Lawmaker criticizes $500 student board scholarships amid lowered K‑12 standards
State Rep. Paul Jacobs, R-Pomona, who serves on the higher education appropriations committee, says recently signed Senate Bill 1475 is another unnecessary expense for taxpayers at a time when the state faces far greater challenges.
"We have to cut expenses instead of doling out expenses that are really completely unnecessary in my estimation," said Jacobs. "I just don't see a state that has the problems that this state has with finances extending out for more expenses."
Jacobs questioned the integrity of students serving on these boards if compensated, suggesting it could undermine their motivations.
"The kids that are doing this do it because they're encouraged to do it. It's going to go really great on their college applications that they're self-starters. As soon as you pay them, are they really self-starters?" He further argued that such compensation might negatively impact their college applications, stating, "I think it could actually backfire and go against them when they're trying to get into a really good college."
Koehler, in a news release, emphasized that the scholarship rewards the time and effort students dedicate to serving on higher education boards and encourages continued engagement in improving Illinois' colleges and universities.
'These students do incredibly valuable work for Illinois,' Koehler said. 'Providing this modest financial support demonstrates that our state values their dedication and appreciates their contributions.'
The bill becoming law comes as the Illinois State Board of Education recently voted to lower proficiency benchmarks for K‑12 students.
Jacobs warned that paying students to sit on boards while struggling students fail to meet basic reading and math standards sends the wrong message about priorities in Illinois education.
"Let's focus on the basics, reading, writing, and math, rather than all these extracurricular activities. It's great that some students serve on these boards, but I don't think they should be paid. We can't afford it, and frankly, if I were a college admissions officer, seeing that they were paid for this might raise questions."
Jacobs was asked about the value of students serving on the Illinois Board of Higher Education and the Illinois Community College Board.
'I think that's always good to learn something about that. I don't know if it's really a tremendous experience for them or not. I don't think I've ever met one of the kids that is doing this,' said Jacobs. 'We should focus more on ensuring students from kindergarten through 12th grade can read, write, and do math."
Currently, two students serve on the 16-member Illinois Board of Higher Education (IBHE). These student members are selected by the Student Advisory Committee of the IBHE. The 11-member Illinois Community College Board has one student member.
Since SB1475 lacks explicit appropriation language, the funding likely could come from general state appropriations, to be allocated in a future budget by the Illinois General Assembly, probably administered through relevant agencies like the Board of Higher Education or Community College Board, or potentially through the Illinois Student Assistance Commission (ISAC).
Jacobs confirmed that ultimately it'd be taxpayers paying for the $500-per-semester scholarships.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
Immigrants seeking lawful work and citizenship are now subject to 'anti-Americanism' screening
Immigrants seeking a legal pathway to live and work in the United States will now be subject to screening for 'anti-Americanism',' authorities said Tuesday, raising concerns among critics that it gives officers too much leeway in rejecting foreigners based on a subjective judgment. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said officers will now consider whether an applicant for benefits, such as a green card, 'endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused" anti-American, terrorist or antisemitic views. 'America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies,' Matthew Tragesser, USCIS spokesman, said in a statement. 'Immigration benefits—including to live and work in the United States—remain a privilege, not a right.' It isn't specified what constitutes anti-Americanism and it isn't clear how and when the directive would be applied. 'The message is that the U.S. and immigration agencies are going to be less tolerant of anti-Americanism or antisemitism when making immigration decisions," Elizabeth Jacobs, director of regulatory affairs and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates for immigration restrictions, said on Tuesday. Jacobs said the government is being more explicit in the kind of behaviors and practices officers should consider, but emphasized that discretion is still in place. "The agency cannot tell officers that they have to deny — just to consider it as a negative discretion,' she said. Critics worry the policy update will allow for more subjective views of what is considered anti-American and allow an officer's personal bias to cloud his or her judgment. 'For me, the really big story is they are opening the door for stereotypes and prejudice and implicit bias to take the wheel in these decisions. That's really worrisome," said Jane Lilly Lopez, associate professor of sociology at Brigham Young University. The policy changes follow others recently implemented since the start of the Trump administration including social media vetting and the most recent addition of assessing applicants seeking naturalization for 'good moral character'. That will not only consider 'not simply the absence of misconduct' but also factor the applicant's positive attributes and contributions. 'It means you are going to just do a whole lot more work to provide evidence that you meet our standards,' Lopez said. Experts disagree on the constitutionality of the policy involving people who are not U.S. citizens and their freedom of speech. Jacobs, of the Center for Immigration Studies, said First Amendment rights do not extend to people outside the U.S. or who are not U.S. citizens. Ruby Robinson, senior managing attorney with the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center, believes the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution protects all people in the United States, regardless of their immigration status, against government encroachment. 'A lot of this administration's activities infringe on constitutional rights and do need to be resolved, ultimately, in courts,' Robinson added. Attorneys are advising clients to adjust their expectations. 'People need to understand that we have a different system today and a lot more things that apply to U.S. citizens are not going to apply to somebody who's trying to enter the United States," said Jaime Diez, an immigration attorney based in Brownsville, Texas. Jonathan Grode, managing partner of Green and Spiegel immigration law firm, said the policy update was not unexpected considering how the Trump administration approaches immigration. 'This is what was elected. They're allowed to interpret the rules the way they want,' Grode said. 'The policy always to them is to shrink the strike zone. The law is still the same.'
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Immigrants seeking lawful work and citizenship are now subject to 'anti-Americanism' screening
Immigrants seeking a legal pathway to live and work in the United States will now be subject to screening for 'anti-Americanism',' authorities said Tuesday, raising concerns among critics that it gives officers too much leeway in rejecting foreigners based on a subjective judgment. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said officers will now consider whether an applicant for benefits, such as a green card, 'endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused" anti-American, terrorist or antisemitic views. 'America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies,' Matthew Tragesser, USCIS spokesman, said in a statement. 'Immigration benefits—including to live and work in the United States—remain a privilege, not a right.' It isn't specified what constitutes anti-Americanism and it isn't clear how and when the directive would be applied. 'The message is that the U.S. and immigration agencies are going to be less tolerant of anti-Americanism or antisemitism when making immigration decisions," Elizabeth Jacobs, director of regulatory affairs and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates for immigration restrictions, said on Tuesday. Jacobs said the government is being more explicit in the kind of behaviors and practices officers should consider, but emphasized that discretion is still in place. "The agency cannot tell officers that they have to deny — just to consider it as a negative discretion,' she said. Critics worry the policy update will allow for more subjective views of what is considered anti-American and allow an officer's personal bias to cloud his or her judgment. 'For me, the really big story is they are opening the door for stereotypes and prejudice and implicit bias to take the wheel in these decisions. That's really worrisome," said Jane Lilly Lopez, associate professor of sociology at Brigham Young University. The policy changes follow others recently implemented since the start of the Trump administration including social media vetting and the most recent addition of assessing applicants seeking naturalization for 'good moral character'. That will not only consider 'not simply the absence of misconduct' but also factor the applicant's positive attributes and contributions. 'It means you are going to just do a whole lot more work to provide evidence that you meet our standards,' Lopez said. Experts disagree on the constitutionality of the policy involving people who are not U.S. citizens and their freedom of speech. Jacobs, of the Center for Immigration Studies, said First Amendment rights do not extend to people outside the U.S. or who are not U.S. citizens. Ruby Robinson, senior managing attorney with the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center, believes the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution protects all people in the United States, regardless of their immigration status, against government encroachment. 'A lot of this administration's activities infringe on constitutional rights and do need to be resolved, ultimately, in courts,' Robinson added. Attorneys are advising clients to adjust their expectations. 'People need to understand that we have a different system today and a lot more things that apply to U.S. citizens are not going to apply to somebody who's trying to enter the United States," said Jaime Diez, an immigration attorney based in Brownsville, Texas. Jonathan Grode, managing partner of Green and Spiegel immigration law firm, said the policy update was not unexpected considering how the Trump administration approaches immigration. 'This is what was elected. They're allowed to interpret the rules the way they want,' Grode said. 'The policy always to them is to shrink the strike zone. The law is still the same.'
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lawmaker criticizes $500 student board scholarships amid lowered K‑12 standards
(The Center Square) – Illinois student leaders serving on state higher education boards will now receive $500-per-semester scholarships under a recently signed law championed by Sen. Dave Koehler, D-Peoria. State Rep. Paul Jacobs, R-Pomona, who serves on the higher education appropriations committee, says recently signed Senate Bill 1475 is another unnecessary expense for taxpayers at a time when the state faces far greater challenges. "We have to cut expenses instead of doling out expenses that are really completely unnecessary in my estimation," said Jacobs. "I just don't see a state that has the problems that this state has with finances extending out for more expenses." Jacobs questioned the integrity of students serving on these boards if compensated, suggesting it could undermine their motivations. "The kids that are doing this do it because they're encouraged to do it. It's going to go really great on their college applications that they're self-starters. As soon as you pay them, are they really self-starters?" He further argued that such compensation might negatively impact their college applications, stating, "I think it could actually backfire and go against them when they're trying to get into a really good college." Koehler, in a news release, emphasized that the scholarship rewards the time and effort students dedicate to serving on higher education boards and encourages continued engagement in improving Illinois' colleges and universities. 'These students do incredibly valuable work for Illinois,' Koehler said. 'Providing this modest financial support demonstrates that our state values their dedication and appreciates their contributions.' The bill becoming law comes as the Illinois State Board of Education recently voted to lower proficiency benchmarks for K‑12 students. Jacobs warned that paying students to sit on boards while struggling students fail to meet basic reading and math standards sends the wrong message about priorities in Illinois education. "Let's focus on the basics, reading, writing, and math, rather than all these extracurricular activities. It's great that some students serve on these boards, but I don't think they should be paid. We can't afford it, and frankly, if I were a college admissions officer, seeing that they were paid for this might raise questions." Jacobs was asked about the value of students serving on the Illinois Board of Higher Education and the Illinois Community College Board. 'I think that's always good to learn something about that. I don't know if it's really a tremendous experience for them or not. I don't think I've ever met one of the kids that is doing this,' said Jacobs. 'We should focus more on ensuring students from kindergarten through 12th grade can read, write, and do math." Currently, two students serve on the 16-member Illinois Board of Higher Education (IBHE). These student members are selected by the Student Advisory Committee of the IBHE. The 11-member Illinois Community College Board has one student member. Since SB1475 lacks explicit appropriation language, the funding likely could come from general state appropriations, to be allocated in a future budget by the Illinois General Assembly, probably administered through relevant agencies like the Board of Higher Education or Community College Board, or potentially through the Illinois Student Assistance Commission (ISAC). Jacobs confirmed that ultimately it'd be taxpayers paying for the $500-per-semester scholarships. Solve the daily Crossword
