
EU deal gives '12 years of certainty' to Scottish fishermen, says Murray
The agreement – announced on Monday in London – was hailed by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer as a 'win-win' for both the UK and the bloc, and will create a 'youth experience scheme' for young Britons to study and live in Europe, along with improving trade and allowing British travellers to use passport e-gates on the continent.
But British fishermen have hit out at the deal, which allows a further 12 years of access to UK waters for boats from the EU, with the Scottish Fishermen's Federation (SFF) describing it as a 'horror show'.
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland on Tuesday, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: 'I don't agree with that.
'It gives 12 years of certainty and stability for the industry, it doesn't change any of the deal that was put in place in 2019, which is 25% more quotas for UK and Scottish trawlers and it gives wide access, of course to the new markets of the EU, in terms of pushing away all that red tape that was there before.
'Not one more fish will be taken out of Scottish waters by an EU trawler as part of this deal and that provides that stability and certainty.'
The description of the deal as 'dreadful', the minister said, 'just doesn't pass water'.
He added: 'I've been in business before and I would prefer 12 years of stability and security and certainty than an annual renegotiation that you may or may not win.'
The deal has also angered the Scottish Government, which said it had not been consulted on the fishing aspect of it despite the issue being devolved.
The UK Government asserts the agreement related to international trade, which is reserved to Westminster.
Mr Murray rejected the Scottish Government claims, saying: 'The Scottish Government has been fully informed all the way through this process.
'The Paymaster General who's been doing the negotiations has kept them fully informed, there was an inter-ministerial grouping last week, two weeks ago there was a full briefing, and they were kept up to date as the negotiations were running through.'
The Scottish Government, Mr Murray added, 'have tied themselves in knots to set themselves against this deal', but he described it as 'good for consumers, it's good for business and it's good for Scotland's economy'.
Scottish External Affairs Secretary Angus Robertson said the last three inter-ministerial groups which would have discussed fishing were cancelled, adding engagement with the devolved administration was not about consulting on the deal, but informing them of progress.
'There were meetings with Nick Thomas-Symonds who gave a read out, 'here's where we have got to', not 'what do you think about things? Do you agree to things? Would you seek changes to things?'' he said.
The minister – who praised some aspects of the deal and the benefits it could have to Scotland – added the first the Scottish Government heard about the fisheries deal lasting for 12 years was when it was announced.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
25 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Budget cost hikes drive 79% of hospitality firms to raise prices
Budget cost hikes drive 79% of hospitality firms to raise prices – trade bodies New data from the UK hospitality sector's trade bodies also showed that more than half of firms have axed jobs in a bid to help their finances Almost four-fifths of pubs, restaurants and bars say they have increased their prices after Budget cost hikes, according to new figures Almost four-fifths of pubs, restaurants and bars say they have increased their prices after Budget cost hikes, according to new figures. New data from the UK hospitality sector's trade bodies also showed that more than half of firms have axed jobs in a bid to help their finances. Industry bosses warned that firms across the UK are being squeezed by "unsustainable" taxes, and urged the Government to relax taxation on the sector at the autumn Budget. The survey of members of the British Institute of Innkeeping (BII), the British Beer & Pub Association (BBPA), UKHospitality and Hospitality Ulster shed light on the pressures being felt by hospitality operators. It found that 79% of operators have increased prices as a direct result of increases to operating costs in April. It also showed that 73% of respondents have less than six months of cash reserves, with one in five having no cash reserves at all. Article continues below The data comes after firms were impacted by increases to the national minimum wage, national insurance payments and business rates payments. In April, the national living wage rose by 6.7% to £12.21 an hour for workers aged 21 and older. At the same time, the Government increased the rate of employer national insurance contributions (NICs) from 13.8% to 15% and also lowered the threshold at which firms would pay the tax. Many pubs were also hit by changes to discounts on business rates, the property tax affecting high street businesses. Hospitality businesses received a 75% discount on their business rates bills up to a cap of £110,000 but saw this cut to only 40% in April. Earlier this week, analysis of separate Government data showed that 209 pubs shut their doors for good in the first six months of this year. Bosses said the Chancellor needs to look at changes to VAT, business rates and NICs to ease the burden of firms. In a joint statement, the trade bodies said: "This shocking data reinforces the urgent need for Government to recognise the incredible pressure hospitality businesses have been put under, particularly since April, and illustrates why it should come forward with measures to support this vital sector at the Budget. "Unsustainable tax increases are squeezing businesses, stifling growth and investment, and threatening local employment, especially for young people. Article continues below "It is forcing businesses across the sector to make impossible decisions to cut jobs, put up prices, reduce opening hours and sadly limit the support they desperately want to give their communities. "Hospitality is united in which measures will reverse this trend and drive growth: a reduction in VAT for hospitality, changes to employer NICs and permanently lower business rates for the sector."


Daily Mirror
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Train passengers face potential ticket price rise of 5.8% after inflation update
Train fares went up in England by 4.6% in March this year - this applied to regulated rail fares, such as season, anytime day, off-peak and super off-peak tickets Train fares in England may increase by 5.8% next year in a major blow for passengers and commuters. Rail prices increased this year by one percentage point above the Retail Price Index (RPI) measure of inflation in July 2024. If the same formula is used for train tickets next year, then it would mean the cost of rail travel will jump by 5.8% next year. Train fares went up in England by 4.6% in March this year. This applied to regulated rail fares, such as season, anytime day, off-peak and super off-peak tickets. Unregulated fares - which include advance, anytime, off-peak day and first class fares - are set by train companies. The Office for National Statistics today revealed that RPI rose to 4.8% in July. The Government has not yet confirmed how much train fares in England will rise by next year. The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year. Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland each determine their own train fare increases for regulated fares. Pressure group Railfuture recently told the PA news agency 'it would be outrageous' if fares even rose by as much as 5.5% as train punctuality in Britain at its lowest level in more than five years. Office of Rail and Road figures show trains in Britain reached 66.7% of scheduled stops within a minute of the timetable in the year to July 19. This marks the worst performance since the year to May 30 2020. A DfT spokesperson said: 'The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. 'The Government is putting passengers at the heart of its plans for public ownership and Great British Railways (GBR), delivering the services they deserve and driving growth. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.' Most railcards also went up this year, with prices rising by £5, or 17%. The majority increased from £30 a year to £35. How to save money on train travel There are plenty of ways to cut down the cost of your commute. You should plan your journey as far in advance as possible to get discounted fares. Cheaper tickets are normally released 12 weeks ahead of time. See as well if you can split your journey to save costs. This involves splitting your journey up into different sections, so you're buying lots of multiple tickets instead of just one single ticket. It is also worth checking if you'd benefit from getting a rail card to save between 30% and 50% off the price of your fare. If you're a regular traveller, see if you'd save money by purchasing a season ticket or flexi ticket. How much you could save depends on how often you travel - but it can add up to hundreds of pounds.


Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Primary school pupils in white working-class regions ‘among worst performing'
Primary school pupils in white working-class regions are among the worst performing in the country, a report has suggested. The Institute for Government (IfG) think tank said disadvantaged white pupils in England have 'particularly poor educational outcomes' compared to their peers. In a report published on Wednesday, it found that councils in the bottom fifth for performance of disadvantaged pupils were 'disproportionately likely' to have large shares of pupils from white working-class backgrounds. Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, last week sounded the alarm over the 'national disgrace' of under-performance among the demographic. She warned that 'far too many' white working-class children were failing to get the exam results they needed to move on in life and risked being 'written off' by society. Pupils across England, Wales and Northern Ireland will receive their GCSE results on Thursday, a week after A-level results were handed out. This year's cohort were mostly aged 11 when schools were first closed during the Covid pandemic. The IfG report analysed pupil performance at Key Stage 2 – when children are around the same age, in their final year of primary school. It claimed that educational inequalities across England have 'grown wider and more pronounced' since the pandemic, with only 10 local authorities recording the same or better attainment levels last year than before the first Covid lockdown. Disparities have grown especially among the poorest children, in part because they were less likely to have access to laptops or quiet office spaces during the pandemic, the think tank said. It meant fewer than half of disadvantaged pupils – or around 46 per cent – met the expected standards in reading, writing and maths for Year Six last year. The results were particularly stark among regions with high rates of white working-class children, with only 41 per cent meeting the required standards for 11-year-olds last year. It included areas such as Knowsley and Blackpool, while almost all of the top performing regions in Key Stage 2 attainment were in London. Along with pupils from mixed white or black Caribbean backgrounds, white working-class children were the only pupils with attainment rates lower than the national average last year, the IfG said. By contrast, close to half of disadvantaged children from mixed backgrounds met that benchmark, with the figure rising to nearly 60 per cent for both disadvantaged black pupils and disadvantaged Asian pupils. The IfG cited previous research by the Commons education committee, which suggested that white British children's performance may be particularly vulnerable to disadvantage. It said this was because they were more clustered in rural or coastal areas with 'lower funding ... higher teacher vacancies, longer travel times and worse digital infrastructure'. The think tank suggested tackling high absence rates would help to improve performance among disadvantaged pupils. The Telegraph revealed last week that the Government was preparing a series of interventions to address low attainment measures among certain demographics in a white paper to be unveiled in the autumn. Measures being considered by ministers include plans to expand an AI-powered attendance tool, showing schools how they fare against those with similar demographic make-ups. The Department for Education currently publishes data showing school absence levels among minority ethnic groups, but is understood to be alarmed at figures for white working-class pupils.