
‘We don't want to go': Australian couple told to pay $3,500 to postpone flights amid Middle East volatility
Sharon Latour and her husband are scheduled to fly through Abu Dhabi on an Etihad flight on Wednesday, just nine days after Iran launched a missile strike on a US base in nearby Qatar.
As of Friday, the Australian couple's flight was still scheduled for takeoff despite the volatility in the region. Latour is upset that Etihad are insisting on charging her $3,500 to change their tickets if they want to postpone their trip until early next year.
'I kept repeating over the phone: 'We're genuinely scared, we're not making this up.' [But] not a care in the world,' Latour said. 'They're just like, 'well, pay the [fee]'.'
Australian travellers had already been advised to avoid the region as Israel and Iran exchanged missile strikes , before a US strike prompted the Iranian retaliation.
Countries closed their airspaces and airlines diverted flights, leaving passengers stranded. Iran has threatened to strike US military bases if it is subjected to further American attacks.
But Australians hoping to avoid flying through the Middle East in coming weeks have found they have limited consumer rights to move or cancel their own flights.
With many passengers facing delays, scheduling changes and cancellations, consumer advocates have called for stronger protections to ensure compensation and transparency for passengers.
Latour left Australia for a work trip to Malaysia, and her husband joined her in early June. They planned to holiday in Europe, so while in Kuala Lumpur they booked Etihad flights to Rome with a transit in Abu Dhabi.
They booked business class seats on Etihad using a combination of rewards points and a bank card.
Latour said she and her husband were looking forward to their trip until the airspace closures caused by Iran's threats to strike US bases. They were worried about Al Dhafra airbase, which hosts US military assets and is situated just 25km from Abu Dhabi.
At this point Latour said she contacted Etihad to request help moving their flight, 'because we're really scared, we don't want to be stuck there'.
'You just had bombardment, missiles flying literally next door,' she said. 'You have an American base really close to the airport. We don't want to go there.'
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Latour said an Etihad call centre representative told her she should have been aware of the company's rules requiring the payment of rescheduling fees. They refused Latour's request for a free or low-fee deferral to fly instead on March 2026.
Australians travelling through Middle Eastern airports in June have reported chaotic waits.
Guardian readers have reported being among thousands stranded in Doha airport. One couple reported being stuck at Doha airport for 40 hours.
They said the airport had few staff assisting passengers.
Another passenger told Guardian Australia that Doha airport security staff threatened to seize the mobile phones of some customers who had attempted to film the queues and crowds. Passengers joined airport staff behind information desks as customers waited for flight information, they claimed.
But Australian consumers are unlikely to have any legal rights to defer their flights unless their airline's fine print allows, experts say.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) have said airlines must meet the guarantees under the Australian Consumer Law. But the guarantees may not apply in every case.
The consumer guarantees probably won't apply if an airline delays or cancels a flight due to the actions of a third party, such as a government implementing restrictions on the flight, the ACCC said.
And if a customer initiates a cancellation, the guarantees are again unlikely to apply, meaning any remedy consumers are entitled to will depend on the specific terms and conditions of their fare.
In Latour's case, she and her husband are likely at the 'behest' of Etihad, especially because they booked their tickets in Malaysia and not Australia, according to Jodi Bird, a travel expert at the consumer advocacy organisation Choice.
Bird said if they had booked the tickets at home they could have at least mounted an argument that they should be protected under consumer law.
But even that outcome is doubtful, Bird said. 'Our experience is that it doesn't do a lot to protect you beyond [the terms and conditions] of the airline.'
Bird said even people whose flights were cancelled or rescheduled by the airlines will likely be reliant on the carriers for compensation. And they could struggle to get refunds rather than flight credits, he said.
The predicament raises broader questions around consumer protections in the aviation industry, Bird said.
Choice has called for the federal government to implement a compensation system for passengers affected by cancelled and delayed flights, which Bird said would be similar to a scheme in the European Union.
'The main advantage is it just becomes more transparent,' he said. 'You've got that kind of central place that people can go to to understand the rules, rather than having to understand the fine print of every single different airline.'
The Albanese government has committed to having an aviation industry ombudsman operating in 2026.
Guardian Australia understands Etihad flights are now operating to schedule without reported issues. Etihad was contacted for comment.
Etihad's terms and conditions indicate that customers are entitled to re-book or get a refund if the airline cancels their flight, or if they booked a fare which offered free re-booking.
Some major airlines have granted limited flexibility to customers who no longer wish to travel on flights scheduled in June to, from or via Qatar or Doha.
Qantas says it has offered fee-free refunds, credits or date changes to passengers on Emirates-operated flights through Dubai scheduled up to 27 June, with additional flexibility for those travelling on to Iraq, Lebanon or Israel.
Virgin and Qatar Airways say they have extended the same courtesy to those with flights through Doha up to 30 June.
But people with flights scheduled from 1 July, just a week after the US strike on Qatar on 23 June, are not included. Qatar Airways said disruptions resulting from the temporary closure of Qatari airspace had been resolved by 26 June.
Latour and her husband aren't so optimistic. They've cancelled their European hotel bookings and will not get on the plane on Wednesday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Heathrow warns of slowdown in travel from America
Heathrow has warned that economic uncertainty unleashed by Donald Trump's trade war has sparked a slowdown in travel from the United States. In an update to investors, Europe's busiest airport said it is beginning to see indications of a drop in bookings on transatlantic routes most favoured by business travellers. Heathrow said that while demand among Britons for leisure flights to the US remains strong, it has 'observed some early signs of softness on business-heavy routes'. It added: 'The impact of the economic uncertainty across North America has made this market more challenging so we are maintaining a close watching brief on traffic trends.' Heathrow's comments suggest that demand in the world's biggest corporate and premium travel market is beginning to be undermined by Mr Trump's trade war and its impact on business confidence. They said that while transatlantic routes continue to represent a core strength of the network it serves, there is an 'overhanging uncertainty' about how well they will hold up going into the summer peak. Slight recovery However, US passenger volumes still increased from January through May compared with a year earlier, it said, while cargo volumes jumped amid increased trade activity ahead of the president's liberation day tariffs announcement in April. British Airways (BA) has previously reported softer ticket sales for its economy class cabins on flights from the US, though Luis Gallego, chief executive of parent company International Airlines Group, said this month that demand was recovering. Virgin Atlantic also said in March that it was seeing a lower level of bookings made in the US, with a few weeks where it had turned negative. Heathrow predicted that passenger numbers will increase 0.5pc this year to 84.2m, while warning of a 3pc drop in operating profits as it absorbs the impact of the Government's National Insurance tax raid. Thomas Woldbye, Heathrow's chief executive, said punctuality at the airport has improved to the best level among European hubs, while almost 97pc of passengers were now clearing security in less than five minutes. Mr Woldbye had faced criticism over service standards from Heathrow Reimagined, a lobby group that includes BA and Virgin and is demanding a reset of the charging mechanism for flying from the airport ahead of the construction of a third runway. It is seeking the establishment of a new body that will give airlines more say over infrastructure spending, and a move to competition between Heathrow's terminals. The Civil Aviation Authority will set out the scope of a review of the charging system as early as next week.


The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Tell us how you might be affected by Trump's new travel ban
Donald Trump has announced an order banning travel from 12 countries and restricting travel seven others, citing a range of reasons including national security and concerns that visitors from those countries are overstaying their visas. The nationals of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen will be 'fully' restricted from entering the US, according to the proclamation. Meanwhile, the entry of nationals of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted. There is an exemption, however, outlined in section 4 of the order, which states that 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state' are not subject to the ban. We'd like to hear from people from the listed countries and how they might be affected by the ban. How would it affect your job or your relationships with a partner, friends or family in the US? If you already had plans to visit the country, what will happen now? Have you had an exemption? You can tell us how you might be affected by Trump's new travel ban by filling in the form below, or messaging us. Please include as much detail as possible Please include as much detail as possible Please note, the maximum file size is 5.7 MB. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. If you include other people's names please ask them first. Contact us on WhatsApp or Signal at +447766780300. For more information, please see our guidance on contacting us via WhatsApp, For true anonymity please use our SecureDrop service instead. If you're having trouble using the form click here. Read terms of service here and privacy policy here.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Cruise passengers reveal the destinations they'd NEVER go to again
Cruise holidays give tourists the chance to tick off several top destinations on one trip. But unfortunately, not every port leaves passengers hungry for more. Experienced cruisers have taken to Reddit to share their main cruise regrets – and for many people, it's a destination that didn't quite hit the mark. So, where will these cruisers be leaving off their itinerary? The largest island in French Polynesia, Tahiti, is often considered to be one of the world's most luxurious places to cruise. But that's not the case for Reddit user 'Jammu2' who says: 'The actual island of Tahiti and the capital Papeete are pretty grim.' And another person adds that they had to pay $30/£21.85 for a glass of beer in the luxury island location. It's a Jamaican destination that 'VagabondCamp' won't be returning to. They say: 'Falmouth, Jamaica - small hole in the wall town - we left the port area and got screamed at, followed, blocked from walking etc.' Cruiser 'mga1' agrees, adding: 'There isn't anything around. There isn't much to see/shop/eat in the area.' For 'wanderingstorm', there are several destinations that have left them with no desire to return. They say: 'I wasn't impressed with Western Caribbean, Cozumel, Roatan, Costa Maya etc. It was fine but nothing I had much desire to see again once the cruise was over.' And 'GroundbreakingHeat38' slams Costa Maya, a cruise port in Mexico, as 'awful'. They claim: [It's] a big tourist trap type stop and you couldn't even go in the ocean, there was no beach.' The Bahamas has also sadly left several cruise guests unimpressed with 'Express-Bee-6485' moaning that they 'should've stayed on [the] ship!' 'Elvisdog12' even describes Nassau, the capital of the Bahamas and a leading cruise destination, as 'straight up gross'. Europe isn't spared on the thread with 'malbecois' claiming: 'I could do without stopping in Olympia on future cruises.' They explain their dislike for the Greek destination by saying: 'It sounded interesting, but the Olympic site was a bit of a let-down compared to other historical ruins. And damn was it hot!' And 'PMyra' had their cruise ruined by a terrible excursion to a 'factory' in Puerto Plata in the Dominican Republic. They claim the trip was 'nothing but sales pitches and forced shopping' adding that they now 'avoid' any factory excursions. Meanwhile another cruise guest says they need a 'a vacation to recover after a Mediterranean cruise', explaining that 'there's a port every day and you're usually waking up at 6am to do whatever is planned'. Cruise guests have also been warned that trips to a popular European destination are about to get a little pricier. Norway has announced that local governments will be able to charge a three per cent levy on overnight stays and cruise ship visitors. The tax is due to launch in the summer of 2026 and has been designed in response to overtourism in the Nordic country.