logo
Eva Longoria's loudmouthed virtue signaling backfires spectacularly as Spain bans Muslim festivals

Eva Longoria's loudmouthed virtue signaling backfires spectacularly as Spain bans Muslim festivals

Daily Mail​9 hours ago
Eva Longoria tried to leave America behind over its immigration policies — but now she's facing a new crisis abroad, as her adopted home country of Spain enforces its own controversial crackdown.
The Desperate Housewives alum, 50, who vocally supported Kamala Harris during the 2024 election, fled the U.S. last year citing fears that if Donald Trump 'keeps his promises,' the country would become a 'scary place.'
'I'm privileged,' Longoria told Marie Claire in November. 'I get to escape and go somewhere. Most Americans aren't so lucky. They're going to be stuck in this dystopian country, and my anxiety and sadness is for them.'
Since then, the actress — who splits her time between Mexico and Spain with husband José Bastón and their 7-year-old son Santiago — has remained outspoken about U.S. policy from afar, even taking to Instagram as recently as June to slam Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) deportation raids sweeping across U.S. cities.
In a tearful selfie video, she called the operations 'un-American' and 'cruel.'
But now, a town in Spain — the very country she chose as a safe haven — has sparked outrage by banning Muslims from using public facilities to celebrate religious festivals deemed ' alien ' to local identity.
Longoria has yet to comment on the Spanish policy shift, but the irony isn't lost on critics watching her anti-US stance come full circle abroad.
The controversial ban, passed in the town of Jumilla in Murcia, marks the first of its kind in Spain.
It was pushed through by the conservative People's Party (PP) with backing from the far-right Vox party.
Under the new proposal, 'municipal sports facilities cannot be used for religious, cultural or social activities alien to our identity unless organized by the local authority.'
The town in the Murcia region has a population of around 27,000 - roughly 7.5 per cent of whom come from mostly Muslim countries.
The policy comes on the heels of rising anti-migrant tensions in the region.
Less than a month earlier, violent riots erupted in Torre Pacheco — just 70 miles from Jumilla — after a Moroccan trio allegedly attacked an elderly Spanish man, leaving several people injured in the chaos that followed.
Following the announcement of the new ban, critics argue that the language is a clear targeting of Islamic customs and have raised concerns it may violate Spain's constitutionally guaranteed freedom of religion.
Meanwhile, the local Vox party proudly took credit for the move on X, stating, 'Thanks to Vox the first measure to ban Islamic festivals in Spain's public spaces has been passed.
'Spain is and will be forever the land of Christian people.'
The new regulation bars Muslims in Jumilla from using public gyms or community centers to celebrate Eid al-Fitr, which marks the end of Ramadan, as well as Eid al-Adha, the Islamic festival of sacrifice.
Muslim leaders have strongly condemned the ruling.
Mounir Benjelloun Andaloussi Azhari, president of the Spanish Federation of Islamic Organisations, described the ban as a direct attack on the country's Muslim community, calling it 'Islamophobic and discriminatory.'
'They're not going after other religions, they're going after ours,' he told the Spanish newspaper El País.
Addressing the recent surge in racist rhetoric and violence, he added, 'We're rather surprised by what's happening in Spain. For the first time in 30 years I feel afraid.'
Despite staying silent on the recent crackdown in Spain, Longoria didn't hold back in June when she fiercely criticized U.S. immigration policy amid the ICE raids.
Addressing her 10.6 million Instagram followers in an extended video, Longoria admitted she wasn't physically in Los Angeles but in France filming a project.
Still, she called the unfolding events 'hard to witness from afar.'
'I can't imagine what it's like to be in Los Angeles right now,' the Corpus Christi, Texas-born star said. 'I can't believe it's happening in Austin, Texas. I can't believe it's happening all over the country.'
Longoria, who is Mexican-American, said she was stunned watching the events unfold because they contradicted the principles America's founders established.
'We all can agree nobody wants criminals in our country, nobody wants rapists, nobody wants drug dealers, nobody wants bad actors in our country — that's not what's happening,' said the Golden Globe-nominated actress.
She criticized President Trump for overstepping his bounds and failing to keep his campaign promise to deport only criminals.
'These roundups are happening in birthday parties, in elementary graduations, Home Depots — those are not criminals,' she said.
In her Marie Claire interview, Longoria didn't hold back about Trump either.
'The shocking part is not that he won… It's that a convicted criminal who spews so much hate could hold the highest office,' she told the magazine.
Since marrying José Bastón in 2016, Longoria has shifted her base abroad.
In early 2023, the couple purchased a sprawling six-bedroom, seven-bathroom mansion in Marbella — a 1,531-square-meter villa featuring an indoor pool, sauna, and state-of-the-art home gym.
By 2024, they began moving their belongings there.
Earlier that year, they slashed the asking price on their eight-bedroom Beverly Hills home from $22.8 million to $18.9 million, saying they were 'ready to get out.'
Longoria revealed she often travels to South America or Europe for work and rarely returns to Los Angeles anymore.
'I had my whole adult life here,' she said of LA to Marie Claire. 'But even before [the pandemic], it was changing.
'The vibe was different. And then COVID happened, and it pushed it over the edge.
'Whether it's the homelessness or the taxes, not that I want to s**t on California — it just feels like this chapter in my life is done now.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump says Putin does not have to meet Zelensky for US-Russia summit to go ahead
Donald Trump says Putin does not have to meet Zelensky for US-Russia summit to go ahead

Daily Mail​

timea minute ago

  • Daily Mail​

Donald Trump says Putin does not have to meet Zelensky for US-Russia summit to go ahead

Donald Trump last night dismissed the idea that a US-Russia summit will only happen if Vladimir Putin meets Ukraine 's president. The US leader is continuing to seek a diplomatic end to the war in Ukraine – and is threatening economic sanctions if Putin continues to snub Volodymyr Zelensky. A Kremlin aide yesterday indicated that Mr Trump and Putin could get together 'in the coming days'. Putin said desire for a US-Russia summit was 'mutual' and that friends in the UAE could accommodate the meeting. He also did not rule out face-to-face talks with President Zelensky, adding 'certain conditions' would need to be met, without specifying what those would be. Earlier, a White House official, cited by several US outlets, said the Russian leader would have to agree to meet his Ukrainian counterpart in order for the talks with Mr Trump to go ahead. But when pressed on further details by reporters, the US President said Putin and Mr Zelensky did not have to meet in order for the US-Russia meeting to take place. A US deadline for Russia to commit to peace talks expires today. If the deadline passes, the US is expected to levy secondary tariffs targeting Russia's key allies India and China. In anticipation of those surcharges, India last night announced it was suspending its orders for Russian oil. The move would deprive the Kremlin of billions in oil revenues to bankroll its occupation and bombardment of Ukraine. When asked about today's deadline, Mr Trump said last night: 'It's going to be up to him [Putin]. We're going to see what he has to say. It's going to be up to him. Very disappointed.' Posting on X, President Zelensky said a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia was still at the forefront of negotiations. He said: 'We remain mindful of the need for a real ceasefire. Ukraine is ready for it and there has been no clear public response from Russia yet.' Last night, former UK defence secretary Ben Wallace said it was essential a European power, such as the UK, should be present at the talks.

Trump orders new census that excludes immigrants in the US illegally
Trump orders new census that excludes immigrants in the US illegally

Reuters

time28 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump orders new census that excludes immigrants in the US illegally

WASHINGTON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday ordered the Commerce Department to begin work on a new census that excludes immigrants in the U.S. illegally, revisiting a push from his first term that was later rejected by the courts and reversed by his successor. Trump made his census order in an early-morning post on Truth Social, saying the population count carried out every 10 years should be "based on modern day facts and figures" and results of the 2024 presidential election. "People who are in our Country illegally will not be counted in the census," he said. Trump's politicization of a constitutionally required process used to determine congressional districts and federal funding comes as the president has pushed Republicans in Texas and several other states to pursue a rare mid-decade redistricting for partisan gain. The next full census is planned for 2030. The White House had no immediate comment on whether Trump was calling for a count before the 2030 census. Trump has long railed against the inclusion of immigrants living in the U.S. illegally from the census, which is used to determine the number of seats each state gets in the U.S. House of Representatives and state legislative districts. The U.S. Supreme Court in 2019 blocked Trump from adding a contentious citizenship question to the 2020 census, saying the federal government gave a "contrived" rationale. Upon taking office in 2021, former President Joe Biden used an executive order to affirm the longstanding practice of including all people residing in a state in the official count. Trump revoked that order on his first day in office this term. Sean Moulton, a census expert at the watchdog group Project on Government Oversight, said some Republicans believed excluding immigrants in the U.S. illegally would benefit Republican districts and hurt urban areas, which are often Democratic-controlled. But Moulton said not counting all the people living in a given region hurts everyone there. "If we don't count everybody, we wind up misspending our money on infrastructure and hospitals, schools, power grids and water, so everyone winds up being inconvenienced and encountering problems," he said. Trump's announcement comes amid pressure by Republicans to redraw congressional districts in Texas, Florida, Missouri and Ohio, and with Democrats now threatening to redistrict their own voting maps in California, Illinois and New York. Undertaking an additional census would be time-consuming and costly. The 2020 census cost nearly $14 billion, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office. Trump has also launched a nationwide campaign to arrest migrants who are in the country illegally and to deport millions of people, actions that have prompted dozens of lawsuits.

‘I'm willing to take the heat': Immigration lawyer is facing sanctions from Trump's DOJ over deportation case
‘I'm willing to take the heat': Immigration lawyer is facing sanctions from Trump's DOJ over deportation case

The Independent

time31 minutes ago

  • The Independent

‘I'm willing to take the heat': Immigration lawyer is facing sanctions from Trump's DOJ over deportation case

The Department of Justice wants 'substantial monetary sanctions' against a California immigration attorney, marking a dramatic escalation of the Trump administration's threats to lawyers and law firms taking up cases against the president's agenda. Joshua Schroeder appears to be the first attorney to be singled out by Justice Department lawyers in court documents following the president's push to punish law firms and immigration attorneys over what he considers 'frivolous, unreasonable, and vexatious' claims. 'I am not worried. I willingly take hard cases, and I'm not afraid to lose them,' Shroeder told The Independent on Thursday. 'When the motion came in, I didn't know it would be a story. I just kind of thought, 'well, I guess I'm gonna fight that too.'' The sanctions motion, first reported by Politico, followed Schroeder's attempts to block the government from deporting his client, a Hmong immigrant identified in court documents as V.L., who has a green card and immigrated to the United States as a child in 1987. He was living with his wife in Oklahoma when he was arrested during a routine Immigration and Customs Enforce check-in. The government pushed to deport him to Laos, according to court filings. In court filings, Schroeder argued that his removal to Laos 'could be deadly.' Schroeder had successfully temporarily blocked his removal while the legal challenge continued, but V.L. was moved to detention in Guam from another facility in Texas to prepare for his removal. Despite Schroeder's appeals, V.L. was deported in June. Schroeder, who is working on the case pro bono, had asked for court orders to block V.L.'s removal — pointing to, among other things, the Trump administration's aggressive push to summarily deport immigrants to a brutal El Salvador prison and so-called 'third countries' beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. 'The president is using orders of removal as permission slips to do whatever he wants,' Schroeder told The Independent. 'The reason we don't know what he would do is we have no notice or an opportunity to be heard about how broad these orders can be used.' In March, Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act to swiftly deport Venezuelan men accused of being members of the Tren de Aragua gang, which many of their attorneys and family members have denied. Government attorneys have also admitted that 'many' of the dozens of immigrants deported under the law — and then sent to El Salvador's notorious CECOT prison — have no criminal records whatsoever. In court filings, Schroeder said Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act unleashed 'unbounded war powers that could apply to any immigrant or disfavored U.S. citizen,' and argued that V.L. may similarly be targeted. In June, the federal judge overseeing the case in Guam District Court dismissed the case, noting that the government's removal 'is not based' on the Alien Enemies Act, and that Schroeder had made an 'improper invocation' of that law to challenge V.L.'s detention and removal. Nearly two months later, the Trump administration is now asking that judge to punish Schroeder over those arguments. 'I didn't make money from this. It was a very high cost to me, and very difficult,' he told The Independent. 'And the profession depends upon these pro bono cases. It depends upon normal, ordinary lawyers being willing to take time out of their schedule to help people who can't pay. And if we don't have that, if that all dries up, we're going to have a huge due process issue, not just for immigrants.' The president has raised dozens of legal threats aimed at his ideological opponents and issued a series of executive orders targeting the law firms representing them. In March, the president ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi 'to seek sanctions against attorneys and law firms who engage in frivolous, unreasonable, and vexatious litigation against the United States' — including immigration lawyers. Lawyers for the government have accused Schroeder of arguing that he falsely claimed V.L. was facing removal under the Alien Enemies Act and continued to do so despite arguments and court orders stressing that V.L. was being deported under standard immigration law. A sanctions motion filed on August 1 accuses Schroeder of acting 'unreasonably and vexatiously.' The motion claims Schroeder continued to insist the government was trying to deport his client under the Alien Enemies Act while he 'knew that assertion to be false.' The 29-page complaint accuses him of making 'bad faith' arguments, 'and even if Schroeder did not know that his arguments were frivolous, at a minimum, he recklessly maintained his frivolous arguments.' The Justice Department is also seeking sanctions as a 'deterrent' to other lawyers to prevent 'frivolous claims that would stoke unnecessary controversy,' government lawyers wrote. Legal experts have warned that the motion amounts to a significant turning point in the administration's avalanche of legal battles that appears aimed at preventing other lawyers from taking on cases against the government. 'This is just harassment of good and reasonable lawyers [and] I expect judges and the bar will see through this ruse from Trump's DOJ,' wrote Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, a Fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law The Trump administration is 'stripping away a core tenet of our justice system — the ability to defend oneself against [government] accusations,' according to Justice Connection, a network of Justice Department alumni. 'This will have a chilling effect on lawyers willing to take on clients against DOJ,' the group said. Schroeder, meanwhile, says the motion will not prevent him from continuing to represent immigrant clients. 'I'm willing to take the heat. I'm not afraid. If bad things happen, they happen,' he told The Independent. 'I'm willing to go down, but I'm not going to give up.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store