‘In a state of shock': Palestinians respond to Trump's proposal to take over Gaza
It's not easy to catch Palestinians off guard, given the scenes from 15 months of Israeli bombardment, siege, starvation, and the world's inaction to what Amnesty International has called a "genocide".
But if anyone can throw things off kilter, it's US President Donald Trump, who on Tuesday said the US would expel Palestinians from Gaza, likely move in American troops, and then develop 'the Riviera of the Middle East' for tourists.
The stunning announcement was made alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who was given the privilege of being the first foreign leader to visit the White House in Trump's second term.
But the backlash to Trump's 'long-term ownership' of Gaza was swift.
Democratic Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, the only Palestinian in the chamber, said, 'Palestinians aren't going anywhere'.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
'This president can only spew this fanatical bullshit because of bipartisan support in Congress for funding genocide and ethnic cleansing,' Tlaib wrote on X. 'It's time for my two-state solution colleagues to speak up.'
Democratic Senator Chris Murphy called Trump's comments a mere distraction.
'The US isn't invading and occupying Gaza. Trump wants us to talk about this crazy idea all day to relieve the pressure on him that is building as the public figures out that a theft is occurring - the billionaires illegally taking over government to steal from us,' he wrote on X, referencing the domestic chaos unfolding as billionaire Elon Musk shuts down US agencies.
And Republican Senator Rand Paul, who has long identified as a Libertarian, said, 'The pursuit for peace should be that of the Israelis and the Palestinians.'
'I thought we voted for America First,' he wrote on X. 'We have no business contemplating yet another occupation to doom our treasure and spill our soldiers' blood.'
'A new Nakba'
Palestinians who have already left Gaza marvelled at what they saw as the callousness of Trump's remarks.
'I'm in a state of shock. I almost don't believe they can be rude as such,' Palestinian human rights lawyer Raji Sourani told Middle East Eye.
Sourani, 70, born and bred in Gaza, left through Egypt and then went to Europe one year ago after Israel destroyed his home. He remains the director of the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights in Gaza and is a party to South Africa's genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice.
'A first-class war criminal [like] Netanyahu standing in the White House, invited… and dealt with respectfully as though there is no [International Criminal Court] warrant against him, and praised as a hero and supported politically, financially, legally, and they decide publicly in a press conference in front of the whole world… to complete the genocide mission? To make a new Nakba?' Sourani asked.
'I mean, I just don't believe it.'
Instead of expelling Palestinians, Sourani suggested the Israelis be offered one-way tickets instead.
'Why the Israelis not be paid? I mean, in the US, there is a huge, vast land. They can settle them anywhere they like. We didn't do the Holocaust.'
Palestinians, he said, 'are the stones of the valley… no power on earth can kick us out'.
And while many living inside Gaza today have expressed similar sentiments, others say the notion that all Palestinians will simply tolerate what comes their way is 'dehumanising'.
'You know, there is a lot of mythologisation of the Palestinians, that we are superhumans who, despite any pain, wouldn't leave. That's not true, and that's dehumanising to an extent,' Khalil Sayegh, a Palestinian political analyst based in Washington, told MEE.
Sayegh is the founder of the Palestinian-Israeli shared vision platform, The Agora Initiative.
His father died of a heart attack in Gaza in 2023 while sheltering at the Church of the Holy Family, which came under attack by Israeli snipers.
Trump advisors push for Gulf states to cooperate on Gaza but find no takers Read More »
'When we are pushed and we have to choose between staying or our kids will die, I think many of us would choose rightfully to leave,' he said. 'Others who stay, despite them dying with their kids, we also have to respect them and see them as humans.'
If the Rafah border to Egypt reopens, Sayegh said, he estimates that up to half a million Palestinians would leave Gaza now if they were provided the means.
It would be, he confessed, 'a disaster' for the Strip.
'However, in terms of ethnic cleansing and the demographic war that we have with Israel, that wouldn't be a threat because, ultimately, the birth rate in Gaza is so high that in three or four years, we'll be able to have the demographic balance back again,' Sayegh told MEE.
So where does that leave Trump's extreme opening bid to negotiate Gaza's future?
'Two things have to happen. In my opinion, Hamas has to clearly say that they're willing to not be in the picture. This hasn't happened at all… [And] the Arabs have to push Trump,' he said.
'We've seen the Arabs already doing that. We've seen the Egyptians already doing that [but] they have to come to the table, from my point of view, to Trump with a plan that is actionable.'
Saudi Arabia was the first among the Arab nations to denounce Trump's plans and insist on a Palestinian state before it considers what would be the ultimate prize: diplomatic relations with Israel.
Jordan and Egypt have also firmly rejected plans to take in Palestinians from Gaza.
'I think the Arabs so far are taking a good stance,' Sayegh told MEE. 'If they continue to do so, I think we can overcome this, inshallah.'
Ultimately, whatever Palestinians may be forced to do, they will not be 'good victims,' Sourani said.
'Whatever the conditions are or will be, people have no intention to leave. We have no other home, Palestine is our homeland.'
Aftermath
By Wednesday morning, Arab Americans For Trump, which led the charge to get him elected among those angered by Joe Biden's perpetuation of the war on Gaza, sent out a press release changing its name to Arab Americans For Peace.
'We are adamantly opposed to the notion of transferring Palestinians outside of historic Palestine for ANY reason,' the statement read. 'We appreciate the president's offer to clean and rebuild Gaza. However, the purpose should be to make Gaza habitable for Palestinians and no one else.'
Within hours, the administration began the cleanup effort, with officials significantly walking back Trump's proposal.
In an interview with CBS, Trump's national security advisor, Michael Waltz, all but admitted the president was effectively starting a negotiation process by adopting an extreme position.
'The fact that nobody has a realistic solution, and [Trump] puts some very bold fresh new ideas out on the table, I don't think should be criticised in any way,' Waltz said. 'I think it's going to bring the entire region to come with their own solutions.'
This was further communicated at the White House briefing, where press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters, 'Donald Trump, who is the best dealmaker on the planet, is going to strike a deal with our partners in the region.'
Asked about US 'boots on the ground' in Gaza, Leavitt said Trump has not 'committed' to that idea 'yet'.
And his real estate development of the enclave? 'This is an out-of-the-box idea,' Leavitt responded, and 'American taxpayers' will not be footing the bill, she said.
While on a trip to Guatemala, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio reframed Trump's entire proposal, saying that Palestinians would only relocate temporarily and that Trump's offer is an act of generosity.
'Obviously people are going to have to live somewhere while you're rebuilding it. It is akin to a natural disaster,' Rubio said. 'So what he's very generously offered is the ability of the United States to go in and help with debris removal, help with munitions removal, help with reconstruction, the rebuilding of homes and businesses and things of this nature, so that then people can move back in.'
Still, there was no way to take back what Trump very publicly put on the table.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
West Bank: Israeli settlers seal off access to village for fifth consecutive day as part of campaign to displace residents
Palestinians in the village of al-Lubban al-Sharqiya, south of Nablus in the West Bank face potential displacement from their homes after Israeli settlers started both an online and physical campaign to demolish homes, according to Wafa news agency. Israeli settlers have threatened to demolish more than 20 homes in the village, located on the main road linking the cities of Nablus and Ramallah. For the fifth consecutive day, dozens of Israeli settlers have stormed the main entrance to the village and performed Talmudic rituals, obstructing people coming in and out. The Israeli military have supported the settlers by sealing off the iron gate at the main entrance to the village according to Wafa. The in-person campaign started 12 days ago, and Israeli settlers have closed off the main entrance to the village seven times over the past 12 days. On Sunday evening, the campaign intensified after Israeli settlers shared posts on social media calling for the Israeli military to demolish homes and infrastructure on the main street of the village. Wafa said the settlers have posted incendiary material against the villagers - particularly against schools located on the main street. The Israeli settlers also announced they would demonstrate every evening at 7:30pm local time at the main entrance and close the village until demolition is carried out.
Arabian Post
3 hours ago
- Arabian Post
U.S.-China Trade Talks In London Form The Basis Of Early Agreement On Contentious Issues
By Nitya Chakraborty The high level delegations of United States of America and China concluded their two day trade talks in London on Tuesday agreeing to take forward the course of negotiations for further promoting steady and healthy development of economic and trade ties between the two largest economies of the world. Both Chinese and U.S. sources underlined that the London talks were based on the guidelines set through phone conversations between President Trump and President Xi Jinping on June 5 as also the understanding arrived at the earlier meeting in Geneva last month. In fact following the Geneva meeting last month, the Chinese side made lot of complaints that the U.S, agencies have been violating many of the principles agreed to at the Geneva meeting and this was hampering the proper implementation of the Geneva understanding. Chinese President's office communicated this to the President Trump's office and finally Trump spoke directly to President Xi Jinping on June 5 and discussed a few guidelines for trade discussions scheduled in London on June 9 and 10. Now this London agreement based on that June 5 guidelines set by the two Presidents will be taken forward for further finetuning at the next meeting to be scheduled soon. U.S. sources say that the areas of discussions are so vast and the items are so many that a full fledged deal will take a few more sources have hinted that the Trump administration is really keen in arriving at an early deal with China. So, the U.S. side will abide by the London agreement in the interests of normal trade relations between both the countries. According to a latest survey released by the American Chamber of Commerce in China, although tariffs pose rising challenges to US companies in China, most companies are not planning to exit China, with none reporting shifting production back to the US. Chinese sources say that China is maintaining strategic patience in talks with the U.S. officials as there are some structural trade conflicts and these require time consuming discussions. On Monday morning, China released the trade data for the first five months of 2025. China's total goods imports and exports in yuan-denominated terms rose to 17.94 trillion yuan ($2.5 trillion) in the first five months of 2025, up 2.5 percent year-on-year, official data showed Monday. The continuous growth in foreign trade underscores the resilience of the world's second largest economy, with supply chain and industry chain remaining competitive in response to the world market demand, despite global headwinds highlighted by unilateralism, a Chinese expert said. 'Since the beginning of this year, China's economy has continued to recover and improve. Under external pressure, the country's goods trade has maintained strong resilience. By May, China's imports and exports continued their growth trend, with the growth rate accelerating notably after the high-level China-US economic and trade talks,' said Lü Daliang, a GAC spokesperson, Xinhua reported on Monday While China's foreign trade generally saw a positive growth, uncertainties remain, as reflected in some trade figures. Media reported that last month, goods exports rose 6.3 percent year on year, while imports went down 2.1 percent. China-US trade decreased by 8.1 per cent year on year basis to1.72 trillion yuan during the first five months of 2025, according to Chinese customs data. Li Changan, a professor at the Academy of China Open Economy Studies at the University of International Business and Economics, told the Global Times on Monday that data from May shows that while China's foreign trade remained generally stable, some fluctuations did occur, likely linked to the trade tensions. 'China's import and export growth accelerated significantly following recent high level trade talks between China and the US in Geneva. This suggests a rebound in foreign trade after the joint statement, partially offsetting the negative impact of the trade dispute and helping maintain overall trade stability,' Li said, adding that challenges persist as businesses expect more predictability in world trade. The trend in China-US trade data was 'expected,' as even though China and the US reached an agreement to significantly reduce reciprocal tariffs during the Geneva talks in May, US tariffs on Chinese goods remain high, prompting Chinese foreign trade companies to made adjustments by exploring alternative markets to reduce their reliance on the US, Huo Jianguo, a vice chairman of the China Society for World Trade Organization Studies in Beijing, told the Global Times on Monday. The United States and China have a substantial trade relationship, with China being a major trading partner and a significant export market for the US. In 2024, total US-China trade in goods reached an estimated $582.4 billion, with US exports to China at $143.5 billion and imports from China at $438.9 billion, resulting in a trade deficit of $295.4 billion. China is the third-largest export market for the US, behind Canada and Mexico. It is interesting that Chinese policy makers are making special efforts to woo the European Union in both political and trade areas by taking advantage of the current fissures in US-EU relations. The idea is to project China as a defender of multilateral trading as also WTO norms as against the unilateralism being followed by the US President Donald Trump. However, there have been many setbacks to China-EU relations also. This month, the EU has taken steps to restrict Chinese medical devices from participating in its public procurement market, which was firmly opposed by the Chinese side. Recently, negative hype against China has increased in Europe. Following the 'China spy' case and the so-called lobbying scandal related to Huawei, the Czech Republic openly accused China of launching a cyberattack against it, and the EU and NATO followed suit. Even after a major power outage in Europe, solar power inverters produced in China were questioned by some for 'cybersecurity risks.' In the recent days, China and Europe have conducted intensive diplomatic interactions. President Xi Jinping spoke with French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz respectively, Vice Premiers He Lifeng and Liu Guozhong visited Europe successively, the Danish and Dutch foreign ministers visited China successively, and Foreign Minister Wang Yi spoke with the German and Polish foreign ministers. Vice Premier He Lifeng is currently in London on an official visit to the UK. He will be having intensive discussions on trade and political issues with the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The European Parliament and China have decided to simultaneously and comprehensively lift restrictions on mutual exchanges, further sending a positive signal for expanding exchanges between the two sides. It's reported that European Council President Antonio Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will also visit China in July to hold meetings with Chinese leaders. Chinese experts say that such setbacks are not unexpected taking into account the policies of EU members but still cooperation and collaboration are possible. China is interested in that. Over the past 50 years since establishing diplomatic relations, China and the EU have formed a strong economic symbiotic relationship, with annual trade increasing from $2.4 billion to $785.8 billion – a growth of over 300 times. Both sides have engaged in productive multilateral coordination and cooperation in areas such as climate change. Both Chinese and EU sources say these collaborations have not only brought tangible benefits to nearly 2 billion people on both sides but have also made significant contributions to maintaining global stability and prosperity. In the current complex international situation, the China-EU relationship holds even greater strategic significance and global influence. The Chinese perception is that the development of China-EU relations demonstrates that the two sides can fully respect each other, engage in equal dialogue, complement each other's strengths, and achieve mutual success. The world is changing, but the fundamental fact that cooperation between China and the EU far outweighs competition, that consensus far exceeds differences, and that opportunities far exceed risks remains unchanged. (IPA Service)
Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US embassy in Iraq prepares for partial evacuation ahead of Iran talks
The US is reducing staff levels at its embassy in Iraq on security concerns, US officials told several media outlets on Wednesday, as Iran threatened US bases if conflict breaks out. "Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq," a US official told AFP on condition of anonymity. Meanwhile, The Financial Times reported that US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth authorised the voluntary departure of military dependents throughout the Middle East. The withdrawals come as Iran's defence minister, Aziz Nasirzadeh, said on Wednesday that Tehran would target US military assets in the region in response to any attack 'without hesitation'. "God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," he said, adding that the US side "will suffer more losses" if it came to conflict. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to negotiate a new nuclear deal to replace the 2015 accord that US President Donald Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. The next round of talks is scheduled for Thursday. 'Ordered departure from US Emb Baghdad could reflect a major threat, but also is impactful as a means of signaling possible near-term military action against Iran. It's a big move, hard to reverse quickly, comes at some cost. So if signaling, you play this card when you mean it,' Daniel Shapiro, the US's former ambassador to Israel, wrote on X. Shapiro added that it doesn't "necessarily" mean military action is imminent but said that the move provides "important leverage in nuclear talks". Trump had previously expressed optimism about the talks, saying during a Gulf tour last month that Washington was "getting close" to securing a deal. But in an interview published on Wednesday, Trump said he was "less confident" the US and Iran could reach a deal, in response to a question on whether he believed he could stop Tehran from enriching uranium. "Something happened to them, but I am much less confident of a deal being made... Maybe they don't wanna make a deal, what can I say? And maybe they do. There is nothing final." Trump maintained that Washington would not allow Tehran to obtain nuclear weapons, saying that "it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying'. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke on Monday. Trump says he had been holding back Netanyahu from launching preemptive strikes on Iran. Oil prices jumped almost four percent on Wednesday amid the tensions.
