Meet The Need And Case IH Partner To Feed Kiwi Families In Need
Since launching in 2020, the charity has already provided over 2.3 million meals, but demand continues to grow.
As food prices continue to rise and food insecurity affects more New Zealanders than ever, Meet the Need is proud to announce their partnership with leading agricultural brand Case IH, to help ensure no Kiwi goes hungry.
Through this collaboration, $50 from the sale of every new Case IH tractor in New Zealand will be donated to Meet the Need – supporting the delivery of nutritious, protein-rich meals to families through foodbanks and community organisations across the motu.
Founded by farmers, Meet the Need offers a practical, grassroots solution to food insecurity, enabling farmers to donate livestock, milk, or funds to provide quality protein to over 130 foodbanks and community groups nationwide. Since launching in 2020, the charity has already provided over 2.3 million meals, but demand continues to grow.
Meet the Need General Manager, Zellara Holden, says this partnership couldn't come at a more important time.
'Right now, food insecurity is rising fast – and for many whānau, meat and dairy are luxuries they simply can't afford,' Holden said. 'We're proud to partner with Case IH, who share our belief that everyone deserves access to nutritious food. Their support helps us deliver real meals to real families – and we're calling on the rural sector to get behind us.'
'We know Kiwi farmers are generous. Every animal, every litre of milk, every dollar – makes a difference.'
Aaron Bett, Business Director – Agriculture ANZ at Case IH, said the partnership reflects the brand's ongoing commitment to the rural sector and to practical, community-driven action. 'Farmers are already doing so much to support their communities,' Bett said. 'Partnering with Meet the Need is another way we can amplify that generosity – and help deliver food security for more New Zealanders.'
As part of the partnership, the Case IH team will also continue to raise awareness and fundraise to support Meet the Need's mission to feed hope, one meal at a time.
To get involved or learn more, visit www.meettheneed.org.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
39 minutes ago
- 1News
Major new build-to-rent development to ease Queenstown housing woes
A massive new housing development focused solely on a 'build-to-rent' model is expected to ease housing woes in Queenstown. Simplicity Living, an off-shoot to KiwiSaver provider Simplicity, has bought just over six hectares of land on Ladies Mile to build 600 build-to-rent homes and apartments. "As one of the most unaffordable and constrained housing locations in New Zealand, we prioritised bringing our high-quality, secure tenure build-to-rent housing solution to the region," manager director Shane Brealey said. It is one possible solution to a problem that plagues the district – houses that sit empty most of the year. The Queenstown Lakes District Council estimates around 6000 residential properties have been consented in the past five years – many are yet to be built. ADVERTISEMENT Julie Scott from Queenstown Lakes Community Housing Trust said the region had plenty of new homes being built, but not enough being rented out. (Source: Breakfast) But many of those will never be lived in for the long-term because many are holiday homes or short-term accommodation. Queenstown Lakes Community Housing Trust chief executive Julie Scott told 1News, "the latest Census results said that we have 27% of our homes in the district unoccupied." "That's more than a quarter of houses sitting empty every single night. It's absolutely nuts." The housing trust has already built some mixed-use properties in the town, but demand for long-term rentals is outstripping supply. "We currently have 1480 eligible households on our waiting list across Queenstown and Wanaka [and] 83% of those are Queenstown based," Scott said. "We can't help all of them straight away. We need more entry-level market rental properties." ADVERTISEMENT Simplicity managing director Sam Stubbs told 1News while 42% of people in the OECD live in apartments, in New Zealand the number is just 4%. "What we want to do is show New Zealanders and, in this case, the people of Queenstown [is] that you can actually rent for the long-term in a really high-quality place at an affordable price and you can do that forever if you want to," he said. Simplicity Living currently has 889 homes under construction across Auckland. But this is the first development outside the supercity and the largest development with an estimated value of around $500 million. A completed Simplicity Living development on Range View Rd in Mt Wellington, Auckland. (Source: Supplied / Simplicity Living) "This is another example of the sort of thing our KiwiSaver scheme can help make possible," Stubbs said. "We think it's a good long-term investment for our members and helps provide warm, dry homes for Kiwi families, in a region that urgently needs them.' Queenstown Lakes mayor Glyn Lewers told 1News he is pleased to see the concept come together in the tourist town on a large scale. ADVERTISEMENT "Honestly, a game changer. It allows nurses, police, teachers to have a place to stay and actually work and live in Queenstown." While in this case, KiwiSaver is used to help build capital for construction, the Government has pushed through a build-to-rent amendment bill to make it easier for foreign investment in the model. It passed its first reading in June and will head to select committee. In the meantime, Lewers is aware while more rentals is one thing, there is also focus on infrastructure challenges that surround new developments. "We've still got to sort out the transport issues, we've still got to sort out the underground infrastructure," he said. "And look, the Government's also got to step up with schooling and health as well." He continued, "We know that mum and dad driving their kids to school in the morning contributes to the traffic. So, if we could have schools in the right spots, it obviously alleviates that."
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Covid spending can be justified, despite Treasury report
Coverage of this report has focused on an implication that Treasury were opposed to much of the Covid-19 response and had sought to limit the extent of Government spending. Others have noted that the report does not say this directly, though the selective quotes from advice at different stages do not exactly discourage this reading. In the interests of full disclosure, I was an adviser to the Minister of Finance Grant Robertson from December 2020 onwards. Unsurprisingly, my perspective often differed from Treasury (which in some ways was a key required skill for that job), and readers may reasonably take that into account in the criticisms that follow. The risks highlighted in the report around the use of fiscal policy tend to underline the view that 'cyclical management should mostly be left to monetary policy run by an independent central bank'. This is not a new position – it is such an established aspect of economic orthodoxy that it is known as the 'consensus assignment'. Finance Minister Grant Robertson during the pandemic. Photo / Pool Why, then, would we use fiscal policy in response to a shock? Recent decades have seen very low interest rates, and therefore situations where central banks cannot cut rates to the level they believe necessary to support the economy. This issue is known as the 'effective lower bound' and was one of the major preoccupations of economic debates following the global financial crisis. However, it was clear that Treasury had done limited thinking on how fiscal policy should be used in a crisis. This was despite the fact that the official cash rate was just 1% as the pandemic approached. I recall my surprise at being briefed on a work programme to review Treasury's macro-economic framework – thinking that I would have assumed it had already taken place sometime in the previous decade. At different stages Covid-19 required spending to support overall economic activity (i.e. stimulus) as well as more targeted spending for workers and businesses directly affected by lockdowns. The LTIB notes that Treasury did support large-scale spending responses in the initial stages, but then 'advised shifting towards more targeted fiscal support and recommended against further stimulus from Budget 2022 onwards'. Covid-19-related supports had continued during this period, because large numbers of New Zealanders continued to be affected by Covid-19, most notably during the Auckland lockdowns. But the purpose of this spending was to support people and businesses during a time when normal economic activity was not possible, not to stimulate more economic activity. Despite the large initial cost of the wage subsidy scheme in 2019/20, the largest year for Covid-related spending was actually 2021/22, owing to the combination of business support programmes and the ramping up of the national health response. Former Beehive staffer Toby Moore. Photo / Supplied A further, separate category of spending is funding allocated through the Budget operating allowance, which is typically a mix of new spending and the increased cost of existing spending (cost pressures). In late 2021, the operating allowances for upcoming budgets were increased compared to what was previously signalled. Treasury has at times raised concerns that adjusting future allowances might undermine credibility; however, it was not an uncommon occurrence for parts of Treasury to raise such concerns and for other parts of Treasury to put advice to the Minister suggesting that allowance should increase. It is important to understand that budget allowances are not an end in themselves. Adhering to previously planned allowances come what may does not amount to a sensible fiscal strategy, and governments tend to put more focus on whether those allowances are contributing to them keeping debt or deficit levels in line with their intended objectives. The operating allowance for Budget 2022 was large, at $6 billion. But based on forecasts at the time, that level of spending was consistent with Government debt peaking at a much lower level than earlier forecasts, and the Government's books returning to surplus much earlier, in 2023/24. At the point Treasury states that they were not advising further stimulus, this was very much the Government's view as well. Economic and fiscal forecasts were looking much different from mid-2022 onward, and the economy continued to slow as the Reserve Bank tightened interest rates in response to rising inflation of the sort that was experienced around the world. While larger proportions of budget spending during this period were trying to maintain existing public services in the face of high levels of inflation, the other side of this story is the fact that forecast tax revenue has continually failed to eventuate. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern during the pandemic. Photo / Mark Tantrum Ahead of Budget 2024, Nicola Willis alluded to a further downgrade in economic and fiscal forecasts, saying 'Sadly, I've learned to dread what comes out of the forecasters' mouths when they come into my office'. If nothing else, this is a sentiment shared across successive offices of the Minister of Finance. Repeated downward revisions of the tax-to-GDP ratio over time means that Budget 2025 forecasts for the current fiscal year are a full 3.3% of GDP lower than what forecasts in mid-2022 had anticipated. This has contributed to OBEGAL surplus getting pushed further out in the forecast period (and more recently, only showing surpluses on the Government's self-invented measure, OBEGALx). If decision-makers had cared only about inflation and nothing else, fiscal policy could potentially have done a lot more to reduce economic activity. With the Government not willing to resort to tax increases, more contractionary fiscal policy would have meant absorbing more of the burden of constraining demand through deteriorating public services, with the Reserve Bank having to do less through the OCR. Given the ongoing pressure on the health system today, we should be glad this was not the path that was taken. But far from being critical of this Budget spending, Treasury was also raising concerns that spending was not high enough. In the half-year update in 2022, Treasury expressed concern about what it described as the largest fall in real government consumption since 1987. As late as October 2022 Treasury was advising the Minister of Finance to increase the allowance for the next Budget from $4.5 billion to $5b. This incongruous array of advice was not a matter of mutinous radicals seizing control of the Government's lead economic adviser. Treasury was trying to tread the same narrow path that the Government was. The economy as a whole was hitting up against its capacity, and vulnerable New Zealanders needed targeted support towards the cost of living. Every dollar of additional spending risked adding to inflation and every dollar of spending that was withheld meant that rising costs would hit core government services or households directly. It is appropriate that we try to learn lessons from the experience of Covid-19. It is reasonable for people to disagree with some aspects of the fiscal response and it is highly unlikely that every decision taken was the right one. But the economic response was overwhelmingly guided by officials' advice rather than contrary to it. There may now be unease among some public servants about the level of debt that New Zealand assumed or the spending pressures that it is facing. But the other side of that debt is the businesses that are still operating, the people who were kept in work and the loss of friends and family members that were avoided because NZ chose to support each other through that most complex and challenging time. Toby Moore is a doctoral candidate at Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington and was previously a senior adviser to former Finance Minister Grant Robertson. He is also on the Labour Party's policy council, though the views here are his own
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Jamie Beaton's new venture Concord Visa aims to simplify US visa pathways for Kiwis
Concord charges between US$6500 ($10,912) and US$10,000 to shepherd an individual through a O-1 application, which Beaton says can potentially be approved in just over a month ('Concord' is a reference to speed). The price is pitched as being around 40% the rate charged by a law firm specialising in immigration (the traditional route). The US$10,000 tier offers more assistance 'building your profile'. Chance meeting As with Crimson, Concord was born in part out of Beaton's own experience, after earning the first of his (now half dozen) US post-graduate degrees at Princeton. 'When I first came to the US, I was on the F1, the student visa. And I wasn't really sure how one stays in the US post-degree for an extended period of time,' Beaton said. 'Getting an O-1 visa was totally random. I bumped into a fellow Kiwi entrepreneur, Divya Dhar, who mentioned she's secured a green card through this mystical process. After going through the application, I managed to land my visa, enabling me to build Crimson at full speed." Beaton said even with the serendipity of meeting Dhar, it was a slog, with around 200 pages of paperwork, and, as with trying to penetrate the Ivy League, it can be hard for a novice to navigate the best path. He sees a 'massive information barrier', now compounded by a growing AI slop of misinformation online. The New Zealander still has an O-1, today, which he's renewed several times. He says once you've secured it, the visa is relatively straightforward to renew. Beaton co-founded Concord with Kevin Park, a fellow Auckland University grad who is familiar with the ins and outs of immigration through his former role as Crimson's shock trooper, setting up beachheads in a series of countries during the firm's early days. "Trump is throwing visa bombs left, right and centre,' says Jamie Beaton (left), here with Concord Visa co-founder Kevin Park. 'Crimson went from one country to 20 really fast, with plenty of messy chaos, with Kevin and many other great folks leading the charge to go through that baptism by fire.' 'Trump throwing visa bombs' There's plenty of messy chaos in the US now, of course – though these days it's more likely to emanate from the White House. Beaton says Concord recently helped a crypto entrepreneur from China gain a visa to build his firm in the US. 'It's really exciting to see cases like this, especially as Trump is throwing visa bombs left, right and centre,' Beaton says. 'A lot of our families are very keen to have clarity as to what a multi-year journey looks like in America or other countries, and this is really designed to be that next step in the Crimson journey for them.' Park says it's important to get all your paperwork correct. But, as with trying to get into Harvard or Yale, it's also a matter of putting together the right 'narrative' for the talent-based O-1, which is often restricted to around 10,000 people each year. Park says Concord offers more than 10 types of visas, including those in various skills shortage categories, and will match a candidate to the best type. His pitch is that traditional immigration advisers are often used to dealing with the requirements of big corporates. He and Beaton are more savvy about the potential quirks and complications of smaller firms, like Silicon Valley startups, where a funding round or change of ownership can pull the rug out from under an E2 visa (a business investment and employee transfer visa that has been another traditionally popular way for Kiwis to set up shop in the US). A venture capital round that brings in a range of international investors would see a US-based firm majority-owned offshore, and an E2 visa holder suddenly asked to leave the country within 60 days, Park says. The firm also helps with immigration into Australia, Britain and New Zealand. Beaton says the business is a natural extension of Crimson, which has helped 'several thousand' students secure F1 visas. Although only up and running for a few months, Concord has already helped more than 100 people secure US visas, Beaton and Park say. Their hero client is Auckland brand-tracking start-up Tracksuit, which has been pushing into the US after a $42 million raise this year. Inside help It also helped the East Auckland-raised Wayne Zhou secure an O-1 visa for his move from Australia to the US as his Silicon Valley-based startup staged a US$20m Series A raise. Macleans College old boy Zhou has quite the backstory. He enrolled at the University of Sydney but was only two years into a seven-year path to a Doctor of Dentistry ('my immigrant parents' dream') before he dropped out. Zhou had been running a recruitment consultancy as a side hustle. 'I was basically helping my friends get jobs in the best industries; in finance, investment banking and professional services,' he says. 'Ruler', as he called his careers platform, blossomed during his second year, as the 2020 Covid lockdown hit – to the point where he left university. Crimson acquired Ruler in 2022, and Zhou stayed on until mid-2023, until striking out on his own again to form a fintech called Verve. 'It flopped,' he says. A year ago, he founded Paraform, 'a recruiting marketplace that connects companies with a network of specialised recruiters to fill their hardest roles'. With backing from the founders of Canva, among others, his start-up quickly grew to 40 staff, with plans for 100 by year's end. It's a roller-coaster story, especially for someone yet to hit 30. But how should it be framed in a bid for an O-1 talent visa? Zhou says the Concord consultant assigned to him had previously worked on the other side of the fence, where she had conducted more than 10,000 visa interviews while with the US Embassy in Australia. Chris Keall is an Auckland-based member of the Herald's business team. He joined the Herald in 2018 and is the technology editor and a senior business writer.
