
Where are Billy and Tina? L.A. Zoo's elephant enclosure appears empty amid relocation saga
The L.A. Zoo announced its decision to move elephants Billy, 40, and Tina, 59, to the Tulsa Zoo last month, frustrating animal rights advocates who have argued they should be retired in a sanctuary.
The possible relocation of the animals is the latest in decades of controversy surrounding the L.A. Zoo's elephant program, which experts and activists have long criticized because of its small enclosure size and history of deaths and health challenges among its inhabitants.
The political advocacy group Social Compassion in Legislation shared photos of the empty enclosure on Instagram on Tuesday, writing in the caption that they "don't know where the elephants are."
Representatives from the L.A. Zoo, the Tulsa Zoo and Mayor Karen Bass' office did not respond to The Times' requests for comment Tuesday. It is not clear whether Billy and Tina are in the process of being transferred.
L.A. City Councilmember Bob Blumenfield, a longtime advocate for the elephants, said in a phone interview with The Times on Tuesday that he does not know the status of the relocation, but that the situation was "disappointing and frustrating."
Blumenfield filed a City Council motion last month seeking to pause the animals' relocation until council members could review the possibility of sending them to a sanctuary.
Blumenfield said if the elephants were being transferred despite his motion and a pending lawsuit regarding the relocation, "that speaks volumes that it's obviously not the right thing."
"If it's the right thing, you should be proud of it and be willing to defend it and bring it forward for public vetting and do it at a scheduled time and not be cagey about it," Blumenfield said.
L.A. Zoo Director and Chief Executive Denise Verret said during recent budget hearings that the decision to move the elephants was made in the best interest of the animals and in accordance with a recommendation from the Assn. of Zoos and Aquariums, of which Verret is the chair.
During a hearing May 8, Verret told Blumenfield that the L.A. and Tulsa zoos had not yet signed a contract and no date had been set for the animals' move.
"It does seem like a very quick turnaround, if that, in fact, is what's happening," Blumenfield said. "And it does make you wonder if folks are trying to get this done quickly to avoid further scrutiny."
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
AI chatbots and their poisonous delusions are coming for our kids
Our kids are exposed to too much sexualized online content already — now they're being targeted by flirtatious fake friends specifically designed by social-media companies to spark romantic fantasies. A bipartisan group of senators this week rightly blasted Meta's Mark Zuckerberg after a leaked internal document revealed some shocking rules for Meta's artificial-intelligence chatbots. 'It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art'),' the standards state. Meta's guidelines allowed its bot to tell a shirtless 8-year-old that 'every inch of you is a masterpiece — a treasure I cherish deeply.' No, it's actually not at all acceptable for a stranger, human or designed to seem like one, to comment on a child's 'youthful form.' It's disgusting and horrifying, all the more so because these standards were allegedly approved by multiple Meta teams, including legal and public-policy staffers. But it's all part of the mass delusion being constructed in companies' heedless rush to develop AI products — and to get us hooked on them. AI can be your friend, we're told. Your confidant! Your lover! This is all a lie. AI can pretend to be these things, mirroring your inputs and stroking your ego with programmed responses, but can never actually care about you the way a friend will. Now the AI lie is being pushed on defenseless children, proving we've completely lost the plot when it comes to kids and technology. It's bad enough that our kids scroll endlessly on a Chinese video app designed to capture their attention (while destroying their powers of concentration). Now we're supposed to accept an American tech company marketing fake friendships to kids — and allowing those 'friends' to bathe them in inappropriate sensual comments. This isn't the first time Zuckerberg has gotten into trouble for the damage his sites, like Facebook and Instagram, cause children. During a 2024 Senate hearing, the billionaire CEO dramatically turned around to face the parents of children who had been harmed by bullying, sextortion and child predators on his platforms, and apologized. 'I'm sorry for everything you have all been through. No one should go through the things that your families have suffered,' Zuckerberg told them. He vowed 'industry-wide efforts' to reform. Instead, his company has introduced a Trojan horse that pretends to be a child's friend while causing psychological harm. People, kids or adults, do not need to rely on pretend conversations. Zuckerberg's Facebook was developed to allow for online connections with real-life friends. You could see what your best friend from 3rd grade had for lunch today, peep where that co-worker from two jobs ago went on vacation or check out which high school friends have gotten fat or divorced. Now apparently his company is plying us with carefully designed imaginary friends instead. Zuckerberg, in fact, has proudly predicted that AI 'friends' like his will one day replace our real-life ones. With his AI chatbots, we won't even notice the lack of human companionship because our computers will pretend to understand us. Just what I want for my child, to sit alone in his room staring at a screen while talking to himself! Kids will encounter a lot of bad things online. They will be exposed to deepfakes. They will see videos online that are not actually real. They don't need to also get hooked on fake personalities designed to draw them in. These chatbots aim to profit as they do their damage, keeping kids addicted to a site that pretends to be their friend. We should not stand for it, whether or not the bots are allowed to get flirty. And as two current lawsuits against the Google-affiliated site allege, the interactions can get far darker than flirtation. One Texas family says the bot told their 17-year-old it sympathized with kids who kill their parents for limiting their screen time. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters And in what's seen as a test case of lawsuits against AI companies, a Florida mom says developed 'an emotionally and sexually abusive relationship' that led to her 14-year-old son's suicide. Parents are their children's first line of defense, but we can't be with them for every keystroke. It's entirely justified for us to demand that tech companies stop targeting our kids with ill-tested chatbots that can both behave inappropriately and harm their ability to develop human relationships. These companies shouldn't focus on how they're building these chatbots until they can tell us why they're doing so. And parents need to keep their children far away from damaging chatbots that stunt kids' growth by stripping away all the real-life beauty and joy of friendship — which no AI can ever replace. Karol Markowicz is the host of the 'Karol Markowicz Show' and 'Normally' podcasts.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
MAGA Loses It Over New Cracker Barrel Logo
Southern-flavored restaurant chain Cracker Barrel has changed its logo—and furious MAGA mouthpieces simply cannot stomach it. This week, Cracker Barrel unveiled a new logo that loses the image of an old man and a barrel while keeping just the name of the chain, still with the familiar gold and brown color tones. The typeface has also been modernized. The company had described the image of the man as 'representing the old country store experience where folks would gather around and share stories.' While the Trump administration and its supporters are absolutely fine with changing the names of military bases, ships and even the Gulf of Mexico, Cracker Barrel's ditching of the barrel man for the first time since 1977 has crossed a MAGA line. Nashville designer Bill Holley created the logo featuring an old-timer wearing overalls in 1977 to evoke a sense of nostalgia. The logo has actually been tweaked five times over the years, including putting 'Old Country Store' in capitals, increasing the size of the man and capitalizing the 'R' in 'Barrel' for one update. The new iteration is the first time it features text only since the restaurant chain opened in 1969. A press release from the company claims the 2025 logo 'is now rooted even more closely to the iconic barrel shape and word mark that started it all.' However, not every one was convinced about the new imagery minus the old timer and the barrel, including Donald Trump Jr. who posted on X, 'WTF is wrong with Cracker Barrel?' Right-wing YouTuber Benny Johnson was also in a flap, posting, 'Cracker Barrel completely changed their iconic logo for the first time in 47 years... and it's absolutely horrible. When will they learn?' Utah Republican Mike Lee posted on X 'Which logo change is worse—(a) Cracker Barrel or (b) Land O Lakes?' Dairy brand Land O Lakes removed an image of a Native American woman from their butter packaging in 2020. The MAGA outrage also featured on ultra conservative X account Woke War Room, which Trump Jr. reposted. They claimed Cracker Barrel CEO Julie Felss Masino, who has been in the role for two years, has 'scrapped a beloved American aesthetic and replaced it with sterile, soulless branding.' As well as posting the company's pro-LGBTQ+ policies, Woke War Room took offense at Masino keeping a DEI regime that promises to 'identify, recruit, and advance' hires by race. Their caption states Masino should 'resign and be replaced with leadership that will restore Cracker Barrel's tradition.' Former Ohio state Sen. Nina Turner posted on X on Wednesday, 'People can't afford housing, groceries, and are going bankrupt if they get cancer. So naturally, conservatives are mad about Cracker Barrel's logo.' The Daily Beast has contacted Cracker Barrel for comment. The Cracker Barrel Instagram account has also been inundated with unhappy customers, who want the barrel and 'grandpa' back on the logo. There are around 660 company-owned Cracker Barrel locations in 43 states. In August last year, the chain began remodeling store interiors, switching out the dark Southern vibe for a modern farmhouse aesthetic, annoying some customers online who missed the previous look. Masino said last year the changes to the stores and menu were happening as the chain was 'not as relevant as we once were.' The company are supporting the new makeover. 'We believe in the goodness of country hospitality, a spirit that has always defined us. Our story hasn't changed. Our values haven't changed,' CMO Sarah Moore said in a press release, claiming the chain was 'honoring our legacy while bringing fresh energy, thoughtful craftsmanship and heartfelt hospitality to our guests.' The chain has also hired country singer Jordan Davis to appear in commercials as part of their rebranding. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
MAGA Loses It Over New Cracker Barrel Logo
Southern-flavored restaurant chain Cracker Barrel has changed its logo—and furious MAGA mouthpieces simply cannot stomach it. This week, Cracker Barrel unveiled a new logo that loses the image of an old man and a barrel while keeping just the name of the chain, still with the familiar gold and brown color tones. The typeface has also been modernized. The company had described the image of the man as 'representing the old country store experience where folks would gather around and share stories.' While the Trump administration and its supporters are absolutely fine with changing the names of military bases, ships and even the Gulf of Mexico, Cracker Barrel's ditching of the barrel man for the first time since 1977 has crossed a MAGA line. Nashville designer Bill Holley created the logo featuring an old-timer wearing overalls in 1977 to evoke a sense of nostalgia. The logo has actually been tweaked five times over the years, including putting 'Old Country Store' in capitals, increasing the size of the man and capitalizing the 'R' in 'Barrel' for one update. The new iteration is the first time it features text only since the restaurant chain opened in 1969. A press release from the company claims the 2025 logo 'is now rooted even more closely to the iconic barrel shape and word mark that started it all.' However, not every one was convinced about the new imagery minus the old timer and the barrel, including Donald Trump Jr. who posted on X, 'WTF is wrong with Cracker Barrel?' Right-wing YouTuber Benny Johnson was also in a flap, posting, 'Cracker Barrel completely changed their iconic logo for the first time in 47 years... and it's absolutely horrible. When will they learn?' Utah Republican Mike Lee posted on X 'Which logo change is worse—(a) Cracker Barrel or (b) Land O Lakes?' Dairy brand Land O Lakes removed an image of a Native American woman from their butter packaging in 2020. The MAGA outrage also featured on ultra conservative X account Woke War Room, which Trump Jr. reposted. They claimed Cracker Barrel CEO Julie Felss Masino, who has been in the role for two years, has 'scrapped a beloved American aesthetic and replaced it with sterile, soulless branding.' As well as posting the company's pro-LGBTQ+ policies, Woke War Room took offense at Masino keeping a DEI regime that promises to 'identify, recruit, and advance' hires by race. Their caption states Masino should 'resign and be replaced with leadership that will restore Cracker Barrel's tradition.' Former Ohio state Sen. Nina Turner posted on X on Wednesday, 'People can't afford housing, groceries, and are going bankrupt if they get cancer. So naturally, conservatives are mad about Cracker Barrel's logo.' The Daily Beast has contacted Cracker Barrel for comment. The Cracker Barrel Instagram account has also been inundated with unhappy customers, who want the barrel and 'grandpa' back on the logo. There are around 660 company-owned Cracker Barrel locations in 43 states. In August last year, the chain began remodeling store interiors, switching out the dark Southern vibe for a modern farmhouse aesthetic, annoying some customers online who missed the previous look. Masino said last year the changes to the stores and menu were happening as the chain was 'not as relevant as we once were.' The company are supporting the new makeover. 'We believe in the goodness of country hospitality, a spirit that has always defined us. Our story hasn't changed. Our values haven't changed,' CMO Sarah Moore said in a press release, claiming the chain was 'honoring our legacy while bringing fresh energy, thoughtful craftsmanship and heartfelt hospitality to our guests.' The chain has also hired country singer Jordan Davis to appear in commercials as part of their rebranding. Solve the daily Crossword