a queer child—fear of our early passing from some disease, some mental illness, some lover's quarrel, some brutal attack by a stranger on a street.
I want Pulse not to be solely a tragedy, a massacre, a mass shooting. I want it to signify more than pain, suffering, and unending mourning. I want after Pulse to be about the patchwork of joys, contradictions, mundanities, hopes, differences, and freedom projects that define queer life. The many ways of reaching out with all of our senses to other bodies, other places, other histories. Our after should include shaking a**, gossiping with friends, drinking cocktails, lip-syncing to a favorite song—staring into the strobe lights, feeling alive, fully bodied, transcendent.
After Pulse is where I want to be.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Report: Roger Goodell tells ESPN employees the NFL won't get involved with journalism
Pending regulatory approval (which seems to be hardly a given), the NFL eventually will own 10 percent of ESPN. That dynamic has raised obvious concerns that the NFL will parlay its partial ownership into the potential airing of grievances about ESPN's coverage of the league. As a result, the powers-that-be are trying to ease the worries of ESPN reporters and analysts who fear being micromanaged by The Shield. Most recently, that resulted in (according to Commissioner Roger Goodell communicating with ESPN employees at a town-hall meeting via a recorded message. Per the report, "Goodell emphasized to ESPN employees that the league would not get involved in the network's journalism." We have three points to make in response to that contention. First, what else is he going to say? "You'd better watch out?" It's a very real concern that the NFL will try to impose upon ESPN the same degree of conscious self-editing that NFL Network reporters and analysts have exercised for years. Second, it would be different if the NFL didn't already have a habit of complaining to broadcast partners about things said and written by their reporters and analysts. It absolutely happens. (And it may happen today, as a result of me pointing out that it absolutely happens.) The league surely has complained to ESPN at some point in the past about something that ended up on ESPN Radio, or any of the various ESPN networks. And that was before the league owned a piece of the business. It's naive to think the NFL will say nothing if/when someone on the ESPN payroll says something that someone at the league office doesn't like. Third, Jim Trotter. So while the league may not "get involved in the network's journalism," the league will surely have something to say in the aftermath of the exercise of it. Especially when it's time to renew the contracts of people who have a history of covering stories the league doesn't like and/or posing questions to the Commissioner that he doesn't appreciate. At a time when it's more important than ever to speak truth to power, this has all the earmarks of yet another situation where power will end up being spoken to truth. Not immediately. Not obviously. But inevitably.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
4 Common Banking Mistakes the Ultra-Wealthy Know To Avoid
When it comes to money, the ultra-wealthy don't just make it — they know how to keep it. And while most of us focus on earning more, they're quietly sidestepping financial slip-ups that can drain fortunes faster than a bad investment. The good news? You don't need a yacht or a private island to learn from their playbook. Trending Now: Find Out: Here are the common banking mistakes the ultra-wealthy know to avoid — and how steering clear of them can help you protect and grow your own money. They Think of Banks as Partners, Not Just Service Providers According to Bhavin Swadas, CEO of Squeal My Deal, a considerable contrast between the hyper-wealthy and the typical customer pertains to mindset. 'Affluent entrepreneurs do not see banks as a financial platform to deposit money — they regard them as strategic partners,' Swadas added. This implies that they go in search of banks in which they can get relationship benefits, and not necessarily convenience. They will then tend to concentrate funds on different accounts to gain a higher level of relationship, enjoy private banking services, zero fees and better interest rates. This is the point, said Swadas: They realize that volume and loyalty equate leverage. 'On that leverage, they secure more favorable rates — lower or no maintenance charges, free wires, increased ATM withdrawal, and special credit lines.' Explore More: They Avoid Transaction-Based Pitfalls Rich people ensure that they do not initiate transactions that attract unneeded transaction fees. 'These are the overdraft fee, the foreign transaction fee, and the wire transfer,' said Swadas. They have international accounts with no fees charged or use tanks to have a banking service with these bundled in for free. The existence of multiple checking accounts in various currencies or jurisdictions is also common, said Swadas, especially among people who travel or invest in a foreign land, which saves them from currency conversion and foreign ATM fees. They Maintain Buffer Accounts for Liquidity Rather than having a single account used to act as a catch-all, Swadas said the very rich tend to set up their finances in a variety of accounts that are more specialized. For example, they maintain an active checking account with an overdraft protection, a high-yield savings account with slow growth, and cash management accounts that are linked to investments and allow one to withdraw money without penalty. 'This system eliminates errors in transactions, bounced checks or surprise fees,' according to Swadas. They Use Private Bankers and Relationship Managers Swadas also noted that the ultra-affluent usually do not have to wade through the policies of banks. These institutions usually set up managers to exclusively handle relations with the ultra-affluent who check their accounts, update their clients on any changes in the policies and proactively eliminate or overturn charges. 'These bankers can really assist in this lifestyle structuring of their accounts, as well; for example, how to make large or frequent transfers without causing red flags or compliance holds,' Swadas noted. More From GOBankingRates 5 Old Navy Items Retirees Need To Buy Ahead of Fall 4 Affordable Car Brands You Won't Regret Buying in 2025 This article originally appeared on 4 Common Banking Mistakes the Ultra-Wealthy Know To Avoid Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Frequent Travelers Drive High-Value Opportunities in the US
New LoopMe consumer data offers insights into travel planning, preferences, and booking behaviors NEW YORK, August 14, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--New research from LoopMe, the global leader in brand performance, reveals that while a majority of Americans book only one or two trips per year, there is a high-value segment of frequent travelers emerging. These consumers are between the ages of 18-24 years old and are likely to book up to seven trips a year, indicating a growing opportunity for brands to build long-term loyalty with younger consumers who are more likely to travel and spend. The report also revealed that domestic travel remains the most popular type of trip booked (39%), followed by nearby weekend getaways (23%) and international travel (17%). Cruises (15%) and theme parks (12%) have also been listed as popular destinations for Americans. International travelers (50%) and cruise-goers (48%) are also more likely to travel up to three times per year, creating an opportunity for brands and marketers to explore. When booking travel, 22% of US consumers use direct websites or online travel agencies (21%); however, other routes used include: Travel agency - 11% Credit card portals - 5% Employer travel portal - 4% Additional key insights from LoopMe's analysis include Frequent travelers spend big: Frequent travelers are more than twice as likely to spend at least $3000 per person on each trip Most Americans book travel for leisure and family visits: Top travel purposes include leisure (29%), family visits (24%), and group travel (7%). "While most Americans travel occasionally, the real opportunity lies with frequent travelers to build long-term loyalty and growth", said Brian Bell, GM North America at LoopMe. "As the travel landscape continues to evolve, brands have the perfect opportunity to reach emerging, high-value audiences and drive ROI in order to stay ahead in an increasingly competitive space." Methodology LoopMe surveyed 6,409 US consumers between 27-31 January 2025 to gauge travel habits, preferences, and motivations. About LoopMe LoopMe is the global leader in brand performance, redefining brand advertising for the digital and app ecosystem. LoopMe was the first to apply AI to brand advertising and its Intelligent Marketplace, finding solutions to industry challenges that haven't previously been solved. With consumer insights and AI at its core, LoopMe makes brand advertising better, outperforming industry benchmarks for leading global brands. Our vision is to change advertising for the better, by building technology that will redefine brand advertising. LoopMe was founded in 2012 and is headquartered in the UK, with global offices across New York, Boston, Atlanta, Chicago, Detroit, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Toronto, Singapore, Sydney, Melbourne, Dnipro, Krakow, Beijing, Shanghai and Hong Kong. For more information, please visit View source version on Contacts loopme@ Sign in to access your portfolio