Nashville school district defends no metal detectors before school shooting: 'Unintended consequences'
"I knew this day was gonna happen," Fran Bush, a former Metro Nashville Public Schools (MNPS) board member, told the New York Post. "I knew it was gonna happen just because it's like a free open door, everybody coming in."
The shooting, which left 16-year-old student Josselin Corea Escalante and the suspect dead, has parents calling for the school to bring in metal detectors after the AI security system failed to detect the 17-year-old gunman's weapon.
Bush claims she pushed for metal detectors while serving on the MNPS board, but district Director Adrienne Battle wasn't receptive.
Battle told reporters that the school district did not have metal detectors because of potential "unintended consequences," but did not elaborate on the possible repercussions.
MNPS allegedly sent the Post a study showing that metal detectors can disproportionately impact students of color and instill more of a sense of fear than one of safety for some. However, Bush dismissed this reasoning as a "bunch of bull."
"There's no study [that] shows metal detectors don't work," Bush told the Post. "If that was the case, then we won't have them in our airports, sports games, we wouldn't have them in all these places that require security."
Parents are demanding that MNPS at least consider installing metal detectors. MNPS mom Mary Uhles told local outlet WSMV 4 that it's time for administrators to take action and not "sit around and wring hands."
"At the end of the day, you have to ask yourself the question, which are you more afraid of? Walking through a metal detector or some terrible piece of violence happening?"
Another MNPS parent, Melissa Alvarez-Zabriskie told WSMV 4 that she has been demanding metal detectors for years and she believes that they could have "prevented" the fatal shooting that occurred last week.
Following the deadly shooting, Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee expressed gratitude for "law enforcement & first responders who responded quickly and continue to investigate." He also said he was praying for the victims and their families.
"Every day I told her how much I loved her," German Corea, the father of Escalante, told WTVF. "It's not fair."
Escalante's aunt also told WTVF that the 16-year-old was a "very calm girl and well-behaved."
In February 2023, the MNPS board greenlit a $1 million contract with AI gun detection system Omnilert, which is set to end on Nov. 30, 2025, local outlet WKRN reported. On its website, the AI company claims that the system can identify gun threats and send "human-verified intelligence" to first responders. However, last Wednesday, the system failed to pick up on the 17-year-old suspect's weapon.
"AI visual gun detection is a new and promising way to get advance warning before an incident occurs, allowing preventative action to take place. This is particularly so since most gun violence begins outdoors and often in full view of previously unmonitored security cameras. In the Metro Nashville case, unfortunately, the gun was only brandished in the bathroom, where there are no cameras, and then for 30 seconds in the cafeteria where the gun was not visible to the camera, neither to human eyes nor to AI," Omnilert CEO Dave Fraser told Fox News Digital.
"We're saddened that this tragic incident occurred despite the various security methods in place, and it serves to remind us of the value of our mission and to redouble our efforts to have monitoring on every available camera. Remarks that the AI system 'failed' are misleading to say the least and may serve only to decrease the safety of children and staff in our schools."
MNPS has yet to respond to a Fox News request for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
One particular aspect of NCAA's Michigan ruling should infuriate USC fans
On Friday morning, the NCAA announced its penalties against Michigan football for the Wolverines' 2021-2023 sign stealing scandal. As we noted here following the ruling, USC fans have every right to be frustrated given that the Wolverines received a significantly lesser penalty than USC got in 2010 for a much smaller offense. However, there is one aspect of the NCAA's decision that should absolutely infuriate USC fans. Following Friday's ruling, Nicole Auerbach of NBC Sports published a particularly notable quote. According to Auerbach, the NCAA believed that Michigan's offenses warranted enough of a violation for a postseason ban. 'However,' the NCAA said, 'the panel determined that a postseason ban would unfairly penalize student-athletes for the actions of coaches and staff who are no longer associated with the Michigan football program." USC football fans should be furious Any USC fan that reads this quote should be absolutely furious, because the Trojans received no such luxury from the NCAA back in 2010. The 2011 Trojans were unable to play in the Pac-12 Championship Game and a potential Rose Bowl due to NCAA sanctions regarding Reggie Bush receiving improper benefits while he was at USC. Middle school Many of the players on that team were in middle school when Bush was playing for the Trojans. Scholarships Further, USC was stripped of 30 scholarships between the 2012, 2013, and 2014 recruiting classes. In other words, kids who were between the ages of eight and 11 when Bush allegedly received a limousine ride to the 2004 Heisman Trophy presentation ceremony had the ability to play football for the Trojans taken away from them. Lots of irony The especially ironic part is that Michigan's violations are much more recent than USC's were at the time of the Trojans' sentencing. By 2010, not a single USC player who had been teammates with Bush remained on the roster, and the Trojans' coaching staff looked very different as well. By contrast, there are still some upperclassmen on the Wolverines' roster who were a part of their 2023 national championship team, and current head coach Sherrone Moore was the offensive coordinator for that group. Perspective More than 15 years later, it remains obvious that USC got jobbed by the NCAA. Every NCAA ruling with a much lesser punishment than what the Trojans got back in 2010 will only continue to highlight the point.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Melania Trump's Message to Putin Sparks AI Claims
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Melania Trump's letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin has sparked speculation over whether the first lady used AI to pen a missive to the Kremlin chief. In a message posted to the first lady's social media, Melania Trump appealed to Putin to "singlehandedly restore" the "melodic laughter" of children caught up in the nearly three and a half years of full-scale war in Ukraine. Why It Matters President Donald Trump met with Putin in Alaska on Friday with relations soured by Russia's refusal to ink a ceasefire deal brokered by the U.S. to stop fighting in Ukraine. Although no deal was reached in Anchorage, Trump described the summit as "useful" and pivoted his position on a ceasefire, saying he would move straight to a permanent peace deal. Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, who will visit Washington on Monday, said on Saturday that Russia's refusal to sign a ceasefire "complicates the situation." First lady Melania Trump listens as President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4, 2025. First lady Melania Trump listens as President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4, To Know The message sent by the first lady, dubbed a "peace letter" on her official Instagram account, quickly prompted online commentators to question whether the letter had been generated using AI. Democrat strategist, Keith Edwards, said in a post to X the letter "says a whole lot of nothing," and "may have been written by AI." Chris Jackson, a long-time supporter of former president Joe Biden and Democrat activist, said in his own social media post that he had run the letter through AI, which had deemed the message to the Kremlin AI-generated. Grok, a tool developed by Elon Musk's company xAI, said the letter "shows strong signs of AI generation" with "minor human edits for tone." There is no concrete evidence that the letter published on the first lady's accounts was generated using artificial intelligence. Newsweek has reached out to Melania Trump's office for comment. As tools improve, it becomes harder to work out when AI is responsible for published writing. When Newsweek asked AI's opinion on the letter, it said it had "qualities that resemble AI writing," including a lofty, idealistic style. "Words like purity, innocence, humanity, love, possibility, dignity are stacked densely without much concrete policy or detail. AI models tend to default to these universal values when asked to 'sound inspirational,'" according to one AI response. But AI also said the letter did not feature the types of tonal shifts or awkward phasing often associated with content generated using artificial intelligence. Zelensky Thanks The First Lady for 'Sincere Attention' President Trump hand-delivered a letter from his wife to Putin during the summit, which focused on the fate of Ukrainian and Russian children, Reuters reported, citing two unnamed White House officials. Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Andrii Sybiha said in a post to social media that Zelensky had "conveyed his gratitude" to Trump during a conversation on Saturday for the first lady's "sincere attention and efforts to bring forcibly deported Ukrainian kids back." The version of the letter published by the first lady on her social media does not directly mention Ukrainian children taken to Russia. Ukraine has consistently said Russia has abducted thousands of Ukrainian children throughout its full-scale invasion of the country and relocated them to Russia or Russian-controlled areas. Kyiv has called this a war crime. The International Criminal Court in March 2023 issued arrest warrants for Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, Russia's children's rights commissioner, for being "allegedly responsible for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and that of unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation." Moscow has said children were moved away from conflict areas to protect them. UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk said earlier this year that children had been subject to "summary executions, arbitrary detention, conflict-related sexual violence, torture and ill-treatment" in the four regions of Ukraine Russia claimed to have annexed in fall 2022. The Kremlin declared Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia were part of Russia after referendums widely condemned as a sham. Russia had seized Crimea, to the south of the mainland, from Ukraine in 2014. The first lady has released an audiobook touted as "created entirely with artificial intelligence audio technology." The seven-hour-long audiobook is narrated by Melania Trump's "official AI voice." Melania Trump faced accusations in 2016 that she had plagiarized a previous address given by Michelle Obama during a section of her own speech to the Republican National Convention. Trump's team at the time said Melania Trump had used "common words" and not copied Michelle Obama's speech. The First Lady's Letter in Full "Dear President Putin, Every child shares the same quiet dreams in their heart, whether born randomly into a nation's rustic countryside or a magnificent city-center. They dream of love, possibility, and safety from danger. As parents, it is our duty to nurture the next generation's hope. As leaders, the responsibility to sustain our children extends beyond the comfort of a few. Undeniably, we must strive to paint a dignity-filled world for all – so that every soul may wake to peace, and so that the future itself is perfectly guarded. A simple yet profound concept, Mr. Putin, as I am sure you agree, is that each generation's descendants begin their lives with a purity – an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology. Yet in today's world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them – a silent defiance against the forces that can potentially claim their future. Mr. Putin, you can singlehandedly restore their melodic laughter. In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone – you serve humanity itself. Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are fit to implement this vision with a stroke of the pen today. It is time."
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Cherokee Nation Shows How AI Governance Can Be Sovereign
When most enterprises and governments evaluate artificial intelligence, their primary lens is return on investment such as how many processes can be automated, how many jobs restructured, and how much efficiency squeezed from the system. At the Ai4 2025 conference in Las Vegas, Paula Starr, Chief Information Officer of the Cherokee Nation, offers a very different perspective. For sovereign tribal governments like the Cherokee, ROI isn't purely financial. It is cultural, legal, and existential. 'AI must serve the collective good and uphold Cherokee values,' Starr told the audience. 'If a tool compromises that, it doesn't belong in our Nation's systems.' This perspective positions the Cherokee Nation at the forefront of a movement redefining what artificial intelligence governance means. While big tech and large governments experiment with guardrails, the Cherokee Nation is constructing a model rooted in centuries of tradition and sovereignty. From Enterprise ROI To Sovereign ROI The Cherokee Nation, with nearly 480,000 citizens and a land base of 7,000 square miles in northeastern Oklahoma, has ambitions and obligations that extend far beyond typical government IT departments. The question of AI adoption is not simply 'how much faster can a form be processed' or 'what percentage of staff hours can be reduced.' It is about protecting Cherokee data sovereignty, ensuring cultural preservation, and reinforcing treaty rights in the digital era. That shift in framing, away from efficiency and toward sovereignty, has profound implications for how AI is selected, tested, and deployed. In most enterprises, procurement is measured in business outcomes. For the Cherokee Nation, the baseline metric is trust. Citizen data must be treated with the same protection as physical sovereignty, and outcomes must strengthen rather than erode the community's lifeways. The concept of ROI here stretches to include aspects of citizen trust, cultural preservation, and legal autonomy. The key questions to address with AI include are citizens more confident engaging with tribal services, does AI strengthen traditions, language, or practices, and does technology reinforce tribal governance authority? AI in Action: Use Cases Built on Values Starr's presentation outlined several initiatives now underway that showcase how AI can be deployed under this framework. The Gadugi Portal, named after the Cherokee value of working together, is built on Salesforce and augmented with AI to provide authenticated access to tribal services. Rather than reducing headcount, the platform allows more citizens to be served without expanding staffing, improving efficiency while broadening reach across geography. A Legal Agent developed in Microsoft Copilot Studio with assistance from MIT interns, consolidates treaty law, tribal codes, executive orders, and court rulings into a single AI-driven research system. For a sovereign government often required to defend its rights in state and federal courts, this capability accelerates legal decision-making and strengthens sovereignty. The AI Agent, as part of a website refresh launching this year, includes an AI assistant that helps citizens navigate services and applications. The expected result is higher completion rates, 24/7 accessibility, and a reduction in friction for rural citizens. In a unique blending of cultural continuity and conservation, the Nation is using AI-driven scanning to replicate turtle shells traditionally used in ceremonies, without harming wildlife by using 3D printed shells. These examples underscore a central point. AI is not replacing people, it is extending tradition and sovereignty into the digital domain. Governance: Policy Before Code Many enterprises are only now realizing the importance of governance after experimentation with generative AI has already run ahead of regulation. The Cherokee Nation has taken the opposite approach. In October 2024, Principal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr. issued an Executive Order on Data Sovereignty and Self-Governance, creating the AI, Data Sovereignty, and Cybersecurity Task Force. Starr, as CIO, chaired this group, which produced a comprehensive roadmap earlier this year. The report's key recommendations included adoption of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to provide a baseline for ethics, transparency, and accountability. Also recommended is the creation of dedicated AI and Data Governance Committees with clear roles for policy development, legal review, and risk mitigation. Other recommendations include institution of an AI Questionnaire for evaluating any generative AI tools under consideration, covering oversight, data privacy, bias mitigation, and risk scenarios. The document also aims for standardization of the Cherokee Citizen ID across all data systems, strengthening both sovereignty and service delivery, expansion of data literacy programs for the workforce, ensuring adoption doesn't outpace understanding, and establishment of a Tribal Innovation Summit to generate citizen-driven use cases. Community Values as a Governance Lens The framework is not just technical. It is cultural. Starr shared how Cherokee Community Values are core to the implementation and usage of AI. Principles such as 'detsadasinasdi itsehesdi', translated as live skillfully and resourcefully aims to engage with new technologies to augment talents and skills. 'Detsadageyusesdi' which is to protect each other as a mother with child aims to protect the data of our citizens as we would protect their existence and 'detsadanvwidisgesdi', encourage and instruct one another in a gentle and thoughtful way is focused on meeting the challenges of the future and staying forever resilient. When surveyed, while only 74% of Cherokee citizens said they had limited AI understanding, 70% were open to AI adoption if it was aligned with cultural and ethical standards. That conditional openness is the key, AI is welcome if it is accountable to values. By embedding these cultural guardrails, the Nation ensures that AI outcomes are not only efficient but also consistent with the community's identity. In effect, the Cherokee are demonstrating that governance frameworks grounded in culture may be more effective than those grounded solely in regulation. Broader Context: A Global Movement The Cherokee Nation is not alone in rethinking digital sovereignty. Around the world, Indigenous communities are building frameworks to ensure emerging technologies serve their people rather than exploit them. In Canada, the Indigenous Digital Sovereignty Initiative seeks to give First Nations control over data infrastructure and governance. In New Zealand, the Māori Data Sovereignty Network asserts that data about Māori people should be subject to Māori governance. The Cherokee approach, integrating AI into service delivery while grounding deployments in cultural values, adds a North American model to this growing international movement. For governments worldwide struggling with questions of digital ethics, this experiment in sovereignty-driven AI governance may provide a reference point. Where corporations often prioritize shareholder returns, sovereign nations must prioritize the well-being of citizens and future generations. As Starr put it plainly, 'AI is a tool. But it's our people, our values, and our policy that give it direction.' That framing may turn out to be the most sustainable way to harness AI, because it ties innovation not just to speed and scale but to the long-term continuity of a people.
