Here is how Tshwane will be spending its R54.6 billion budget
The City Of Tshwane will spend more than R125 million on government work programmes while aiming to raise an extra R17 billion through investment.
The nation's capital will dedicate more than a billion rand to infrastructure maintenance for the coming financial year.
The City of Tshwane (CoT) tabled a draft budget of R54.6 billion for the 2025/26 financial year in council on Thursday.
Deputy Mayor and MMC for Finance Eugene Modise said it was a proud moment for the city, but the opposition benches stated the budget places the city's financial burden on the residents.
Increased revenue generation
The budget will be split into an operational budget of R52.2 billion and a capital expenditure budget of R2.4 billion.
Additionally, grant allocations include R5.5 billion in operational grants, R2 billion in infrastructure grants and R152 million through a new urban development financing grant.
Tariffs are set to increase despite Modise noting that the city has seen a 2% increase in revenue generation, amounting to R777.5 million.
The higher tariffs for Tshwane residents include a 10.2% increase in electricity, a 13% increase in water costs, and a 4.6% increase in refuse removal.
However, Modise has placed a 4% reduction in property rates on the table.
Modise said the city had decreased its expenditure on employees by 3%—R346.5 million—and reduced its own penalty fees by R71 million—a 32% reduction compared to last year.
'It translates our vision into action, outlining how we intend to meet the urgent needs of our residents while building a stronger, more sustainable city,' stated the Deputy Mayor.
Money for jobs
Jobs were an expected theme of the budget, with Modise stating that R740 million would be allocated to the economic and spatial planning department for unemployment interventions.
This would be to support SMMEs, youth-owned enterprises, cooperatives and their VIP business line — a service for the city's top 200 businesses.
The city aims to attract R17 billion in new investment, with the hope of creating 80 000 new jobs by 2029.
Further investment in government employment programmes will see R49.2 million and R76 million go toward 11 034 extended public work programme opportunities and the public employment programme, respectively.
A proposed R21 billion allocation will go towards energy and electricity infrastructure, with that being a small part of the city's infrastructure drive.
'This budget seeks to develop a culture of maintenance of its assets, and in doing so, we have allocated R1.4 billion for repairs and maintenance. This is to ensure that we break the cycle of letting our infrastructure decay,'
The achievement of growth targets will be aided by maximising the potential of facilities such as Wonderboom airport, events centres, economic hubs and tourist attractions.
'Revenue generated from these assets will augment our service delivery efforts and assist us in achieving our economic growth target of 3.9% by 2029,' stated Modise.
New levy for waste
Democratic Alliance shadow MMC for Finance Jacqui Uys said Modise's budget shifted responsibility for the city's financial stability onto the residents.
'This budget is not serving the residents of Tshwane, but becomes part of the ANC's quest to look good on paper but fail in its real mandate – delivering services,' Uys told The Citizen.
The city wishes to introduce a new R194 cleaning levy for households without a waste account, which will generate an extra R400 million from waste collection.
'The same draft budget proposes a decrease in spending on waste collection and illegal dumping from R2.1 billion in the current year to R2 billion in the next budget cycle,' said the shadow MMC.
'This clearly indicates that the intention of this new levy is not to ensure a cleaner city, but rather the introduction of yet another tax to use the residents of Tshwane as a stopgap to improve the city's financial position,' concluded Uys.
The debate of the speech and the vote to approve the Integrated Development Plan is scheduled for 29 May.
NOW READ: Drive to repair Tshwane's 'five' potholes
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
38 minutes ago
- The Star
Lack of support for Gauteng ECD centres leaves children vulnerable
The Gauteng Department of Education (GDE) has constantly failed in its mandate to provide effective oversight and support for Early Childhood Development (ECD) centres in line with Section 94 of the Children's Act (2005). A glaring example is the unresolved impasse over the Bantu Bonke ECD Centre in Vereeniging, where more than 100 children have been denied access due to bureaucratic confusion between the GDE and the Department of Social Development regarding the facility's transfer and ownership. The injustice continues; the ECD government subsidy, which was suspended at R17 per child per day since 2019, is set to increase to R24 in 2025. This increment still falls short of the target of R36 per child per day, which experts say would be sufficient to cover the costs of beneficial ECD programmes. Moreover, recent statistics from the 2024 General Household Survey further illustrate the scale of the issue: only 41.1% of children aged 0–4 in Gauteng attend formal Early Childhood Development (ECD) facilities. GDE has spent over R186 million on management fees for ECD logistics from 2019 to 2024, rather than directly benefiting the children. The MEC of Education, Matome Chiloane, failed to provide a basic register of the number of ECD centres that meet the basic infrastructure standards in Gauteng. He was responding to the DA's questions tabled in the Gauteng Provincial Legislature (GPL). These shortcomings have left thousands of children without access to quality early learning, undermining the province's developmental goals and perpetuating educational inequality. The DA Gauteng demands that the GDE prioritise universal access to ECD programmes by ensuring that proper facilities are available to all children, particularly in disadvantaged and impoverished communities. Sergio Dos Santos MPL, DA Gauteng Shadow MEC for Education
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Lack of support for Gauteng ECD centres leaves children vulnerable
Gauterng Department of Education has spent over R186 million on management fees for Early Childhood Development logistics from 2019 to 2024, rather than directly benefiting the children, says the writer. The Gauteng Department of Education (GDE) has constantly failed in its mandate to provide effective oversight and support for Early Childhood Development (ECD) centres in line with Section 94 of the Children's Act (2005). A glaring example is the unresolved impasse over the Bantu Bonke ECD Centre in Vereeniging, where more than 100 children have been denied access due to bureaucratic confusion between the GDE and the Department of Social Development regarding the facility's transfer and ownership. The injustice continues; the ECD government subsidy, which was suspended at R17 per child per day since 2019, is set to increase to R24 in 2025. This increment still falls short of the target of R36 per child per day, which experts say would be sufficient to cover the costs of beneficial ECD programmes. Moreover, recent statistics from the 2024 General Household Survey further illustrate the scale of the issue: only 41.1% of children aged 0–4 in Gauteng attend formal Early Childhood Development (ECD) facilities. GDE has spent over R186 million on management fees for ECD logistics from 2019 to 2024, rather than directly benefiting the children. The MEC of Education, Matome Chiloane, failed to provide a basic register of the number of ECD centres that meet the basic infrastructure standards in Gauteng. He was responding to the DA's questions tabled in the Gauteng Provincial Legislature (GPL). These shortcomings have left thousands of children without access to quality early learning, undermining the province's developmental goals and perpetuating educational inequality. The DA Gauteng demands that the GDE prioritise universal access to ECD programmes by ensuring that proper facilities are available to all children, particularly in disadvantaged and impoverished communities. Sergio Dos Santos MPL, DA Gauteng Shadow MEC for Education
The Citizen
4 days ago
- The Citizen
Johannesburg's last hope may be the ballot box
A turnaround is possible if Johannesburg residents collectively use their votes to rid the city of unqualified, incompetent, corrupt people ruining a great city. We do not have to live like this, with our municipalities crumbling. The outcry against dysfunctional local governance is growing. Presidential and ministerial interventions are underway, and the auditor-general has released another devastating report. Will any of these fix our municipalities? Johannesburg, South Africa's richest city, is an obvious example of failure. Business Leadership SA CEO Busi Mavuso says Johannesburg, which has been in a state of gradual decline for many years, cannot manage its R89.4 billion budget adequately. Mavuso bemoans the lack of financial management skills in municipalities, noting: 'There simply aren't enough qualified people working in local government to ensure the accounts are done properly.' She doesn't single out individuals, but I will. Joburg's member of the mayoral committee (MMC) for finance, Margaret Arnolds, has no financial skills or qualifications. An internet search will tell you where she went to high school, while on Facebook she says she 'studied media philosophy at Unisa'. Ja, nee. Very reassuring. ALSO READ: Joburg can only be saved by fair municipal elections With that skills deficit, no wonder she did not want to engage with our team's constructive suggestions in the build-up to last week's budget speech. Joburg's budget is not fully funded, being over reliant on loans, whose repayments burden ratepayers. The trend is unsustainable. Borrow, borrow, borrow while, at the same time, chasing away ratepayers, is an approach worthy of a Darwin award. Who will fix Joburg? Certainly not the current crew. Cooperative Governance Minister Velenkosini Hlabisa recently launched a review of local government. However, in an interview with the Sunday Times, he gave the impression of passing the buck. Asked about consequence management, he deflected responsibility to provincial MECs. Pressed further, he said he wasn't going to ask the relevant Gauteng MEC why Joburg's mayor hasn't been fired. So, no pressure there. What about Cyril Ramaphosa's presidential working group? We are told the group is active in Joburg. It reportedly includes chambers of commerce, township economy business associations, plus civil society groups such as the Johannesburg Crisis Alliance and the SA National Civics Organisation. ALSO READ: Broken promises and failing services are sinking Joburg There is no mandate for this. No detail has been presented to council. Indeed many elected councillors feel undermined by this unelected intervention which has yet to show any progress. Daily there is social media coverage of 'high impact service delivery' attributed to the mayor. Despite photographs and hagiographic descriptions, the overall impact is risible. Deterioration continues apace. The daily grind of water and electricity outages, sewage spills, unreinstated excavations, faulty traffic signals and nonworking streetlights is relentless. More and more people are having their water or electricity cut off, often erroneously. Reconnections are taking too long, with ward councillors in the crossfire. Who will break this pattern? Hlabisa says some interventions in municipalities have been going on for more than 10 years, with no improvement. We cannot rely on any president, minister, provincial MEC, municipal MMC or civil society group to save Joburg. You can do it, collectively as voters. At the earliest opportunity, use your vote to get rid of the unqualified, incompetent, corrupt people who are ruining our great city. We do not have to live like this. NOW READ: Democracy is the winner in VAT hike drama
