
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge: The TRUTH About the Thinnest Flagship
Watch this video on YouTube. Edge Display Design: Innovation Meets Complexity
The Galaxy S25 Edge's defining feature is its curved edge display, which seamlessly wraps around the sides of the device. This design not only enhances the phone's visual appeal but also provides additional screen real estate for notifications, shortcuts, and other interactive elements. The edge display is a testament to Samsung's commitment to pushing design boundaries.
However, this innovative feature introduces certain challenges: Accidental Touches: The curved edges can make it difficult to avoid unintended interactions, potentially disrupting your experience during regular use.
The curved edges can make it difficult to avoid unintended interactions, potentially disrupting your experience during regular use. Durability Concerns: The curved glass is inherently more fragile than flat screens, increasing the likelihood of damage from accidental drops or impacts.
While the edge display is undeniably striking, its practicality depends on how effectively Samsung has mitigated these issues. For users who prioritize aesthetics and innovative design, the edge display may be a compelling feature. However, those who value durability and ease of use might find it less appealing. Hardware: Premium Performance at a Premium Price
The Galaxy S25 Edge is equipped with top-tier hardware, making sure a high-performance experience across various applications. Its next-generation processor delivers seamless multitasking, while the high-resolution display and advanced camera systems cater to gamers, photographers, and everyday users alike. These features position the device as a powerhouse in the smartphone market.
However, the inclusion of such advanced components comes with trade-offs: Higher Price Point: The premium materials and unique edge design contribute to higher production costs, potentially making the device less accessible to budget-conscious consumers.
The premium materials and unique edge design contribute to higher production costs, potentially making the device less accessible to budget-conscious consumers. Value Proposition: Users must weigh whether the edge display's added functionality justifies the increased cost compared to other high-performance smartphones.
For those seeking innovative technology and are willing to invest in premium features, the Galaxy S25 Edge offers exceptional performance. However, its price may deter users who prioritize affordability over innovation. Software: Tailored Features with Limitations
Samsung has optimized the Galaxy S25 Edge's software to complement its unique edge display. Customizable shortcuts, edge lighting for notifications, and specialized widgets enhance the device's usability, making the most of the additional screen space. These features aim to provide a seamless and intuitive user experience.
Despite these enhancements, certain limitations remain: Optimization Challenges: Making sure smooth and consistent performance requires meticulous software fine-tuning, which may not always meet user expectations.
Making sure smooth and consistent performance requires meticulous software fine-tuning, which may not always meet user expectations. Third-Party Compatibility: Some apps may not fully integrate with the edge display, potentially limiting its utility for users who rely on a wide range of applications.
While the software innovations are designed to maximize the edge display's potential, their effectiveness depends on how well they integrate with the broader ecosystem of apps and services. For users who value seamless functionality, these limitations may be a consideration. Market Positioning: Balancing Innovation and Practicality
The Galaxy S25 Edge positions itself as a standout device in a crowded smartphone market, targeting tech enthusiasts and early adopters. Its edge display sets it apart from competitors, offering a unique selling point that appeals to those seeking innovative design.
However, this approach also presents challenges: Appeal to Practical Users: Consumers who prioritize durability, ease of use, and straightforward functionality may find the edge display less attractive.
Consumers who prioritize durability, ease of use, and straightforward functionality may find the edge display less attractive. Price Sensitivity: The higher cost associated with advanced hardware and unique features could limit the device's appeal in price-sensitive markets.
Samsung's challenge lies in striking a balance between innovation and practicality. To broaden the Galaxy S25 Edge's appeal, the company must address concerns about durability and cost while maintaining the device's unique identity. User Experience: Striking a Balance
The Galaxy S25 Edge offers a mixed user experience, with opinions varying based on individual preferences and priorities. While some users may appreciate the added screen space and innovative features, others might find the edge display cumbersome or unnecessary. Key considerations include: Durability: The curved glass design raises concerns about long-term reliability, particularly for users prone to accidental drops.
The curved glass design raises concerns about long-term reliability, particularly for users prone to accidental drops. Practicality: Not all users find the edge display's functionality compelling enough to outweigh its potential drawbacks, such as accidental touches and fragility.
Ultimately, the Galaxy S25 Edge's appeal depends on how well its features align with your personal needs and usage habits. For some, the edge display represents a bold step forward in smartphone design. For others, it may feel like an unnecessary complication. Final Thoughts on the Galaxy S25 Edge
The Galaxy S25 Edge is a bold and ambitious device that showcases Samsung's commitment to innovation. Its edge display, advanced hardware, and tailored software set it apart from competitors, offering a unique experience for users who value innovative design. However, the device's complexity introduces challenges in usability, durability, and market positioning.
As a potential user, it's essential to weigh the Galaxy S25 Edge's unique advantages against its limitations. Whether you prioritize aesthetics, performance, or practicality, the decision ultimately comes down to how well the device meets your specific needs and expectations.
Enhance your knowledge on Galaxy S25 Edge by exploring a selection of articles and guides on the subject.
Source & Image Credit: Mark Linsangan Filed Under: Android News, Mobile Phone News, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Finextra
13 minutes ago
- Finextra
What SoftBank's PayPay IPO float means for embedded finance in Japan
0 This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community. Last week Reuters reported that SoftBank has picked investment banks Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Mizuho and Morgan Stanley to support a potential US IPO for its Japanese payments app operator, PayPay. In what could be as early as Q4'25, PayPay could raise over $2 billion from investors, but timing and the amount are subject to market conditions. PayPay's success can be attributed to 'encouraging Japanese consumers to move away from a long-standing preference for cash by offering rebates on payments through its mobile app.' As SoftBank prepares to float PayPay on the US stock market, this marks a significant milestone for the Japanese fintech sector, but embedded finance worldwide. PayPay started as a QR-code payments app and has now matured into a financial platform that offers banking, credit, and securities within a single user interface. This reflects a broader shift in how financial services are delivered, and raises important questions for incumbent banks, their challengers, and regulators. Here's what SoftBank's PayPay IPO float could mean for the embedded finance trend in Japan, Asia and the world. From payments to platforms PayPay holds substantial market share in QR code and barcode payments in Japan, representing around 64% of total transaction volume in 2024. With remarkable user growth and 70 million registered users as of July 2025 - half of Japan's smartphone users - this has also resulted in widespread merchant adoption. PayPay is accepted across major chain stores, small businesses, vending machines, taxi and public transport, and has contributed to the government's Cashless Vision initiative. The app has evolved into a financial super app, offering traditional banking services, providing accessible asset management services, offering credit card services, and allowing users to transfer funds between accounts instantly and without fees. In addition to encouraging younger consumers to use the app for allowances, PayPay has also partnered with other Asian cashless payment services such as Alipay and Kakao Pay. PayPay is today a true fintech platform, pivotal to revolutionising the fintech landscape in Japan by driving the adoption of cashless payments, but also promoting financial inclusion and enhancing security through eKYC verification, a 24/7 hotline and a full compensation scheme. Embedded finance: A global trend Embedded finance, the integration of financial services into non-financial platforms, is gaining traction worldwide. In Asia, super apps like WeChat, Grab, and PhonePe have pioneered this model, offering everything from payments and lending to insurance and investment. Japan's adoption of embedded finance is particularly noteworthy given its historically conservative financial sector. PayPay's success suggests a shift in consumer expectations and regulatory openness, paving the way for more agile, tech-driven ecosystems. Research suggests that the embedded finance industry is expected to grow by 27.7% during 2024 to 2029, and Japan is a fully-fledged participant in this uptick. With the Japanese government's aim to have 40% of transactions be cashless by 2025, embedded finance initiatives must evolve alongside this. 'In the embedded finance field, the players are ordinarily divided into three categories: brands, enablers, and license holders; however, enablers (as player of the second category) act as license holders (as player of the third category). 'The second unique characteristic is that financial companies are users of embedded finance. This is because the speed of digital transformation at traditional financial companies is relatively slow, and traditional financial companies seek to utilize embedded finance to accelerate their digital transformation,' research outlines. These are not new developments. In November 2023, Stripe expanded its support for Japanese card network JCB, making it easy for businesses to accept payments. Further, in October 2021, embedded financial services platform Orenda partnered with card issuer Nium to leverage BaaS APIs and provide no-code banking infrastructure to their clients. Implications for Western markets While embedded finance is flourishing in Asia, Western markets have been slower to embrace the super app model. Fragmented regulatory environments, legacy infrastructure, and heightened privacy concerns pose significant barriers, and the West has a more fragmented app ecosystem with a preference for specialised apps. If Western markets fail to embrace the super app model, they risk falling behind in user engagement, convenience, and potentially facing increased competition from companies that do adopt the model. However, success of super apps in the West will depend on whether companies can overcome the challenges and adapt to the unique cultural and regulatory landscape. However, PayPay's upcoming IPO could serve as a blueprint for Western fintechs seeking to scale through integration rather than expansion. For instance, PayPay's success stems from its evolution beyond being just a payments app into a comprehensive financial ecosystem offering banking, credit cards, loans, investments, and insurance. Western fintechs can emulate this by diversifying their services and becoming central hubs for their users' financial needs. In addition to this, Western fintechs should consider targeted incentive programs to drive user adoption and engagement in new markets. The road ahead The support of SoftBank and global investment banks lends credibility and resources for expansion and innovation. Western fintechs should cultivate strong investor relationships and strategic partnerships to leverage expertise, resources, and market reach. SoftBank's alignment with AI initiatives suggests that integrating advanced technologies can create significant synergies and value. Moreover, PayPay's listing in the US reflects a strategic choice to capitalise on a market that values innovation, scalability, and potentially offers higher valuations compared to other options. Western fintechs considering IPOs should carefully evaluate global market conditions and choose a listing venue that aligns with their growth objectives and valuation goals. As PayPay enters the global capital markets, its IPO will be closely watched, not just for valuation, but for validation. Can a Japanese fintech ecosystem thrive on Wall Street? Will embedded finance models gain traction in the US? And what does this mean for the future of financial services? For financial institutions, technology providers, and regulators, PayPay's evolution offers a compelling case study in how embedded finance can reshape economies, redefine user experiences, and reimagine the role of financial institutions.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Chip makers Nvidia and AMD agree to pay 15 percent of Chinese revenue to America in deal to make Trump happy
Two American makers of artificial intelligence chips have agreed to pay the U.S. government 15 percent of sales on the technology, in an arrangement that one former export official called "unprecedented and dangerous." Tech giants Nvidia and AMD have agreed to the highly unusual terms as part of the requirements for obtaining export licenses to China, according to The Financial Times, which first reported the deal. President Donald Trump's administration had halted the sale of advanced computer chips to China back in in April, but Nvidia and AMD revealed in July that Washington would allow them to resume sales of the H20 and MI308 chips, which are used in artificial intelligence development. "We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets. While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide,' a Nvidia spokesperson told The Independent Monday. 'America cannot repeat 5G and lose telecommunication leadership. America's AI tech stack can be the world's standard if we race." The Independent has sought comment from AMD on its arrangement with the Trump administration. Restrictions on sales of advanced chips to China have been central to the AI race between the world's two largest economic powers, but such controls are also controversial. Proponents argue that these restrictions are necessary to slow China down enough to allow U.S. companies to keep their lead. Meanwhile, opponents say the export controls have loopholes — and could still spur innovation. The emergence of China's DeepSeek AI chatbot in January particularly renewed concerns over how China might use advanced chips to help develop its own AI capabilities. The U.S. Commerce Department has begun issuing licenses for the sale of H20 artificial intelligence chips to China, citing an administration official, Reuters reported. Christopher Padilla, a top export control official in the Bush administration and a senior adviser with the Brunswick Group consulting firm, told the Washington Post that the deal was 'unprecedented and dangerous.' 'Export controls are in place to protect national security, not raise revenue for the government,' Padilla said. 'This arrangement seems like bribery or blackmail, or both.'' Alasdair Phillips-Robins, who served as an adviser at the Commerce Department during former President Joe Biden's administration, also criticized the move. "If this reporting is accurate, it suggests the administration is trading away national security protections for revenue for the Treasury," Phillips-Robins told Reuters. President Trump has been increasingly intervening in corporate America, particularly when it comes to tech giants. Last week he demanded new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan resign, calling him "highly conflicted" due to his ties to Chinese firms. Tan wrote to Intel employees Thursday that the company is working with the White House to make sure 'they have the facts.' Tan is set to meet with the president Monday. Trump has also pushed other American tech giants, including Apple, to relocate manufacturing locations to American soil.


The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
The iconic mobiles that didn't survive to 2025 amid fears another major brand will shut down after 33 years
TODAY'S smartphone scene is largely dominated by Apple and Samsung. But before them many big brands came and went in a flash. 6 6 Now there are fears another could become a thing of the past. Sony bosses insisted last week that they're not giving up on their Xperia brand despite all phones being out of stock for weeks. Instead, Lin Tao, Sony's chief financial officer, suggested that the division could go in another direction, saying "communication technology is used in areas other than smartphones". Little did many consumers know, Sony has still been releasing smartphones - and they've even won awards too. Samsung is currently the most popular phone around, with a 20.1 per cent market share according to IDC. They're followed very closely by Apple at 19.5 per cent. Others include Xiaomi, OPPO and Vivo which no one had even heard of in Sony Mobile's heyday. So which forgotten phones didn't survive to 2025? Take a look back below. LG LG was once the world's third biggest mobile maker, peaking in 2013. But those numbers dwindled as Samsung and Apple grew, not to mention a load of cheaper new players. In April 2021, the firm announced that it would stop making phones altogether, before closing practically everything mobile in July the same year. Only recently was the final software update issued to its more recent phones. Android users warned as major brand shuts down phone business Windows Phone 6 In a world suddenly led by iOS or Android, Microsoft tried to offer something a bit different in the form of Windows Phone. Despite a simple square design similar to the Windows PC operating system at the time, Windows Phone struggled to make inroads. In 2017, the firm gave up on new Windows Phone hardware, though they continued to support software for a little longer. BlackBerry 6 At its height BlackBerry sold 50 million smartphones in a year. A physical keyboard and BBM before WhatsApp was the in thing which helped propel its success. But in came touch screens and everything changed leaving BlackBerry behind. The company gave up on mobiles in 2016, though the name briefly returned via a licencing deal with Chinese firm TCL until 2020. Sony Ericsson 6 Sony Ericsson is another iconic name you no longer see - though it didn't go because of ailing success. In 2012, Sony bought Ericsson's half of the company to go it alone. And so, Sony Mobile was the new name with its Xperia line. However, Sony's market share has gradually decreased, falling as low as one per cent in some countries. The firm recently told The Sun: "Withdrawal from the mobile business is not being considered at this time."