How the EU plans to ban Russian gas
Here are some details about the proposals, which still need approval from EU countries and the European Parliament.
The ban would take effect in stages. First, from Jan. 1, 2026, the EU would ban imports under any new Russian gas and LNG deals signed before the end of this year.
The EU would then ban imports under short-term contracts from June 17, 2026, for contracts signed before June 17, 2025.
Finally, the EU would ban imports under existing long-term Russian gas and LNG contracts from Jan. 1, 2028. That would sever supply contracts of companies including TotalEnergies (TTEF.PA), opens new tab and Naturgy (NTGY.MC), opens new tab, which were designed to extend into the 2030s.
EU LNG terminals would be banned from servicing Russian customers from Jan. 1 2026, under contracts signed after June 17, 2027. Services under existing long-term contracts must halt by Jan. 1, 2028.
Around two-thirds of Europe's Russian gas imports are under long-term contracts. The rest is short-term and spot trades.
The ban is based on EU trade and energy law - meaning it can be approved with support from a reinforced majority of countries and a majority of the European Parliament.
A reinforced majority means having the support of at least 15 of the EU's 27 member countries, representing at least 65% of the EU's population.
The Commission chose this route to avoid its proposals being vetoed by Slovakia and Hungary, whose governments have opposed the ban. Sanctions would be the strongest legal basis for banning Russian gas, but require unanimous approval from all EU countries.
Spain, Belgium, the Netherlands and France - which import Russian LNG - have said they fully support the ban, while emphasising it must be legally strong enough to avoid exposing firms to penalties or arbitration, EU diplomats told Reuters.
Lawyers have said it would be difficult to eliminate this risk if the EU does not use sanctions. European buyers have "take-or-pay" contracts with Gazprom (GAZP.MM), opens new tab, which require those that refuse deliveries to pay for much of the contracted gas.
Commission officials said the legal measures will allow companies to invoke the contractual clause of "force majeure" - an unforeseeable event - to break their Russian gas contracts, if the contracts include this clause.
To enforce the ban, the EU will require companies to disclose the volumes, duration and destination clauses of their Russian gas contracts to customs authorities.
Russia supplied 19% of EU gas imports last year, through LNG and via the TurkStream pipeline supplying Hungary and Slovakia - far below the 45% share Russia supplied before its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Russia's share is expected to fall further, to 13% this year.
The Commission said its proposals would not threaten Europe's energy supplies, since EU countries have spare LNG import capacity or alternative pipeline routes through which they can import non-Russian gas.
The EU has infrastructure capacity to import 250 billion cubic metres of LNG per year, but last year used less than half of this, the Commission said.
To replace Russian supplies, the EU has signalled willingness to increase LNG imports from the United States, which Brussels is under pressure from President Donald Trump to do.
For Hungary and Slovakia, switching to alternatives will cost. Russian pipeline gas was sold at a 13-15% discount to other options last year, according the Center for the Study of Democracy.
Unlike with gas, the EU has imposed sanctions on most Russian oil imports, with exceptions for Slovakia and Hungary, which still import more than 80% of their oil from Russia.
The Commission proposed a legal obligation on Tuesday for Slovakia and Hungary to produce national plans for how they will quit Russian oil by end-2027. Just 3% of total EU oil imports now come from Russia.
Brussels will also propose measures to limit the EU's reliance on nuclear fuel from Russia, but has not confirmed a date for these proposals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
New pics of Trump holding court in Oval Office branded ‘embarrassing' as world leaders sit around his desk: ‘Like schoolchildren'
New pictures showing Donald Trump sitting in the Oval Office in front of major world leaders has been criticized as an "embarrassing" power play by the president, in what should have been a display of global unity. Some on social media noted that the set up, with Trump behind the Resolute Desk and his European counterparts on chairs opposite him, presented the president as hosting a bunch of 'unruly schoolchildren.' The president was joined for the photo-op by leaders including British prime minister Sir Keir Starmer, French president Emmanual Macron, German Chancellor Freidrich Merz, Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni and Finnish president Alexander Stubb. Also in attendance were European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. Another photo showed a smiling Trump posing with a new golf club, gifted to him by Zelensky. However, the meeting of the circled leaders drew the ire of social media users, with some commenting that the staging and White House mantra of of 'peace through strength' was 'deeply disrespectful to U.S. history itself.' 'Permenant peace is never truly obtained through strength. It may hold for a while under pressure, but it won't last,' wrote one user. 'What a breathtakingly rude, narcissistic asshole,' another said. 'Instead of a conference table where everyone can meet equally, Chump lined them up like unruly school children in a row with himself as the authority figure. Chump can just f*** all the way off.' Others questioned how the leaders, who came to Washington D.C. as 'equals' had allowed such a belittling set up. 'Embarrassing,' wrote one user, with another going further, writing 'I cannot believe they let Trump seat them like a bunch of schoolchildren. 'Do none of these 'leaders' have any testosterone whatsoever or PR teams that can approve/reject seating arrangements. Most embarrassing thing I've ever seen for the EU.'
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Comedian hits out at London's E-bike licensing creating ‘Checkpoint Charlies'
Conflicting council decisions on electric bike licensing have created a "Checkpoint Charlie" situation near London bridges, according to comedian Dara O Briain. The Irish stand-up highlighted the issue of e-bikes "stacking up" at river crossings between the boroughs of Hounslow and Richmond in west London. Hounslow has granted permission for Forest and Voi's e-bikes to operate within its boundaries, while Richmond has licensed rival company Lime. This disparity means riders face a "patchwork of boundaries", preventing seamless travel across boroughs. Lime, one of the rental companies, has urged councils to collaborate to resolve the issue. The latter said it has agreed to a request by Hounslow for its bikes' electric motors to cut out if riders enter the borough. This causes the bikes to become heavy to ride, resulting in many users ending their trips. The PA news agency saw about 30 bikes near the southern entrance to Chiswick Bridge on Monday night. Some were parked appropriately to the side of pavements, but others had been thrown in bushes or tipped over. O Briain, 53, likened the issue to the Checkpoint Charlie border crossing point between East and West Berlin during the Cold War. In a post on social media platform X, he wrote: 'Hounslow Council have banned Lime bikes, and licensed Forest and Voi; neighbouring Richmond has licensed Lime and banned the others. 'So every bridge is Checkpoint Charlie, with loads of Lime bikes parked on one side and loads of Forest and Voi on the other. Top work everyone!' Richard Dilks, chief executive of shared transport charity CoMoUK, said: 'This rather bizarre set of circumstances is an unfortunate outcome of the current situation in London, where regulation of bike sharing schemes is decided at borough level.' He said the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill going through Parliament could make Transport for London the capital's licensing authority for rental e-bikes, enabling a 'more coherent pan-London approach' to be designed. A spokesperson for Lime said the existing scenario is 'frustrating for riders'. She said: 'We've already been contacted by many of them who are disappointed at the new rules. 'They should not have to experience London as a patchwork of boundaries. 'We want to see councils work together so that residents can travel seamlessly across boroughs, without having to stop at borders.' Alex Berwin, head of policy at Forest, said the issue is 'exactly why we have been calling for a pan-London approach to regulation'. He went on: 'We need a single regulatory framework, one enforcement model and one operational rulebook across the capital, whilst ensuring services support the local needs of each borough.' A Voi spokesperson said its users are 'free to cycle across borough boundaries, but parking must be in designated bays within participating areas'. He added: 'We're working with local leaders and TfL towards a London-wide scheme to make cross-borough journeys simpler.' Rental e-bike companies say they encourage people to switch from cars to a more sustainable form of travel, but there have been long-standing concerns about users blocking pavements with the bikes after they finish their rides. A spokesperson for Hounslow Council said: 'The issue of neighbouring boroughs having different e-bike operators is not unique to Hounslow. This is an issue at many boundaries wherever there is a change in operator. E-bike service areas are dynamic, with boroughs deciding to review operators at different points. 'We recognise that a borough-by-borough approach can be confusing for users and we continue to work closely with Transport for London and neighbouring boroughs to make the case to the Department for Transport for a pan-London approach. In the meantime, we are bringing in new measures to ensure e-bikes are better managed when left at the end of a journey.'
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Isak, Newcastle and Liverpool - what's going on?
Nineteen days. That's how long it has been since Liverpool's £110m bid for Newcastle striker Alexander Isak was then, there have been no further it hasn't stopped the future of the 25-year-old Sweden striker being the biggest talking point of the summer Liverpool bid again? Will he rejoin first-team training in the meantime? What happens if a deal is not completed by the 1 September deadline day?BBC Sport has spoken to a number of sources in an attempt to get the latest on these questions and what might happen next. Why haven't Liverpool made another bid for Isak? To explain this we need to look at Newcastle's transfers so a frustrating summer window, their business has started to pick signed midfielder Jacob Ramsey from Aston Villa for £40m on Sunday, after securing AC Milan defender Malick Thiaw for a reported £34.6m earlier in the added to July's £55m signing of Nottingham Forest winger Anthony Elanga and the loan signing of England goalkeeper Aaron Ramsdale early in there is one glaring omission. None of these are strikers - and they really needed one before Isak's future was thrown into question after the departure of Callum have told BBC Sport one reason there hasn't yet been a follow-up bid is that any move would be reliant on Newcastle getting two strikers through have maintained publicly that Isak isn't for sale, but Liverpool know they are looking for two strikers for a reason. When - or perhaps if - Newcastle do, Liverpool are expected to ramp up their interest with another bid. Sources say the next offer will be a minimum £120m. At the moment, though, it's a waiting game. What is happening with Newcastle's own striker hunt? So that focuses the mind on to Newcastle's striker Howe made no bones about it at the weekend."It's not like we are looking at any other area," the Newcastle head coach said following his side's goalless draw against Aston Villa on securing a replacement for Wilson has proved challenging enough - let alone a second additional remain interested in Yoane Wissa but have not yet met Brentford's asking price of in excess of £ DR Congo forward, who was left out of the squad for Sunday's 3-1 loss at Nottingham Forest, wants to join Jorgen Strand Larsen is among a small number of centre-forwards on Newcastle's radar, Wolves do not want to lose only completed a permanent move to Molineux last month after a successful loan spell in which he scored 14 goals in the Premier club have already let Matheus Cunha and Rayan Ait-Nouri go this and Wissa illustrate the difficulty Newcastle face, at this stage of the window, to convince a side to part with another key fell to Anthony Gordon to lead the line on the opening day and, as it stands, it would be a surprise if the winger did not start up top against Liverpool on Monday night. Why have Newcastle found it hard to close some deals? After missing out on a number of targets this summer, it felt like there had been a shift in momentum in the last week after completed moves for Thiaw and don't forget Newcastle have seen top targets like Hugo Ekitike, Benjamin Sesko and Joao Pedro move elsewhere this strikers ended up at Liverpool, Manchester United and Chelsea respectively and as well as facing intense competition from such clubs, there are other factors at replacing Wilson, for centre-forwards want minutes so there were not necessarily a queue of quality frontmen lining up to play a supporting role before Isak stopped training with the goalscorers are may be in a much stronger financial position this summer after substantial historic losses dropped out of the club's new three-year Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) they still have to be smart to sign what those behind the scenes call the "right" is not a long list of targets and Newcastle have found that when one coveted striker has potentially become available this summer, his price has then gone pressing the need, in the final throes of the window, Newcastle are wary of overpaying given the knock-on effect such a splurge could have on the club's ability to strengthen in subsequent windows. If Isak doesn't move, can he be reintegrated into the fold? That remains a big 'if', of has been consistent in his messaging throughout this saga: the door remains open to the Newcastle head coach stressed what happens next is down to the striker, who continues to train away from the certainly felt a long way back for Isak on Saturday after the away end called the Swede "greedy" following the goalless draw against Aston time is against Isak if he is to get a move to Liverpool, particularly when there are few realistic options left on the market who would be capable of stepping up for Chaudhuri, the chief intelligence officer of Twenty First Group, who previously worked with clubs like Newcastle and Tottenham, has noticed a "greater interest in top-class strikers" compared to years gone by."Globally, there have been seven centre forwards moving for 50m euros or more this window, compared to two in 2024, six in 2023, and five in 2022," he said. "But clubs should probably temper expectations as to their impact. Of the 19 strikers signed by Premier League clubs for 50m euros or more before this season, perhaps, only Haaland and Isak can be considered unqualified successes."No wonder Howe has maintained that the door is to, somehow, reintegrate Isak may yet prove one of Newcastle's better options - and that is saying something.
