logo
Bike-sharing is making a quiet comeback – but will Singaporeans give it a second chance?

Bike-sharing is making a quiet comeback – but will Singaporeans give it a second chance?

CNA4 days ago
SINGAPORE: A cautious revival is underway in Singapore's bike-sharing scene, as operators expand their fleet while working to regain public trust lost in the chaos of the industry's early days.
On Jul 1, Chinese company HelloRide increased its fleet here from 15,000 to 20,000 bicycles. Local firm Anywheel, which has been gradually scaling up its presence since 2022, operates another 35,000 bicycles.
Singapore's total bike-share fleet now stands at 55,000, up from 36,000 three years ago.
Both firms told CNA this expansion is more than just a numbers game. It is part of a broader vision to make bike-sharing a reliable, even habitual, part of daily transportation in Singapore.
'For HelloRide specifically, we want to grow beyond a utility – into a brand that Singaporeans associate with freedom, health and modern city living,' said its general manager Hayden Choo.
Anywheel founder Htay Aung added: 'Our vision is to grow in Singapore in such a way that … when you go from point A to B, regardless of whether you use us, at least our name will come to your mind.'
These aspirations come with an awareness of past missteps. Singapore's bike-sharing boom in 2018 saw the market flooded with more than 200,000 bikes operated by as many as seven different firms.
But the rapid growth in the absence of regulations resulted in public frustration over indiscriminate parking, damaged bicycles and abandoned bikes clogging paths.
Legislation was subsequently introduced to manage these problems, but this led to the closure of several operators, some of whom exited the market with debts owed to vendors, retrenched staff and without returning user deposits.
The sustainability of the industry was cast into question more recently, when SG Bike – once a key player – announced in March 2024 that it was exiting the market after nearly seven years.
Mr Htay said the bike-sharing industry is now in its 'second run' – a correction period where companies have to tread carefully. 'We have to be very careful to slowly gain back the confidence of Singapore users,' he said.
Mr Choo agreed, adding: 'The other key learning is that trust – with users, with government – this takes time to build but is easily lost.'
SLOW, CALIBRATED EXPANSION
Both Anywheel and HelloRide are taking a more measured approach to growth, focusing on getting things right this time round.
Anywheel is currently holding back from expanding its fleet further, choosing instead to focus on replacing ageing bicycles to improve user experience. When the older fleet is fully replaced, the company will apply to expand its fleet, Mr Htay said.
HelloRide's Mr Choo said one of the biggest lessons from the industry's early days was that "scale without control is a recipe for collapse".
'The early wave emphasised growth at all costs – we've learned instead to value sustainable unit economics, operational efficiency and regulatory compliance.'
The company began operations in Singapore in 2022 with 1,000 bikes and has expanded in phases – reaching 10,000 in 2023, adding 5,000 more in October last year and another 5,000 this year.
The Land Transport Authority (LTA), which approves bike-share fleet expansions, told CNA that its decision to allow HelloRide's latest increase was based on several factors, including the company's track record in managing indiscriminate parking and its efforts to educate users on proper parking behaviour.
The authority said it also takes into account the overall bike-sharing fleet size in Singapore, demand for the services and the availability of parking infrastructure when reviewing expansion applications by bike-sharing companies.
'We will continue to closely monitor the supply and demand of the deployed fleets, while ensuring all operators continue to manage disamenities,' an LTA spokesperson said.
Whether the bike-sharing business is financially viable remains a challenge for operators. For example, while residential deployment increases accessibility for users, it often makes little business sense. Bicycles placed deep in neighbourhoods tend to generate less ridership and revenue.
'You need an operator to sacrifice their revenue and ridership, to dedicate part of their fleet to do that,' said Mr Htay.
Still, Anywheel has taken this step deliberately in the hopes of shifting commuter behaviour over time. For instance, the company has placed bikes in Orchard and Tanglin residential neighbourhoods, where most residents typically drive cars.
Though initial ridership was poor, usage increased significantly after six months, Mr Htay said.
'Now, ridership is very high. Even in areas where residents may have two to three cars, with consistent deployment, service and availability, people will pick it up,' he said, adding that Anywheel has been profitable since 2023.
Similarly, HelloRide has observed that ridership in heartland areas has tripled compared to leisure hotspots like parks and tourist attractions.
'Riders see it as a viable replacement for first-and-last mile transport … as it might be more cooling in the early mornings and evenings,' said Mr Choo.
Mr Htay said Anywheel sees serving residential areas where last-mile transport is a pain point as a duty. 'LTA gave us a bigger licence, so we have the responsibility to serve the heartland from day one,' he said.
THE USER EXPERIENCE GAP
Despite these efforts, some users still find that locating a bike when they need one remains a hit-and-miss affair.
Cleaning supervisor Ng Gim Beng, who prefers to use bike-sharing rather than feeder bus services to get around his neighbourhood, said availability remains an issue near his home in Yishun.
'Especially at the HDB blocks, there isn't a bike, and I have to go and find one through the app,' the 68-year-old said.
Fellow Yishun resident and student Naurah Usyazwani, 19, agreed that finding an available bike is "not that easy" unless it is during off-peak hours.
'At any one spot, there needs to be two to three bikes, but it's sometimes empty,' she said. 'When people want to go from their home to the MRT, it's very hard to find a bike.'
THE FUTURE OF BIKE-SHARING
Bike-sharing has the potential to fill a gap in Singapore's transport system, analysts said. This is helped by Singapore's investment in cycling infrastructure – now over 730km of dedicated paths and park connectors, with plans to reach 1,300km by 2030.
'By expanding the fleet and making cycling more accessible, bike-share operators could help to accelerate this process,' said Dr Che Maohao from the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS), whose research interests include non-motorised transportation.
However, challenges persist that could hinder expansion. For example, deploying bikes in residential areas may remain an unprofitable venture, said transport analyst Walter Theseira.
The associate professor of economics at SUSS pointed out that the allocation of bicycles is a problem in neighbourhoods.
'Many have talked about first- and last-mile connectivity using dockless bikes between, say, the MRT station and the home or factory or office,' he said. 'That sounds great in theory, but what it means in practice is a lot of one-way rentals that end up with bikes at a factory or office some distance from the station.'
These bikes are likely to be under-utilised during the day, but if they are used or relocated, they will no longer be available to the original user at the end of the day.
Deploying the bicycles in recreational areas – where bikes are circulated continuously – supports higher utilisation and makes better business sense, Assoc Prof Theseira said.
Operators also face regulatory hurdles. New rules banning bicycles from footpaths next to cycling lanes have added uncertainty for riders.
'With the stricter policies on where you can ride, chances are that if I'm a user, I'd be quite worried,' said urban mobility consultant Tham Chen Munn. 'There's this uncertainty, (over whether) I will get caught (if I) go on the wrong path.'
This could dampen interest in bike-sharing, he said.
'If we are forever arguing over who to ban and where we can use it, it doesn't make it sexy to even try out.'
The analysts highlighted the potential for e-bikes to drive the next phase of growth, with examples from cities like London, where rental e-bikes have fuelled a surge in cycling.
Assoc Prof Theseira said electric mobility offers a sweat-free commute and would suit Singapore's climate better.
Rental e-bikes opens up the possibility to not just first- and last-mile transport, but that of the 'first five and last five miles', said Mr Tham.
Still, concerns around pedestrian safety persist, and there remains a 'lack of a proper system to ensure motorists and PMD users can coexist', said Assoc Prof Theseira.
But Mr Tham remains optimistic about the future of bike-sharing.
"We already put so much money into the infrastructure," he said, "The question is whether we can efficiently use it while embracing the enhancements in technology."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump, Xi might meet ahead of or during October Apec summit in South Korea: SCMP
Trump, Xi might meet ahead of or during October Apec summit in South Korea: SCMP

Business Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Times

Trump, Xi might meet ahead of or during October Apec summit in South Korea: SCMP

US President Donald Trump might visit China before going to the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit between Oct 30 and Nov 1, or he could meet Chinese leader Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the Apec event in South Korea, the South China Morning Post reported on Sunday citing multiple sources. The two countries have been trying to negotiate an end to an escalating tit-for-tat tariff war that has upended global trade and supply chains. The two sides have discussed a potential meeting between the leaders in the region this year, but they have not confirmed a date or location yet, according to a person familiar with the matter. Trump has sought to impose tariffs on US importers for virtually all foreign goods, which he says will stimulate domestic manufacturing and which critics say will make many consumer goods more expensive for Americans. He has called for a universal base tariff rate of 10 per cent on goods imported from all countries, with higher rates for imports from the most 'problematic' ones, including China: imports from there now have the highest tariff rate of 55 per cent. Trump has set a deadline of Aug 12 for the US and China to reach a durable tariffs agreement. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up A spokesperson for Trump did not respond to a request for comment about the reported plans for a meeting with Xi in the autumn. The two countries' most recent high-level meeting was on July 11, when US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi had what both described as a productive and positive meeting in Malaysia about how trade negotiations should proceed. Rubio said then that Trump had been invited to China to meet with Xi, and said that both leaders 'want it to happen.' On Friday, China Commerce Minister Wang Wentao said China wants to bring its trade ties with the US back to a stable footing and that recent talks in Europe showed there was no need for a tariff war. REUTERS

Shaping Tomorrow - Fueling the nation through rest
Shaping Tomorrow - Fueling the nation through rest

CNA

time25 minutes ago

  • CNA

Shaping Tomorrow - Fueling the nation through rest

02:00 Min Shaping Tomorrow Tempur Singapore's managing director Iris Leong shares how the company has consistently supported the nation's vision for a smarter, greener future - from pioneering smart sleep technologies to embracing sustainable practices. Shaping Tomorrow About the show: SG60: Shaping Tomorrow is a compelling video series that brings to life the Singapore stories of our most cherished brands. Through their journeys, they reflect on their past, celebrate their present achievements and reaffirm their commitment to shaping the future of our Little Red Dot. Join us as each brand honours its legacy, embraces the now and builds a better tomorrow with Singapore.

Money in, promises out: Red flags in Vietnam's PE and VC dealmaking
Money in, promises out: Red flags in Vietnam's PE and VC dealmaking

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

Money in, promises out: Red flags in Vietnam's PE and VC dealmaking

[HO CHI MINH CITY] A planned stake sale by shareholders of EQuest Education, one of Vietnam's biggest private education groups, is facing setbacks after a school acquisition in Hanoi collapsed, in a case highlighting the broader risks of doing business in the country's fast-growing, but often unpredictable, business sector. KKR, the largest shareholder with a 54.8 per cent stake in EQuest, held through its Singapore-based vehicle Equinox II, invested more than US$200 million into the Vietnamese group in two funding rounds in 2021 and 2023. The PE juggernaut and other shareholders of EQuest were eyeing a stake sale this year, in hopes of raising funds and paving the way for KKR's exit four to five years since its investment in EQuest, sources familiar with the matter told The Business Times. That plan now hangs in limbo. The dispute has delayed negotiations and the due diligence process, causing uncertainties, particularly over valuation-related matters, a source noted. KKR did not respond to BT's queries. In 2021, a member company of EQuest signed deals worth one trillion dong (S$49 million) to acquire 80 per cent stakes in two schools in Hanoi. At the time, EQuest had already consolidated some 20 education institutions in Vietnam. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up The schools were part of the Ngoi Sao school system, a prominent private education network co-founded by Pham Bich Nga, a 66-year-old educator. The transaction for the second school, which was established in 2023, hit a deadlock. In a statement issued on Wednesday (Jul 16), EQuest alleged that Nga and her team withdrew funds from the first school and declined to transfer the agreed stake and management control of the second school. EQuest said it has lodged a police report on the matter, alleging embezzlement, misappropriation and fraud. In a Facebook post on Jul 16, Nguyen Quoc Toan, co-founder, chairman and chief executive of EQuest Education, alleged that the former partners claimed they 'did not understand' or had a 'different interpretation' of the contract, while retaining all the investor's funds over the past few years to develop the schools. A day earlier on Jul 15, Nga wrote on Facebook that she had proactively ended the partnership, citing major differences in educational direction and operational culture during their 2022 collaboration. 'Trying to forcibly maintain a partnership when the other party no longer wishes to continue – or attempting to claim what doesn't belong to them – cannot lead to a positive outcome for either side,' she wrote. Familiar red flags The case underscores the travails of doing business in Vietnam, which experts warn could weigh on investor confidence and undermine dealmaking in the long term. In fact, observers say disputes after deal closure between investors and Vietnamese target firms are fairly common, especially in PE and VC circles; legal experts cite mismatched expectations and poor mutual understanding as key sources of friction. David Harrison, a partner for global law firm Hogan Lovells in Ho Chi Minh City, said: 'We do a lot of transactions with Vietnamese targets – family businesses in many cases – where there's no law firm on the other side to help them understand what they're signing.' They may be eager to close the deal and secure cash for their business by taking a pragmatic view, which, in the long run, may not serve their best interests, he added. Tran Duy Canh, managing partner at Dentons LuatViet in Ho Chi Minh City, said post-deal disputes often arise when critical conditions in sale agreements are not met. These do not always arise out of bad faith; more often, it comes from 'overconfidence' or misunderstanding, he said, adding that some local firms assume they can sort things out later or renegotiate if the deal veers off course. One notable case involved Vietnamese plastics firm Rang Dong and Japanese investor Sojitz Pla-Net, over a 2017 deal in which Sojitz bought five million shares in Rang Dong's Long An Plastic unit for more than 174 billion dong. Sojitz later alleged that Rang Dong failed to meet post-closing obligations. On its part, the Vietnamese firm claimed that there were 'unreasonable' terms in the contract, such as requiring it to sign employment contracts with 700 people that Sojitz appointed. Their conflict lasted about three years, from 2020 to 2023, including arbitration at the Singapore International Arbitration Centre in 2022 and subsequent onshore court proceedings in Vietnam. The ruling ultimately went Sojitz's way. However, it remains uncertain whether Rang Dong can fulfil its financial obligations to Sojitz, because the Vietnamese company is now facing bankruptcy proceedings. Lessons from soured deals Such cases worry investors, who often bear the bulk of financial losses and face lengthy investigations and legal battles. Legal counsel typically recommend mediation over taking the matter to court, especially when both sides genuinely want to resolve the misunderstanding. Another high-profile case was VinaCapital's Vietnam Opportunity Fund (VOF) investing US$32.5 million for a 34 per cent stake in Vietnamese egg and poultry giant Ba Huan in early 2018. The deal quickly unravelled after founder Pham Thi Huan publicly sought to cancel it, claiming the investor's terms risked eroding family control. She claimed VinaCapital imposed a 22 per cent annual return rate without consent, and that the Vietnamese contract included clauses missing from the English version, such as penalties for missed targets and a possible transfer of at least 51 per cent of the company's shares. VinaCapital maintained that all terms were lawful and in line with market norms, but later agreed to an amicable exit from the deal. Vu Nguyen Khanh, managing director and lead portfolio manager at VinaCapital's VOF, told BT: 'We may have a very clear view of what those terms mean, but at the same time, we want to make sure that the person on the other side of the table also understands that.' Founded in 2003 and managed by VinaCapital, VOF is a closed-ended investment trust listed on the London Stock Exchange with net assets exceeding US$970 million as at the end of June; it invests in listed equities and private companies in Vietnam. Khanh said the fund has invested in more than 200 companies in Vietnam over the past two decades. Harrison from Hogan Lovells stressed the importance of robust financial, legal and technical due diligence and forging direct ties with local partners, rather than relying on 30- to 40-page term sheets drafted for deals in other markets. He also highlighted the value of including downside protection mechanisms for investors – in the form of put rights, redemption rights, pull-back clauses, or earn-outs, for example – in case deals do not go as expected. 'The diligence, monitoring and the engagement process throughout the investment should pick up a lot of the flags,' VOF's Khanh added. He said if a situation calls for renegotiation, the first step should be to revisit the original agreements, which ought to include an avenue to resolve the issues before turning to the court. 'At the end of the day, our objective as investors is to create value and exit at a return. Disputes rarely create that kind of return,' he noted. Cultural gaps Hoang Minh Duc, special counsel at Duane Morris Vietnam, said investors are usually open to dialogue if founders stay transparent and actively work towards the best solutions for the businesses when obligations become difficult to meet. Drawing on his experience advising deals between foreign VCs and Vietnamese startups, he said many disputes stem from cultural gaps between Vietnamese business norms and those in more developed markets. He noted that Vietnamese startup founders often sign agreements without fully grasping the terms, sometimes without legal counsel or under guidance by inexperienced advisors. And when problems arise, some try to sidestep the investors. 'Vietnamese founders often value flexibility, while most venture capital investors, many of whom are from Singapore, prioritise transparency and an agreed structure,' he said, adding: 'This cultural gap can lead to painful partings, which may ultimately undermine dealmaking in Vietnam over the long term.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store