How Trump managed to get his much-needed China trade victory
President Donald Trump's shock-and-awe tariff approach threatened to rupture the global financial system and drive the US economy into recession. Nervous about the prospect of empty store shelves and reignited inflation, Trump sent in his even-keeled and professional negotiators to Geneva to snag a win.
The unexpectedly dramatic de-escalation with China laid the groundwork for a growing series of trade negotiations that may produce a handful of rapid-fire, if less than fulsome, bilateral agreements to reduce US trade deficits.
'We actually have a fresh start with China,' National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said in an interview on CNN News Central. 'That's the way to think about these negotiations.'
The decision by both the United States and China to drop stratospheric tariffs by 115 percentage points at the conclusion of two days of talks marked the most significant development in a policy approach that has been equal parts maximalist and messy. The de facto trade embargo between the world's two largest economies had produced domestic and global economic pressure that appeared on the brink of calamity.
The de-escalation sent markets soaring across the world Monday, as it shed light on a Trump administration's strategy to maintain significantly higher tariffs while incentivizing its largest trading partners to come to the table with offers.
In Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, Trump sent lead negotiators who are viewed by market participants and their Chinese counterparts as serious, levelheaded and empowered.
As those talks start in earnest, the ongoing effort to secure deals with roughly two-dozen other countries was given a boost last week after a small-scale agreement with the UK. That provided a model for what Trump wanted in the urgent scramble to secure bespoke deals with the US, according to several foreign diplomats involved in the bilateral talks.
The negotiators, parameters for negotiation and clearly serious approach from both sides that will drive the next three months are all viewed as tangibly positive signs by Trump's advisors. Whether they lead to a substantive outcome remains an open question, but as one advisor put it to CNN, 'this a hell of a lot better than the alternative both of us were staring down.'
'This is really the first time it's been possible to actually see the path to land this plane without some cataclysmic economic disaster,' a Republican senator told CNN. 'Doesn't mean we will, but that's a lot better than where we've been.'
The path from the market-panic-inducing 'Liberation Day' tariff announcement on April 2 to this point was hardly linear. Trump's advisors have long insisted, against plenty of evidence to the contrary, that it was all a deeply strategic roadmap that incorporated every possibility.
The fallacy of that insistence is laid bare by Trump's own view that 'flexibility' is paramount. Bessent, who is fond in private settings of talking through the game theory he sees as animating Trump's approach, cites the value of the 'strategic uncertainty' created by his boss.
It was Trump, after all, who hit the pause button on his hardest hitting 'reciprocal' tariff rates on roughly 100 countries. And it was Trump who first publicly floated significant de-escalation with China after, in private internal discussions, his team weighed even more dramatic off-ramps to step back from the brink.
The bond market, supply chains blinking red and increasingly apocalyptic warnings from executives across major industries all served as critical accelerants for Trump's personal pivots. The actions in some cases had the effect of hanging his own advisors out to dry hours after they'd been on television pledging there would be no exceptions, delays or revisions.
There has, however, been a broad strategy designed to push trading partners to the very place the administration finds itself now, officials say.
In the end, the Trump administration has somehow managed to lock into place dramatically higher tariffs – a 10% universal rate across the globe and sector tariffs that largely stand untouched. And, while recognizing that tariffs aren't going back to zero, trading partners are still lining up to get a deal done with the United States.
That lawmakers and foreign diplomats alike appear willing to overlook – or even outright accept – that a 10% global tariff rate is basically a nonnegotiable reality at this point is perhaps the best window into the moment Trump has led the world into.
Trump's team said that shock-and-awe strategy to get a 'win,' even out of significant tariffs that remain in place was the strategy all along.
'We have had a plan, we have a process in place, now with the Chinese, we have a mechanism in place for future talks,' Bessent told reporters in Geneva.
The China talks would always be the most difficult, labor-intensive and time consuming. The lessons from Trump's first term negotiations are deeply internalized among not just his advisors, but Trump himself.
For Trump, trade is the lynchpin to everything. That includes the India-Pakistan ceasefire agreement he told reporters was, in his view, primarily attributable to his promises of rapid increases in trade flows to both nations.
It seemed fitting that the most astute observation in the rush to analyze the dramatic de-escalation in US-China trade relations came from the man who drove them to the brink on an entirely unrelated yet no less consequential matter.
'People have never really used trade how I use trade,' Trump told reporters Monday morning.
CNN's Jeff Zeleny contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
38 minutes ago
- Newsweek
China Challenges US Sea Power With Two Aircraft Carriers in West Pacific
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. For the first time ever, two Chinese aircraft carriers operated simultaneously in the western Pacific beyond a strategic island defense line meant to keep China's naval forces in check. Chinese naval activities in relevant waters are "fully consistent with international law and international practices," the Chinese Foreign Ministry said at press conference on Monday. Newsweek has also reached out to the Chinese Defense Ministry for comment by email. Why It Matters The Chinese navy is the world's largest by hull count, with more than 370 vessels, including two aircraft carriers—CNS Liaoning and CNS Shandong—in active service. This growing fleet enables China to expand its military reach and presence in the Pacific Ocean. Under a containment strategy, the United States has established three island chains across the western and central Pacific by using its own territories, as well as those of its allies and partners, in an effort to restrict China's naval access to the broader Pacific during wartime. On Saturday, Japan—a U.S. treaty ally—announced that the Liaoning had become China's first aircraft carrier to be spotted sailing in waters east of the Second Island Chain, which links Japan to New Guinea, north of Australia, via Guam—America's westernmost territory. What To Know A second Chinese naval task group—consisting of the Shandong and four other vessels—was tracked operating in the Philippine Sea on Saturday, approximately 340 miles southeast of Miyako Island in Japan's southwestern waters, the Japanese Defense Ministry announced. The Chinese vessels deployed alongside the aircraft carrier—which has served in China's navy since 2019—included one Type 055 destroyer, two Type 054A frigates, and one Type 901 fast combat support ship, according to hull numbers provided by Japan's military. It remains unclear when and where the Shandong and its task group breached the First Island Chain—formed by Japan, Taiwan and the Philippines, west of the Philippine Sea. They may have passed through the Luzon Strait, which lies between Taiwan and the Philippines. The Liaoning, which has been tracked underway since late May, was first spotted operating in the East China Sea before transiting the Miyako Strait—a key waterway in the First Island Chain near the Japanese island of Miyako—toward the Philippine Sea. The Shandong-led naval task group was later tracked moving northeast, reaching north of Okinotorishima on Monday. The island, located over 1,000 miles south of Japan's capital, Tokyo, is the country's southernmost territory. The Shandong conducted flight operations with its fighter jets and helicopters within Japan's 230-mile-wide exclusive economic zone (EEZ) around the island, according to a Japanese Defense Ministry map. The carrier was accompanied by a Type 052D destroyer and a Type 054A frigate. All countries have the right to conduct freedom of navigation and overflight within an EEZ, a maritime area beyond and adjacent to a nation's territorial sea—which extends up to 13.8 miles from the coastline—according to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The dual aircraft carrier deployment is just another example of the Chinese navy expanding its reach in international waters, Tom Shugart, a former U.S. Navy submariner and adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, told Newsweek in an email. "In the event of a conflict, a PLA Navy that is the U.S. Navy's equal is not one that fights in the Western Pacific—it's one that challenges for control of the Central Pacific," Shugart said, referring to the official name of the Chinese navy, the People's Liberation Army Navy. Chinese aircraft carriers CNS Liaoning, right, and CNS Shandong carry out a dual carrier formation exercise for the first time in the South China Sea in late October 2024. Chinese aircraft carriers CNS Liaoning, right, and CNS Shandong carry out a dual carrier formation exercise for the first time in the South China Sea in late October 2024. Chen Mengxi/Xinhua via AP "I think the [dual aircraft carrier deployment] is interesting, but also unsurprising in the larger context of evolving Chinese blue water operations," Australia-based naval analyst Alex Luck said in an email to Newsweek, referring to a navy capable of operating globally. "I would expect [the Chinese navy] to schedule repeats and increasing complexity for such future activities," Luck said—especially once CNS Fujian, China's third aircraft carrier, which is yet to be commissioned, becomes operational with a more capable carrier-based aviation unit. What People Are Saying Tom Shugart, a former U.S. Navy submariner, told Newsweek: "China is now, by far, the world's dominant maritime power by every measure other than sheer naval tonnage (U.S. Navy ships are, on average, still larger), and its maritime interests are global in nature. That we also see global Chinese naval power should come as no surprise." Australia-based naval analyst Alex Luck told Newsweek: "My personal view is that China does consider their carrier force as an important element in adding strategic space across the Pacific, aimed at making American deployments near the Chinese main more challenging." What Happens Next The Chinese navy may conduct its second dual aircraft carrier operation as the Liaoning and the Shandong operate around the Second Island Chain, a Newsweek map shows. The two aircraft carriers conducted their first joint operation last October in the South China Sea.

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Israeli navy attacks rebel-held Yemeni port city of Hodeida
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — The Israeli navy attacked docks in Yemen's rebel-held port city of Hodeida on Tuesday, likely damaging facilities that are key to aid shipments to the hungry, war-wracked nation. The Israeli military said navy missile ships conducted the strikes, the first time its forces have been involved in attacks against the Houthi rebels. Tuesday's attack comes as the Houthis have repeatedly launched missiles and drones targeting Israel during its war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The Houthis announced the attack via their al-Masirah satellite news channel. They said the attack targeted docks there, without elaborating. Late Monday, Israel issued online warnings to Yemenis to evacuate from Ras Isa, Hodeida and al-Salif ports over the Houthis' alleged use of seaports for attacks. 'The port is used to transfer weapons and is a further example of the Houthi terrorist regime's cynical exploitation of civilian infrastructure in order to advance terrorist activities,' the Israeli military said in a statement Tuesday. Hodeida also is the main entry point for food and other humanitarian aid for millions of Yemenis since the war began when the Houthis seized Yemen's capital, Sanaa, in 2014. The Houthis have been launching persistent missile and drone attacks against commercial and military ships in the region in what the group's leadership has described as an effort to end Israel's offensive in Gaza. From November 2023 until January 2025, the Houthis targeted more than 100 merchant vessels with missiles and drones, sinking two of them and killing four sailors. That has greatly reduced the flow of trade through the Red Sea corridor, which typically sees $1 trillion of goods move through it annually. The Houthis paused attacks in a self-imposed ceasefire until the U.S. launched a broad assault against the rebels in mid-March. President Donald Trump paused those attacks just before his trip to the Mideast, saying the rebels had 'capitulated' to American demands. Early Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth wrote on the social platform X that U.S. Navy ships had traveled through the Red Sea and its Bab el-Mandeb Strait 'multiple times in recent days' without facing Houthi attacks. 'These transits occurred without challenge and demonstrate the success of both Operation ROUGH RIDER and the President's Peace Through Strength agenda,' Hegseth wrote ahead of facing Congress for the first time since sharing sensitive military details of America's military campaign against the Houthis in a Signal chat. It's unclear how the Houthis will respond now that an attack has come from the sea, rather than the air, from the Israelis. Meanwhile, a wider, decadelong war in Yemen between the Houthis and the country's exiled government, backed by a Saudi-led coalition, remains in a stalemate.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Reveals What's Next For That Tesla He Bought From Elon Musk
Donald Trump on Monday addressed a question that's been on many people's minds ever since the president's spectacular blow-out with former so-called 'First Buddy' Elon Musk last week. Namely, what will happen to the red Tesla model S that Trump bought during a White House event in March to promote Musk's electric vehicle brand amid backlash to the billionaire's now-ended role leading the public spending-slashing, unofficial Department of Government Efficiency. 'Are you going to get rid of the Tesla and the Starlink system that you have here at the White House?' Trump was asked by a reporter. 'No, I haven't heard that,' the president replied. 'I mean, I may move the Tesla around a little bit but I don't think we'll be doing that with Starlink, it's a good service,' he added, the latter being Musk's satellite internet service. The journalist pressed Trump on the Tesla: 'Where are you going to move it to? Move it around? What do you mean?' Trump replied: 'I have a lot of locations. I've got so many locations I don't know what to do with them all.' Watch the exchange here: Earlier this month, a White House official had claimed that Trump would sell or give away the car. Karoline Leavitt Squirms Over Maria Bartiromo's Blunt Question About Elon Musk Trump Accused Of Inciting Violence With Chilling New Rhyme Mike Johnson Offers Bizarre Justification For ICE Masks. Backlash Follows. George Clooney Reveals The 1 Line He Used To Silence Protesters During Broadway Play