Weather, illicit drug may have contributed to fatal B.C. chopper crash, TSB says
The Transportation Safety Board says a number of factors could have led to a fatal helicopter crash in British Columbia last year but it makes no final finding of the cause.
The TSB said in a report on Thursday that the helicopter was on its way to a private residence near Sicamous, B.C., from High River, Alta., on Jan. 5, 2024 when it crashed 18 kilometres east of Revelstoke.
It was located two days later in deep snow with its sole occupant, a student pilot, dead.
The report said it took two days for a Canadian Armed Forces Cormorant helicopter to find the crash site because of bad weather and challenging terrain.
The report said the man, who had passed his flying test, hadn't applied for his full licence yet. It also found there was an illicit substance in his blood that's not permitted when flying a helicopter.
'This substance may derive from an illicit drug or from certain medication,' the report said.
'The investigation determined that the substance was present prior to death. However, it could not determine the source of the substance or whether the presence of the substance influenced the pilot's performance during the occurrence.'
The pilot had texted before the crash that he had encountered poor weather and would take a route along the Trans-Canada Highway through Rogers Pass, B.C.
The report said a warm front in the area at the time was producing strong winds and reduced visibility with low clouds. As the helicopter neared Revelstoke, the visibility would have been further reduced by precipitation.
'In this occurrence, the pilot performed multiple 360 degree left-turn orbits before striking terrain. After each orbit, the pilot rejoined the south side of the highway and continued flying toward Revelstoke at approximately 50 to 100 feet above the trees.'
The TSB said the helicopter was badly damaged in the crash.
'The fuselage deformation and damage were consistent with a high-energy impact in a forward direction. The two main rotor blades were fractured at different lengths and deformed, while the main transmission was ejected,' said the report.
'The accident was not survivable because of the impact forces involved.'
The report did not provide an exact cause for the crash but addressed Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT).
It said it often happens in low visibility, at night or in poor weather and reduces a pilot's awareness of the surrounding area.
The TSB suggests pilots check the weather before a flight.
The TSB is an independent agency that investigates air, marine, pipeline and rail transportation occurrences.
It does not assign fault or determine criminal liability.
This report by Bill Graveland, The Canadian Press, was first published July 24, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
First in Canada unexplained wealth order issued in B.C. against alleged pot growers
VICTORIA – British Columbia's Public Safety Minister Nina Krieger says she's 'pleased' that the B.C. Supreme Court has issued Canada's first unexplained wealth order against two accused illicit pot growers tracked down by police who followed a trail of blood after a shooting. A court ruling issued in Victoria on Thursday says Jianxin Huang and Xiao Zhen Jean Li are facing a civil forfeiture action for three properties and nearly $1.5 million in cash allegedly tied to illicit cannabis production and the failure to declare taxable income. The ruling says Vancouver police were called to a property on East 28th Ave. in September 2023 for reports of shots fired and followed a trail of blood to the rear of a property on Victoria Drive owned by Li, while a person was found nearby with multiple gunshot wounds and later died. It says a search of the home turned up nearly $1.5 million in cash, more than 75 kilograms of cannabis and Canada Child Benefit and BC Family Benefits applications in Li's name that claimed she made less than $1,000 a year. The ruling says both Li and Huang reported 'minimal' taxable income for nearly two decades, but Li bought the Victoria Drive home in 2005 for $588,000, another home with Huang in 2013 for $705,000 in cash and a property in Abbotsford in 2020 for $1.7 million. A statement from Krieger on Friday says unexplained wealth orders require people to detail how they acquired their assets 'to prove that their luxury property, cars or cash were obtained legally, or risk losing them.' The ruling says both Huang and Li were the subject of multiple suspicious transaction reports to Canada's money laundering watchdog, the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada, from four different banks between 2017 and 2023. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 15, 2025.
Winnipeg Free Press
7 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
‘Free Palestine' banner hung on B.C. legislature sets off probe of ‘security breach'
VICTORIA – A protest banner hung on the outside facade of the British Columbia legislature has set off a police probe and an investigation by the clerk's office into the 'external security breach.' A statement from the Office of the Clerk says the banner was put up overnight between Aug. 13 and Aug. 14 and the security breach was 'being taken very seriously' with a full internal investigation underway. The banner, reading 'Free Palestine Economic Sanctions' was placed on the front of the building above a giant Canadian flag that was put up as the tariff dispute heated with the United States. The statement says the Victoria Police Department is also investigating the breach. The banner was removed Thursday shortly after it was discovered, but not before being seen by motorists and others travelling past the building on Victoria's Inner Harbour. The intersection near the legislature is among the busiest in the city, and the grounds of the legislature have recently been used by those protesting the Israeli war in Gaza. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 15, 2025.
Ottawa Citizen
8 hours ago
- Ottawa Citizen
Wife's ADHD cited by Federal Court in reasons for delaying deportation of man from India
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'There is evidence that L.B. suffers from ADHD which impairs her ability to manage time, stress, focus ... and that the Applicant provides her with support' Last updated 11 minutes ago The front doors to the Federal Court of Canada in Ottawa in 2023. Photo by Sean Kilpatrick / The Canadian Press A Federal Court judge has temporarily stopped the deportation of a man from India over Ottawa's handling of health concerns by his Canadian wife who has ADHD, and financial problems his departure would cause his sister. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles from Elizabeth Payne, David Pugliese, Andrew Duffy, Bruce Deachman and others. Plus, food reviews and event listings in the weekly newsletter, Ottawa, Out of Office. Unlimited online access to Ottawa Citizen and 15 news sites with one account. Ottawa Citizen ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles from Elizabeth Payne, David Pugliese, Andrew Duffy, Bruce Deachman and others. Plus, food reviews and event listings in the weekly newsletter, Ottawa, Out of Office. Unlimited online access to Ottawa Citizen and 15 news sites with one account. Ottawa Citizen ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Jagjit Singh, a citizen of India, came to Canada in 2021 on a temporary resident visa and made a refugee claim for asylum. While that claim was being processed, he met a Canadian woman, in November 2024, and married her the following January. The woman, identified only by the initials L.B., in the court decision, submitted a spousal sponsorship for her new husband to become a permanent resident of Canada a couple of weeks later, after which he withdrew his refugee claim. The Ottawa Citizen's best journalism, delivered directly to your inbox by 7 p.m. on weekdays. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again While one arm of the immigration system was processing the spousal sponsorship, another arm was dealing with a man who was no longer seeking refugee protection and so had overstayed his original visa. In May his wife was notified she met the eligibility requirements to sponsor Singh and, in July, Singh was given a removal date for August. He asked Canada Border Services Agency officials to delay his deportation until after his wife's application was adjudicated. CBSA refused his request. Singh then sought intervention from the Federal Court to delay his removal. His case was heard by Federal Court Justice Avvy Yao-Yao Go on Tuesday and her decision was released the same day. Lawyers for Singh claimed five grounds for a delay, including various ways that the CBSA mishandled and misapplied evidence in the case to a degree suggesting they had not reviewed the submission Singh had made. The judge said not all of Singh's grounds were persuasive, but only one serious issue was needed for a stay to be granted, and she saw one. 'There is at least one serious issue with respect to the Officer's assessment of the evidence the Applicant submitted in support of his deferral request, and the Officer's interpretation of the scope of their discretion,' Go wrote in her decision. She found the border officer did not properly consider the issue of irreparable harm. 'Irreparable harm refers to harm which cannot be compensated in money; it is the nature rather than the magnitude of the harm,' her judgment says. It doesn't have to be the person being deported that is harmed, it can be 'specific harm that is demonstrated in regard to any persons directly affected by the removal, and who will be remaining in Canada.' This advertisement has not loaded yet. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. In this case, Go found that there was evidence of harm to Singh's wife, who has ADHD, and to Singh's sister, who will suffer financially because the couple pay to live in her house. The CBSA officer's dismissal of the concerns was not based on evidence before the court, Go said. 'In the case before me, there is evidence that L.B. suffers from ADHD which impairs her ability to manage time, stress, focus and everyday responsibilities and that the Applicant provides her with support by, among other things, helping her maintain daily structure and reminders for medications and appointments, and providing her with emotional stability and mental health support. The evidence before the Court also indicates L.B. cannot rely on other family members to support her. 'The evidence before the Court further indicates that the Applicant's sister has put her house on sale in light of the Decision denying the Applicant's request to defer his removal.' In court, the government argued the couple's spousal sponsorship application faces further investigation due to 'possible bona fide concerns,' suggesting CBSA wants to see whether their marriage is a sham for immigration purposes. Singh's lawyers responded that the couple has not been asked for any information in that probe, so the delay is the government's fault, not Singh's. 'In the end,' Go wrote, 'taking into consideration the irreparable harm to the Applicant's spouse on the one hand, and the inconvenience to the Respondent caused by delay in removal on the other, I find that granting the stay until the underlying (application for judicial review) is determined would be just and equitable in all the circumstances of the case.' Go said Singh could stay in Canada until that review happens. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here.
