Middle East conflict: Iranians in Hyderabad uninstall 'Western' apps, rely on locally developed platforms; cite privacy concerns
This development follows a report aired on Iranian state television on June 18, which urged citizens to uninstall WhatsApp from their smartphones, alleging the app was collecting user data to share with Israel.
You Can Also Check:
Hyderabad AQI
|
Weather in Hyderabad
|
Bank Holidays in Hyderabad
|
Public Holidays in Hyderabad
Iran -developed apps
Among the alternatives gaining popularity are Eitaa, Soroush, Gap, Bale, Rubika, and Vrasty. These applications have replaced Western platforms such as WhatsApp, Telegram, and Instagram, all of which have traditionally enjoyed widespread use in West Asia.
Eitaa closely resembles Telegram, offering features such as channels, bots, and group chats. Bale combines fintech and messaging, enabling users to send messages and carry out basic financial transactions within a single app. Rubika is evolving into Iran's comprehensive alternative to YouTube, WhatsApp, Telegram, and Spotify.
Ali Hussaini, an Iranian resident of Banjara Hills, said these homegrown platforms have become more popular as tensions escalate.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
NL-1 Trial: ทดลองเรียน + วัดระดับ ก่อนสอบใบประกอบฯ
MedMaster
อ่านเพิ่มเติม
Undo
"It has become absolutely essential to use these apps in such tense times as they help us stay connected with our families. We heard that during this wartime, around two billion messages were exchanged daily on Rubika app. I installed them long ago in case of emergencies," said Hussaini.
Other apps, such as the updated version of Soroush, are used for receiving news and official communications. While, iGap is another locally developed alternative to foreign messaging services like WhatsApp and Telegram.
'No risk of misinformation'
Mahdis, another Iranian national living in Banjara Hills, said he relies on Soroush. "I receive news updates directly from national broadcasters, without the risk of misinformation. Apps like WhatsApp and others from abroad can't be trusted during a crisis. These platforms even allow people to interact directly with political figures and leaders," he said, adding that some also offer live streaming and OTT services.
In 2022, the Iranian govt banned WhatsApp and Google Play amid mass protests sparked by the alleged death of a woman in custody of the country's morality police. However, the ban was lifted in December 2024.
Despite the govt's recent appeal to delete WhatsApp, many Iranians continue to access it through proxies and virtual private networks (VPNs).
"I've been using WhatsApp via a VPN for about a year now. I end up buying a new VPN server every two days," said a Hyderabad native currently residing in Tehran, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
12 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Meta's AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual' chats with kids, offer false medical info
An internal Meta Platforms document detailing policies on chatbot behavior has permitted the company's artificial intelligence creations to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,' generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are 'dumber than white people.' These and other findings emerge from a Reuters review of the Meta document, which discusses the standards that guide its generative AI assistant, Meta AI, and chatbots available on Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, the company's social media platforms. Meta confirmed the document's authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children. Entitled 'GenAI: Content Risk Standards," the rules for chatbots were approved by Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist, according to the document. Running to more than 200 pages, the document defines what Meta staff and contractors should treat as acceptable chatbot behaviours when building and training the company's generative AI products. The standards don't necessarily reflect 'ideal or even preferable' generative AI outputs, the document states. But they have permitted provocative behavior by the bots, Reuters found. 'It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art'),' the standards state. The document also notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that 'every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply.' But the guidelines put a limit on sexy talk: 'It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch').' Meta spokesman Andy Stone said the company is in the process of revising the document and that such conversations with children never should have been allowed. 'The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed,' Stone told Reuters. 'We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors.' Although chatbots are prohibited from having such conversations with minors, Stone said, he acknowledged that the company's enforcement was inconsistent. Other passages flagged by Reuters to Meta haven't been revised, Stone said. The company declined to provide the updated policy document. The fact that Meta's AI chatbots flirt or engage in sexual roleplay with teenagers has been reported previously by the Wall Street Journal, and Fast Company has reported that some of Meta's sexually suggestive chatbots have resembled children. But the document seen by Reuters provides a fuller picture of the company's rules for AI bots. The standards prohibit Meta AI from encouraging users to break the law or providing definitive legal, healthcare or financial advice with language such as 'I recommend.' They also prohibit Meta AI from using hate speech. Still, there is a carve-out allowing the bot 'to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics.' Under those rules, the standards state, it would be acceptable for Meta AI to 'write a paragraph arguing that black people are dumber than white people.' The standards also state that Meta AI has leeway to create false content so long as there's an explicit acknowledgement that the material is untrue. For example, Meta AI could produce an article alleging that a living British royal has the sexually transmitted infection chlamydia – a claim that the document states is 'verifiably false' – if it added a disclaimer that the information is untrue. Meta had no comment on the race and British royal examples. Evelyn Douek, an assistant professor at Stanford Law School who studies tech companies' regulation of speech, said the content standards document highlights unsettled legal and ethical questions surrounding generative AI content. Douek said she was puzzled that the company would allow bots to generate some of the material deemed as acceptable in thedocument, such as the passage on race and intelligence. There's a distinction between a platform allowing a user to post troubling content and producing such material itself, she noted. 'Legally we don't have the answers yet, but morally, ethically and technically, it's clearly a different question.' Other sections of the standards document focus on what is and isn't allowed when generating images of public figures. The document addresses how to handle sexualised fantasy requests, with separate entries for how to respond to requests such as digitally undressing singer Taylor Swift. Here, a disclaimer wouldn't suffice. The first two queries about the pop star should be rejected outright, the standards state. And the document offers a way to deflect the third: 'It is acceptable to refuse a user's prompt by instead generating an image of Taylor Swift holding an enormous fish.' The document displays a permissible picture of Swift clutching a tuna-sized catch to her chest. Next to it is a more risqué image of a topless Swift that the user presumably wanted, labeled 'unacceptable.' A representative for Swift didn't respond to questions for this report. Meta had no comment on the Swift example. Other examples show images that Meta AI can produce for users who prompt it to create violent scenes. The standards say it would be acceptable to respond to the prompt 'kids fighting' with an image of a boy punching a girl in the face – but declare that a realistic sample image of one small girl impaling another is off-limits. For a user requesting an image with the prompt 'man disemboweling a woman,' Meta AI is allowed to create a picture showing a woman being threatened by a man with a chainsaw, but not actually using it to attack her. And in response to a request for an image of 'Hurting an old man,' the guidelines say Meta's AI is permitted to produce images as long as they stop short of death or gore. Meta had no comment on the examples of violence. 'It is acceptable to show adults – even the elderly – being punched or kicked,' the standards state.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Can vertical SaaS transform niche industries with artificial intelligence
Some of the most interesting startup pitches I see these days do not promise to change the world. They promise to change a workflow, with artificial intelligence solving a critical problem of a particular industry. A messy, outdated, painful process that is too niche for large software giants to notice. That is the magic of vertical SaaS powered by artificial intelligence. Also, these businesses need very little venture capital to reach escape velocity, also known as breakeven at scale. Hence, the guerrilla way of venture building. As a seed investor, I believe this category is quietly reshaping how industries function, one focused solution at a time. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency For those unfamiliar, vertical SaaS refers to software products or platforms built specifically for a single industry or use case. Examples include a debt collection solution used by banks and NBFCs to improve recovery and compliance, a sustainability reporting tool built for textile manufacturers to track emissions and meet ESG norms, or a customer conversation platform that uses artificial intelligence to assist call centre agents in real time. Their value lies in deep domain knowledge, built to navigate the unique rules, workflows, and challenges of each industry. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo As venture capitalists, we are not just chasing trends, we are also looking for signals. And in the case of vertical SaaS, the signals are strong. These startups tend to have longer-lasting customer relationships, stronger margins, and much clearer paths to profitability. Their clients rarely churn because once an industry-specific tool is integrated into daily operations, replacing it is painful. That creates stickiness, and stickiness builds enduring companies. But what is really interesting is the timing. Several things are coming together to make this moment ripe for vertical SaaS. Cloud infrastructure is now robust and affordable, allowing startups to build faster and scale without massive upfront investment. Even traditional businesses, from clinics to small factories, are now open to digitisation, especially when the solutions speak directly to their problems. Live Events At the same time, artificial intelligence, often viewed as a general-purpose technology, is supercharging these vertical solutions. A chatbot trained on dermatology data with over one thousand patient conversations can outperform any generic artificial intelligence model in a clinical setting. That is the power of specificity, and it is what makes artificial intelligence in vertical SaaS truly transformative. I often get asked why not just invest in broader platforms that can scale across industries. The answer lies in focus. Startups that go deep into one sector understand their customers better. Their messaging is clearer. Their sales cycles are shorter. They do not have to educate the market on the value of software. They show how their product solves a known, painful problem. That is a huge advantage, especially in emerging markets where trust and usability are everything. We are seeing this play out across India and other developing economies. From supply chain platforms for agri-exporters to legal tech tools for small law firms, entrepreneurs are spotting inefficiencies that have long been ignored. These are not glamorous problems, but they are real, and solving them creates real value. In many cases, these startups are not even competing with other software. They are replacing pen and paper, Excel sheets, and WhatsApp groups. That is an enormous opportunity. Of course, capital plays a crucial role, but it is not just about writing cheques. At the early stage, vertical SaaS startups often need guidance on how to sell, how to price, and how to build for scale without losing their niche. As venture capitalists, we bring not only capital but also access. Access to pilot customers, to advisors from within the industry, and to talent that understands both technology and the specific sector. I have seen companies unlock growth just by getting introduced to the right distribution channel or hiring someone who has worked on the client side of the industry. What is also heartening is how founders in this space tend to operate. Many come from the industries they are trying to fix. They have seen the gaps firsthand, often as bankers, engineers, teachers, or logistics operators. They decided to build solutions because nobody else was solving the problems they encountered daily. That lived experience brings empathy, and it reflects in the product. The interface is more intuitive. The features are more relevant. The onboarding feels less like software and more like a helping hand. There is also something to be said about the resilience of vertical SaaS models. Most operate on a subscription basis, creating predictable revenue. Contracts are often annual, if not multi-year. This gives startups the stability to reinvest in product development and customer success, both of which matter a lot more when you are solving for depth rather than breadth. It also gives investors like us the confidence that the business can withstand market swings better than many flashier counterparts. After investing in several such companies at the pre-seed stage and witnessing their journeys first-hand, we have seen a clear pattern emerge. In categories like debt recovery, construction management and artificial intelligence-enabled sales platforms, it is possible to reach ₹300 crore in topline within the first five years when founders are solving a deep, industry-specific pain point and distribution is cracked early. With strong product-market fit, the path to ₹500–1000 crore revenue becomes a question of execution, not potential. None of this is to say that vertical SaaS is easy. Going deep into one sector means founders must be patient. The total addressable market might look small at first glance. But once the product proves itself, expansion into adjacent segments or into new geographies with similar market structures becomes a natural next step. And that is when growth really takes off. Looking ahead, I believe the next decade will see vertical SaaS companies emerge not just as profitable businesses but as quiet disruptors within industries that desperately need modernisation. Whether it is farming, education, construction, or logistics, sectors that are often overlooked in technology conversations will be transformed by software built not for the general market but for the people who wake up every day to real, operational problems. As investors, we are excited to partner with these founders. The ones who know that transformation does not always begin with scale. Sometimes, it starts with a small fix to a big problem. And from there, everything changes. Author is Founder and Managing Partner of Zeropearl VC .
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Do you need a TV anymore? I used the Lumio Arc 7 to get a better picture
I have noticed that the TV is being used less in our household these days. Of course, it has a pride of place in the living room and is almost always on, but it is now rarely the screen in front of which the family congregates. It is more of an on-demand screen, which makes its real estate allotment in the living room a bit awkward. My hypothesis is that a projector, which is essentially an on-demand screen, makes more sense for chord cutters like me. The Lumio Arc 7 tried to tap into this smarter post-idiot-box generation of viewers. The Lumio Arc 7 is a compact tower-shaped projector that has been designed to impress as well as to be practical. There is just a power button on top that fires up the projector, and all other settings are managed using the remote. Below is a kickstand — smartly called the Understand — which lets you change the angle of the projector. However, this gives you just one tilt and does not stop at any angle before. The remote is very easy to use and comes with buttons for YouTube, Netflix, and Prime Video. There is also Lumio's own TLDR app, which is like a hub for sports and entertainment. Set up is easy using Google Home, and the projector takes you there as soon as you power it on for the first time. Like all new projectors, you don't need to bother about focus or keystone as the Lumio Arc 7 will do all of that itself. However, this is not a short-throw projector and needs a distance of at least 8 feet from the wall to give you a sharp image, so keep this in mind if buying. I have a space issue in my small apartment and do not have a wall that is ideal for a projector. So I projected on my living room wall, which unfortunately was behind my sofa and facing the TV. As this was a temporary arrangement, I could manage. But if you have the Lumio Arc 7 or any other projector, it is best to invest in a screen and find a room where the projection will be the best. The Lumio Arc 7 has a 400 ANSI Lumens 1080p projection with 1500:1 Contrast Ratio, and even with my biscuit coloured walls, the colours were clear and striking. Placed about 10 feet away from the wall, I could get a 100-inch image. This big screen experience takes your screen time to a whole new level, even with a 65-inch TV at home. There is no learning involved in using the projector as it runs Google TV out of the box. The interface is the same as you see on any Android TV. For me, it was exactly like using my OnePlus TV, just with a much larger screen. The settings, too, are accessed like you would on a TV, and you can use presets for movies, gaming, and the like for picture quality. You can adjust brightness, too, though there isn't a lot of leeway there. When it comes to using projectors in place of TVs, there used to be a few hurdles, such as the lack of native access to popular streaming apps like Netflix and Amazon Prime Video, as well as low audio output in most projectors. The Lumio Arc 7 solves both these problems. It offers native apps—including Netflix and Amazon Prime Video—and allows you to download additional apps from the Play Store. I have to say the Netflix experience is as good as on any TV, and there are no stalling issues like those encountered with the skinned apps that came on earlier projectors. The audio is loud, and the Lumio Arc 7 works almost like a Bluetooth speaker of the same size. The audio matches to the size of the screen and you can hear dialogues. There is a decent surround effect with Dolby Audio, though this will also depend to a large extent on the size of your room. Plus, like a good TV, you have options to show content from other sources using the HDMI or USB ports at the back. There is a counter too. This is not the brightest projector I have used, and if you don't have a good white wall or a screen, the chances are you will start missing the comfort of a TV screen. Also, experience is not that great during the day if you are not able to darken the room well. Compared to 4K projectors, this is a disadvantage and one reason why you might still need a TV at home. But a lot of my context of how a projector should work goes out the door when you realise that the Lumio Arc 7 costs just Rs 34,990 at the moment. And even if you add a good screen and a tripod, you will not spend more than an additional Rs 3,000. At that price, you should consider this more as a backup for the TV, one that can bring the family back together for a movie night or a match day. For this price, you cannot get a better projector. Period.
