
Inclusion of TRF in report under 1267 Committee a boost for India's counter-terror campaign: officials
India has described the TRF as a front of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and accused it of carrying out the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians and injured dozens more on April 22. The Monitoring Team of the 1267 Sanctions Committee, which chronicles global terror groups for international punitive actions, published its report on July 24.
India had sent a technical team to the UN to convey its position on cross-border terrorism, after Operation Sindoor was conducted between May 7 to 10. The technical team had reached out to the members of the UNSC and briefed officials of the 1267 Sanctions Committee's Monitoring Team. Earlier, India's campaign found support from the United States, with the U.S. State Department including TRF as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) on July 17.
In its report, the Team noted that the TRF had taken responsibility for the attack in Pahalgam, saying, 'On 22 April, five terrorists attacked a tourist spot in Pahalgam, in Jammu and Kashmir. Twenty-six civilians were killed. The attack was claimed that same day by The Resistance Front (TRF), who in parallel published a photograph of the attack site. The claim of responsibility was repeated the following day. On 26 April, however, TRF retracted their claim. There was no further communication from TRF, and no other group claimed responsibility.'
Following the publication of the Team's report, officials here noted that the mention of Pakistan-based TRF in a UN document has brought global spotlight to a group that India considers to be the latest addition to the list of Pakistan-based terror outfits like the LeT, Jaish-e-Mohammed and others. Under Operation Sindoor, Indian armed forces struck locations inside Pakistan that were known to host terror-training facilities. The team further noted that there was high regional tension that could be exploited by terror groups. 'One Member State said the attack could not have happened without Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT, QDe.118) support, and that there was a relationship between LeT and TRF. Another Member State said that the attack was carried out by TRF, who was synonymous with LeT. One Member State rejected these views and said LeT was defunct,' the MT's report said, referring to divergent exchange between Indian and Pakistani officials on the TRF following the attack in Pahalgam, in which a Nepali citizen was among those killed.
India's international campaign on the role of the TRF in the Pahalgam attack has been part of its overall campaign that also included sending multi-party teams to various countries in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor. The TRF also featured in the speech by External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, who spoke on Operation Sindoor in the Lok Sabha on July 29 and mentioned the U.S. action against the TRF.
'...I would particularly like to mention two or three other developments. One, the American designation of TRF. On the 17th of July, the Department of State designated the TRF as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation, and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist. Now, this sir, comes in the wake of extradition of Tahawwur Rana, who was involved in the 26/11 attack,' said Mr. Jaishankar speaking in the Lok Sabha.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Supreme Court verdict on student suicides should move the needle on mental health of youngsters
On July 25, the Supreme Court delivered a judgment of profound constitutional and societal significance. A Division Bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta addressed one of the most tragic, yet inadequately acknowledged issues, confronting Indian society today: The alarming rise in student suicides. The Court invoked its constitutional authority to acknowledge the scale of the mental health crisis in educational institutions and provided an actionable framework for redress. The SC has issued 15 binding directions applicable to all schools, colleges, hostels, and coaching centres across the country, aimed at institutionalising mental-health support and safeguarding the psychological well-being of students. The gravity of its concern was encapsulated in the apex court's unequivocal recognition that the current education system, given its obsession with competitive examinations, has turned toxic. The pursuit of learning — ideally a joyful and liberating experience — has been reduced to a mechanical, high-pressure ordeal centred on ranks, grades, and performance metrics. The soul of education, the Court observed, has been 'distorted'. The verdict asks all educational institutions to adopt a uniform mental-health policy, taking cues from existing frameworks such as the UMMEED Draft Guidelines, the Ministry of Education's MANODARPAN initiative, and the National Suicide Prevention Strategy. The Court has also made it compulsory for schools and coaching centres with more than 100 students to appoint at least one qualified counsellor or psychologist. The judgment directs educational spaces to avoid harmful practices such as batch segregation based on academic performance, public shaming, or setting unrealistic academic goals. Among other things, the Court also directed institutions to have written protocols for emergency mental health referrals and display suicide prevention helpline numbers prominently in hostels, classrooms, and websites. This verdict has not emerged in a vacuum. It's a direct judicial response to the devastating data published by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) in its 2022 report, 'Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India'. The figures are chilling: 1,70,924 suicides were recorded in 2022, of which 13,044 were students, translating to nearly 36 student suicides per day. Alarmingly, 2,248 of these deaths were attributed to examination failure alone. Over the past two decades, student suicides have more than doubled. Between 2011 and 2022, suicides among male students rose by 99 per cent, and among female students by 92 per cent. Despite this spiraling crisis, institutional mechanisms for mental-health support within India's educational architecture have remained fragmented, voluntary, and largely ineffective. The Supreme Court's judgment seeks to bridge this gap, much like it did in Vishaka vs State of Rajasthan (1997), where the absence of legislative measures on workplace sexual harassment compelled the Court to issue interim guidelines. In Vishaka, those judicial directions later became the blueprint for a central statute. The present judgment has similar transformative potential. It fills a policy vacuum, asserts constitutional accountability, and paves the way for legislative reform. In terms of timelines, the judgment is characteristically firm. All states and Union Territories are required to notify appropriate rules and regulations within two months, while the Union government must submit a compliance affidavit within 90 days. The timeline signals the Court's intent to not merely issue guidelines but to ensure they are implemented. The constitutional implications of the verdict are manifold. First, it reinforces the idea that the Right to Life under Article 21 of the Constitution includes the right to mental well-being and a dignified educational environment. Second, it builds on the Court's jurisprudence in Unnikrishnan JP vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka, where the Right to Education was read as an essential component of the Right to Life. The SC has now brought mental health within the domain of constitutional protection, making it not merely a policy concern but a justiciable right. The verdict also critiques the structural violence that's inherent in India's educational ecosystem. Coaching centres have become infamous for their conveyor-belt pedagogy and relentless pressure. The commodification of education, where success is narrowly defined by entrance exam results, has eroded the developmental and humanistic objectives of learning. By compelling educational institutions to re-centre their focus on student well-being, the Court is reminding the nation that education is a public good, not a private transaction. However, while the judgment lays a robust foundation, the real challenge lies ahead in its enforcement. Judicial pronouncements, however well-intentioned, require vigilant implementation. The failure of several state governments to fully operationalise the Vishaka Guidelines until the enactment of the 2013 legislation is a cautionary tale. The central and state governments must now rise to the occasion. More importantly, educational institutions must internalise the fact that compliance is not merely a legal compulsion but a moral imperative. Preventing even a single suicide means preserving a future, shielding a family from unbearable loss, and affirming the constitutional promise of a life of dignity. The writer is a Kashmir-based lawyer and national president of J&K Students Association
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump's ‘penalty' tariff threat: How much Russian oil does India buy? What are the other alternatives?
Donald Trump's threat of a 'penalty' tariff on India for buying Russian crude oil looms large as New Delhi and Washington try to reach a trade deal. Russia accounted for a mere 0.2 per cent of India's imports of crude oil before the Ukraine war began in February 2022. Today, the South Asian country is among the top buyers of Russian oil. But how did this happen? read more A view shows an oil pump jack outside Almetyevsk, in the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia, July 14, 2025. File Photo/Reuters United States President Donald Trump has increased pressure on India to reach a bilateral trade deal by imposing 25 per cent tariffs on Indian imports. Compared to India, more than 50 countries have lower levies, including Pakistan and Bangladesh at 19 per cent and 20 per cent, respectively. On Wednesday (July 30), Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on goods imported from India from August 1 and threatened a 'penalty' tariff for buying Russian crude oil. In another scathing attack, the US president said that India and Russia could 'take their dead economies down together.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As Trump goes after New Delhi for its trade with Moscow, particularly crude, can India give up Russian oil? Let's take a closer look. How much Russian oil does India buy? India's oil purchases from Russia have seen a hike since Moscow invaded Ukraine in February 2022. In fact, China and India are the top two buyers of Russian oil. Before the Ukraine invasion in early 2022, Russia accounted for a mere 0.2 per cent of India's imports of crude oil. India purchased 68,000 barrels per day of crude oil from Russia in January 2022, PTI reported, citing global real-time data and analytics provider Kpler. By June 2022, Russia replaced Iraq to become India's top oil supplier. Moscow supplied 1.12 million barrels per day (bpd) to India, compared to 993,000 bpd from Iraq and 695,000 bpd from Saudi Arabia. The turnabout came as the West sanctioned Russia over its war in Ukraine. This led Moscow to cut crude prices, with discounts reaching $40 per barrel at one point. India ramped up its purchase of discounted crude oil from Russia. In May 2023, Russian oil imports peaked at 2.15 million bpd. A man stands at an Indian Oil fuel station in Sonipat, March 5, 2025. India's oil purchase from Russia has increased in the past three years. File Photo/Reuters India's import of crude oil from Russia has not fallen below 1.4 million bpd. While prices have varied, New Delhi has since bought Russian oil worth approximately $275 billion each year, as per a New York Times (NYT) report. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Since the Western sanctions on Russian oil, China has purchased 47 per cent of Russia's crude exports, followed by India (38 per cent), the European Union (six per cent), and Turkiye (six per cent), according to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) analysis. Last month, India's crude oil imports from Russia rose to an 11-month high of about 2.08 million barrels per day. 'In June, India remained the second-largest purchaser of Russian fossil fuels, importing fossil fuels worth 4.5 billion euros. Crude oil accounted for 80 per cent (3.6 billion euros) of these imports,' as per the CREA data, reported by CNBC-TV18. The oil companies in India refined some of their imported crude oil for domestic consumption, while the rest was exported as diesel and other products, including to Europe. The cheap Russian oil helped India keep inflation in check and the economy stable amid growing geopolitical tensions. India has maintained a neutral stance in Russia's war with Ukraine. It has also defended its trade with Moscow, citing historical ties and energy needs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Union Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas Hardeep Singh Puri has also repeatedly stated that global oil prices would have significantly spiked if India had not purchased Russian oil. Can India cease buying Russian oil? As Trump presses New Delhi, Indian state refiners have stopped buying Russian oil in the past week, industry sources told Reuters. On July 14, Trump had threatened 100 per cent tariffs on countries buying Russian oil unless Moscow reached a peace deal with Ukraine. Puri previously asserted that India was not perturbed by the US president's threat, as oil markets remain well supplied. 'Russia is 10 per cent of global production. We have the analysis that if Russia were not included, the prices would have gone to $130 a barrel. Even Turkey, China, Brazil and even the EU have bought oil and gas from Russia,' the minister said. Puri also warned an uptick in oil prices if Russian crude was shunned. 'There are two possibilities: one, the whole world consumes 10 per cent less — which means some people won't get heating in winter; some won't get air conditioning in summer; some of the transport will stop flying. Or, you start buying more from the remaining 90 per cent (suppliers). You know what that would do to prices? The prices would skyrocket,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If Trump goes through with his threat of a 'penalty' tariff, it would become difficult for India to continue buying Russian oil, the discount on which has decreased. In such a case, Indian refiners will have to return to their traditional crude suppliers in West Asia and seek new ones such as Brazil. However, these new barrels would bear a higher cost, ranging around $4-5/barrel, as per an Economic Times report. India has also enhanced its crude imports from the US. However, it is not easy for the South Asian country to ditch Russian oil, partly because its refineries are configured for Russia's denser and more sulfurous fuel, reported NYT. 'The pivot away from Russia — if forced — will be costly, complex and politically fraught,' Kpler wrote in a note this week. With inputs from agencies


India.com
7 minutes ago
- India.com
Tariff tension with US hits Indian companies, decides to pause oil import from Russia due to...
Tariff tension with US hits Indian companies, decides to pause oil import from Russia due to... Trump Tariff Woes: As Donald Trump's tariffs are haunting several countries, Indian oil refineries are also feeling the heat. Oil refineries such as Indian Oil Corporation, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation, Bharat Petroleum Corporation, and Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals have temporarily halted purchases of crude oil from Russia. Notably, India is the biggest buyer of seaborne Russian crude oil. The country ranks third in the world in terms of oil imports. According to reports, Indian refiners have turned to the Middle East and Africa to purchase oil. Indian Refiners Quietly Pulling Back On Russian Oil As per a report by Reuters, citing sources, stated that the state-owned refineries have not imported oil from Russia since last week. However, no response has come from the companies regarding the development. It is to be noted that four state-owned refiners – IOC, BPCL, HPCL, MRPL – buy Russian oil in bulk but no purchase has been done since last week, Reuters report said, citing sources. As the supply of crude oil have impacted, these refiners are now looking at the spot market to fulfil their demands. These refiners are now buying crude oil from West Asia and West African oil. This occurs as the price reductions on Russian oil have decilned, alongside President Donald Trump's caution to nations regarding the acquisition of oil from Moscow. The report states that Indian refiners are distancing themselves from Moscow's crude oil due to shrinking discounts. The price reductions on Russian crude oil have decreased to their lowest levels since 2022, attributed to reduced exports and consistent demand. Private Refiners Still Importing Russian Crude Oil Meanwhile, the private players of the country are still importing the crude oil from Moscow as per their annual agreement with the country. Notably, the discounted rates at which India was buying crude from Moscow since 2022 has declined. Recently, US President Donald Trump has issued a warning that India could face a 100 percent tariff for buying crude oil from Russia. Starting August 1, he's already set a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods as part of a broader move affecting more than 90 countries. It is expected that Trump may hit New Delhi with more penalties over its oil trade with Russia.