Bank of England to ease rules for smaller and mid-sized banks
The Bank said its Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has pushed back the start of a new internal model approach for considering risk in the market by a year to January 1 2028.
It said the latest proposals will allow time 'for greater clarity to emerge in other jurisdictions' amid uncertainty how President Trump will implement the global Basel rules in the US.
The Basel 3 regime was first drawn up in the aftermath of the financial crisis to increase the amount of equity available to absorb stress from banks in an effort to avoid future state bailouts.
The Bank of England said it will continue with plans to launch the majority of its modified Basel 3.1 rules at the start of 2027.
It had previously delayed the start by a year in the face of uncertainty in the global financial markets.
Basel 3.1 is set to promote 'banking resilience', according to the PRA, but comes as the Chancellor seeks reduce regulation in a bid to drive growth.
On Tuesday, the Bank said it would also change restrictions it claims will drive growth opportunities among smaller and mid-sized banks.
It will push forward with its 'strong and simple framework', which will reduce capital rules for smaller non-systemic banks and building societies, providing them with simpler restrictions than the largest UK banks.
The PRA said it is also putting forward prospective plans to make it easier for mid-sized banks to compete in the mortgage market.
It will publish a paper this summer with options to help-mid-sized banks grow by adjusting some barriers to securing permissions in providing residential mortgages.
Sam Woods, chief executive of the PRA and deputy governor for prudential regulation at the Bank, said: 'Today's announcements will give certainty to firms of all sizes about the future capital framework, bring in a simpler regime for smaller banks, make it easier for mid-sized banks to scale up in the mortgage market, and allow an extra year for part of the implementation of new investment banking rules.'
Dave Ramsden, deputy governor for markets and banking at the Bank, said: 'We have considered and reflected industry feedback in today's announcements.
'These changes are designed to foster growth and competition, recognising that smaller firms present lower risks to financial stability, whilst also maintaining size-appropriate resolvability capabilities.'
The rule changes come ahead of the Chancellor's Mansion House speech to financial industry bosses, where she is expected to launch further cuts of industry red tape.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
13 minutes ago
- Reuters
EU's pledge for $250 billion of US energy imports is delusional
LAUNCESTON, Australia, July 28 (Reuters) - There are strong echoes of Donald Trump's failed trade deal with China from his first term as U.S. president in the framework agreement reached with the European Union. Trump and EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced the deal for a 15% tariff on U.S. imports of EU goods at the U.S. leader's golf course in Scotland on Sunday. But more important than the 15% tariff rate was the apparent commitment by the EU to massively ramp up energy imports from the United States. The agreement calls for EU imports of U.S. energy, which currently are mainly crude oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG), of $250 billion a year for three years. This is a delusional level of imports that the EU has virtually no chance of meeting, and one that U.S. producers would also struggle to supply. Even if the EU did manage somehow to boost its energy imports from the United States to the $250 billion a year mark, it would also prove massively disruptive for energy flows around the rest of the world. The numbers show the scale of the challenge. The 28 members of the EU imported 3.38 billion barrels of seaborne crude oil in 2024, according to data compiled by energy analysts Kpler. Assuming the 2025 volume stays the same and the price paid per barrel averages around $70, this means the EU will pay about $236.6 billion for its crude. The EU's imports from the United States were 573 million barrels in 2024, which if replicated this year would be valued at around $40.1 billion. For LNG, the EU imported 82.68 million metric tons in 2024, which would have cost around $51.26 billion assuming an average price of around $12 per million British thermal units (mmBtu). Imports of the super-chilled fuel from the United States were 35.13 million tons in 2024, worth about $21.78 billion. The EU also buys coal from the United States, the bulk being higher-value metallurgical coal used to make steel. Total EU imports of metallurgical coal in 2024 were worth $6.72 billion, assuming an average price of $200 per ton, with those from the United States valued at $2.67 billion. Putting together the value of EU imports of U.S. crude oil, LNG and metallurgical coal gives a 2024 total of around $64.55 billion. This is about 26% of the $250 billion the EU is supposed to spend on U.S. energy a year under the framework agreement. If the EU did ramp up its imports of U.S. crude, LNG and metallurgical coal to $250 billion, it would account for 85% of its total spending on those energy commodities. The United States exported 1.45 billion barrels of crude in 2024, according to Kpler, which would be worth $101.5 billion at a price of $70 a barrel. U.S. shipments of LNG were 87.05 million tons in 2024, which would be worth about $54 billion at an average price of $12 per mmBtu. The U.S. exported 51.53 million tons of metallurgical coal in 2024, worth $10.3 billion at an average price of $200 a ton. Putting together the value of all three energy commodities gives a total of $165.8 billion, meaning that even if the EU bought the entire volume it would still fall well short of the $250 billion. The scale of the delusion probably exceeds what Trump and China agreed in their so-called Phase 1 trade deal in December 2019, under which China was supposed to buy $200 billion of additional U.S. energy by the end of 2021. The reality is that China never even came close to buying that level, and its imports of U.S. energy didn't even reach what they were before Trump launched his first trade war in 2017. There are a few caveats when looking at the framework agreement between Trump and Von der Leyen. The first is that not all the details are known and the $250 billion of energy is also said to include nuclear fuel, although this will only be a small value even if included. The second is the deal will probably include refined fuels, with U.S. exports to the EU of products such as diesel, being almost 110 million barrels in 2024, worth about $10.9 billion assuming a price of $100 a barrel. But it's still clear that the commitment to buy $250 billion in U.S. energy is completely unrealistic and unachievable. The smart people in the room must know this, begging the question as to why agree to what is obviously a ridiculous number? What happens when the inevitable failure is realised? Perhaps the EU is hoping for the same outcome as China did with the first trade war with Trump in 2019. Run down the clock, talk nice, and hope the next U.S. president is easier to deal with. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab. The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
Reuters
13 minutes ago
- Reuters
India's equity benchmarks set to open near one-month low
July 28 (Reuters) - India's equity benchmarks are likely to open on Monday near the previous session's one-month closing low, with uncertainty over trade talks with the U.S. and weaker-than-expected results from Kotak Mahindra Bank weighing on sentiment. The Gift Nifty futures were trading at 24,841 points as of 8:04 a.m. IST, indicating that the Nifty 50 (.NSEI), opens new tab will open near Friday's close of 24,837. The benchmark hit its lowest level since June 20 at 24,806.35 points in the previous session The Nifty 50 and 30-stock Sensex (.BSESN), opens new tab have logged four consecutive weekly losses due to weak earnings, foreign outflows and uncertainty over U.S.-India trade deal. Negotiations between India and the United States remained deadlocked over tariff cuts on agriculture and dairy products, dimming hopes of an interim deal ahead of U.S. President Donald Trump's August 1 deadline. Meanwhile, the U.S. struck a framework trade agreement with the European Union over the weekend, averting a bigger trade war between the two allies, which account for almost a third of global trade. The easing global trade tensions buoyed equities globally. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan (.MIAPJ0000PUS), opens new tab was up 0.2%, just shy of the almost four-year high it touched last week. Kotak Mahindra Bank ( opens new tab will be in focus on the day after India's No. 3 lender by market capitalisation reported a drop in first-quarter profit on Saturday, as it set aside more funds for potential bad loans and saw a contraction in lending margins. ** India's largest IT services provider Tata Consultancy Services ( opens new tab will reduce its workforce by 2%, affecting roughly 12,200 employees, in fiscal year 2026 as it deploys AI and other technologies while entering new markets and contending with an uncertain demand outlook ** Bank of Baroda ( opens new tab posts higher profit and interest income for April-June quarter, and says it is targeting a 9%-10% growth in corporate loans for fiscal year 2026 ** Homebuilder Sobha's ( opens new tab first-quarter profit more than doubled, helped by higher prices and sustained demand for premium apartments
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Eroding protections for public lands
'Public lands have tremendous bipartisan support in the state,' Lawson said in reference to her home state of Montana, about 30% of which is federal public land. 'Everybody from the wilderness advocates who want public land preserved in perpetuity to the hunters and anglers to the OHV (off-highway vehicle) Jeepers. Everybody loves public lands. Access to those public lands is so integral to daily life.' Deep budget and staffing cuts to the U.S. National Forest Service, National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management could affect their ability to effectively care for these lands at a time when they are experiencing record numbers of visitors. Last year, national parks welcomed more than 332 million visitors, a new high, up 6 million from 2023. The National Park System has lost 24% of its permanent staff since Trump returned to office in January, according to the National Parks Conservation Association, a watchdog advocacy group. The association attributes much of the drop to job cuts and staff taking buyouts offered by Trump's administration. And, the National Forest Service cut about 10% of its workforce as part of the administration's campaign to reduce spending. This legislation that Trump signed also rescinded funding for conservation and climate resilience projects in national parks and Bureau of Land Management land that was provided in a law signed by his predecessor Joe Biden called the Inflation Reduction Act. 'Unleashing America's economic potential goes hand-in-hand with preserving our public lands, as years of mismanagement, regulatory overreach and neglect of routine management have hindered outdoor recreation opportunities,' the White House said in a statement to Reuters. Leshy said budget and staffing cuts could be a strategic move by U.S. officials who have long wanted to dispose of public land, pointing to Russell Vought, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget and a force behind the Project 2025 initiative that laid out a conservative blueprint for reshaping the U.S. government. 'I think they've decided, looking at the opinion polls, that it's not popular and it's not wise to press for outright selling off or disposing, transferring federal lands. So what they're doing instead is hollowing out their management, is slashing their budgets and slashing the personnel,' Leshy said. 'The aim is, 'Let's make federal management so bad and so dismal that it will change public opinion,'' Leshy added.
