Court hears community fears in baby abduction case
Image: Ayanda Ndamane/Independent Newspapers
The woman accused of kidnapping a nine-day-old baby appeared in the Mitchells Plain Magistrate's Court this week, as the court grappled with balancing her rights as a mother against the safety of the child and the concerns of a fearful community.
Sameemah Jacobs, who faces charges of kidnapping and potentially defeating the ends of justice, was arrested two days after the disappearance of baby Mogamat Imaad Sharmar.
The baby was allegedly taken from his mother, Imaan Sharmar (also known as Britney Brandt), on 28 June at Middestad Mall in Bellville.
Sharmar had believed she was attending a support workshop for single mothers under the banner of the Zoey Project.
Jacobs was later found in possession of the baby, who was unharmed. She was arrested following tip-offs from the community.
During the bail application, Magistrate G Ndaleni raised the issue of whether keeping Jacobs in custody might infringe on the rights of her own child, referencing Section 28 of the Constitution, which protects the best interests of children.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
'She is a first-time offender. Has it been proven that the accused would endanger the public?' the magistrate asked during proceedings.
However, Sergeant Dawid Fortuin of the Serious and Violent Crimes Kidnapping Unit testified that Jacobs's actions were calculated and posed a risk to society.
'The victim is also a nine-day-old child. He has rights too,' Fortuin told the court.
He presented new evidence, including a petition compiled by Faith and Hope Missing Persons founder Veranique 'Benji' Williams, which argued against Jacobs's release.
Fortuin explained that the organisation had contacted him before the arrest, and that members of the community had expressed concerns about Jacobs's presence in the neighbourhood.
'The organisation informed me that they would be drafting a petition against her release,' he said.
The petition, supported by a formal memorandum, called on the court to prioritise child safety and public trust in the justice system.
It referenced constitutional and legal duties to protect children from harm, and warned that bail could undermine community confidence.
Imaad's mother, Imaan Sharmar, voiced her fears following the day's testimony.
'Listening to what was all said, I am starting to realise that there is a very strong possibility that the court is leaning towards the accused's side more,' she said.
'It's making me feel very unsafe again because, honestly, she knows where I live. She knows where my daughter goes to crèche, so she could go with anyone to her school, because she disguised herself before, and say I sent her. Or she could come to my house as someone else. Her possible release is pushing up all these emotions. I don't even feel like leaving my house when I have places to be.'
Jacobs's Legal Aid lawyer, Asangezwa Mafuya, argued that his client was not a flight risk.
He said she owns a home and vehicle, and has a seven-year-old child who depends on her. He added that Jacobs had cooperated with the police and did not resist arrest.
But Fortuin disagreed, stating: 'A house you can sell and flee with the vehicle. The fact that she went with us doesn't mean she'll come to court every time.'
He further alleged that Jacobs had used three different identities to mislead the victim.
'The complainant thought she was meeting someone else. The accused disguised herself and misled the victim,' he said.
Fortuin also linked Jacobs to another case involving a 15-year-old girl, still under investigation, in which the same phone number was used.
Mafuya questioned whether there was any evidence that Jacobs had poisoned the baby's mother, which had been suggested informally.
Fortuin clarified: 'We've never alleged poisoning.'
The defence proposed strict bail conditions, including house arrest and weekly reporting to police. Mafuya also submitted a counter-petition calling for Jacobs's release, with 111 signatures from residents in Eerste River, Heideveld and Manenberg.
Fortuin downplayed the petition, stating that some of the pages lacked proper details and it represented a small portion of the community.
He warned that house arrest would be ineffective, pointing out that Jacobs wears a pardah and could not easily be identified if she left home without permission.
'She was desperate, and there's no guarantee she won't do it again,' Fortuin said.
He also testified that Jacobs falsely claimed the baby was hers, which may form part of potential obstruction of justice charges. He said she had told one witness that her husband made her confused, a statement he believed was meant to deflect responsibility.
Mafuya requested a postponement to finalise an affidavit in support of bail. However, Magistrate Ndaleni criticised the delay.
'You're not ready with your affidavit – it doesn't take long to produce one,' he remarked.
The matter was postponed to 23 July for the defence to complete the affidavit and for further bail arguments to be heard.
mandilakhe.tshwete@inl.co.za
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
uMkhonto weSizwe Party praises SAPS for reinstating Political Killings Task Team
KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, has unleashed a storm in South Africa's world of intelligence. His explosive disclosures have triggered a deluge of questions, literally opening Pandora's Box. Image: Thobile Mathonsi / Independent Newspapers The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) has expressed renewed confidence in the South African Police Service (SAPS) following the reinstatement of the Political Killings Task Team, describing the move as a pivotal step towards restoring justice for victims of politically and criminally motivated violence that has engulfed the nation. MK Party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndlhela praised the task team for their "perseverance and professionalism," which he said had illuminated numerous crimes that might have otherwise faded into obscurity. Nhlamulo Ndhlela affirms the MK Party's confidence in the re-establishment of the SAPS "Political Killings Task Team," Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading "We celebrate the effectiveness of the Political Killings Task Team, which has already arrested and charged 436 individuals; this is clear evidence of their capabilities," Ndlhela noted. Ndlhela articulated a strong stance on the principle that 'justice delayed is justice denied,' underscoring the urgency for swift action in the pursuit of justice for all victims. Ndlhela rejected calls for a judicial commission of inquiry intended to scrutinise allegations made by General Mkhwanazi regarding the now-suspended police minister, Senzo Mchunu's alleged collusion with criminal elements. He argued that such a commission could only serve to delay justice even further. "We urge General Mkhwanazi and the Political Killings Task Team to act swiftly and make additional arrests, including any of those implicated politicians, parliamentarians, and members of the judiciary, specifically naming Police Minister Senzo Mchunu and Deputy National Police Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya,' Ndlhela asserted. In a show of support for the task team, Police spokesperson Athlenda Mathe echoed sentiments of gratitude towards the team's diligent work, stating that Police Commissioner General Fannie Masemola was pleased with the task team's progress. National Police Commissioner General Fannie Masemola spoke to the media after signing a memorandum following the "Hands Off Mkhwanazi" march in Durban. Image: Doctor Ngcobo/ Independent Newspapers "General Masemola is optimistic about the hope that their ongoing investigations will ultimately bring closure to the affected families,' Mathe conveyed. Highlighting the commitment of law enforcement personnel, she said, "Well done to the teams that have been piecing together evidence since November 2022. This is the culmination of hard work and dedication to justice. It is crucial that we take our time to ensure a thorough investigation, so we can present a strong case before the court." The MK Party has reaffirmed its steadfast support for the task team, applauding their unwavering commitment to uncovering the truth, especially in cases fraught with political sensitivities. "We urge the continuation of their mandate, free from political interference, and we remain resolute in our call for full accountability. We reiterate that justice must never be compromised,' Ndlhela urged. DAILY NEWS

IOL News
14 hours ago
- IOL News
Auditor-General highlights rampant R1bn irregular expenditure in Johannesburg
Auditor-General Tsakani Maluleke pointed out that the malpractice observed in Johannesburg is not an isolated issue, but part of a broader trend seen across major municipalities in South Africa. Image: Thobile Mathonsi / Independent Newspapers The Auditor-General Tsakani Maluleke has drawn attention to the alarming reality of irregular expenditure within the City of Johannesburg (CoJ), revealing that the municipality was leading the nation in this regard with contracts exceeding R1 billion awarded to contractors with connections to officials. In a webinar hosted by the Centre for Development and Enterprise (CDE) Conversations, Maluleke pointed out that the malpractice observed in Johannesburg is not an isolated issue, but part of a broader trend seen across major municipalities in South Africa. However, she said a concerning aspect of this issue related to existing National Treasury regulations that allow municipalities to pay start-ups in advance for transactions not exceeding R2 000. She highlighted that these regulations may unintentionally facilitate corrupt practices within the CoJ. "The CoJ has high irregular expenditure year-on-year and it does not seem to be a situation that is getting under control. So it raises questions about whether the Council, the Speaker, the Mayor are decisive," Maluleke said. "It is undesirable, it raises a series of conflicts. It raises the question if the contract is in the interest of the city or in the interest of the the individual concerned." Maluleke emphasised that while the law did not expressly prohibit municipalities from engaging in transactions with family members of councillors or employees, there was a vital obligation to disclose such dealings, particularly when they exceed R2 000. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ "We have got to look at different players in the ecosystem of accountability and our analysis is local government is a different sphere of government from provincial and national government, but they are not meant to be autonomous," she said. "They are not meant to operate as islands. These are public resources. We find too many municipalities do things that nobody hold them accountable for. And then they all wait for the AG to come every year they all lament and then we start the thing again next year." Maluleke said her experience in recent years showed that when accounting officers faced scrutiny, they were often transferred, creating instability that hampers accountability. "Our experience in the last few years is that accounting officers where we are zeroing-in to issue a certificate of debt, they get moved around and because we dont hire or fire them," she said. "What you find is that a Council will keep that role very unstable, make someone act for six months another one for six months. It just delays the process. So it might delay the AG but worse of all it continues to weaken the institution. It must often be deliberate." Maluleke said accounting officers too often did not go into the details of the plans that they sign off on. "All too often they don't do that. They might tick a box and say we have seen the plan, but you never seen evidence of suggestions that should be amended so that there is coherence for a province," she said. "No wonder then some of the plans are cut and paste jobs by consultants, and yet they pass and then when they are being implemented, all manner of adjustments are made during the year, which runs into a different costs far way above what it should have cost. "We have got to ask where is the provincial legislature when we have gone into this. We find some of them did not know they were supposed to get certain reports let alone look at them. Sometimes they get them bit did not do anything with them. "I believe we must be much more impatient with municipal leadership that simply does not submit financial statements because these are public funds. And so the very least you can do, whether or not the statements are credible, is to submit them. It's something we should never tolerate, that and disclaimers is something we must leave behind. 30 years into democracy that should not be our experience." BUSINESS REPORT

IOL News
21 hours ago
- IOL News
Supreme Court ruling clarifies limits of freedom of expression in social media defamation cases
The Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that neither the Constitution nor freedom of expression is an excuse for defamation. Image: File Neither the Constitution nor the freedom of expression protects a person who posts defamatory material concerning another on social media, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled in turning down an appeal by a farmer after a Facebook post by him sparked death threats against an attorney. A dispute arose between Pretoria attorney Pieter Strydom and farmer Francois Harman after the latter accused Strydom in a Facebook post of targeting white farmers. Strydom, upset by the contents of the post, obtained an urgent interdict against Harman to stop harassing him. The high court found that Harman and his friends and followers on his Facebook account posted and published offensive and life-threatening defamatory statements concerning Strydom. Some of the postings were found by the high court to amount to a smear campaign. The high court ordered Harman to remove the published material from his Facebook account, which referred to Strydom. Harman was further ordered to submit, under oath, a list of the particulars of the persons who made the responding postings. While Harman had meanwhile removed his posts, he turned to the SCA to appeal against the fact that he had to disclose the particulars of his followers who published threats against Strydom. Strydom is an attorney and insolvency practitioner who also represents the Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa and its financial agent, Unigro Financial Services. The Land Bank and Unigro advance loans to farmers, subject to agreed terms and conditions, which include mortgaging their farms as collateral. The loan agreements provide for annual instalment payments of the amount loaned, due to seasonal harvest of the crops. Whenever a farmer falls in default of payment, the Land Bank instructs its attorneys, in this case, Strydom's law firm, to institute legal proceedings to recover the debt. Included among the farmers was Harman and his company, who fell into arrears with payments. Harman took to his Facebook account, stating that Strydom and some officials in the Land Bank were the cause of his problems. Strydom obtained an interdict against Harman, prohibiting him from committing verbal abuse through electronic communication as well as refraining from harassing him. The order was obtained in Harman's absence. The following day, a messenger tried to serve him with the protection order, but Harman denied them entry into his house and instead photographed them. After they left, he again took to his Facebook account and posted the pictures together with a post regarding how the lives of white farmers are made difficult in this country. On the same day, his Facebook post was followed by a slew of other vitriolic postings from different persons - some who made death threats towards Strydom. This resulted in the court ordering him to take down his post and to disclose the identities of those who had levelled threats and made defamatory statements towards Strydom. Harman refused to submit the list of his Facebook friends involved and cited various excuses, including that 'the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) prevented him from divulging this information. He also stated freedom of expression as an excuse. To post a message on Facebook that someone 'needs a bullet between the eyes' is an impermissible exercise of freedom of expression. The right to freedom of expression, like all rights, has limits. The one obvious limit is when its exercise encroaches into the domain of another person's right, the SCA said. It found that Strydom is entitled to the list of persons responsible for these unlawful acts in order to vindicate his rights, if he deems fit to do so. [email protected]