Probe 171 alleged fake encounters in 2021: SC to Assam rights panel
Supreme Court
NEW DELHI: The SC on Wednesday asked the Assam Human Rights Commission (AHRC) to inquire into 171 alleged incidents of fake encounters carried out by state police in 2021 but said barring a few incidents the PIL petitioner's claim about fake encounters appeared to be speculative.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh disposed of a petition by an advocate Arif M Y Jwadder and said, "We direct the AHRC to issue a public notice inviting all individuals who claim to be aggrieved (victims and their family members) by the alleged police encounters to come forward and furnish relevant evidence."
Allowing AHRC to select team of police officials unconnected to the encounters for further inquiry into some cases if the need be, the bench said "fair and impartial inquiry" is a right of citizens aggrieved by police action and expected AHRC to adopt robust measures akin to witness protection protocols to safeguard the privacy, safety and security of those participating in the inquiry process.
The state, in its counter-affidavit had said that out of a total of 171 cases, chargesheets have been filed in 125 cases, forwarding reports submitted in 23 cases, and remaining 23 cases are under investigation. Writing the judgment and examining the allegations of the petitioner, Justice Kant said that he has failed to independently place on record any cogent or verifiable material to substantiate the allegations.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
Justice Kant said, "After minutely scanning such data, prima facie it seems that barring a few cases, it is difficult to infer that there has been a procedural breakdown, or the guidelines (relating to encounter inquiry) were flagrantly violated. " Referring to the status report relating to each FIR furnished by Assam, the bench said, "These documents prima facie belies the (petitioner's) claim of inaction and do establish that, at least at the foundational level, the criminal process was duly initiated.
"
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
36 minutes ago
- United News of India
SC upholds UPSIDC's land cancellation to Kamala Nehru Memorial Trust
New Delhi, May 30 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Friday upheld the decision of the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation (UPSIDC) to cancel a 125-acre land allotment to the Kamala Nehru Memorial Trust (KNMT), citing payment defaults and systemic flaws in the process of land allocation. A Bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh rejected the Trust's appeal against the 2017 judgment of the Allahabad High Court, which had affirmed the cancellation of the allotment originally made in September 2003 and annulled in December 2006. While dismissing the appeal, the Apex Court delivered a sharp rebuke to UPSIDC, observing that the land was allotted 'within just two months' and 'without any proper evaluation of public benefit". The Court held that such allocation practices violated the Public Trust Doctrine, which mandates that state-held resources be allocated transparently, with due diligence, and solely for the benefit of the public. 'The Doctrine requires that allocation decisions be preceded by a thorough assessment of public benefits, beneficiary credentials, and safeguards ensuring continued compliance with stated purposes,' the Court said. The Bench criticised UPSIDC for failing to adopt a transparent and competitive process in allocating such a large tract of industrial land. 'This betrays the fiduciary relationship between the State and its citizens,' the Court remarked, stressing that state authorities must ensure accountability in managing public assets. The judgment noted that no verifiable evidence was considered by UPSIDC regarding the economic benefits, employment potential, environmental impact, or alignment with regional development objectives before making the allotment to the Trust. 'Such lapses not only deprived the public exchequer of potential revenue due to the appreciated value of the land but also created a system where privileged access supersedes equal opportunity,' the Court observed. The Supreme Court further flagged concerns over UPSIDC's eagerness to re-allocate the land to another entity during the pendency of the litigation. 'We, therefore, consider it necessary to examine whether UPSIDC's procedure for industrial land allotment meets standards of administrative propriety, particularly in light of the Public Trust Doctrine mandating that public resources be managed with due diligence, fairness, and in conformity with public interest,' the Court said. In a judgment authored by Justice Surya Kant, the Court laid down binding directions to reform the process of industrial land allotment in Uttar Pradesh. It directed, 'The State Government of Uttar Pradesh and UPSIDC are directed to ensure that any such allotment in the future be made in a transparent, non-discriminatory and fair manner by ensuring that such allotment process fetches maximum revenue and also achieves the larger public interest like industrial development priorities, environmental sustainability, and regional economic objectives.' Also, the Court asked that the subject land be re-allotted strictly in accordance with the procedure above. The Court directed UPSIDC for transparent, non-discriminatory Industrial Land Allocation in Uttar Pradesh. UNI SNG RN
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
NFL remains silent as Stefon Diggs' boat video with pink powder sparks major online controversy
NFL refuses to address viral video of Stefon Diggs (Imagn Images) The New England Patriots' offseason buzz took a dramatic turn after a video featuring veteran wide receiver Stefon Diggs surfaced online, showing him on a boat surrounded by women and what appeared to be pink powder. While the video quickly made waves on social media, the response from the NFL and the Patriots organization has been more subdued—at least publicly. NFL declines to clarify controversial Stefon Diggs video Despite the speculation, the league appears to be treading carefully. NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy responded to Pro Football Talk's inquiry by saying the NFL 'will decline comment' on the matter. That silence is telling. The league's current substance abuse policy, significantly revamped in recent years, no longer calls for immediate suspensions over first-time incidents or appearances. Instead, the system emphasizes evaluation and rehabilitation, particularly in the form of the "Stage One" program. According to the policy, a player may be placed into the substance abuse program if his behavior 'exhibits physical, behavioral, or psychological signs or symptoms of misuse of Substances of Abuse.' Notably, this does not require a failed drug test. Should Diggs be placed in Stage One, he would be subject to increased testing and potential fines—but no suspension unless there are repeated violations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like ตลาดหุ้นกำลังส่งสัญญาณว่าอยู่ในช่วงขาลง? IC Markets สมัคร Undo What makes this situation more ambiguous is the lack of public disclosure. Since placement in the program isn't usually announced unless a suspension occurs, it's quite possible that any league-mandated action regarding Diggs could remain confidential. That means fans, media, and even teammates might never know whether or not the video led to disciplinary review. This distraction arrives just as Patriots fans were beginning to get excited about what Diggs could bring to the offense. Signed to a three-year deal worth up to $69 million—with $26 million guaranteed—the former Bills and Texans star was expected to give New England a much-needed boost in their passing game. But the contract did come with risks: Diggs is nearing 32, recovering from a torn ACL, and carries a reputation for occasional locker room friction. Head coach Mike Vrabel didn't dodge the topic when asked about it. 'We all have to make great decisions on and off the field,' Vrabel told reporters, signaling a no-nonsense approach while remaining vague about any internal conversations. He also confirmed that Diggs was absent from the team's organized team activities (OTAs), though no direct connection to the video was made. Still, there's no hard evidence yet to suggest the team is reconsidering its investment. Whether the Patriots choose to discipline him internally remains to be seen. What's clear is that Vrabel expects accountability from his players and is handling the situation in-house—for now. As training camp nears, the focus may eventually return to football. But until then, all eyes are on how Diggs and the Patriots navigate the ripple effects of a 30-second boat video that's raised more questions than answers. Also Read: Taylor Swift just bought her masters back—Travis Kelce's reaction proves he's her biggest supporter yet
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Slapped, beaten with baton': CCSU warden removed for thrashing hostellers in Meerut
MEERUT: The warden of Chaudhary Charan Singh University's (CCSU) Kailash Prakash Hostel has been removed on Friday following protest by students for allegedly thrashing 20-25 hostellers after finding water splashed on the floor and four students in a room for two. A purported video of the accused warden, DK Chauhan, mercilessly beating the students on Thursday night was widely circulated on social media on Friday. In the video, Chauhan is seen purportedly raining blows with a baton and slapping the students as he charged at them like a raging bull. His terror continued for nearly 30 minutes, with shocked students writhing in pain. The video shows that the students were standing still while the warden madly attacked them. On Friday, students staged a sit-in protest outside the vice chancellor's office, demanding immediate action against the warden. Calling the incident a "blatant misuse of power", they demanded stricter regulations for hostel authorities. After hours of protest and intervention by university officials, the warden was removed from his duties. A BTech student, requesting anonymity, told TOI, "The warden arrived at the hostel on Thursday night, and without asking anything, began assaulting some students. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar Undo He also used casteist slurs against some Dalit students. When we were recording the video, he tried to snatch our phones. We raised the matter with senior university authorities, but they sided with the warden." Prof Dinesh Kumar, chief warden of CCSU, told TOI, "We have removed DK Chauhan from his post. The VC, Sangeeta Shukla, is not here. Once she returns, we will place this matter on her table and constitute a high-level committee, in which we will try to include a student member to probe the incident. Further action will be taken after committee's report." "This kind of behaviour is unacceptable. We are committed to ensuring the safety and dignity of each and every student," said a university spokesperson, on condition of anonymity. DK Chauhan told TOI, "They were attacking me. I politely asked them to come out, but some students hurled abuses at me. I have submitted multiple pieces of evidence to the university administration, but they have only presented one side of the story. My car was vandalized, and my home guards were unable to protect me - which compelled me to retaliate." This is not the first time DK Chauhan has courted controversy. A few days ago, he allegedly ordered the on-duty home guards to keep a delivery boy hostage for around 30 minutes for delivering food at the hostel after 9 pm, said another student from Maharana Pratap Hostel.
