India's recent market rally will need support from a stronger macroeconomic backdrop: Ajay Rajadhyaksha, Barclays
India's recent equity rally will need support from a stronger macroeconomic backdrop, said Ajay Rajadhyaksha, global chairman of research at Barclays. In an interview with Himadri Buch, New York-based Rajadhyaksha spoke about the US-China tariff conflict, US treasury, China and Gold, among other topics. Edited excerpts:
ADVERTISEMENT How do you see the recent US-China tariff truce playing out? Is the worst over on the tariff front?By far, yes. While we are still going to end up with sizable tariffs on imports this year compared to the start of the year, it is important to look at where we were just five weeks ago. At that point, with tariffs at 145% on one side and 125% on the other, we were essentially facing a virtual embargo on trade between the two largest economies in the world. Had that continued for another 3-4 months, the consequences would have been severe. Even in the US, many jobs depend on products coming from China. Take the iPhone, for instance. A base iPhone sells for around $1,100. Of that, about $450 is the cost of manufacturing it in China. But the other $450 goes into research, design, development, marketing and advertising costs that are all tied to jobs in the US. So, when the supply chain is disrupted, the spillover effect is significant, especially for smaller businesses. What's important now is we are no longer staring at a wave of small business bankruptcies or facing empty shelves in US retail stores. If we weren't willing to go through that in May and June, there is no chance we were going to escalate further in mid-July, especially right before the holiday shopping season. So, most of the worst is behind us there is no question about it.
Indian stocks had rallied as they were perceived to be less affected by tariffs. Now that the tariff tensions have eased, what does it mean for India?
That may start to change now. For Indian equities to mount a new rally from here, it will depend on whether the macro improves. The macroeconomic environment in India over the last 6-9 months has not been terrible, but it is been more mediocre than it was 18 months ago. Back then, it seemed easy to argue that the country could grow at 8% for 20 straight years. That is no longer the case. As the world starts looking again at other Asian equity markets or even Europe, it starts to take away little bit from India.
When you talk to global asset allocators, what do they say about India? From a global asset allocator's standpoint, India gets put in the same basket as the rest of them. So, if an investor sitting in London or New York has $100, 60-70% is going to be in the US, and the remaining 30% has to be allocated in Europe, Latin America or Asia. Indian bond market tends to be harder to invest in for the average bond investor sitting in the US.
ADVERTISEMENT Having said that, the perception of Indian equities is pretty positive. This is a market that has historically been rewarding to customers for the last several years, which is not true in the case of the Chinese equity market. In terms of size, Asia is about 40% of the world's economies. But the financial markets are not developed enough. Capital controls still exist. Like, I cannot just put as much money as I want and take it out when I want. Given how well Indian large companies have done over the last 20 years, in relative terms, the financial markets still have a lot of catch-up to do. People sitting in Asia perhaps don't appreciate how little focus there is on an individual Asian market and that includes the Indian market for investors who sit in London and New York.
ADVERTISEMENT
What are the key risks that markets are not pricing in adequately? The one asset class that still behaving in a concerning fashion is the 30-year long bond, which remains close to 5%. Even though a recession has been avoided, it's almost certain that 2025 will be slower than 2024. If longer interest rates start to move to 5.5%, and the 10-year goes to 5%, it's because the US is just not willing to do what is required to get our debt in order. This may sound like a strong statement, but the US as a government is genuinely spending money like a drunken sailor on shore. We did it last year, the year before, are doing it now, plan to do it next year, and the risk is that, eventually, the bond market will say enough.
ADVERTISEMENT What are your top picks at the moment?
I would probably pick the big six in the US — the exception being, Tesla, which has now fallen by the wayside a little bit in investors' minds. They no longer talk about the big seven. Despite all this noise about trade, the single biggest economic force over the next 2-4 years is going to be AI and the speed with which that ripples through economies and the US probably still is in lead position. But at this point, the Chinese tech sector looks very attractive given the difference in valuations. They are making strides on AI and pushing AI almost as a government through the economy to the extent they can. They are making strides on robotics and infusing with AI. That is not reflected at all in valuation. Away from that, the dollar asset has near-term upside. I would not, even now, be a buyer of longer US bonds and worried about longer-plus interest rates.
Is China a buy as of now?
Yes, and the reason is partly because of valuations. Indian ETFs trade at a 20–21–22 multiple, while Chinese ETFs trade at a 9–10–11 multiple. But the other part of the reason is that I am genuinely excited about how quickly they are making strides across various technology fronts. Twenty five years ago, the cream of the US corporate sector included companies no one talks about now like General Electric, Intel, IBM. They still exist, but all of the Big Six tech names came up in just the last 20–25 years. There is an equivalent happening right now working beneath the surface, especially because we have less visibility into China's innovation hubs like Chengdu, Guangzhou, or Hangzhou. So yes, China is fine.
ADVERTISEMENT
What is your view on safe-haven gold now that markets have rebounded?
Gold is going to struggle. We may see a short pull-back, but it has seen a massive rally in the last two and a half years, and it very much looks like it's topping out. In the near term or in the next few months, I suspect gold will struggle to go up.
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
21 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Non-Mumbai builders tap into financial capital via redevelopment projects
Real estate developers based outside of Mumbai such as Delhi-based DLF, Bengaluru-based Prestige Estates, Puravankara, Pune-based Blackstone-backed Kolte-Patil Developers, Vascon Engineers, and Hyderabad-based Ramky Estates, are foraying into India's largest real estate market through redevelopment projects. While Mumbai has always been India's prime real estate market, policy-level incentives for redevelopments, less capital intensive nature of redevelopment business amid a lack of open land parcels, is attracting developers that are using asset-light strategies to get better realisations from high property rates. 'For developers based outside the MMR, redevelopment offers an effective route to enter the Mumbai market, given the limited availability of greenfield land. Additional attractive factors include higher FSI allowances in slum rehabilitation and society redevelopment projects, which translate to better returns on investment,' said Siddharth Vasudevan, MD, Vascon Engineers. Mumbai's redevelopment market is big enough to accomodate more players like Bengaluru-based Sobha and Ahmedabad-based Arvind Smartspaces are evaluating opportunities. According to Credai-MCHI, over 25,000 buildings across MMR are eligible for redevelopment, with the total estimated project value exceeding Rs 30,000 crore. As per Anarock, as of 2024, average property prices in MMR stood at Rs 16,600 per sq ft, while those in Bengaluru and Hyderabad stood at Rs 8,380 per sq ft and Rs 7,300 per sq ft, respectively. The prices in NCR stood at Rs 7,550 per sq ft. Vijay Agrawal, MD- investment banking, Equirus said that the average margins in real estate are around 25-30 per cent but the Mumbai market is known for higher realisation per square foot, between Rs 25,000 and Rs 1 lakh. 'In other cities, general realisation is between Rs 5,000-12,000, except in a few micro markets. Higher realisations help developers disclose higher revenue with a smaller sales area. This helps in improving their blended per sq ft realisations.' In Mumbai, a developer can book revenue of Rs 500 crore for 1 lakh sq ft of a project with a sale price of Rs 50,000 per sq ft for one project. However, in other markets, a developer will need to sell 5 lakh sq ft of area at Rs 10,000 per sq ft to achieve the same revenue, Agrawal explained. 'Listed companies can meet their topline growth targets by executing projects in this market," Sanjay Daga, CEO and MD, Anex Advisory, said. But the bright opportunity has its challenges. Redevelopment for non-Mumbai developers involves multiple stakeholders, so having a reliable team in a new market in a must. Dealing with local tenants besides higher cost of approvals, construction in smaller area of sites compared to the other cities, are other issues to name a few. 'Developers fail to underwrite the working capital requirement in Mumbai projects. A typical project in other cities is between 5 to 15 acres, while Mumbai's typical project is 0.5 to 3 acres. Construction costs in Mumbai are very steep,' said an industry expert who didn't wish to be named. To overcome these hindrances, developers are forging joint ventures with local developers who already have the land or permissions, and industry experts who hold the ability to deal with the local administration and tenants more effectively. This helps in securing faster approvals and faster project launches. DLF, for its first Mumbai project, has tied up with Trident Realty, a local real estate firm. Prestige, for its mega redevelopment project in Bandra, has joined hands with Mumbai-based Valor Estate and RC Group. Despite strong balance sheets and deep expertise, building trust among buyers will take time. 'Local developers, due to their deep-rooted presence and familiarity with these intricacies, often have an edge,' Shrinivas Rao, CEO, Vestian.


Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Which country in Southeast Asia is the most popular among Indian travellers?
Known for its pristine beaches, affordable stays and vibrant nightlife, this country received the highest number of Indian tourists among Southeast Asian countries in 2024. Can you guess which one? Also read: 10 million tourists visited Asia's 'most-loved country' in Q1; more than Thailand, Indonesia India is one of Thailand's most significant tourism markets, the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) said in a press release in December 2024 to celebrate the 2 million-mark of Indian tourists in Thailand. In 2023, Indian tourists generated 61.9 billion Baht in revenue for Thailand. More than 35.5 million foreign tourists visited Thailand in 2024. Of these, 2.1 million were Indians. Indian travellers arrive in Thailand around the year. November to February is typically considered the high tourist season, overlapping with winter vacation for schoolchildren in India. Thailand is a popular tourist destination with both bachelors and families. There are plenty of factors that contribute to Thailand's popularity as India's favourite tourist destination, including accessibility, affordability and distance. In its press release, the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) said: 'Thailand's strong air connectivity with India has been instrumental in fostering this growth. As of June 2024, 342 weekly flights between the two nations offered 2.9 million seats annually, representing a 92.2% rebound from pre-pandemic levels. Recent additions, including Indigo's Hyderabad-Bangkok route, THAI's Kochi-Bangkok flights, and Thai AirAsia's Vishakhapatnam-Bangkok service, have further enhanced accessibility.' Friendly visa policies are another major factor contributing the footfall. Thailand has visa-free entry for Indians 'until further notice'. Popular tourist destinations in Thailand include Bangkok, Phuket, Chon Buri, Krabi, Chiang Mai and Phang-nga. Places like Phuket and Krabi are known for their stunning beaches and water activities. In Bangkok, tourists can enjoy shopping, visit famous temples like Wat Phra Kaew and Wat Arun, or drop into one of the city's famous rooftop bars. Chiang Mai, located in northern Thailand, is famous for its historic temples, night markets, and mountain landscapes. It also serves as a base for visiting elephant sanctuaries.


Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
India's National Manufacturing Mission is just the catalyst this sector needs
India's National Manufacturing Mission (NMM), announced in the Union budget this year, was much awaited. While the sector has grown over the years in size, its contribution to our economy has not gained share. The need to increase manufacturing as a proportion of GDP has always been emphasized and this mission-mode approach announced by the government should make a difference. An ambitious, empowered and inclusive framework is expected to be the hallmark for this mission. It must target a share of at least 12% in global manufacturing output for India, as against the current 3%. Let me share a few thoughts on a framework that could help propel India as a manufacturer. Also Read: Time to re-imagine Indian manufacturing from the ground up The first aspect is the structure of the mission, which could determine the success or failure of the initiative. The NMM can consider a three-tier structure. At the initial level, the government could consider having inter-ministerial task-forces. These should focus on the five key areas spelt out by the finance minister in her budget speech for 2025-26: namely, the ease of doing business; a future-ready workforce; micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs); technology adoption; and quality. These five task-forces could be under the concerned ministries with various stakeholders as members. They should recommend policies, propose roadmaps and drive implementation. The NMM could be headed by a senior industry leader. This can be the second tier. Its main members could be secretaries of key government departments related to manufacturing; they can provide policy and strategic direction. In addition, CEOs from industry associations could be members, while state chief secretaries can be special invitees. This high-level private-public partnership model will be crucial for driving this mission. At the pinnacle of this structure could be a high-level committee headed by the Prime Minister. Its members could be the NMM chairperson, finance minister, commerce and industry minister, cabinet secretary and a representative of the Niti Aayog. This three-tier structure, in our view, would be inclusive and empowered to drive reforms and take the steps required to achieve our goals. Also Read: Think ahead: India's electronics manufacturing must go up the value curve The second aspect is whether the NMM should have a sectoral focus or address sector-agnostic issues. In this, the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Ficci) has suggested that its dominant focus should be on sector-agnostic areas, like regulatory reforms, cost competitiveness, the overall investment climate, skilling, quality, productivity and the like. The mission should also make strategic interventions in frontier-technology fields—such as electronics, batteries, defence, space, renewables, AI, quantum computing, etc—by boosting domestic design capability and value addition. Last year, the government announced an allocation of ₹1 trillion to encourage research and development (R&D) in sunrise domains by the private sector. We need to leverage this fund now to take a lead in the frontier technologies. The NMM's priorities are the third aspect. A sine qua non list would include macro-level policies, be it logistics, monetary, fiscal, tariffs or trade. These should be fully aligned with the mission's needs. It would also cover technology, which needs to be the key driver of manufacturing. A focus on value addition by way of design, key components and so on must also feature as a priority. So also export competitiveness, global value chain integration and import substitution in critical areas of dependency. As its fourth aspect, the mission will lay emphasis on MSMEs, which have been the main driver of manufacturing growth in several countries. Also Read: Rahul Jacob: Manufacturing is crying out for a reality check Ficci has suggested six areas of intervention: Training for MSME promoters to grow into mid-sized or large firms in the future; an impetus to family-owned businesses; the development of urban MSME zones, non-polluting MSME malls or urban industrial clusters within city limits to reduce logistical costs and enhance market access for small enterprises; support for environment, social and governance capacity among MSMEs; a catalyst for digital adoption across MSMEs to drive efficiency and growth; and light-touch regulations for three years for MSMEs in strategic areas to help them take off. For India to become a global manufacturing powerhouse, quality cannot be ignored. The mission should collaborate with industry consortiums to set Indian standards and India should take an active part in such processes at international standard-setting bodies. We need to promote and push Indian standards alongside our exports. Apart from the NMM, a high-level committee for regulatory reforms was also announced by the government. Ficci has suggested some broad terms of reference for its institutional structure, urging the adoption of a regulatory impact assessment framework to ensure transparent and consistent policy implementation across regulators. Overall, the two structures should lead to seamless communication and interaction between all stakeholders at every level—from central and state functionaries to experts and leaders of academia and industry—with everyone focused on one mission: manufacturing. The author is president, Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry.