
Xatśūll asks judge for ‘urgent' injunction to stop raising of mine tailings dam that failed in 2014
The Xatśūll First Nation is asking a judge to urgently stop the controversial Mount Polley mine from raising its nearly 20-storey tailings dam even higher on its territories.
On Friday, leaders from the Secwépemc community filed for an injunction 'on an urgent basis' against ongoing construction to increase the height of the dam — which was rebuilt after it collapsed in 2014 in one of the country's worst mining disasters.
The new injunction application came ten days after the community's lawyers filed a lawsuit against the province's permits for Mount Polley Mining Corp.
The April 15 court petition — which has not yet been heard — asks a B.C. Supreme Court justice to review the legality of those permits, which the provincial government issued without requiring a new environmental assessment or Indigenous consultation.
The Ministry of Mining and Critical Minerals said it 'cannot comment on matters that are before the Court.'
Nearly 11 years ago, the mine's previous tailings dam collapsed — dumping 25 million cubic metres of toxic waste and water into the local watershed.
'I can think of 25 million excuses of why we wouldn't want to increase the height of that,' quipped Xatśūll First Nation Kúkwpi7 Rhonda Phillips outside the Vancouver Law Courts on April 15.
'We all know the history of Mount Polley … We will not let that history repeat itself.'
Their legal battle has also drawn support from a growing list of Indigenous leaders opposed to the province's vow to '
fast track
' mining and energy projects to
stave off economic threats
from the 'U.S.-Canada' trade war.
Mount Polley — an open-pit copper and gold mine nearly 60 kilometres northeast of Williams Lake — sits on territories of both Xatśūll First Nation and Williams Lake First Nation.
The mining company, a subsidiary of 'Vancouver'-based Imperial Metals, says it needs to raise its earthen tailings dam from 60 to 64 metres high, and eventually up to 77 metres — roughly equivalent to a 25-storey building.
'As the mine continues to operate and produce more tailings, the height of the storage facility must be gradually increased to safely accommodate this material,' the company
stated on its website
on April 15.
'The dam raise helps manage water … The main reason for this raise is to make room for the additional tailings generated as part of our ongoing mining activity.'
The Aug. 4, 2014
collapse of the original dam
— which was 10 metres
shorter than today's dam
— caused devastation to fish habitat and ecosystems downstream.
Last December, a decade after the disaster, federal prosecutors
charged the mine's owners
with 15 offences under the Fisheries Act. And Engineers and Geoscientists B.C. previously
disciplined three engineers
at the mine for 'unprofessional conduct,' issuing $225,000 in fines.
'Since the 2014 disaster,' Phillips told reporters, 'our people have faced emotional and cultural trauma, environmental dispossession, impacts on salmon, moose and caribou.'
And the aftermath of the disaster worsened her community's 'distrust in government and industry,' she added — despite mining providing jobs in her community.
Xatśūll First Nation, she emphasized, recognizes the importance of the industry.
'The majority of our members drive cars, … live in homes, and benefit from the materials that mining provides,' she said.
'We support development that is responsible, sustainable and carried out in partnership with Indigenous nations.'
According to the B.C. Supreme Court petition filing, the First Nation is asking the court to reverse the provincial mining ministry's March 27 '
Consent for Material Alteration
' decision and the permits issued based on it.
The petition also wants the court to declare that provincial officials 'breached' the Environmental Assessment Act and their duty to consult the First Nation, 'by making the decisions in the absence of a valid environmental assessment certificate' — as well as a court order 'directing the ministers and the deputy chief permitting officer to reconsider.'
Meanwhile, Imperial Metals said 'it is too preliminary for Mount Polley to make a substantive comment' on the nation's legal petition.
But in a post to its website blog a day after Xatśūll First Nation's judicial review application, the firm emphasized the lawsuit is against the provincial permit approval process 'and not of Mount Polley per se.'
The company's statement said the First Nation renewed its longstanding participation agreement with the mine in 2016 — 'two years after the breach,' Imperial Metals noted — and the two sides met 'monthly' for the past three years as it prepared its plans, it added.
'Mount Polley continues to work with Xatśūll representatives on environmental matters, including these permits,' the April 16 blog post stated, 'and we take pride in using Xatśūll business ventures for some of the mine's largest external contracts.'
Ahead of filing the judicial review petition earlier this month, the First Nation held a meeting of its members before proceeding with the lawsuit.
That was important, Phillips told IndigiNews, to ensure elected leaders had the wider community's green light.
'We wanted to make sure that we had their consent before moving forward, and we wanted to hear their voices,' she explained.
But while the mining industry can be controversial among First Nations — and levels of support for particular projects vary widely from community-to-community — the Xatśūll case has drawn the attention of other Indigenous leaders.
That's because some are drawing a link to the 'U.S.-Canada' trade war — and the province letting Mount Polley proceed with construction without undergoing a new environmental assessment or consulting local First Nations.
'Government continues to make progress on previous investments to streamline permitting across the natural-resource sector so high-priority projects can be built faster,' the province announced on March 4.
'This includes fast-tracking 18 major critical mineral and energy projects.'
Mount Polley is
not on the province's list
of 'high-priority' projects — a list of 'mines, LNG and gas infrastructure, and electrical power projects' including 'First Nations clean energy partnerships.'
But there are at least four other gold or copper mines on the
candidates released so far
, several of which face Indigenous opposition.
The province's overall approach raised alarm bells for the First Nations Summit (FNS).
'We are told that some projects have to be expedited because of the tariffs being imposed in the U.S.,' said Hugh Braker, with the organization's political executive and member of c̓išaaʔatḥ (Tseshaht) First Nation, part of the Nuu-chah-nulth Nation.
'We're here to tell the government you cannot hide behind the tariffs. You cannot turn your back on Aboriginal title and rights just because you have a crisis in trade with the United States.'
His FNS executive colleague Robert Phillips added that increasing the size of the tailings pond at a mine that's already caused so much trauma to Indigenous communities and ecosystems is 'something bad just waiting to happen.'
Rushing such projects without mandatory consultation is too risky, he said.
'We're not here to listen to remarks about fast-tracking,' said Phillips, a member of Tsq'escen' (Canim Lake Band), part of Secwépemc Nation. 'That is not right — British Columbia has the time.'
But the province's Ministry of Mining and Critical Minerals insisted no projects will be fast-tracked without Indigenous consultation and proper review processes.
'These projects will still need to proceed with consultation with First Nations and meet or exceed B.C.'s world-class environmental standards,' a spokesperson said in a statement Friday.
'Our focus is streamlining the way government does its job and getting to decisions more quickly.'
For example, the spokesperson said, processes could be sped up by having 'all agencies' co-operate to review projects simultaneously, 'rather than one after the other.'
'All decisions,' the statement added, 'remain subject to technical review and consultation.'
The B.C. Assembly of First Nations (AFN) also opposes any fast-tracking of resource projects without full Indigenous consultation and environmental review.
Regional chief Terry Teegee — a member of Takla Nation who is of Dakelh, Gitxsan and Sekani descent — called on the province to 'live up to their own laws' including its Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, and its duty to ensure 'free, prior, and informed consent' for activities that impact First Nations' lands.
And Stewart Phillip, president of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs (UBCIC), also raised concerns about 'fast-tracking' projects.
'It was the worst mining disaster in Canadian history,' he said. 'Saying we have to fast-track this project … it makes no sense. It's absolutely insane.'
He said the UBCIC — which sits on the B.C. First Nations Leadership Council alongside the B.C. AFN and First Nations Summit — is 'here to service notice' to the provincial NDP government.
'We will not stand idly by and allow the government to fast-track and completely ignore their legal obligations,' said Phillip, former chief of snpink'tn (Penticton) Indian Band.
The tailings storage facility at the Mount Polley mine site holds a mix of water and waste materials from the mine's operations — including
toxic heavy metals
such as arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium, cobalt, thallium, antimony, chromium, vanadium, and manganese, according to federal regulators.
The company's website said its dam 'meets or exceeds' all 'strict engineering and environmental standards.'
In the years since Imperial Metals' dam collapsed in 2014, the mine disposed of 855 tonnes of the arsenic — a highly fatal poison — into its on-site tailings storage, according to the
most recent federal data
, up to 2023.
Arsenic, the
World Health Organization (WHO) notes
, is 'a confirmed carcinogen and is the most significant chemical contaminant in drinking-water globally.'
Over that same time period Mount Polley dumped nearly six tonnes of mercury, another highly toxic heavy metal —
which the WHO deems
'a particular threat to the development of the child in utero.'
Other heavy metals disposed on-site from 2015-2023 include 45,784 tonnes of the
neurotoxin
manganese; 14,312 tonnes of vanadium; 3,047 tonnes of chromium; 1,188 tonnes of cobalt; 417 tonnes of lead; and 11 tonnes of cadmium.
'The toxic metals are still detectable in the critical waterways today,' Phillips said, causing 'a total loss of access to our sacred areas and our food sources.'
In a
post to the mine's website
last October, the firm claimed all environmental damage caused by its tailings breach 'has been successfully repaired and in many cases, the affected habitats have been enhanced beyond their original state.'
Mount Polley said it's invested more than $75 million to remediate the impacts of its 2014 tailings dam breach, including work to enhance fish habitats and reforestation.
'Fish populations are thriving again,' it stated.
For Robert Phillips, with the First Nations Summit, that couldn't be farther from the truth.
'You had a beautiful Quesnel Lake — you could go fishing, you could go swimming in the freshest water in the world,' he said. 'And that's not the case anymore.'
UBCIC's Phillip lambasted any attempt to downplay the lasting damage the catastrophe caused.
'When that tailings pond broke loose,' he said, 'it contaminated Quesnel Lake and the Fraser River, endangered B.C. wild salmon.'
For B.C. AFN's Teegee, there was no question he and other First Nations Leadership Council members wouldn't 'stand here in support of Xatśūll and their fight for a rightful say,' he said.
'And especially in a project such as Mount Polley that has a disastrous history.'
Xatśūll Kúkwpi7 Phillips thanked him and the other leaders for coming to her side as her nation launched its legal challenge.
But she said the biggest thanks goes to her own community who gave their blessing.
Surrounded by roughly a dozen community members on the courthouse steps — including her sister and oldest daughter — Phillips said their collective motivation is 'for future generations.'
'Your strength and your passion fuel me,' she said to her fellow Xatśūll members — including several Elders — who traveled to 'Vancouver' from their territories.
'We're standing up here saying enough is enough,' she added. 'You know, no longer can things keep happening without us.
'We need to make sure that we're at the table.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
US government sparks outrage with controversial decision on massive stretch of public land: 'We won't stay silent'
A sweeping environmental decision is raising major concerns about the future of America's wild spaces. The federal government is moving to roll back protections on a massive stretch of public land in Alaska, potentially opening the door to more dirty energy development in one of the country's most sensitive ecosystems. The U.S. government has announced plans to reverse a major public land safeguard, opening up 23 million acres of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A) to oil drilling and mining. The move would undo a December 2023 executive order from President Joe Biden that had blocked fossil fuel development in this remote Arctic region. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced the change on June 2, arguing that the earlier protections hindered energy independence, according to reporting by the Guardian. Burgum was joined by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, showing the administration's full-court press in favor of dirty energy expansion. But environmental groups say this shift prioritizes corporate profits over public health and natural heritage. "The Trump administration's move to roll back protections in the most ecologically important areas of the Western Arctic threatens wildlife, local communities, and our climate," Kristen Miller, executive director of the Alaska Wilderness League, explained in a statement. The NPR-A provides essential habitat for caribou, polar bears, and migratory birds, and it's been central to the food, culture, and way of life for Indigenous communities for generations. Opening up this much land to oil and gas drilling could add more pollution to our air and water and disrupt fragile ecosystems. The NPR-A is the largest single stretch of public land in the country and helps keep air clean, protect biodiversity, and support the cultural and economic traditions of local communities. Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty? Definitely Only in some areas No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. More fossil fuel development also adds to the heat-trapping pollution that's warming our planet and straining public health systems. We've already seen backlash to similar Arctic projects, like the Willow Project, a major drilling proposal approved in 2023, which sparked widespread opposition over its long-term risks. Conservation advocates are gearing up to fight back by preparing lawsuits, and grassroots campaigns are gaining traction. "The public fought hard for these protections," Miller said. "We won't stay silent while they're dismantled." At the local level, Utah's push to save the Great Salt Lake is showing what dedicated community action can achieve, and it's inspiring similar efforts nationwide. New York now requires all-electric new buildings, while California is phasing out gas-powered cars. These efforts cut harmful pollution and help speed the shift toward cleaner, healthier energy. You can take part by reducing home energy waste, switching to electric appliances, or choosing a clean electricity plan. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.


Hamilton Spectator
10 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Mi'kmaq band drops legal case on N.S. lobster fishery
HALIFAX - A Mi'kmaq band has dropped a legal case alleging Ottawa was violating its treaty rights in the lobster fishery, after hopes were raised of a historic deal. Last December, the lawyer for Sipekne'katik First Nation told Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice John Keith that discussions with Ottawa to settle the matter were 'moving to a conclusion.' Keith gave the parties until June 16 to finish the mediation, but said at that point the case would carry on before the courts. However, a letter to the courts sent June 6 by Sipekne'katik's lawyer Nathan Sutherland dropped the case without any further explanation. Neither side has provided an update on the status of negotiations for a new agreement. Chief Michelle Glasgow, the leader of the Indigenous community about 70 kilometres north of Halifax, didn't reply to a request for comment. Band members had argued their 'moderate livelihood' lobster harvest outside of the regular season is permitted by a 1999 Supreme Court of Canada decision, while non-Indigenous commercial fishers have contended it threatens stocks and fails to recognize how the courts have maintained Ottawa's right to regulate. The original lawsuit was launched by the band in 2021, seeking a declaration that current federal regulations infringe on its treaty right to fish. The Unified Fisheries Conservation Alliance, a group that represents commercial fishers, said in a news release Monday that the discontinuing of the case is a 'major victory' for its members. 'It is an acknowledgement by Chief (Michelle) Glasgow and Sipekne'katik First Nation that the rights to the illegal out-of-season lobster fishing ... are not a treaty protected right, it is poaching, plain and simple', said Colin Sproul, president of the group. Meanwhile, the group said they will be pursuing separate legal action, filed in August 2024, asking the provincial Supreme Court to determine the rules and limits to be applied to Sipekne'katik First Nation's fishery under the Marshall decision. The Supreme Court of Canada's 1999 Marshall decision said the Mi'kmaq, Maliseet and Passamaquoddy bands in Eastern Canada could hunt, fish and gather to earn a 'moderate livelihood,' though the court followed up with a clarification saying the treaty right was subject to federal regulation to ensure conservation. In September 2020, the Sipekne'katik First Nation issued five lobster licences to its members, saying they could trap and sell their catch outside the federally regulated season. In the months that followed there were confrontations on the water, rowdy protests and riots at two lobster pounds, one of which was razed by arson. According to a letter the band's lawyers sent to the court last December, seven federal officials — including the regional director of the Fisheries Department — attended weekly mediation talks in the legal case, with 10 representatives of the First Nation participating. 'The progress made to date and moving forward from our 25 years of impasse is immeasurable,' wrote Ronald Pink, the lawyer at the time, in the 2024 letter to the judge. The talks were also described by lawyers last December as being extensive, with former senator Dan Christmas and retired federal mediator Barney Dobbin guiding discussions. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Hamilton Spectator
11 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
N.S. Mi'kmaq band drops case arguing federal rules don't apply to its lobster fishery
HALIFAX - A Mi'kmaq band has quietly discontinued its legal case alleging Ottawa was violating its right to fish for lobster, after hopes were raised of a historic deal. Last December, the lawyer for Sipekne'katik First Nation told Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice John Keith that discussions with Ottawa to settle the matter were of historic importance and 'moving to a conclusion.' Keith gave the parties until June 16 to finish the mediation, but said at that point the case would carry on before the courts. However, a letter to the courts sent June 6 by Sipekne'katik's lawyer Nathan Sutherland dropped the case without any further explanation, and without any kind of deal announced. Band members had argued their 'moderate livelihood' fishery outside of the regular season is permitted by a 1999 Supreme Court of Canada decision, but non-Indigenous commercial fishers have contended it threatens stocks and fails to recognize the courts also maintained Ottawa's right to regulate. The original lawsuit was launched by the band in 2021, seeking a declaration that current federal regulations infringe on its treaty right to fish. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .