Online students lose thousands of dollars following closure of SC's Limestone University
The Curtis Building pictured Tuesday, June 10,2025, on the Limestone University campus in Gaffney, South Carolina, served as the college's administration building until the school's closure at the end of April 2025. (Photo by Jessica Holdman/SC Daily Gazette)
GAFFNEY — Limestone University required students to pre-pay for summer classes. Now that the college has closed for good, some say they're out thousands of dollars.
The school's initial announcement that the 179-year-old, private college in South Carolina's Upstate needed to raise $6 million to stay open came as online students faced a deadline.
On April 13, school officials told virtual students, including Mike Thielen, to submit their payments for summer classes within five days, according to emails reviewed by the SC Daily Gazette. The April 16 announcement of potential closure said online classes would continue, suggesting online students need not worry.
But after two weeks of frantic fundraising fell short, the school's governing board ultimately voted for total closure. Online offerings ended too.
'That blindsided everybody,' Thielen said.
It's been six weeks since the board vote. Thielen and half a dozen others say the school has still not refunded their money.
Limestone personnel designated as a point of contact after closure have not responded to emails sent by the SC Daily Gazette.
SC's Limestone University to close after nearly 2 centuries
At first, Thielen received email replies from staff saying they were working on returning the $4,000 he paid for two classes.
He followed up several times and received the same response until layoffs became official and people stopped returning messages altogether.
'I don't know if I'll ever see my money again,' Thielen said. 'Everyone is passing the buck. It's just really shameful.'
Thielen enrolled in Limestone's online program while working for a Spartanburg software company, which had a partnership agreement with the school. When he took a new job, he continued studying with Limestone, hoping to become the first person in his family with a master's degree.
The online Master of Business Administration student, who lives near Fort Worth, Texas, and works as a healthcare recruiter, was just three classes away from finishing his degree. Now he's left finding a new school — one that may not accept all of his transfer credits. And he'll have to come up with more money to pay for it, on top of what he lost.
'It was just a total failure of leadership,' he said. 'They rushed to shut it down and now they're hiding.'
SC governor calls for study to consider consolidating colleges ahead of 'enrollment cliff'
The story is similar for South Carolina Army National Guard member Thomas Martin.
The master sergeant from Charleston has worked for the Guard full time for two decades and was pursuing a bachelor's degree in business on the side. Martin said Limestone's online program was a popular choice among his fellow guardsmen because they could use federal and state benefits offered to military members to pay for it.
When Limestone's final spring semester ended, Martin still had about $1,000 in state aid available, which he had hoped to put toward summer classes or textbook costs. The school, which received students' allotment directly from the state Commission on Higher Education, has yet to credit him for those unused state dollars.
'I had a great experience with Limestone up until this,' he said. 'Now they're not even acknowledging my emails. It's disappointing.'
Martin said he was repeatedly referred to South Carolina's higher education agency for help. The commission's staff told him they would research the matter but weren't hopeful that the aid dollars would be returned.
Commission spokesman Mark Swart said the agency has not received any official, written complaints against Limestone at this time. He said the agency referred several students to Limestone's former chief of staff, who the school designated as a point of contact.
Martin told the Gazette he didn't realize the complaint process existed.
When Limestone announced the final decision to close, laying off 478 people employed by the college, leadership cited enrollment declines impacting colleges nationwide and rising costs as the drivers behind the school's financial straits.
Limestone's enrollment fell by half over the past decade, from 3,214 students in fall 2014, according to state higher education data, to 1,600 this semester, including both online and in-person students, according to the university's announcement.
Auditors reported the school had a $7.6 million operating loss as of June 2024. To make up for losses, the school had borrowed some $22 million from its small endowment, which had a balance of just $9.2 million last June.
The school also faced an additional $30 million in debt, largely from a U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development loan, which Limestone took out in 2018 to construct a new library and student center, purchase a residence hall and refinance previous debt. The school offered campus land and buildings as collateral.
So far, USDA is not calling in that loan.
In a statement, a USDA spokesperson said it 'takes its stewardship of taxpayer funds seriously' and 'continues to actively engage with the university's board and leadership to explore all available options to protect the federal investment and ensure the best possible outcome for the community and taxpayers.'
The school also has not filed for federal bankruptcy protections. No liens have been filed against the school in South Carolina district court. Nor are there any small claims filings from students at this time.
$500M for colleges, a bigger share for traditional public schools: How SC budget funds education
Not only does Limestone's closure impact the college's students, it also affected college employees and 13 K-12 public charter schools that relied on the college's associated charter school management operations: Limestone Charter Association.
A former employee has filed suit in federal court alleging the school violated national labor laws when it only gave two weeks' notice to workers. Federal law requires companies with 100 or more employees to give at least 60 days' notice for layoffs, though there are some exceptions.
In its notice letter filed with the state employment agency, Limestone claimed the exemption allowed for employers actively seeking funding that an earlier notice could have jeopardized. The school has yet to respond in court filings.
Meanwhile, the state Department of Education is allowing the Limestone Charter Association, which operates as a separate nonprofit with its own staff, to continue operations through the coming school year as the charter schools it serves search for a new authorizer.
According to staff at the K-12 agency, the charter association will continue to receive state funding and act as an authorizer until July 1, 2026. It cannot accept any new schools starting July 1, 2025, and the state Education Department is recommending charter schools apply to a new authorizer by December.
The Limestone Charter Association schools:
South Carolina Preparatory Academy, Anderson
South Carolina Preparatory Leadership School, Anderso
East Link Academy, Greenville
Global Academy of South Carolina, Spartanburg
Mountain View Preparatory, Spartanburg
Goucher Charter Academy, Gaffney
Legion Collegiate Academy, Rock Hill
Horse Creek Academy, Aiken
OCSD High School for Health Professions, Orangeburg
Summerville Prep, Summerville
Oceanside Collegiate Academy, Mount Pleasant
Atlantic Collegiate Academy, Myrtle Beach
Coastal High School, Myrtle Beach
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Online students lose thousands of dollars following closure of SC's Limestone University
The Curtis Building pictured Tuesday, June 10,2025, on the Limestone University campus in Gaffney, South Carolina, served as the college's administration building until the school's closure at the end of April 2025. (Photo by Jessica Holdman/SC Daily Gazette) GAFFNEY — Limestone University required students to pre-pay for summer classes. Now that the college has closed for good, some say they're out thousands of dollars. The school's initial announcement that the 179-year-old, private college in South Carolina's Upstate needed to raise $6 million to stay open came as online students faced a deadline. On April 13, school officials told virtual students, including Mike Thielen, to submit their payments for summer classes within five days, according to emails reviewed by the SC Daily Gazette. The April 16 announcement of potential closure said online classes would continue, suggesting online students need not worry. But after two weeks of frantic fundraising fell short, the school's governing board ultimately voted for total closure. Online offerings ended too. 'That blindsided everybody,' Thielen said. It's been six weeks since the board vote. Thielen and half a dozen others say the school has still not refunded their money. Limestone personnel designated as a point of contact after closure have not responded to emails sent by the SC Daily Gazette. SC's Limestone University to close after nearly 2 centuries At first, Thielen received email replies from staff saying they were working on returning the $4,000 he paid for two classes. He followed up several times and received the same response until layoffs became official and people stopped returning messages altogether. 'I don't know if I'll ever see my money again,' Thielen said. 'Everyone is passing the buck. It's just really shameful.' Thielen enrolled in Limestone's online program while working for a Spartanburg software company, which had a partnership agreement with the school. When he took a new job, he continued studying with Limestone, hoping to become the first person in his family with a master's degree. The online Master of Business Administration student, who lives near Fort Worth, Texas, and works as a healthcare recruiter, was just three classes away from finishing his degree. Now he's left finding a new school — one that may not accept all of his transfer credits. And he'll have to come up with more money to pay for it, on top of what he lost. 'It was just a total failure of leadership,' he said. 'They rushed to shut it down and now they're hiding.' SC governor calls for study to consider consolidating colleges ahead of 'enrollment cliff' The story is similar for South Carolina Army National Guard member Thomas Martin. The master sergeant from Charleston has worked for the Guard full time for two decades and was pursuing a bachelor's degree in business on the side. Martin said Limestone's online program was a popular choice among his fellow guardsmen because they could use federal and state benefits offered to military members to pay for it. When Limestone's final spring semester ended, Martin still had about $1,000 in state aid available, which he had hoped to put toward summer classes or textbook costs. The school, which received students' allotment directly from the state Commission on Higher Education, has yet to credit him for those unused state dollars. 'I had a great experience with Limestone up until this,' he said. 'Now they're not even acknowledging my emails. It's disappointing.' Martin said he was repeatedly referred to South Carolina's higher education agency for help. The commission's staff told him they would research the matter but weren't hopeful that the aid dollars would be returned. Commission spokesman Mark Swart said the agency has not received any official, written complaints against Limestone at this time. He said the agency referred several students to Limestone's former chief of staff, who the school designated as a point of contact. Martin told the Gazette he didn't realize the complaint process existed. When Limestone announced the final decision to close, laying off 478 people employed by the college, leadership cited enrollment declines impacting colleges nationwide and rising costs as the drivers behind the school's financial straits. Limestone's enrollment fell by half over the past decade, from 3,214 students in fall 2014, according to state higher education data, to 1,600 this semester, including both online and in-person students, according to the university's announcement. Auditors reported the school had a $7.6 million operating loss as of June 2024. To make up for losses, the school had borrowed some $22 million from its small endowment, which had a balance of just $9.2 million last June. The school also faced an additional $30 million in debt, largely from a U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development loan, which Limestone took out in 2018 to construct a new library and student center, purchase a residence hall and refinance previous debt. The school offered campus land and buildings as collateral. So far, USDA is not calling in that loan. In a statement, a USDA spokesperson said it 'takes its stewardship of taxpayer funds seriously' and 'continues to actively engage with the university's board and leadership to explore all available options to protect the federal investment and ensure the best possible outcome for the community and taxpayers.' The school also has not filed for federal bankruptcy protections. No liens have been filed against the school in South Carolina district court. Nor are there any small claims filings from students at this time. $500M for colleges, a bigger share for traditional public schools: How SC budget funds education Not only does Limestone's closure impact the college's students, it also affected college employees and 13 K-12 public charter schools that relied on the college's associated charter school management operations: Limestone Charter Association. A former employee has filed suit in federal court alleging the school violated national labor laws when it only gave two weeks' notice to workers. Federal law requires companies with 100 or more employees to give at least 60 days' notice for layoffs, though there are some exceptions. In its notice letter filed with the state employment agency, Limestone claimed the exemption allowed for employers actively seeking funding that an earlier notice could have jeopardized. The school has yet to respond in court filings. Meanwhile, the state Department of Education is allowing the Limestone Charter Association, which operates as a separate nonprofit with its own staff, to continue operations through the coming school year as the charter schools it serves search for a new authorizer. According to staff at the K-12 agency, the charter association will continue to receive state funding and act as an authorizer until July 1, 2026. It cannot accept any new schools starting July 1, 2025, and the state Education Department is recommending charter schools apply to a new authorizer by December. The Limestone Charter Association schools: South Carolina Preparatory Academy, Anderson South Carolina Preparatory Leadership School, Anderso East Link Academy, Greenville Global Academy of South Carolina, Spartanburg Mountain View Preparatory, Spartanburg Goucher Charter Academy, Gaffney Legion Collegiate Academy, Rock Hill Horse Creek Academy, Aiken OCSD High School for Health Professions, Orangeburg Summerville Prep, Summerville Oceanside Collegiate Academy, Mount Pleasant Atlantic Collegiate Academy, Myrtle Beach Coastal High School, Myrtle Beach
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Limestone University named in class action complaint
GAFFNEY, S.C. (WSPA) — A class action complaint has been filed against Limestone University, marking the first step in the legal process toward a class action lawsuit. The lawsuit claims that Limestone laid off more than 400 employees without providing the legally required 60 days' notice. Instead, the former employee who filed the complaint alleges that workers were only given 13 days' notice. Since the layoffs and the university's shutdown, the campus has noticeably changed. A woman who lives just off campus, said she has lived in her home for over 20 years. She described it as strange to see the area so quiet and clearly no longer maintained. Grass is overgrown, weeds are growing through the concrete, and it's evident that the former university has seen better days. All of the university buildings are also marked with yellow 'Posted' signs, warning trespassers not to enter. The complaint filed against Limestone claims the university violated the WARN Act — a U.S. federal law designed to protect workers by requiring most employers to provide advance notice of significant layoffs. According to the complaint, on or around April 17th, more than 400 employees were informed they would be terminated on April 30th. The complaint was filed by former employee Natalie Ruth, who is being represented by the Langley Law Firm based in Spartanburg. 7NEWS reached out to Langley Law Firm, the plaintiff named in the lawsuit and the law firm believed to be representing Limestone University; 7NEWS has not yet received a response from any of the involved parties. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Senator sues over his own raise, arguing it violates SC constitution
Sen. Wes Climer, R-Rock Hill, in Senate chambers on opening day of the 2024 session, Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024, at the Statehouse in Columbia. Climer is a plaintiff in a lawsuit claiming a pay raise for legislators is unconstitutional. (Mary Ann Chastain/Special to the SC Daily Gazette) COLUMBIA — A state senator is asking the state's highest court to halt a $2,500-monthly raise that legislators voted for themselves. Sen. Wes Climer, a Rock Hill Republican, filed the request Monday. He and his attorney, former Sen. Dick Harpootlian, a Columbia Democrat, contend the $18,000 annual raise approved as part of the state budget violates the state constitution. Climer and fellow plaintiff Carol Herring, who is identified in the lawsuit as a taxpayer, are asking the state's highest court to stop the payments before the July 1 start of the fiscal year. The state Supreme Court agreed Monday with their request to take the case directly, allowing a quick resolution. 'For a General Assembly to vote to give its own members public money is akin to a judge presiding over his own trial, or to a police officer investigating his own alleged conduct,' the legal filing reads. The central question could become whether the state constitution's ban on legislators increasing their own per diems actually applies to the raises. SC legislators pass $14.7B spending plan despite concerns over legislators' pay raise Generally, a per diem is considered a daily allowance. Legislators do receive a specifically designated $230 subsistence payment for each day of session. That's meant to cover the cost of food and lodging while they're in Columbia, though they don't have to spend it on that. Each legislator gets the same amount, no matter where they live. That's in addition to legislators' annual salary of $10,400, which hasn't changed since 1990. The state's chief accountant says the in-district compensation, which is set to increase from $1,000 to $2,500 per month, is not a per diem. Rather, it's considered personal income and taxed accordingly, unlike the designated per diem, said Kim McLeod, spokeswoman for the Comptroller General's Office. In their lawsuit, Climer and Harpootlian argue the combined $22,400 legislators receive currently for their annual salary and in-district compensation counts as a per diem. The money pays legislators for their services on a daily basis while in session, making it a daily funding allotment, the lawsuit argues. The 1868 version of the state constitution was the first to use the term 'per diem' in addressing legislators' pay. According to the lawsuit, the term was meant to differentiate between legislators' salary, then $6 a day, and mileage reimbursements. Similar language carried over to the 1890 constitution that still governs the state. Along with prohibiting legislators from increasing their own per diems, the state constitution also requires they receive an allowance for mileage in order to travel to the Statehouse and that they get the same amount of pay for meeting outside of normal session as they do during it. Columbia attorney and government transparency advocate John Crangle had initially offered to join the lawsuit but changed his mind after learning the comptroller general didn't consider the money to be a per diem, he said. Crangle still disagreed with the raise conceptually, he said. But in his understanding, considering the raise to be personal income would mean the state constitution doesn't cover it, he said. 'I don't think you can use that as the basis,' he said of the argument that the money counts as a per diem. The in-district compensation is meant to pay for legislative expenses outside the Statehouse, though they can spend it however they want. The money comes in a lump sum, not a reimbursement, so legislators don't have to report how they spend it. If the raise were a reimbursement, that might change things, the lawsuit argued. As is, the money is clearly meant to compensate legislators for their day-to-day work at the Statehouse, the lawsuit argues. 'Most importantly, there are no restrictions on how members may use this money — they may use it entirely for any personal purposes,' the lawsuit reads. 'Periodic payments of money, reported and taxed as personal income, with no restrictions on use for personal purposes, to which the recipient is entitled because of services provided to the entity paying the money, are compensation.' Climer and Herring also criticized legislators for putting a pay raise in place without going through the public hearing process typical of a piece of legislation. 'For shame,' the lawsuit reads. 'The people of South Carolina cannot look over the shoulder of every member of the General Assembly every minute of every day.' Legislators don't have to take the raise. Some, including GOP Reps. Kathy Landing of Mount Pleasant and Sarita Edgerton of Spartanburg, have publicly said they plan to refuse the raise. Others, such as GOP Reps. Brandon Guffey of Rock Hill and James Teeple of Johns Island, said they planned to donate the money to charities. Asking the state Supreme Court to let the lawsuit skip the lower courts, Climer and Harpootlian noted the normal appeals process could take years — longer than the budget is in effect. And the case would eventually reach the justices anyway. Technically, the raise is only for the 2025-26 budget, which is a one-year law. But it would stay in effect indefinitely. That's because spending directives in the budget, called provisos, generally roll over from one budget year to the next, unless legislators take action to remove them. The justices need to rule before the raises take effect, the lawsuit reads, because it could be impossible to force legislators to pay the money back if the payments are later found unconstitutional. 'It is unclear whether those payments could be clawed back months or years after legislators spent the money on their personal affairs,' it reads. This is a developing story. Check back for details.
