Assembly backs law stopping mutilated pets being imported into Northern Ireland
In a move described as a 'significant moment' on the North's 'journey towards increasing animal welfare protections for pets', the Assembly approved a Legislative Consent Motion (LCM) to extend powers contained in the UK's Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill to Northern Ireland.
Currently progressing through parliament, the legislation will allow Northern Ireland's Department for Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) to introduce new rules to restrict the import of cats and dogs which have been subject to painful practices like de-clawing or ear cropping.
'I am committed to ensuring the highest standards of animal welfare and creating a safe environment for all pets,' DAERA Minister Andrew Muir said.
It has been against the law to mutilate any animal for cosmetic reasons in Northern Ireland since 2011 (Pic: Rolling news)
'I welcome this approval by the Assembly which marks a significant step forward in protecting companion animals from cruel and inhumane practices,' he added.
While it has been against the law to mutilate any animal for cosmetic reasons in Northern Ireland since 2011, it is not illegal to buy a cat or a dog from another country where these practices are still permitted or tolerated.
'No animal should be subjected to mutilations for aesthetic reasons,' Minister Muir said.
'Ear cropping or tail docking are intensely painful procedures, carried out at a young age and deliver no health or welfare benefits,' he added.
'Gaining consent provides my department with the ability to close any remaining loopholes in our law and it sends a message that these inhumane practices have no place in our society."
The Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill is a UK government-backed Private Members Bill, which was introduced by the MP for Winchester, Dr Danny Chambers.
Once it achieves Royal Assent, it will provide powers to DAERA to make legislation in the NI Assembly to prohibit the importation of these animals on welfare grounds.
See More: Law, Mutilation, Northern Ireland Assembly, Pets
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
Thousands of people line streets for Belfast Pride
Thousands of people have taken part in Belfast's annual Pride parade while thousands more lined the route as the march made its way through the city centre. The theme this year was 'Not Going Back' which organisers said reflected their belief that rights already achieved were coming under pressure. Stormont's four main executive parties, Sinn Féin, the DUP, Alliance and the UUP had been told that they were not welcome at the parade. That is because they voted to approve an indefinite ban on puberty blockers for under 18s in Northern Ireland last December. Stormont Agriculture Minister Andrew Muir who is a member of the Alliance Party took part in a personal capacity along with a church group. The parade started at Custom House Square at 1pm and made its way through the city centre before finishing at Victoria Street. Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O'Neill said she was disappointed that executive parties had been asked not to attend. She posted about Pride on social media this morning saying she wished those attending well and that she was "committed to building a future where everyone in our LGBTQIA+ is seen, valued and treated equally". A number of organisations said they would not be attending the event in an official capacity. They include the Northern Ireland Ambulance Service and the PSNI.
Irish Times
4 days ago
- Irish Times
The ‘honest belief' defence in rape cases rewards ignorance and insensitivity
There is still much work to be done before the human rights and dignity of victims of sexual violence in Ireland are truly realised. A persistent barrier to protecting victims' rights in sexual offence cases is the legal defence based on 'honest belief' that is open to those accused of rape. This means a person accused of rape may avoid conviction if the jury accepts that they honestly believed the other person was consenting – even if that belief was entirely unreasonable in the circumstances. While the Supreme Court has clarified that juries need not accept 'obviously false' accounts, the law still permits acquittal based solely on the accused's subjective perception of events. As it stands, the 'honest belief' defence does not require that the belief be 'reasonable', and relies entirely on the accused's perception of whether the victim was consenting. This undermines the core principle of mutual, meaningful consent that is enshrined in the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017, which defines consent as 'freely and voluntarily given'. READ MORE Some other areas of criminal law measure a person's actions or beliefs against what a reasonable person would have done. However, when it comes to rape, an accused person can rely on their own interpretation of events, even if there is no reasonable explanation for their belief, and even if they took no steps to establish or confirm consent. The Law Reform Commission recommended changing to a 'reasonable belief' standard in its comprehensive report in 2019. It pointed out that a complainant's silence – which may have derived from fear and trauma – could be interpreted incorrectly as consent, and that an honest belief on this basis might even encourage people not to ascertain consent. The commission concluded that arguments against the current law far outweighed arguments in favour of it. Prof Tom O'Malley said that the law as it stands 'places a premium on ignorance, lack of consideration or insensitivity'. At the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre , we support a legislative change that introduces an objective reasonableness standard, as well as a requirement that appropriate actions have been taken to confirm consent. Such changes will mean a closer alignment with our existing statutory definition of consent. For most victims and survivors, this reform would be welcome and necessary. Honest belief as a defence centres the accused's subjective viewpoint, often at the expense of the victim's experience and agency. Reporting a rape takes immense courage and determination, yet survivors must navigate a legal system that is often very challenging. When the law allows the accused to invoke honest belief without any need to demonstrate that this belief was reasonable or based on any concrete steps to establish consent, it can compound survivors' feelings of disempowerment and erode their confidence that their voice matters. If we truly wish to encourage more survivors to seek justice, this reform would be an important positive step. In Ireland, we have come close to modernising this law once before. We strongly supported the honest-belief reforms in the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Human Trafficking) Bill, published in July 2023. It would have replaced the current defence with a requirement that belief in consent must be objectively reasonable. It also proposed that juries must consider whether the accused took steps to ascertain consent, which might include verbal confirmation or other clear indication of agreement. In effect, the planned changes enshrined the question: would a reasonable person, in the same situation, with the same knowledge, have believed there was consent? These reforms were necessary and proportionate. They reflected both public understanding and the legal reality of what genuine consent entails, as well as the lived experience of survivors of sexual violence. [ 'Scale of our sexual violence epidemic' shown by record calls and texts to national rape crisis helpline Opens in new window ] Adopting an objective standard would align Ireland with international best practice. Countries including England and Wales already require a reasonable objective belief of consent, for instance. It would also reflect the principles of the Istanbul Convention, which focuses on whether the alleged victim freely and voluntarily agreed to sexual activity, as assessed in the full context – not just on the accused's own belief. Similarly, the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) urges states to eliminate laws that permit subjective or unreasonable interpretations of consent. These international bodies recognise that in matters as serious as rape, subjective belief – no matter how honestly claimed – is not enough. In recent years, Ireland has taken progressive steps towards addressing gender-based violence and supporting victims. The national strategy on domestic, sexual and gender-based violence sets out ambitious goals and legislative reform is central to achieving them. So we were very concerned to learn in November 2023 that the honest belief provisions were being dropped from the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Human Trafficking) Bill. We warned that removing these provisions weakened the legislation and we urged then-minister for justice, Helen McEntee , to reconsider. She clarified that these provisions were only being cut so as not to hold up the rest of the Bill, while her department addressed considerations on honest belief arising from a recent Supreme Court judgment. McEntee committed to drafting a stand-alone Sexual Offences Bill that would mean the proposed reforms would apply to both rape and sexual assault cases, as flagged by the judgment. Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan is progressing the matter with the Attorney General and should move swiftly to introduce legislation that would ensure belief in consent can only be a defence if it was both honestly and reasonably held. If the new Bill is the robust piece of legislation it ought to be, it must receive cross-party support from members of the Oireachtas when it is published. It will send a clear, consistent message that consent must be mutual and ongoing, based on communication and not on assumption or a one-sided perception. Rachel Morrogh is chief executive of Dublin Rape Crisis Centre. Anyone affected by sexual violence at any time can get free, confidential support on the 24-hour National Helpline 1800 77 8888
Irish Times
6 days ago
- Irish Times
US government offered to use spy satellites to verify IRA arms dumps were decommissioned
The US government offered to use its satellite surveillance systems to verify whether IRA arms dumps had been concreted over during discussions about decommissioning. According to new government files released by the national archives in London, a White House official put forward the idea to the British in 2000 when the issue of putting arms beyond use was one of the most contentious topics between all sides. In a phone call with Bill Jeffrey, the political director of the Northern Ireland Office, the idea was put forward by Dick Norland, a senior US diplomat. 'Norland said that he had raised with [Irish civil servant] Dermot Gallagher whether US satellite surveillance could conceivably have a part to play in verifying that IRA weapons dumps had been sealed, eg by concreting over,' said Mr Jeffrey in a memo of the call. READ MORE 'This might be a bit off the wall, but seems worth exploring.' At the time, Mr Gallagher had also raised the idea of using satellites to replace surveillance from security towers in south Armagh. 'We were pretty clear that would not work. Norland agreed,' wrote Mr Jeffrey. 'When Gallagher had raised the idea with [deputy national security adviser Jim] Steinberg, 'Jim laughed it out of the room'.' The newly released documents contain substantial correspondence about decommissioning and illustrate how the British became increasingly frustrated at the slow pace of the process. About 14 months after the Norland call, the British ambassador to Ireland, Ivor Roberts, said he was sceptical of decommissioning and 'wish we had never got into the game'. 'As Sinn Féin have reminded Fianna Fáil, the latter never decommissioned, they merely buried their arms and stood down their army,' he wrote in a memo. Republican graffiti in east Belfast referring to IRA decommissioning. Photograph: Paul Faith/PA 'I actually believe that it would be more productive if we had been on that tack and if we, the Irish government and the US had been at one in getting the IRA to transmogrify themselves into a retired serviceman's league.' His note came in February 2002 when there were worries that a failure of the IRA to make a move on decommissioning would prompt another crisis in the peace process. 'We do indeed seem to be drifting towards the shoals without a clear idea of how to keep ourselves afloat,' wrote Mr Roberts. British civil servants had argued that they needed to see a significant move towards decommissioning by the IRA in response to demilitarisation in Northern Ireland. John Sawers, prime minister Tony Blair's foreign affairs adviser, wrote in another memo the British had to retain the ability to crack down on racketeering and smuggling, and highlighted the role that prominent republican Thomas 'Slab' Murphy played in it. 'The Irish are better placed to pursue the Al Capone route against PIRA and RIRA on their side of the border (though whether they would ever put Slab Murphy in the dock on smuggling charges is doubtful),' he wrote. Murphy, whose farm at Ballybinaby, Hackballscross, Co Louth, straddles the Border with Northern Ireland, was found guilty in 2016 of nine charges of failing to comply with tax laws in the Irish Republic for the years 1996-1997 to 2004. He was sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment.
