
Trump tariffs aim to settle scores with countries, no matter their size
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
President Donald Trump added Wednesday to his growing list of countries that would face steep tariffs in the coming weeks if they fail to reach trade agreements with the United States, as he threatens to drag nations large and small into his trade war.On his social media account, the president posted form letters informing countries -- including the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Moldova, Brunei, Libya, Iraq and Algeria -- that they should prepare for double-digit tariff rates. Except for the name of the country and the tariff rate, the letters were identical to those he posted Monday, which targeted 14 nations.Later Wednesday afternoon, Trump issued another threat to impose a 50% tariff on products from Brazil. His letter implied that the higher rate was partly in response to what Trump described as a "witch hunt" against former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is facing trial for attempting a coup.Brazil and the other trading partners that Trump targeted Wednesday join a growing list of countries that will face additional tariffs Aug. 1, including Japan and South Korea. The president's renewed threats against both large and small trading partners suggests that he is hewing to a global tariff strategy he announced in early April that punishes countries broadly for a variety of trading practices and policies he has deemed unfair.In issuing his threat to Brazil, which was more sharply worded than the previous form letters, Trump cited the country's "insidious attacks on Free Elections, and the fundamental Free Speech Rights of Americans (as lately illustrated by the Brazilian Supreme Court, which has issued hundreds of SECRET and UNLAWFUL Censorship Orders to U.S. Social Media platforms, threatening them with Millions of Dollars in Fines and Eviction from the Brazilian Social Media market)."As part of his attack, Trump also directed his trade representative, Jamieson Greer, to begin investigating Brazil's digital trade policies, which could result in further tariffs.This week's threats essentially seek to replace steep tariffs the president announced in April, when he singled out roughly 60 countries that sell more goods to the United States than they buy from it. He said that those trade imbalances were evidence that foreign countries had long mistreated the United States, an assertion economists have criticized.The president had originally set July 8 as the last day for countries to sign trade deals with the United States to avoid those tariffs. At the urging of some of his advisers, on Monday he pushed the deadline back to Aug. 1.Many countries are racing to try to sign trade deals, including major trading partners like the European Union and India. In April, Peter Navarro, the president's top trade adviser, promised to sign 90 trade deals in 90 days. But it remains impractical for the United States to negotiate simultaneously with all of the countries the president has threatened with tariffs, something he acknowledged at the White House on Tuesday."We can't meet with 200 countries," he said.Though some investors have doubted whether Trump would follow through with his threats, the president insists that the Aug. 1 deadline will not be delayed further. If that is the case, stiff tariffs will go into effect on imports from dozens of additional countries.In a meeting Wednesday with a group of African leaders at the White House, Trump said that tariffs would be "a great thing for our country," and that Brazil would also be receiving a tariff letter soon."We've taken in hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs, hundreds of billions, and we haven't even started yet," he said. He added that the United States "really haven't had too many complaints because I'm keeping them at a very low number. Very conservative."Trump's letters repeatedly mentioned the bilateral trade deficits that the United States runs with other countries, calling them "unsustainable" and "a major threat" to the nation's economic security.Some economists believe that the overall U.S. trade deficit with the world is problematic, because it means that fewer factories in the U.S. employ Americans. But many economists have criticized the president's focus on the trade deficits with individual countries as a measure for U.S. trading relationships.Economists argue that bilateral deficits with various countries occur for all kinds of reasons. The most important is simply that foreign countries may specialize in producing certain products that Americans prefer to buy -- cars, gold, chocolate -- which is not something a foreign government can or would want to control.It also seems unlikely that the United States could eliminate these trade deficits by encouraging foreign countries to buy American products. While such sales could help to partly balance trade and benefit U.S. exporters, there's little reason to think other countries would buy the same amount of products that the United States, often the wealthier country, demands from the rest of the world.For example, the president has said that a trade deal between the United States and Vietnam would open Vietnamese markets and lead to sales of American vehicles. "It is my opinion that the SUV or, as it is sometimes referred to, Large Engine Vehicle, which does so well in the United States, will be a wonderful addition to the various product lines within Vietnam," Trump wrote on Truth Social last week.But analysts have pointed out that Vietnamese streets are much tinier than American ones, and the per capita annual income in Vietnam is only $4,000, about a tenth of the cost of a midsize SUV.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
Vietnam Urges US Business Group to Help in Tariff Talks: Media
Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh called on a US business group to continue supporting his country's attempt to secure a final tariff agreement with the Trump administration after the two countries basically reached a consensus on the deal's framework, local media reported. Chinh made the request during a Friday meeting in Hanoi with the U.S.-Asean Business Council, The Investor website reported, citing the Vietnamese government's news portal. The group represents companies such as Apple Inc., Boeing Co. and Inc., according to its website. Leaders of the Southeast Asian nation were caught off guard by President Donald Trump's announcement last week that they had agreed to a 20% tariff, Bloomberg News reported. Vietnam seeks to lower the rate, people familiar with the matter said. Read More Vietnam Surprised by Trump Tariff Decision, Seeks Lower Rate Vietnam, which last year had the world's third-biggest trade surplus with the US, was the second country after the UK with which Trump announced a trade agreement. The US president has been issuing tariff letters to dozens of trading partners since then, slapping on duties as high as 50% ahead of an Aug. 1 deadline. Chinh said the two countries had basically reached a consensus on the deal's framework, but he called on the US business group to help Vietnam obtain a reasonable and detailed tariff agreement for individual products and for some groups of goods, The Investor reported. The prime minister urged council representatives to oppose the use of trade defense measures against Vietnamese exports and actions that would undermine bilateral ties between the two countries, according to the report. He also asked companies to push the US to recognize Vietnam as a market economy. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
JPMorgan Tells Fintechs to Pay Up for Customer Data Access
(Bloomberg) -- JPMorgan Chase & Co. has told financial-technology companies that it will start charging fees amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars for access to their customers' bank account information – a move that threatens to upend the industry's business models. The largest US bank has sent pricing sheets to data aggregators — which connect banks and fintechs — outlining the new charges, according to people familiar with the matter. The fees vary depending on how companies use the information, with higher levies tied to payments-focused companies, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private information. A representative for JPMorgan said the bank has invested significant resources in creating a valuable and secure system that protects consumer data. 'We've had productive conversations and are working with the entire ecosystem to ensure we're all making the necessary investments in the infrastructure that keeps our customers safe,' the spokesperson said in a statement. The fees — expected to take effect later this year depending on the fate of a Biden-era regulation — aren't final and could be negotiated. The charges would drastically reshape the business for fintech firms, which fundamentally rely on their access to customers' bank accounts. Payment platforms like PayPal Holdings Inc.'s Venmo, cryptocurrency wallets such as Coinbase Global Inc. and retail-trading brokerages like Robinhood Markets Inc. all use this data so customers can send, receive and trade money. Typically, the firms have been able to get it for free. Many fintechs access data using aggregators such as Plaid Inc. and MX, which provide the plumbing between fintechs and banks. The fees — which vary based on the use cases currently under discussion — could be passed from the aggregators to the fintechs and, ultimately, consumers. The aggregator firms have been in talks with JPMorgan about the charges, and those are constructive and ongoing, another person familiar with the matter said. There have been some concerns about the number of times aggregators request customer data, the person said. Shares of fintech firms and payments companies including Block Inc. and Affirm Holdings Inc. fell Friday on the news, with PayPal dropping as much as 6.5%. JPMorgan's move comes as the fate of a controversial data-sharing rule hangs in the balance. The open-banking measure, finalized in October by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, enables consumers to demand, download and transfer their highly-coveted data. It also requires banks to share that data with another lender or financial services provider for free. Proponents argue the rule enables customers to access a wider pool of financial services, fosters greater competition and boosts data security. But the banking industry, which immediately sued to block the measure, said the arrangements could stoke fraud and expose them to greater liability. Under Donald Trump, a much-stripped back CFPB has asked a federal judge to vacate the open-banking rule, leaving its future in question. That judge has authorized the Financial Technology Association, a trade group with members affected by the fees, to defend the rule. The issue has become contentious at times. PNC Financial Services Group Inc. sued Plaid in 2020 alleging it copied the look of PNC's login screen, misleading the bank's customers into providing Plaid with their login credentials. The firms resolved the legal battle with a customer-data sharing deal last year. JPMorgan Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon said in April that customers should know exactly what data is shared and how it is used. Third parties should pay for banking system access and be prevented from using the data beyond what was authorized, he said. His bank has no problem with data sharing, provided it's properly done, he wrote in his annual letter to shareholders. 'Third parties want full access to banks' customer data so they can exploit it for their own purposes and profits,' he said. 'Banks provide fantastic services, and it's time to defend ourselves – in the public realm or in court if need be.' Steve Boms, executive director of the Financial Data and Technology Association of North America, said JPMorgan's move exploits regulatory uncertainty 'to levy an arbitrary and punitive tax on competitive offerings.' He called it a 'blatant effort to curtail innovation and undermine a stronger American financial system.' JPMorgan's proposed fees in some cases would eclipse the revenue certain companies generate on a single transaction by as much as 1000%, one of the people familiar said. Lower-income customers may also be harmed by restricted access to payments and budgeting apps through fees, said David Silberman, a senior advisor to the Financial Health Network and a former top CFPB official. 'Consumers are getting a lot of value today by permissioning access to their financial data by trusted third parties,' Silberman said. (Updates with additional background, comments, throughout.) More stories like this are available on


NDTV
18 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Just Release Epstein Files": Elon Musk Doubles Down After Trump Post
Washington: Billionaire Elon Musk asked his former ally and US President, Donald Trump, to just release the case files related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, as promised. The comments came after Trump urged his supporters to stop attacking his team members over files related to the late disgraced financier. "Seriously. He said 'Epstein' half a dozen times while telling everyone to stop talking about Epstein. Just release the files as promised," Musk said in a reply to a post on X. Seriously. He said 'Epstein' half a dozen times while telling everyone to stop talking about Epstein. Just release the files as promised. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 13, 2025 The Trump administration has been facing backlash-- even from supporters-- after a memo released by the Justice Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) this week said Epstein never had a client list, nor was there any evidence that he may have blackmailed prominent people. The report also concluded that Epstein died by suicide in his jail cell. Earlier on Saturday, Trump defended his Attorney General Pam Bondi in a post on Truth Social, while also accusing members of the Biden administration and others of creating the files. "We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein," Trump wrote in a lengthy post on his Truth social. Conspiracy theorists, including several of Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) supporters, believe in the existence of so-called "Epstein Files" that include a list of clients the disgraced financier used to blackmail well-known individuals. The Trump administration's report drew disbelief from Trump's far-right supporters, who criticised Trump administration members, including Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, who had earlier supported and propagated the conspiracy theories related to "Epstein filed". During his presidential election campaign in 2024, Donald Trump had pledged to make the case files related to Jeffrey Epstein public. The sex offender had died in prison in 2019, while he was awaiting prosecution on child sex-trafficking and conspiracy charges. While the Biden administration's findings at the time said that Epstein died by suicide, the Republicans have long claimed he was murdered.