
Russian Media Outlet Iran.ru: 'A Military Crisis Or Increased External Threats Against Iran' Would Have 'Profound' Consequences For China And Russia
The article argues that a military crisis or increased external threats against Iran would have profound and many-sided consequences for both China and Russia. "The loss of a key strategic partner would weaken their regional influence and geopolitical leverage over the West. Key energy and transit routes would be disrupted, instability would grow in neighboring regions, and both countries would face significant threats to their economic interests and security," the article noted.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi (in the center) with Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi in Beijing, China, March 14, 2025, during the talks on the Iranian nuclear issue. (Source: the PRC Ministry of Foreign Affairs).[2]
Below is Iran.ru's article:[3]
"This Informal But Vital Partnership Is Based On Shared Goals"
"The strategic cooperation between Russia, China, and Iran, often referred to by Western powers as the 'axis of instability,' has become an important counterweight to Western influence, especially to the United States. This informal but vital partnership is based on shared goals: countering American unipolarity, protecting national sovereignty, and expanding influence in strategic regions.
"Thanks to the country's strategic location and vast energy resources, Iran comes forward as a key element in this axis, serving as a vital ally for Russia and an important energy and transit hub for China. Both Russia and China promote Iran's integration into [international] structures such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and BRICS, perceiving it as a bulwark against Western sanctions. Therefore, provided Iran is drawn into a military conflict or faces increased external threats, especially from the West or as a result of regional conflicts, this could significantly upset the global and regional balance of power, which would have serious consequences for both Russia and China."
"Iran Is A 'Key Gateway' For China's Belt And Road Initiative"
"A military crisis or growing external threats to Iran could pose significant risks to China's economic and strategic interests. Despite its close economic ties with the West and Israel, China prefers diplomatic and political support for Iran to direct military intervention. Iran plays a key role in ensuring China's energy security, supplying about 90 percent of its exported crude oil to the PRC. In 2025, average supplies [volume] will range from 1.4 to 1.7 million barrels per day (bpd), reaching a peak of 1.8 million bpd in June 2025.
"These supplies with a discount, made possible by Western sanctions, are extremely important for China, the world's largest oil importer. A crisis in Iran will disrupt this vital supply chain, prompting China to seek more expensive or less reliable alternatives, which could potentially slow its economic growth. In addition, non-oil trade between Iran and China, which amounted to $32.3 billion in 2024, will face serious restrictions.
"Iran is a 'key gateway' for China's Belt and Road Initiative (B&R), facilitating a connection to markets in Europe and West Asia. A military crisis or external threats disrupting Iran's transport and energy corridors would jeopardize China's major infrastructure projects and vital logistics routes to the West.
"Events such as Israel's strike on Iranian military and nuclear facilities in June of 2025 could further undermine strategic projects such as the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). The 'Middle Corridor' (Trans-Caspian International Transport Route), which comes as an alternative to routes running through Iran or Russia, has a number of infrastructure limitations, including limited capacity, making it an unsuitable replacement for Iran within China's Belt and Road Initiative.
"Geopolitics-wise, the crisis in Iran would undermine China's diplomatic authority, especially after its successful mediation in Iran and Saudi Arabia rapprochement in March of 2023. It will also jeopardize China's strategic autonomy in securing energy and logistics routes, increasing its vulnerability to external pressure, especially in such narrow points as the Strait of Malacca, which remains under notable US influence. This would weaken China's stance in the region and globally, giving the West an opportunity to strengthen its position and possibly to shift its focus towards a direct confrontation with China."
"A Crisis In Iran Will Weaken Russia's Ability To Maintain Its Influence In The Region"
"For Russia, a military crisis or external threats targeting Iran would have far-reaching consequences, affecting its geopolitical influence, economic stability, and security interests. A crisis in Iran will weaken Russia's ability to maintain its influence in the region, which could create a power vacuum that rivals such as Turkey or Saudi Arabia could make use of. In the worst-case scenario, under a serious escalation of the conflict, growing instability, inter-ethnic tensions, or a refugee crisis, the situation could spread to Central Asia and the Caucasus, which in turn increases the risks of terrorism, migration, and anti-Russian sentiment in these critically important regions.
"Economy-wise, while Russia, being a major oil exporter, may temporarily benefit from an increase in global oil prices due to supply disruptions from Iran, long-term market volatility will undermine OPEC+ cooperation on oil production and price stabilization. Iran is also perceived as a market for Russian arms, and the crisis will likely reduce demand for Russian military exports, which will affect the country's defense industry. In addition, Iran provides Russia with access to Asian markets, in particular India, through [its] transportation corridors.
"The International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), which connects Russia, Iran, and India, is a cornerstone of Russia's strategy to diversify trade routes and reduce dependence on routes controlled by the West. The crisis in Iran would threaten feasibility of the INSTC by disrupting Russia's access to markets of the South Asia and exacerbating problems associated with the sanctions over the conflict in Ukraine. A direct conflict involving Iran could further reduce the security of these routes and block Russian exports.
"In terms of politics, Iran serves as a geopolitical buffer protecting against Western pressure, especially in the context of the Ukrainian conflict. The crisis in Iran will encourage the West, which could increase Russia's isolation and weaken its rhetoric against Western imperialism."
The "Geopolitical Leverages Over The West"
"In conclusion, let's note that a military crisis or increased external threats against Iran would have profound and many-sided consequences for both China and Russia. The loss of a key strategic partner would weaken their regional influence and geopolitical leverages over the West. Key energy and transit routes would be disrupted, instability would grow in neighboring regions, and both countries would face significant threats to their economic interests and security.
"The 'axis' would be seriously weakened, which will create opportunities for the West to expand its influence. Provided the U.S. manages to deal with the challenge posed by Iran, it will be able to divert resources to a more direct confrontation with China and Russia, wherein Russia will face an additional threat in the form of increased NATO pressure, especially in the context of resumed support for Ukraine on part of the West. This scenario will prompt both countries to rethink their geopolitical and economic strategies and face significant obstacles to maintaining strategic balance and global influence."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Memri
22 minutes ago
- Memri
Former CAIR Florida Director Hassan Shibly: The Only Excuse Muslims Have for Living in the West Is to Change These Countries for the Better – Our Number One Priority Should Be Dawah; I'm Sure MEMRI Wi
Muslim civil rights attorney and former director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Florida chapter Hassan Shibly discussed the role of Muslims in America in an August 7, 2025 episode of Blood Brothers Podcast, hosted by British journalist Dilly Hussain and posted on 5 Pillars on YouTube. He said the only excuse Muslims have for living in Western countries such as the U.S., UK, or Australia is to change these countries for the better, and therefore the number one priority should be dawah, or Islamic proselytizing. Shibly added that he was sure MEMRI would produce a clip of these statements and 'blast' it. He said Muslims are not trying to take over America but to make it more representative of the ideals it espouses, adding that Muslims in America will be remembered for preserving the very soul of liberty and justice within the country. For more about Hassan Shibly, see MEMRITV clip number 11981 and for more about Dilly Hussain and 5 Pillars, see MEMRITV clip numbers 11399 and 11758.


Shafaq News
an hour ago
- Shafaq News
Trump: Putin talks in Alaska can bring Ukraine peace deal
Shafaq News – Washington / Moscow US President Donald Trump on Thursday asserted that his upcoming meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin could lead to an agreement to end the war in Ukraine. In a radio interview with Fox News, Trump indicated that his threat of sanctions may have influenced Putin's request for the talks, adding that both economic incentives and punitive measures are 'very powerful' tools, stressing that it is up to Putin to choose. He stated that penalties are ready to be imposed if no agreement is reached, pointing out that his warning had prompted Putin to seek the meeting. Trump revealed that the discussions will include exchanges on borders and territorial issues. He acknowledged uncertainty over achieving an immediate ceasefire and noted that it was still unclear whether the upcoming press conferences would be joint. If the Alaska talks succeed, he will contact Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, but will refrain from doing so if the meeting ends poorly. The US president also disclosed that three locations are under consideration for a follow-up meeting with Putin after the Alaska summit. US Senator Marco Rubio stressed that security guarantees should form part of any peace framework, acknowledging that discussions must also address disputes over territory and annexation claims. However, the Russian Interfax news agency, quoting Kremlin sources, reported that no documents are expected to be signed at the US-Russia summit in Alaska. Officials cautioned that predicting the outcome of the high-level negotiations would be a 'serious mistake.'


Shafaq News
an hour ago
- Shafaq News
Foreign currencies rise in al-Sulaymaniyah
Shafaq News – Al-Sulaymaniyah On Thursday, foreign currency rates in Kurdistan Region's al-Sulaymaniyah inched higher amid continued market volatility. Shafaq News correspondent reported that the US dollar was trading at 140,550 Iraqi dinars per $100, the euro at 161,500 dinars per €100, and the British pound at 185,000 dinars per £100. The equivalent of $100 was also recorded at 8,650,000 Iranian tomans, 3,950 Turkish liras, and 1 million Syrian pounds. This modest increase comes as traders await government and banking measures to curb currency swings and stabilize Iraq's financial market, which has faced sharp fluctuations in recent months due to Central Bank restrictions on foreign transfers, regional economic pressures, and shifts in local supply and demand.