Missing nanny reveals sinister secrets: discover the dark side of wealth in 'Secrets We Keep'
Cecilie (Marie Bach Hansen) with her neighbour and best friend Katarina in a scene from 'Secrets We Keep'.
Image: Netflix
I know that not everyone is a fan of subtitled offerings. However, sometimes it's worth putting aside such peeves when you are guaranteed a phenomenal watch.
One such show is the Danish whodunit, 'Secrets We Keep', which is among SA's Top 10 shows streaming on Netflix.
The six-part series is set in an affluent suburb in Copenhagen, where Filipino au pairs live their best life, too.
It centres on the close-knit friendship between Cecilie (Marie Bach Hansen) and her lawyer husband, Mike (Simon Sears), and their neighbours Katarina (Danica Curcic) and her tycoon husband Rasmus (Lars Ranthe).
The dynamic changes when the latter couples nanny, Ruby (Donna Levkovski), goes missing.
Cecilie grapples with guilt after dismissing Ruby's plea for help during dinner at her home on the night of the incident. The event also affects Cecilie's au pair, Angel (Excel Busano), and other local babysitters from the Philippines.
Viewers streaming the first episode are captivated by the lavish lives of the featured individuals. Cecilie, a working mother, enjoys an ideal balance between her career and family life, a privilege made possible by Angel.
These opulent homes, filled with top-of-the-line decor and high-tech gadgets, appear worthy of a feature in a sophisticated home magazine.
Despite their seemingly flawless lives, wealthy families often have hidden complexities. And that is certainly unpacked in the unfolding episodes.
Although Cecilie shows kindness and support for Angel, encouraging her to finally start her own business, her well-heeled lifestyle sharply contrasts with the personal hardships faced by her nanny.
Katarina and Rasmus are more inconvenienced than concerned by Ruby's disappearance, even though all her belongings, including her passport, are in her room.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Rasmus (Lars Ranthe), Cecilie (Marie Bach Hansen), Katarina (Danica Curcic) and Mike (Simon Sears) in a scene from 'Secrets We Keep'.
Image: Netflix
Meanwhile, Cecilie urges Katarina to report Ruby as a missing person. The case is assigned to a police officer named Aicha (Sara Fanta Traore), who appears to be more emotionally invested in solving it.
Cecilie initiates her own investigation into the matter, occurring concurrently with Aicha's inquiry. Amid this, she stumbles across information that looks damning for her husband, who, when he was younger, was charged with rape.
During this time, she discovers potentially incriminating information about her husband, it is compounded by her knowledge of a rape charge when he was a young adult. This incident has haunted him his entire life, as there were mitigating circumstances surrounding the charge.
But he isn't the only suspect on her list, especially after realising that Ruby was pregnant.
Rasmus has a chequered history with their au pairs, who are never around for a very long time.
The strain of Ruby's disappearance weighs heavily on everyone, and the cracks in their relationships as well as friendships start surfacing.
However, the distracted parents remain oblivious to their teenage sons' activities: secretly filming their au pairs and sharing the pornographic material.
While Katarina's son Oscar (Frode Bilde Rønsholt) is the ringleader of this group, Cecilie's son Viggo (Lukas Zuperka) is more of an observer until he is shown troubling footage of Ruby.
At school, a teacher stumbles across what the boys have been up to, and it opens a can of worms, especially when Ruby's body is found.
"Secrets We Keep" reveals the evolving moral compass of the affluent as they attempt to resolve issues with financial resources. The narrative dissects their transformation from lenient to neglectful parenting styles.
Through detailed settings and complex challenges, the script highlights the contrasting realities of nannies and their employers.
Overall, this stylishly directed series offers a bird's-eye view into the deficient morals of the rich, who have no qualms turning a blind eye to injustice when it comes to protecting one of their own.
Rating: 4/5 **** a standout series with exceptional qualities.
Below are similar must-see offerings:
"Sirens"
In this Netflix dark comedy, Devon is worried about her sister Simone's unsettling connection with her wealthy new employer, Michaela, prompting her to plan an intervention.
It has a star-studded cast of Meghann Fahy, Milly Alcock, Kevin Bacon and Julianne Moore.
"The Perfect Couple"
A Nantucket setting provides the backdrop for a story about a lavish wedding thrown into chaos by a sudden murder.
It stars an ensemble cast of Nicole Kidman, Liev Schreiber, Eve Hewson, Billy Howle, Meghann Fahy, Donna Lynne Champlin, Jack Reynor, Michael Beach, Ishaan Khatter, Sam Nivola, Mia Isaac and Dakota Fanning.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7 hours ago
Sunrise Animation Studio is rolling out its latest Jungle Beat film
Have you heard or seen Jungle Beat , the animation produced by Sunrise Animation Studios in Cape Town? Locally produced animations very seldom get their time in the sun. Not only is this series and film one widely enjoyed, but it is also receiving a sequel, and this second instalment will be shown in cinemas. Jungle Beat 2: The Past is an animated odyssey that sees Munki and Trunk on a time-travelling journey. An eccentric stegosaurus appears in their jungle home. They come to learn that their at times ditsy alien compadre, Fneep, accidentally opened up a time portal. The two principal characters then try to return the dinosaur to its rightful place in time. Trunk mistakenly slips into the portal and finds himself trapped in the Jurassic era. Phil Cunningham, the founder of Sunrise Animations, revealed what the journey of getting this project to this point has been like. 'What started as an animation test grew into a TV series with eight seasons (so far), and a YouTube audience of over 100 million views per month. The series has always been non-dialogue and is built around the incredible friendship between Munki and Trunk (a monkey and elephant character, respectively). 'We wanted to showcase values like loyalty, kindness and putting the needs of others above your own,' Cunningham explained. Jungle Beat: The Movie (2021) was produced by Sandcastle Studios in Mauritius through a licensing partnership with Sunrise Animation. It began with the idea of a little alien character, Fneep, who crash-lands his spacecraft in the Jungle. He has fantastic alien tech (a speech pod). It allows us to hear Munki, Trunk, and their friends speak for the first time. 'Introducing dialogue and new characters allowed us to continue to explore the same themes that the series elevates. We could do this, but in a richer, deeper sense, and to a broader audience,' Cunningham elaborated. The movie was completed in early 2020, just as the COVID-19 pandemic hit, which harmed cinema attendance. ' Jungle Beat had been licensed by distributors in over 30 countries, including theatrical rights in many of those territories. Fortunately, we were approached by Netflix to acquire the movie as a Netflix original. We were able to negotiate with the licensees that were already in place to allow that to happen.' When the movie came out in 2021, Netflix's audience data was somewhat scarce. Cunningham and his team couldn't track their performance as it moved into the Top 10 carousel in most major territories worldwide. In 2023, Netflix began to share audience numbers. We learned that in the first six months of the year, two full years after release, Jungle Beat was in the top seven per cent of all titles on the platform. That was exciting,' Cunningham bragged. Following the popularity of the first movie, their writer and director, Sam Wilson, had an idea about Fneep bringing time-warping portal technology to the jungle. This results in a whole new ensemble of dinosaur characters for Munki and Trunk to engage with. 'Without giving too much of the story away, Jungle Beat 2: The Past is about friendship that spans both time and space. It is also packed with fun and adventure.' Jungle Beat has grown from a series to a Netflix hit feature film and now a sequel. For Cunningham, the beauty of animated films lies in their ability to entertain audiences of various ages in different ways. ' Jungle Beat 2: The Past has a slightly higher level of tension and adventure than the first movie. We have some adventurous scenes, and our goal was to delight our core audience of young children, while also being enjoyable for parents and older siblings.' He believes they were able to strike a balance between providing young audience members with their dose of entertainment while also making the offering engaging for parents and older siblings. 'The dinosaur characters add scope for a lot of laughter. Trey (the King of the Dinosaurs) is brilliantly voiced by Rob Van Vuuren. He brings incredible comedic value to the movie.' The growth of their YouTube audience was explosive, reaching 40 million views per month by 2019. They averaged well over 100 million views monthly since 2020. 'I think the key is to bring exceptional people together behind a clear vision, and with enough room for each of them to have authentic input without being micromanaged or dictating the creative process too much.' We do tend to prioritise international productions across the board in South Africa. This has resulted in some challenges for Cunningham and his stable of talents. 'Living through an extended period of disruption in the way content is sold and consumed worldwide has created a lot of uncertainty in terms of the business model for animation producers (and other genres too).' Previously, a successful film would benefit from a profitable cinema release, before earning good fees from the TV broadcast, and then enjoying revenue from DVD/home video sales. 'All of those windows have been eroded for most films over the last decade or so. Netflix and the other major streamers have re-trained audiences to expect unlimited content to be available on demand in the comfort of their homes.' He said that the business model for filmmakers is still in flux, as the big streamers were spending huge amounts of money to acquire content and subscribers for several years. In the last five years, however, that has started to recede. 'This is an ongoing challenge. Ultimately, I believe that the market will find a way to meet the global audience's desire for fresh, excellent film content. We as filmmakers need to be adaptable and optimistic.' 'On a local level, I think South African animators and studios are increasingly being recognised on the international stage. I think we're in an exciting moment of stepping up to the challenge of creating content for a global audience. We are sharing this space with the biggest international players.' The creative mind who was born in Zimbabwe believes there are many interesting and disruptive trends happening right now. 'The way social media is leading young audiences to consume very short-form content and the implications of A.I.'s growing capacity.' What is being touted as Africa's first film animation franchise will be in cinemas on June 27. Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
In the age of AI, content is everywhere — but are we still telling stories that matter?
Content might be multiplying, but is it connecting? Is it resonating in the way great stories once did – not just engaging but anchoring us? Last week on Substack, AI marketing expert Charlie Hills penned a sharp, clear-eyed provocation: Content is Dead. Long Live Connection. It caught me off guard and held me there. Not because content is dead (it's not – it's alive, omnipresent, flooding our screens in formats we couldn't have imagined five years ago), but because Charlie is right to point us towards the deeper issue: connection. Content might be multiplying, but is it connecting? Is it resonating in the way great stories once did – not just engaging but anchoring us? That question has never been more urgent. We're living through a supercharged shift – a reformatting of reality – as artificial intelligence enters its next act. The race to create has become a sprint. With just a few prompts, almost anyone can make anything. Art. Music. Dialogue. Essays. Sales decks. Songs. Films. It's dazzling. And yet – it's also flattening. Because what we're seeing now isn't just a technological leap. It's a philosophical one. One where the difference between originality and replication, between human thought and predictive patterning, is collapsing in plain sight. The race to the bottom of the brainstem 2.0 Back in 2017, Tristan Harris – former Google design ethicist turned activist and leading voice of the Netflix documentary The Social Dilemma – warned of a phenomenon he called the race to the bottom of the brainstem. Platforms weren't just competing for time or clicks, he argued. They were competing for the most primitive parts of our brain: our instincts, our fears, our compulsions. Whatever could trigger outrage or anxiety – that's what won the attention war. The consequences are now well known: fractured focus, polarisation, social fatigue, and perhaps most disturbingly, a generation trained to skim, not think. But what's unfolding now feels like a spiritual sequel to that. A new race. This time, not towards the base of the brain, but towards the end of originality. Because AI doesn't think. It predicts. It doesn't dream or deliberate or dissent. It calculates likelihoods – what's most probable, based on patterns of the past. It does this with extraordinary sophistication, but its engine is built not on insight, but inference. And so, just as Harris warned us about platforms hijacking attention, today we face the subtle creep of something just as worrying: the erosion of human uniqueness through the mass rehashing of content. Is content dead? Its intentions appear warped To be clear: content isn't dead. It's thriving in volume. We have never had so much access to ideas, essays, videos, podcasts and posts. But the question is no longer how much, but how meaningful. Because when content is generated by tools designed to mimic – not originate – we have to confront a brutal truth: intention matters. In the past, 'content' was less polished but had raw, unpolished soul. We sought stories – in church, around the fire, at the pub – to make sense of life. It feels like now we are just 'wading through' a river that has broken its banks. Today, we scroll. We skim. And increasingly, we wonder: who wrote this? Did anyone? The horse bolted. What now? Perhaps the horse has indeed bolted. The tools are here. Anyone can now produce passable content – indistinguishable at a glance from the real thing. But 'passable' is not the same as 'powerful'. And this is where our opportunity lies. It is possible – and urgent – to use AI not to replace creativity, but to amplify time. Let the machines handle the mundane. Let them assist, support, scaffold. And then use the time you get back, not to produce more noise, but to reconnect with the very essence of being human. It's not easy when someone hands you a magic wand to stop tapping things, I know. But time is a wonderful thing. Time to think, to read or for a long-overdue lunch with friends. The greatest threat AI poses is not to employment, but to enchantment – to the spontaneity and serendipity that defines art, love, humour and originality. And we must see that our kids will need this mentorship in connection and relationship as time goes on. LinkedIn's demise Nowhere is this shift more visible than on LinkedIn. What once felt like a platform for raw professional reflection – real people, real ideas – is slowly becoming an uncanny valley of templated inspiration and machine-stitched leadership. You can sense the AI-ness. The bland polish. The synthetic sincerity. It sounds right, but it feels wrong. The solution isn't to quit. It's to reclaim tone. To sound like yourself. To say things that don't sound like anyone else could say them. To use tools for acceleration, but let you do the speaking. The real winners in this AI era will not be those who extract the purest margins or fastest output. They'll be those who master the balance: AI and humanity. Efficiency and empathy. Data and depth. They'll be the ones who deploy the extra time AI gives them to become more human – not less. That could mean more family time. Or mentoring. Or writing something messy and bold. Or just watching a film without checking your phone. Whatever it is, it's the redeployment of time towards meaning that will mark the new creative class. Final thoughts: A call to be seen This isn't a Luddite's lament. This is a call to awareness. We're at a cultural fork in the road. AI is here, and it's extraordinary. But it is not us. It can assist, but it cannot replace. And if we let it mimic the soul out of our storytelling, we will look back and realise we lost something irreplaceable – the texture of being alive. So no, content isn't dead. It's dynamic and alive, its production value is better than ever, but will anyone care if they think it's fake. We will be digging harder than ever for connection. That's the new gold in marketing over the next few years. Much harder to mine, but more valuable than ever. My business partner and CEO, Mike Butler, doesn't lean on AI much at all. He doesn't need to. He is a master of caring about people's outcomes, asking questions, probing for strategic insights and value and for nurturing relationships. He unlocks the most value in our AI business, ironically. Our entire team would agree. I would have my kids use AI well but drive with Mike's foundation for how to relate to people. Let's not settle for attention. Let's fight for connection, which will mean that humans adapt to bring the elements of what we see, what we read between the lines, by dialling up human insight and relationships and humour. DM
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Reality check: three gripping shows that reveal the psychology of competition
"Battle Camp" season 1 cast. Image: Instagram. Over the past few weeks, I've swapped my usual line-up for some gripping reality TV competition shows on Netflix Think "Survivor", "The Mole" or "The Circle", but with a more refreshing take on things. And if I'm being honest, there were so many notable insights into human behaviour. First up was "Battle Camp", a mix of "Survivor" and "Wheel of Fortune", where the contestants are well-known stars from other shows such as "Squid Game: The Challenge", "Selling The OC" and "Too Hot to Handle". After being divided into teams, the Wolves, the Bears, and the Eagles, they feature in a mix of hair-raising physical challenges, group votes, and strategic gameplay to avoid elimination. Ultimately, contestants will need to be unbeatable, unbreakable and unhateable to have the chance of winning $250 000 (around R4.5 million). The show is a perfect blend of fun and nail-biting suspense. A scene from "Million Dollar Secret". Image: Instagram. Next up, "Million Dollar Secret". Hosted by British comedian Peter Serafinowicz, the series features twelve contestants, one of whom is secretly awarded a $1 000 000 prize at the start of the game. The contestant who finds it becomes the "Millionaire" and must conceal their identity for the duration of the game. The remaining contestants, known as "Hunters", aim to hunt down who is secretly holding the prize money. At the end of each episode, players vote to "lock out" the person they most suspect. If the Millionaire is eliminated, the money is re-hidden in a new box, and the game continues. Throughout the game, players must participate in trust-based challenges, alliance-building exercises, and "Secret Agendas," which are private missions that can influence power and suspicion in the house. The show incorporates elements of strategy, emotional intelligence and psychological deception. Cast of "The Trust". Image: Instagram. Then, "The Trust: A Game of Greed", heightened my fascination. Eleven strangers are offered $250 000 to split equally among themselves or to eliminate each other and eventually receive more money for themselves. Contestants play games that can add money to the prize pot. These include games that reveal secrets about each other or games that ask them to reveal their voting history. Some contestants are offered access to "The Vault", which allows them to take an offer which could benefit themselves or the group. "The Trust" explores human behaviour and psychology.
