logo
Federal firings, economic uncertainty stain REIT outlooks

Federal firings, economic uncertainty stain REIT outlooks

Yahoo06-05-2025
Equity reported a record low turnover rate in the first quarter at 7.9 percent, COO Michael Manelis said. Camden reported a 3.3 percent pop in lease renewals, one of the firm's highest-ever rates, Executive Vice Chairman Keith Oden said.
Right now, renters are holding on to those keys — tightly.
'People, if they lose their jobs, don't immediately give us the keys.'
'We are a lagging, not a leading indicator of changes in the economy,' Parrell said on the firm's Wednesday earnings call.
Neither the REIT nor peers Equity and Camden said layoffs had hit leasing numbers. But impacts typically manifest six to eight months down the line, Breslin said; Equity's CEO Mark Parrell echoed this.
AvalonBay will feel that absence. About 12 percent of its residents work for the federal government, Breslin said.
Swap the local lens for a national one and 260,000 federal employees have exited the workforce — by choice, force or some mix — since President Donald Trump took office, according to a May analysis by Reuters.
The federal workforce in D.C., alone, is projected to shrink 21 percent by September 30, according to the District's Office of Revenue Analysis, which now forecasts the metro region to enter a mild recession by year's end.
The REIT, headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, owns multifamily in 12 states and, notably, Washington, D.C., where sweeping federal layoffs have marred the job market and stoked lasting fears among the still employed.
AvalonBay CEO Sean Breslin said talk from tenants, both prospective and current, has centered on: 'I have a job today; will I have a job tomorrow?'
Mortgage rates and home prices are high, which has dissuaded would-be buyers from leaving leases and further pressured a nationally undersupplied housing market. Meanwhile, peak rental season is dawning, creating a perfect storm for owners.
All three REITs said demand is about as robust as it gets — at least right now.
The upshot: Market fundamentals are solid and poised to strengthen; the biggest unknown now is the jobs market.
Execs admitted uncertainty clouded crystal balls. Still, they shared what they could divine.
'You're like the only apartment REIT that so far has really talked about resident concerns,' Piper Sandler analyst Alexander Goldfarb said on AvalonBay's Thursday call.
An outlook during earnings season should be par for the course. But the industry has basically been mum since 'Liberation Day,' making straight talk on earnings calls held by Equity Residential, AvalonBay Communities and Camden Property Trust a much-needed novelty.
The heads of the country's largest apartment REITs are finally giving their two cents on how tariffs, trade wars and economic tumult might affect business.
Story Continues
That's good news for right now. But it also signals tenants are responding to uncertainty, and hard times may be on the horizon.
Breslin outlined the typical chain of events when economic outlooks get dicey: tenants hunker down, then they cut the 'wants' in their budget until they're forced to trim the 'needs' — critically, rent.
The signs are there. Discretionary spending is down. It has slipped precipitously since November 2025, according to Deloitte, though it remains above 2023 and 2024 lows. And tenants since February have reported higher expected costs for housing and utilities, signaling pocketbooks are being pinched.
'The probability of a recession remains at 60 percent,' J.P. Morgan bluntly proclaimed in its mid-April report.
Still, those jitters aren't yet rattling the REITs. Or so they claim.
'As of today, we are not seeing any signs of consumer weakness,' Equity's Manelis said. When weakness does show up, it manifests as broken leases, move-outs for lower rents, fewer renewals and late payments.
'We haven't had people coming in and saying, 'Oh my god, I've lost my job in the federal government, you need to let me off my lease,'' said Camden CEO Ric Campo.
'We just haven't seen it.'
Positive supply signs
The good news, however, is the oversupply story seems to be in the rearview mirror, and, barring a surge in unemployment, dwindling deliveries should give rents a boost.
The first quarter marked the first time since 2021 that tenants nationally leased new units faster than developers could deliver them.
Last year, Washington, D.C. pumped out the greatest excess of apartments, as compared to tenant demand, according to RealPage. Then came Houston and Las Vegas.
The scales are tipping in landlords' favor in Dallas, Atlanta and Denver, Equity Chief Investment Officer Alec Brackenridge said. Austin, Charlotte and Phoenix 'haven't cauterized the bleeding from all the supply that they've been under,' he added, but dwindling pipelines signal they soon may.
Austin, which has led the pack nationally in oversupply, produced fewer units than were leased in the first three months of 2025 — the first time in three and a half years it has recorded positive net absorption, according to the brokerage MMG.
The pipeline is still robust, but construction is slowing 'pretty significantly towards the back half of 2025,' Camden's Camp said.
After nearly two years of negative growth, rent changes are now projected to turn positive by 2026, according to Origin Investments.
Sun Belt snap back
Groups such as AvalonBay are betting on that sea change. The firm went into contract on eight Texas multifamily properties in the first quarter — two in Austin, the rest in Dallas-Fort Worth — for over $600 million.
'Look at the basis at which we can enter these markets,' Breslin said, specifying the Texas deal had priced out to $230,000 a door. By comparison, per-unit pricing in Austin topped out at $275,000 during the last cycle.
Houston-based Camden one-upped AvalonBay in Febraury, scooping up Austin's Emerson at Leander for about $68 million or $192,000 a unit — a 16 percent discount from its appraised value.
Across the Sun Belt, distress that marred values from 2022 through last year is working its way through the system and investors eyeing the shift are stepping off the sidelines.
'Lenders have just kind of had it: they're not extending loans anymore; they're not extending caps on interest rates,' Equity's Brackenridge said.
S2 Capital, for example, one of the multifamily syndicators to ride out the Sun Belt's downturn, snapped up a good chunk of buildings owned by GVA – a syndicator that didn't fare so well.
One of the cycle's largest investors, GVA has lost dozens of assets to foreclosure and forced sales after interest rates soared on its floating-rate loans; it faces multiple investor suits alleging shady dealings.
S2, in partnership with WindMass Capital (a third syndicator), picked up one of GVA's struggling Austin assets in January for $50 million. S2 also stepped in as the general partner on a 1,768-unit GVA portfolio with buildings in Dallas and Nashville, and Knoxville, Tennessee.
'We're seeing some more products starting to come to the market,' Brackenridge underscored. 'At the same time, there's a lot of interest in buying that product.'
Equity is currently combing Dallas, Denver and Atlanta for acquisition opportunities. Unlike its peers, it doesn't quite have the appetite for Austin yet.
'There's such a glut of supply — that's probably a little bit later for us,' CEO Parrell said.
What about tariffs?
All three REITs, which double as developers, said tariffs would pressure expenses. AvalonBay estimated a 5 percent jump in hard costs and said the uptick 'could be enough to tip some projects into being infeasible.'
'Even with no change in costs, it's really hard to make deals underwrite right now,' Brackenridge said. A mix of uncertainty and still-high rates is complicating the math.
But as new development activity dries up, contractors and subcontractors are more willing to come down on pricing, which figures to offset the higher price of materials, executives said.
'Contractors [are] getting really hungry,' Brackenridge added. 'They see the pipeline dwindling and so they're accepting less of a margin.'
AvalonBay, which acts as its own contractor, said, 'Our phones are ringing off the hook with deeper bid coverage and stronger subcontractor availability than we have seen in years.'
'This bodes well,' Chief Investment Officer Matt Birenbaum said.
Read more
This article originally appeared on The Real Deal. Click here to read the full story.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Trump's newly announced tariffs aren't a done deal
Why Trump's newly announced tariffs aren't a done deal

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

Why Trump's newly announced tariffs aren't a done deal

THE LAW ON LIBERATION DAY — On Thursday, Donald Trump announced sweeping new tariffs against U.S. trading partners that will go into effect next week. The announcement came on the same day that an appeals court grappled with the question of whether Trump's tariffs are even legal. Indeed, there is a strong argument that the tariffs are illegal and unconstitutional. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, which on Thursday held oral argument on two major tariff challenges — one from a group of small businesses and the other from a coalition of twelve states led by Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield — seems like it may ultimately agree. Rayfield was pleased with how it went. 'If you were an outside observer watching the hearing and you had to pick a party to stay in the shoes of, I think you would prefer to be in the state's shoes after Thursday's hearing,' Rayfield said in an interview with POLITICO this afternoon. That seems to be the consensus among close observers. 'Federal appeals court judges on Thursday sharply questioned President Donald Trump's authority,' POLITICO's Kyle Cheney and Doug Palmer wrote. Reuters put it similarly, while the Associated Press reported that the judges 'expressed broad skepticism' toward the government's arguments. The New York Times' account said that Brett Shumate, the lawyer arguing for the government, 'at times faced an icy reception.' This is not that surprising if you have been following this legal saga closely. The Constitution explicitly gives the power to impose tariffs to Congress. Congress has passed several trade laws that provide the president with the power to impose tariffs in certain circumstances, but they do not grant the sweeping and unreviewable power that the Trump administration has claimed — and indeed requires in order to support Trump's tariffs as a legal matter. Meanwhile, the statute that has actually been invoked by the Trump administration — the International Emergency Economic Powers Act — has never been used to impose tariffs over the course of the nearly half-century that it has been on the books, and it makes no mention of tariffs in the text. It was in fact passed to limit the president's emergency economic powers. On top of that, the key case cited by the government in its favor does not actually support their position (usually a bad thing). Thus far, two lower courts have ruled against the administration on this issue — a unanimous three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of International Trade and a federal district court judge in Washington, D.C. Both rulings have been stayed pending appeal. Thursday's argument concerned the first of those rulings and was conducted in the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. If the government loses in the Federal Circuit, it is still possible that the Supreme Court's conservative justices could agree to hear the case and ultimately rule in Trump's favor. On the merits, that outcome would be hard to square with the conservative majority's stated commitment to textualism as a mode of statutory interpretation, as well as the major questions doctrine that was developed in recent years by the conservative justices, who used it in 2023 to strike down much of the Biden administration's student-loan forgiveness effort. In the student-loan forgiveness case, the conservative justices relied crucially on the fact that the program was estimated to cost taxpayers roughly $500 billion, according to a budget model from the University of Pennsylvania. They concluded that this warranted a particularly rigorous and stringent mode of statutory interpretation. The estimated cost to taxpayers in that case pales in comparison to the estimated cost for Americans resulting from Trump's tariffs, according to a model at Yale University. That model currently estimates that Trump's latest tariff framework will result in an average per household income loss of $2,400 this year alone, that it will result in a 0.5 percentage loss in real GDP this year and next year, and that the economy will lose nearly half a million jobs by the end of 2025. None of this has stopped the administration from plowing forward. At this point, the administration may be hoping for a victory at the Supreme Court (assuming they lose at the Federal Circuit) or, perhaps, simply planning to do as much as they can to advance their tariff policy before a day comes when it is definitively thrown out by the courts. They have already been aided in this regard by the Supreme Court, intentionally or otherwise. In mid-June, the two businesses that prevailed in federal district court in Washington asked the Supreme Court to short-circuit the appeals process and take the case up immediately for review. 'In light of the tariffs' massive impact on virtually every business and consumer across the Nation, and the unremitting whiplash caused by the unfettered tariffing power the President claims, challenges to the IEEPA tariffs cannot await the normal appellate process (even on an expedited timeline),' the companies' lawyers wrote. The companies' request was far from crazy, particularly given the fact that the conservative justices have moved quickly in a variety of major court challenges to the Trump administration's actions since Trump's inauguration. Three days later, however, the Supreme Court denied their request, with no explanation. Perhaps not coincidentally, those expedited rulings have favored the Trump administration, while in the case of Trump's tariffs, a critical mass of conservative justices may ultimately be compelled to rule against Trump — if, that is, they actually adhere to the interpretive and constitutional principles that they claim to follow. In the meantime — and as the administration has been struggling in the courts to defend its policy — the Trump administration is evidently moving forward undeterred. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@ Or contact tonight's author at akhardori@ What'd I Miss? — Trump demands firing of BLS chief after soft jobs report: President Donald Trump called for the ouster of the head of the Labor Department's statistical arm this afternoon after the latest monthly jobs report came in well under expectations. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,' Trump wrote in a social media post. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' Trump reprised prior accusations that the Bureau of Labor Statistics under Commissioner Erika McEntarfer surreptitiously put out overly rosy jobs numbers at the tail end of the Biden administration that were subsequently revised in order to influence the election. Economists have roundly dismissed these claims as a misunderstanding of the agency's revision processes. — Huckabee, Witkoff visit US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation amid global outcry: Senior U.S. officials visited a distribution center for the American-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation today, pledging to report back to President Donald Trump about the foundation's operations and devise a plan to address starvation in the strip amid growing global outcry over the humanitarian crisis. U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee and special envoy Steve Witkoff made a rare trip to Gaza today amid heightened pressure — including from within MAGA circles — to reconsider the administration's support for Israel's war on Hamas and intervene in Gaza's hunger crisis. — Corporation for Public Broadcasting shutting down: The Corporation for Public Broadcasting announced today it was shutting down its operations after President Donald Trump rescinded funding for the nonprofit, which it used to support public radio and TV stations around the country. The CPB — which was established by Congress decades ago as an independent nonprofit — said it will begin 'an orderly wind-down' after Trump signed a measure last month to claw back $1.1 billion in grants appropriated to CPB over the next two fiscal years. — Ghislaine Maxwell transferred to less restrictive prison after DOJ meeting: Days after sitting down with one of the highest-ranking members of the Justice Department, Ghislaine Maxwell has been transferred to a less restrictive minimum security federal prison camp in Texas, her attorney said. Maxwell's attorney David Oscar Markus said today she had been moved to Federal Prison Camp Bryan, a facility for female inmates in Southeast Texas. He declined further comment. Until this week, Maxwell, the onetime girlfriend of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, had been serving a 20-year sentence for her 2021 conviction for sex trafficking crimes in Florida, at FCI Tallahassee, a low-security prison. — Trump, escalating war of words with Russia's Medvedev, mobilizes two nuclear submarines: President Donald Trump said today he mobilized two nuclear submarines 'to be positioned in the appropriate regions' in response to threatening comments by Russia's former president Dmitry Medvedev. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he was taking that action 'just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Medvedev on Thursday referenced Russia's nuclear capabilities amid an escalating battle on social media sparked by Trump's latest efforts to increase economic pressure on the Kremlin in hopes of reviving diplomatic efforts to end the war in Ukraine. AROUND THE WORLD RAISING THE BAR — Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni reacted with fury today as the EU's top court raised the threshold for member countries to reject asylum-seekers. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) said EU nations may only create national lists of safe countries outside the bloc if they fully justify their assessments with public sources. According to the court, a country can only be considered 'safe' for repatriation if 'the entire population' is protected across all regions. Meloni called the court's decision 'surprising' and a power grab by EU judges. 'Once again, the judiciary, this time at the European level, claims spaces that do not belong to it, in the face of responsibilities that are political,' she said. SLOVENIA STEPS OUT— Slovenia became the first EU country to ban all weapons trade with Israel, citing the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The government also prohibited the transit of weapons to or from Israel through Slovenia, the administration in Ljubljana said in a statement Thursday. Slovenia said that it decided to act independently from the EU, as 'due to internal disagreements and disunity,' the bloc is unable to take action against Israel. Though the European Commission proposed partially suspending Israel's association agreement with the EU this week, member countries have yet to agree on it. Nightly Number RADAR SWEEP WEEKEND WARRIORS — Under the threat of Chinese invasion, more and more Taiwanese civilians are signing up for civil defense classes. US intelligence predicts that China will be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027 as China builds up its aircrafts and warships. Armed with airsoft guns that fire plastic pellets, men and women train on the weekends in converted garages and empty warehouses to prepare a civil resilience. Beyond armed defense, officials and private organizations have amped up drills for attacks on critical infrastructure and cyberattacks. Yian Lee reports on the 'soft militarization' of Taiwanese civilians for Bloomberg. Parting Image Jacqueline Munis contributed to this newsletter. Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

5 questions Trump faces after dismal jobs report; BLS commissioner firing
5 questions Trump faces after dismal jobs report; BLS commissioner firing

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

5 questions Trump faces after dismal jobs report; BLS commissioner firing

President Trump's economic pitch took a serious hit Friday after the latest federal jobs report revealed stunning weakness in the labor market. He responded by firing the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) for what he called politically-motivated revisions that lobbed off hundreds of thousands of job gains earlier this summer. The dismal jobs report raised serious questions about the strength of the U.S. economy, especially in light of looming tariffs causing anxieties in the global market. Here are the five big questions facing Trump as he faces the fallout. How much worse does it get? After months of warnings from economists and weakening data from the private sector, federal jobs numbers have caught up to the concern. The July jobs report dramatically changed the picture of the U.S. economy, ramping up concerns fueled by Trump's tariffs and the uncertainty they unleashed. The U.S. added only 73,000 jobs in July and just 106,000 jobs since May — a three-month total barely enough to sustain the labor market for one month. 'Not only was this a much weaker than forecast payrolls number, the monster downward revisions to the past two months inflicts a major blow to the picture of labor market robustness,' wrote Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management, in an analysis. 'More concerning is that with the negative impact of tariffs only just starting to be felt, the coming months are likely to see even clearer evidence of a labor market slowdown.' The U.S. economy needs to add 80,000 and 100,000 jobs each month just to replace those who leave the workforce for retirement or incapacity. Without a significant turnaround, the unemployment rate could begin to rise, and the overall economy could slow drastically. 'The U.S. slowdown is starting to take shape,' wrote Alexandra Wilson-Elizondo, global co-CIO at Goldman Sachs Asset Management, in a Friday analysis. She added that a decline in labor force participation, which is also bad for the job market, was keeping the unemployment rate from rising further. 'While overall levels are not flashing red, the trend is cause for concern,' she wrote. How does Trump adjust his tariff plans? Trump and top White House officials spent months laughing off the dire projections of economists, who feared his tariffs would tank the job market and boost inflation. That position may not be tenable after Friday. The July jobs report came out on what was supposed to be the final deadline for the imposition of Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs. After insisting for weeks that he would not delay the deadline further, Trump announced Thursday evening that some countries would have an additional week to strike deals with the U.S. Trump's latest punt — which happened after the president is typically briefed on the jobs report — was the latest in a series of delays issued amid rough economic news or stock market turmoil. The president proposed much steeper tariffs during his 'Liberation Day' announcement in April, but delayed and weakened his plan after two weeks of turmoil in financial markets. Trump and top White House economic aides touted the benefit of federal revenue from import taxes, which are paid by the U.S. businesses and individual who purchase foreign goods. But the growing pressure of his tariffs could prompt further delays from Trump. Trump could also keep higher headline tariff rates while quietly making exemptions for key goods, undermining the overall goal of his import taxes while potentially avoiding some of the costs. 'A web of exemptions and, in the case of the deals, preferential rates means many key imports face lower tariffs or none. That significantly lowers the actual tariff rate, in many cases well below the quoted headline rate,' wrote Michael Pearce, deputy chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, in a Friday analysis. How does the Fed respond? The stunning July jobs numbers will boost pressure on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates at its next policy meeting in September, and are already raising questions about whether it should have cut rates already. The Fed kept rates steady Wednesday as inflation continued to rise and the labor market appeared to be weakening at a much slower rate than seen in Friday's jobs report. While Fed Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged Wednesday the risks that the job market could weaken quicker than expected under the bank's moderately high interest rates, he said he and his colleagues were still unsettled about how Trump's tariffs could drive inflation higher. The Fed now appears to be in a quagmire with the country on track for both a weaker economy and higher inflation — a dynamic known as 'stagflation.' Lower interest rates could stimulate the sluggish labor market, but also drive inflation higher with additional money in the economy. Keeping interest rates unchanged could stave off inflation, but suffocate the economy into higher unemployment and slower spending. 'With persistent policy uncertainty, tariffs, and diminished immigration flows paralyzing employers, the U.S. economy is now flirting with job losses, revealing a labor market that is much weaker than most Fed policymakers had believed,' wrote Gregory Daco, chief economist EY-Parthenon, in a Friday analysis. 'The Fed is now behind the curve.' Will voters ding Trump as job approval sinks? Trump is largely fulfilling his campaign promises on the economy, including instituting tariffs, though that policy proved to be much more widespread than what he suggested while running for a second-term. He's also making good on mass deportation plans, which the administration is using to sell what they see as a stronger economy for the American worker. But some slices of voters don't appear to be singing Trump's praises. Trump headed into the big week on the economy with his job approval rating slipping, with net approval dropping 15 points, according to an Economist/YouGov poll. And his net approval rating also fell 9 points to its lowest rating yet last week in the Decision Desk HQ (DDHQ) average, with independents taking issue with Trump's actions on the economy and immigration. Consumer confidence ticked up only slightly in July, a sign that anxieties over the economy could be coming to a head as a result of the president's policies. Consumers also expressed more negative assessments of their economic situations overall. What impact will firing the BLS commissioner have? Experts and economists were left reeling Friday afternoon when Trump announced he was firing the commissioner of Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Erika McEntarfer. That cast doubt on the bureau's reporting standards and the type of revisions it makes on previously released reports. When Trump was later asked if that decision meant anyone providing him data he doesn't agree with could risk losing their job, he responded: 'I've always had a problem with these numbers.' In considering who could be McEntarfer's long-term replacement, Trump did not pinpoint experience in labor statistics as a qualification. 'We need people we can trust,' Trump said. 'I put somebody in who's going to be honest.'

What does TACO mean? What to know when Trump issues new tariffs after 2 delays
What does TACO mean? What to know when Trump issues new tariffs after 2 delays

USA Today

time4 hours ago

  • USA Today

What does TACO mean? What to know when Trump issues new tariffs after 2 delays

President Donald Trump signed an executive order to issue a new slate of tariffs on July 31, the latest in a long saga of policy changes for imports from countries around the world. Reciprocal tariff rates for 70 countries will range from 15% to 41%, set to go into effect seven days from the order. Trump also separately raised the tariff rate on imports from Canada from 25% to 35%, which is set to go into effect Aug. 1. Tariffs are a tax on goods from other countries that importers pay, and economists generally agree it leads to higher prices for consumers. Trump began imposing tariffs on imports from the U.S.'s top trade partners in February, only to change their effective date, scope or rate over the following months. The on-again-off-again tariffs have been a theme of Trump's second term, leading to the creation of the term TACO. Here is what to know: Live updates: Trump fires head of labor statistics bureau after weak jobs report What does TACO mean? Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong coined "TACO trade" in May, describing how some investors anticipate market rebounds amid Trump's on-again, off-again tariff policies. The acronym stands for "Trump always chickens out." Armstrong describes TACO trade as many investors' strategy to buy into the market that dips when Trump announces steep tariffs on the assumption that he will back off his tariff order, and the market will rebound. Trump hit back at a reporter who asked about the term on May 28, saying, "you ask a nasty question like that. It's called negotiation." Trump's tariffs have been on-again-off-again Back in February, Trump announced a 25% tariff on goods from top trade partners Mexico and Canada and 10% on goods from China. Such was the start of a series of delays and negotiations that left Canada and Mexico relatively untouched when Trump expanded steeper tariff orders to the rest of the world in April. China and the U.S. were caught up in an intense trade war where the economic powerhouses retaliated until both sides issued tariffs in the triple digits. They reached a truce in May and have discussed extending the 90-day pause while they work out a deal. Trump on April 2 announced widespread tariffs in what he called "Liberation Day." Shortly after, he paused the climbing rates for 90 days. That pause was set to expire on July 9, but instead of the tariffs going into effect, Trump extended the deadline. That deadline was Aug. 1, and Trump had said the deadline would not change, but the recent order gives it another week. Mexico remains at 25% while it continues to work on a trade deal for the next 90 days, Trump said. Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store